Select Page
Spread the love

44 Government Documents Prove FLAT EARTH

Transcript

Anthony Skaar Moochie is a Trump advisor and he went on CNN and made an of

himself on the issue of climate science overwhelmingly census in the scientific community is that presented actions have

an impact on science race oh yeah I was interacting world and whenever it comes out creo had Chris there was an

overwhelming science that the earth was flat and there was an overwhelming sign learned over the time the Senate we were

the center of the world a hundred percent you know we get a lot of things wrong in the scientific community you

and I both know that no that’s called not science geocentrism to there was an

overwhelming signs have you believe no that wasn’t a scientific belief that was a belief that wasn’t scientific that was

a belief there’s a difference there’s a difference hello my name is Nathan Roberts thanks for tuning in to flat

earth doctrine I appreciate you being here please do subscribe if you haven’t yet done so though do not count on my

social media account always being active it’s at one point in time sometime in the future YouTube because it is censoring

flattered specifically you will not be able to find my account it will be gone because of YouTube so as a result to

stay in contact with me once all that goes down please go to my website flat

earth doctrine calm and you’ll see a pop-up appear on the web page please

provide your email address so that when things go down where I’m censored completely we will be able to stay in

contact through email so let’s go ahead and dive into these documents I’m here

to share with you 44 different documents from the government swear by they admit the earth is flat documents from the CIA

USSR US Army NASA Federal Aviation Administration the FFA US Navy national

imagery and mapping agency National geospatial intelligence agency and the US Marine Corps which

includes state-owned universities such as UCLA Penn State and Shang yang aerospace

university government admits Flat Earth document number one put out by the CIA

whereby it looks like they stole it from the USSR and this document was created

appears to be sometime around March of 1957 and you’ll notice that in the

bottom left-hand corner and you’ll see the title of the document the author if there is one cited unless there’s a ton

of them and I’m not gonna list them all and then you have the URL of this document so if you want to go download it yourself you were able to and when I

go through these documents themselves you’ll see on the bottom right-hand corner is the page number where you can

find these these phrases and words cited so beginning with page 19 of 104 this

dissertation there’s the brightness of the firmament the firmament is a biblical term which

is a just mentioned in Genesis chapter one eight different times and beginning with verse six and the firmament is is

was made to divide and separate the waters from above from below as well as

the Sun Moon and stars are placed within the firmament so please go reread

Genesis chapter one the firmament is also mentioned on page 20 also a near

Sun which means localized Sun is mentioned and it talks about the

brightness of the first order and derived on the assumption of a Flat Earth and giving some conclusions

derived on the basis of this formula so the formula is based upon the assumption of a Flat Earth there’s a near Sun and

there’s a firmament apparently government admits Flat Earth document

number two propagation of electromagnetic fields over Flat Earth you’ll notice it on page seven it says

flat idealized Earth on page 17 Flat Earth page 18 Flat Earth

page 28 Flat Earth page 35 Flat Earth government admits

Flat Earth document number three from the US Army titled an energy budget

model to calculate the low atmosphere profiles of effective Sound speed at night there’s an image in the document

where it shows a near and localised Sun crepuscular rays and a flat earth and

that again is on page 10 and then if you go to page 16 you see the word Flat

Earth government admits Flat Earth document number 4 put out by the United

States Army titled computationally efficient algorithms for estimating the

angle of arrival of helicopters using acoustic arrays let’s see what it has to

say on page 17 it says Flat Earth page

30 Flat Earth model page 31 Flat Earth

page 35 a flat earth government admits

flatter document number 5 this one is from United States Army titled adding liquid payloads effects to the 6 DOF

trajectory of spinning projectiles see what it has to say on page 7 says assume

a Flat Earth these equations assume a flat earth government admits Flat Earth

document number 6 this is put out by the United States Army in fact it’s the same author as document number 5 gene R

Cooper and in fact the title is almost eerily the same though what we’ll find

is that he didn’t make any Corrections for assuming a Flat Earth but let’s read

the title trajectory prediction of spin-stabilized projectiles with a steady liquid payload what does it say

page 10 it says these equations assume a Flat Earth

why would you assume a Flat Earth if you’re on a spinning ball govern

admits Flat Earth document number seven put out by NASA in August of 1988

derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model what does it have to say

let’s see here well starting with page six it says this report details the development of the

linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non

rotating earth it goes on to say on the same page by defining the initial conditions of the nominal trajectory for

straight in level flight and setting the asymmetric aerodynamic and inertia terms

to zero one can easily obtain the more traditional linear models from the linear model derived in this report on

page 35 it says this report derives and defines a set of linearized system

matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying in a stationary

atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth on page 55 it says based on

assumptions of symmetric mass distributions symmetric aerodynamics and straight in level flight and then on

page 102 this report documents the derivation and definition of a linear

aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non

rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 8 put out by NASA

titled general equations of motion for a damaged asymmetric aircraft and on page

2 it states in this paper the rigid body

equations of motion over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat

Earth document number 9 put out by NASA titled predicted performance of a thrust

enhanced sr-71 aircraft with an external payload this has put out in June of 1997

and it states non rotating earth right there page 10 and this this sr-71

blackbird has a top speed of 2,100 93 miles per hour and it doesn’t have to

account for a rotation of the earth the Coriolis effect the alleged Coriolis effect or even the curvature of the

earth at 2193 miles per hour certainly

would have to if it existed unless it was flying over a flat non rotating

earth government emits flat earth document number 10 put out by the Federal Aviation Administration in

conjunction with company named MIT re it’s derivation of a point mass aircraft

model used for fast time simulation this is from April 2015

says assuming a flat non rotating earth page 7 government admits Flat Earth

document number 11 put up by NASA in conjunction with the University of Kansas they contracted kayuu to do this

work with with them and it was put out June of 1971 it is titled a method for

reducing the sensitivity of optimal nonlinear systems to parameter uncertainty let’s see what has to say

page 14 it says the idealizing assumptions made are the following

number two is a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document

number twelve put out by NASA it is titled calculation of wind compensation

for launching of unguided rockets and on page eight and 10 we have a diagram as

well as it states the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat

non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by

NASA December of 1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to

derive linear aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft

flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating or

government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by NASA December of

1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to derive linear

aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft flying in a

stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat

Earth document number 14 put up by NASA in 1988 in fact it looks like to be an updated version from the document number

13 that I just went over same authors and almost the same exact if not same exact title which is user’s manual for

interactive linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it

states on page four equations with stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions same thing as

in document 13 same authors basically same title they didn’t make any adjustment going onto page 126 it states

the same thing stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions doesn’t look like they made a mistake

with that documentation their government admits Flat Earth document number 15 put

out by NASA this was put out in March of 1972 and it’s titled determination of

angles of attack and side slip from radar data and a roll stabilized platform what does it have to say well

page two it states the method is limited however to application where a flat non

rotating earth may be assumed if it’s limited to that assumption and the earth

is a spinning ball then this document is garbage unless the earth is truly flat

and non rotating government admits Flat Earth document number 16 put up by NASA

it’s titled US standard atmosphere what does it have to say well on page 22 it says for the

accuracy required in this document it suffices to treat the surface as an

ellipsoid whose flattening ellipticity that means they had to flatten the globe

why would you have to do that for accuracy maybe because the earth is government admits flatter document

number 17 put out by NASA in December of 1991 titled an aircraft model for the

AIAA controls design challenge and what does it have to say on page 13 it states

the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a

flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document number 18 put

out by NASA this was in December of 1978 titled investigation of aircraft landing

in variable wind fields and what does it have to say on page 14 it states the

aircraft trajectory model employed in this study was derived based on the following assumptions a the earth is

flat and non rotating government admits

flatter document number 19 put up by NASA titled a mathematical model of the CH – 53 helicopter and its states on

page 25 the helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with

respect to a flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document

number 20 put out by NASA titled development and validation of a piloted simulation of a helicopter and external

sling load well what does it have to say well on page six it states a general set

of nonlinear rigid body equations of motion for both the helicopter and external load determines the motion of

each vehicle with respect to a flat non rotating earth it states on page 37 the

equations of motion for both the helicopter and the external sling load are developed in body axes with respect

to a flat non rotating earth on page 48 it states the terrain is generally flat

government admits Flat Earth document number 21 put out by NASA and the US Air

Force in conjunction with research provided by Georgia Tech and it is and

it is titled atmospheric oscillations what does it

have to say well on page 13 it states a model frequently used is that of a flat

non rotating earth also States the most one can profitably simplify the problem

is to consider an isothermal atmosphere plane level surfaces and a non rotating

earth government admits flat earth document number 20 to put out by NASA

titled stability and control estimation flight test results for the sr-71

aircraft with externally mounted experiments and what does it have to say

well it states on page 18 and 19 if you put them together because there’s a

break in the paragraph it states these equations assume a rigid vehicle and a

flat non rotating earth not very safe for a vehicle that travels at a top

speed of 2000 193 miles per hour government admits Flat Earth document

number 23 put out by NASA in May of 1988 titled flight testing a V s tol aircraft

to identify a full envelope aerodynamic model and it states motion over a flat

non rotating earth page 9 of 18 government admits flatter document

number 24 put out by NASA it is titled singular arc time optimal climb

trajectory of aircraft in a two dimensional wind field what does it have

to say it states on page two in our minimum time to climb problem the

aircraft is modeled as a point mass of the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non

rotating flat earth government admits flatter document number 25 this is put

out by the United States Navy and it is titled studies on instabilities in long baseline two-way satellite time and

frequency transfer including a troposphere delay model and what does it have to state it states on

page two it shows a graphic which shows two ground stations on equal level

ground both ground stations on the same flat plane and then on page six it states assuming a flat earth and the

straight line of sight line of sight just so you know line of sight does not

apparently exist when you’re looking over the earth and I’m gonna get to that in another document pretty soon

government admits Flat Earth document number 26 United States Army it is

titled scale and sensitive detection algorithm for FLI our imagery what does

it have a state it states that in other scenarios only the range to the center

of the field of view and depressions angle is known so that a flat earth approximation provides the best estimate

that is page 6 of 22 government admits Flat Earth document number 27 put on it

again by the United States Army and it is titled user manual for the microsoft

windows edition of the scanning fast field program version 3.0 what does it

have to stay well it says on page 45 and 47 this model works over a flat and non

turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth document number 28 put out by

the United States Army titled path loss measurements in a forested environment at VHF and what do we have to find in

here but it states on page 8 Flat Earth age 16 over a flat earth age 17 over

flat earth page 18 over flat earth page 19 over flat earth h20 based on Flat

Earth theory not a theory it’s fact page 23 over Flat Earth page 25 Flat

Earth page 26 Flat Earth page 35 over Flat Earth over Flat Earth stated

twice government admits Flat Earth document number 29 this is the US Air

Force who contracted Brown University to put forth the docking

titled review of sound propagation in the lower atmosphere documented in May

1955 so what does it say on page 18 it says in most of the topics to be

discussed the problem is to describe the sound field in a region of atmosphere

above a flat earth and then it goes on to cite and page 208 cite a document an

article that was written in 1954 in physica xx

and it is titled the extension of summer fields formula for the propagation of

radio waves over a flat earth two different conductivities of the soil so

you may want to research that one a little bit further government admits Flat Earth document number 30 put up

with the United States Army entitled beacon position and altitude navigation aided by a magnet meter and it states on

page 11 it says that the first is the

earth fixed coordinate system which is fixed to the earth with a flat earth

assumption and just check out the diagram that they have associated with it are you serious government admits

Flat Earth document number 31 put up by the United States Army and it is titled automatic target acquisition of the demo

3 program and it states on page 9 only

the range to the center of the field of view and the depression angle is known so that a Flat Earth approximation

provides the best estimate government admits Flat Earth document number 32 put

up by the United States Army and it is titled modeling of atmospheric effects

see what it’s got to say well I’m page 28 it states this model works well over

a flat earth and non turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth

document number 33 put out by NASA in conjunction with an organization called

range commander’s Council telemetry group the cumin is titled telemetry standards this

organization range commander’s council their mission is dedicated to serving the technical and operational needs of

us test training and operational ranges the RCC provides a framework where in

common needs are identified and common solutions are sought technical standards are established and disseminated joint

procurement opportunities are explored technical and equipment exchanges are facilitated advanced concepts and

technical innovations are assessed and potential applications are identified the vision is the range commits

commander’s Council RCC will promote credible change to meet Department of Defense DoD tests and training

requirements while promoting the common good of its members and enhance and enhance sharing and interoperability of

infrastructure and resources and so apparently I’ve got a lot more than just

NASA who they serve they just they serve the Department of Defense the Air Force the Navy the army that’s who’s at least

listed here so back to the document which is to telemetry standards on page

172 it states although the equations for the terrain model can be rather daunting

in its simplest form one uses flat earth trigonometry to compute the difference

in path lengths between the direct and reflected signals you don’t use flat

earth trigonometry if you’re on a globe government admits Flat Earth document

number 34 put out by NASA in conjunction with UCLA that’s right the University of California this was put out in 1993 and

it is titled approximate optimal guidance for the Advanced Launch System

and it states that the equations of motion for the 0th order problem of

flight in a vacuum over a flat earth are presented that’s

page 32 of 164 and then on page 43 of 164 it states in this section the

three-dimensional equations of motion are reduced for flight in a great circle

plane the the xz-plane over a flat non-rotating

earth and in further states below it says equations of motion representing

flight in a vacuum over a flat earth government in MIT’s Flat Earth document

number 35 put out by NASA and October 1995 and it is titled flight simulation

software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and it states on page 4 this

structured with both flat and oblique earth versions has successfully supported more than 50 different

aircraft apparently it also has a flat earth version and in most cases Flat

Earth six degree of freedom equations of motion are used why would that be unless

here at this flat government admits Flat Earth document number 36 put up by NASA and it

is titled simulator arrow model implementation on page 10 it states for

the flat non rotating earth considered here and why are we considering to build

a software over a flat earth to be used for trainings when the earth is a

spinning ball maybe the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document

number 37 this is Shen yang aerospace University which is affiliated with

obviously China and the title is design and implementation of flight visual

simulation system and on page three it states and I’m gonna read this entire thinks it’s very important to understand

mathematical modeling of flight simulation the aircraft flight motion simulation as an important part of fvss

directly affects the reliability and authenticity of the system flight motion simulation of effect can be greatly

improved by relative mathematical models of aircraft flight dynamics in this paper the fvss is based on two

assumptions a flight area is the space above ground level level where the

rotation of the earth and the curvy motion of mass center of Earth are

neglected meaning they don’t take it to an account at all for this flight

simulation software why would they do that if the earth is a spinning ball why

would you create software to train people how to fly on flat non rotating

earth software why because government

admits flat earth document number 38 this is put up by Penn State which is a public university so state-owned the title is a discussion

of methods of real-time airplane flight simulation and what does it have to say

about flight simulation well on page 11 estates flat earth coordinates and many

flight simulators globe navigation is not important in such cases it is

appropriate to model the earth as a plane half-space rather than an oblate

spheroid then the simulator need not worry about how the local horizontal plane changes as the airplane flies

around the earth though we know from other documentation all flight is straight and level this simplifies the

bookkeeping in the simulator considerably the Flat Earth coordinate system is a Cartesian system Flat Earth

model Thank You Penn State government admits Flat Earth document number 39 and

this is in conjunction with nad the National imagery and mapping agency as well as the national

geospatial-intelligence agency and the document is titled the American practical navigator an epitome of

navigation this is the 1995 edition alright so what does it have to say well

it states well one is water line how can water have a line if it’s always curving

maybe because it’s level in any case this assumes that the observer is at sea

level the earth is flat between observer and object there is no refraction in the

object and it’s water line form a right angle for most cases of practical

significance these assumptions produce no large errors or

rather in fact no errors at all and that’s found on page 351 of 7:14 and

then we also find that they have curvature of surface at point 8 foot per

nautical mile which does workout with what commonly is known as the earth

curvature calculation for the statute mile for the statute mile it’s point six

six six foot per statute mile for the

curvature of the surface but for nautical mile it does work out to 0.8 fluid per nautical mile for the

curvature of the surface so apparently they’re using the same spherical trigonometry that flat earthers are

using to prove that the earth is not a globe and that’s found on page 355 of

7:14 and then this definition I think was very interesting it’s called back

shore the part of a beach which is usually dry being reached only by the

highest tides and by extension a narrow strip of relatively flat Coast bordering

the C flat Coast page 573 and then we

also have line of sight now this is a very interesting definition line of sight the straight line between two

points which does not follow the curvature of the earth the only way that

this apparent definition works out would mean that you’re only looking up in the

sky never looking straight out over the plain of the earth because if you were

then you would be following the curvature of the earth thereby it’s no longer the line of sight

but we commonly say in my line of sight I can see such-and-such when you’re

looking straight over the earth apparently we’ve been using it incorrectly government admits Flat Earth

document number 40 put up by the United States Army in November of 1969 titled

the production of firing tables for cannon artillery ballistic research laboratory

in Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland and what is it state right off the get-go on

page ten ms l equals mean sea level what does sea level mean well sea level it is

the level of the sea surface used in reckoning the height of geographical

features such as hills and as a barometric standard and then what is the definition of level but a horizontal

plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point a position on a real or imaginary scale of

amount quantity extent or quality having a flat or and even surface without

slopes or bumps at the same height as someone or something else give a flat or

even surface to begin to fly horizontally after climbing or diving

that’s the word level that’s what is attributed with the word for sea level

the phrase sea level the word level is in there because water always seeks to

find its level and okay so now

interestingly in this document it does state on page 22 and 34 rotation of the

earth that phrase rotation of the earth is cited three times between pages 22

and 34 however an equation based on a theory particle theory is not a proof

for rotation of the earth for each of the three variables for the rotation of the earth in the theoretical equation

the number zero can be plugged in without negatively impacting the

entirety of the equation thus it’s just a variable that has no bearing within

the equation and here was an interesting graphic on page 110 it shows a horizontal range in meters on

the far right the one is chopped off somehow that happened but it’s 12,000

meters that represents seven point four five miles and would be representative

of 37 foot drop if the earth is a ball but earth curvature is not necessary for

calculating ballistic artillery they put it on a until range no curvature government

admits Flat Earth document number 41 put out again by the United States Army April 2016 titled Field Artillery manual

cannon gunnery what do they have to say well no rotation of the earth that is

standard conditions no rotation of the earth that’s on page 175 however it does

state on page 192 theory of rotational effects but we understand if we look at

the word theory in the definition it is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something especially

one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained about hypotheses thesis conjecture

supposition speculation postulation postulate proposition premise surmise

assumption presumption presupposition notion guess hunch feeling suspicions do

you understand that the idea of a theory in science with until it’s been proven

anyways it is simply a form of mysticism even potentially so this idea that they

want to throw in the rotational effects and this document has no bearing because they admit that is just a theory a

supposition a speculation a postulation it’s not a fact so and this is

interesting to the m198 howitzer has a maximum range of 14 miles that would be

a hundred and fifty seven feet of dropped from the alleged earth curvature that goes unaccounted for why why would

you not account for the alleged drop if you’re living on a ball because you don’t have to here at this flat

government emits Flat Earth document number 42 United States Army put out in

July of 2006 titled field artillery gunnery and I’m not gonna go through all

the document but I’m gonna summarize what is in here and you can check it for yourself concepts not discussed or

disclosed in the document Coriolis rotation of the earth sphere curve

or even the motion of the earth however the concept that is discussed is azimuth

and azimuth proves that you have to be on a ground plane flat no curvature for

an azimuth now this image was not in the document itself but the concept itself

is used throughout the document proving that it’s flat government admits Flat

Earth document number 43 and this time it’s the United States Marine Corps and it is titled TTP for the field artillery

cannon gunnery and what is a state the same thing is the document number 42

which I just covered the concepts that are not discussed in this document include Coriolis rotation of the earth

sphere curvature and motion of the earth however azimuth is is discussed again

the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document number 44 put up by the

United States Marine Corps entitled tactics techniques and procedures for the field artillery manual cannon

gunnery what’s interesting about this document is that it does go into great lengths of

stating the words and phrase rotation of the earth and Coriolis it says it one

two three four five six seven seven different times at least however it also states that the standard

conditions by which it operates or expects to be operating is no rotation

of the earth at all so why is there this contradiction so how do we reconcile the

difference an apparent contradiction of whether or not rotation of the earth or Coriolis needs to be taken into account

well number one other than the mention of the terms rotation of the earth and Coriolis there is absolutely no

instruction in the documentation for how to account for the rotation of the earth so why is that number two the rotation

of the earth is a theory and just as in the quote equation cited in the u.s. army document report number thirteen

seventy one entitled the production of firing tables and for cannon artillery which was document number

it allows for the variable of alleged rotation of the earth to be zero leaving

the entirety of the equation unaffected and it is the same with this documentation produced by the United

States Marine Corps and if you’re interested in looking at document number

40 again one more time you can pause this this is for your help and research a little bit more right

here or you can just go to the document itself and check it for yourself but I’m gonna move on now what is discussed in

the document is azimuth and we understand that only works on a ground

level plane flat no curvature so I rest

my case the earth is flat so in the photo you see this curvature of Earth’s

surface Wow he’s in space look at that no he’s not at that point you don’t see you don’t

see the curvature of the earth if you are two millimeters above this beach ball he just don’t that stuff is what a

quick shout out to pasture Dean Hodel who was the first to expose many of these documents on June 10th 2018 if you

want to check out his website you can go to WWE know tool org and there’s also a

conference coming up and that is October 2nd through the 4th of 2019 and Auburn

Alabama if you would like to register assuming there’s still space for it which actually there is no space but if

there is space or room rather for the event you can go to Skyfall 2019 org and

register nearly everyone interested in space has seen this picture it was

released by NASA and has the iconic name the Blue Marble 2 you can find the

picture everywhere but one of the best places to find it is NASA’s own website

this photograph is iconic because NASA says it is one of the most detailed

true-color images of the entire Earth to date to put it in a nutshell the picture

is iconic well amazingly it turns out a number of sleuths have now found compelling new

evidence that the image is indeed a fake now let’s take a look at first the photo

seems legit I mean it looks like earth the earth that we have always been told

we live on but as the Savi Internet sleuths point out if you take a closer

look things start to take a somewhat sinister turn look closely at the

repeating cloud pattern here we can see clear examples that the photograph has

not only been doctored or constructed but also strong evidence that whoever

done the doctoring used repeating photographic templates that is they

cloned parts of the image and repeated it that is the photograph is a construction this does not happen in

nature clouds do not repeat in the same pattern like this the chances of this

happening in the same photograph are low the only way this could happen is if

someone has cloned clouds and painted them on this of course could be for a

number of reasons you could argue that NASA simply touched up the photograph or effect or that it was a problem with the

imaging systems that were used but still the question exists why is NASA

releasing fake pictures of Earth if they are going to release a picture of Earth to be used in museums and by educators

as they state for the blue marble – then should they not release real images of

Earth instead or manipulated or fake images since the natural extension of

this is what other images have they doctored the moon pluton Mars maybe all

of them and if they are faking pictures to such an extent whether by wanting them to look better or other reasons

then what real scientific value are they isn’t science about finding the truth and is that not hard to do when you are

being fed and accurate or in this case completely manufactured data NASA says

these images are to be used by educators museums and scientists which means they

are passing off the image as a real picture of Earth when it is not what do you guys think do you think

something sinister is going on or is there some harmless and less exotic reason there are great ideas

undiscovered breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truths

protective layers

then in 2002 Blue Marble 2.0 NASA’s Rob

simin made this and it had wide appeal – for example it ended up as the default background on the iPhone I didn’t even

know until I bought an iPhone and turned it on and kind of did a little happy

dance Simmonds job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of

datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture the to us the really cool thing was the

data set up until that point there was no realistic color map of the globe

anywhere so the land layer here comes from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer aboard Terra and the

tricky part here was the weather so we actually had to take clouds out they stashed the clouds for later went onto

the ocean that came from an instrument that measures phytoplankton in the sea where it was low I colored it dark blue

because they’re low mostly in mid oceans and then where’s a little bit higher it was like a little bit brighter green then add the clouds back in there’s a

small problem with it because there’s a very slight gap in between each orbit so

some of those are painted on it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of

simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlights so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water

those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat or the

clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world

what I imagined it to be unfortunately I’m not an astronaut I’ve never been to space but I’ve looked

at these images over and over again trying to sort of get the essence of it

you [Music]

[Applause] [Music]

[Music]

ha I know ranking centigrade could you show us somersault right now

[Laughter] [Applause]

[Applause]

[Laughter]

[Applause]

low Earth orbit is between 99 miles and 1200 miles away

the moon is claimed to be two hundred and thirty-eight thousand miles away that’s a big difference this is the

spacecraft that’s gonna take humans to explore the solar system it’s the next

big step for NASA in exploration called the Orion multi-purpose crew vehicle or MPCV this next generation spacecraft

will enable America to explore beyond low-earth man that NASA has is to build

a rocket called SLS which is a heavy lift rocket it’s something that is that is much bigger than what we have today

and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board as well as

Landers or other components to be it two destinations beyond Earth orbit right

now we only can fly in Earth orbit that’s the farthest that we can go right now we only can fly in Earth orbit

that’s the farthest that we can go in this new system that we’re building is gonna allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar

system to explore so the moon Mars asteroids there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building

these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually the moon Mars the moon the moon the moon

kinds of technologies that we’re testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going

beyond low-earth orbit our goals of going beyond low-earth orbit a set of crewed flights will test and prove the

systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit [Music]

it was all recorded on these telemetry tapes so where is this hard evidence I

haven’t seen anything that indicates the kilometer II data is even an existence

and as I said even if we had it we don’t have the machines to play it back but you’re you your own researchers show the

telemetry data is missing that’s right could this be true mankind’s first

interplanetary exploration and the original science data is missing if it’s

anywhere it should be here at NASA’s Goddard Space Center in Maryland home to

the national space science data archives Tim you’re making man what is it this is

this is a film trying to prove that Apollo 11 happened I just have an AI mean do you have you have a name for it yet or you okay did we go did we go okay

okay doesn’t have it either this was so

right as an ad right right right we’ve been unable to track it down I mean we

don’t know where this this telemetry data ended up and we don’t know the what

what path it may have taken so unfortunately I’m afraid I can’t really give you much of a clue as to as to

where this data ended up and whether it still exists or not [Music]

mr. look at the supposed to images provided from NASA of Jupiter here’s the

problem again 2016 2014 what’s the difference here no difference is they

how did the supposed Aurora’s on the North it’s nothing but a Christmas tree

give me a break take a look here mean all the clouds from the same exact

position just in 2016 images a bit will take darker it’s a bit lighter in 2014

here’s a side by side if you can’t see what’s taking place or if NASA nothing

more than faker to me give me a break this is completely an insult you have to be brain your head [Music]

so I keep digging a little bit deeper and I finally get underneath this cloud cover here and a few images pop up I

sell they were just really well this we got which I’m sure that looks familiar to you right looks just like the

pictures they give us a Mars so I’m just kinda creeping around here and definitely notice in the same kind of

undulation changes and same kind of rock same kind of dirt only thing it’s missing is that nice of a red tint that

they ate take somebody hundred fifty two thousand dollars a year to put on there

whose owner covers this okay that looks like an assistant well let’s do a little

further because I can’t really see anything on here then NASA simple

I can’t read that track cameras set up dance ATVs who have been there a while

it’s not a one-day trip tennis setup

no we’re in Greenland another ATV the left-wing bubbler

equipment so I keep kind of going through here and yeah so

I think I found out what Mars is guys it’s just 5,000 miles north of me

not quite the distance and essences I can’t find anybody who’s in charge this must be hiding behind these rocks oh no

they’re there I’m friendly with my standard lovely number one number two

number three thinks his travel around taking pictures

[Music]

Simmons job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of

datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture

[Music] um it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has

to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s

called the specular highlight so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just

slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat looks kind of flat looks kind of flat or the

clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world

[Music]

lish in reading too much but I’ve since grown out of that and I enjoy reading now and I played a lot of sports and all

of that happened at a little town called York Maine across the United States from where we’re talking to you right now us

the United States from where we’re talking to you right now boss the United States from where we’re talking to you right now

[Laughter]

and that enlist the help of a friend thanks you might know ladies and

gentlemen if you didn’t figure out by now I’m gonna be the first man to actually tell you this that teleportation is officially real we are

live in the ISS and let’s go back and relook at that clip again you see it now

watch whoa wait see this ladies and gentlemen should let you know that this

is only done through the usage of chroma key this is chroma key technology this is

green screen or blue screen technology that’s what is being utilized here this

is simply virtual reality that is actually being fed to you and you’re taking this virtual reality making it

the reality when in fact all this is is simply just virtual CGI computer

generated images them so you decide for yourself if we have the technology to

build the space station and have people go and live in the space station for months and months at a time and they are

they’re constantly reporting back to earth the things that they are finding there then the question is why go

through all this trouble as far as taking the space station itself why go through the trouble of making these

people in space who are supposed to be the astronauts who are in space and of their arms disappear from the screen

just like that why have that why go through all the trouble so this video is an astronaut

explaining the mission it’s not like practice footage or anything watch closely

[Music] dan said in the pilot seat during this

operation sort of monitoring the motion of the vehicle making sure that

it was steady and that the you know there were very few vibrations of any

sort here’s a picture of the inset actually being deployed from the

spacecraft you can see that the deploy went very smoothly at that moment did

you see it in the background there was a guy in the background man I’m not kidding you did

you can’t deny that that’s someone in the background there’s a guy moving in the background here and watch it again

watch it closely I looked up or I tried to lock up the

size of this rocket I found his picture you can see it’s massive so if that

rocket is in space and if there’s a guy in the background in that footage that

means that there are like giants like insane big giants floating around in

space looking at NASA that’s pretty that’s probably why they don’t dare to

go back to the moon and why they hide so much stuff space is full of giants and

explore 130 2,900 feet per second altitude now I know I got my downrange distance 7r huh this is not standard

this is not something that is planned of course I can see a solid rocket booster has broken away from shuttle Challenger

that’s what you’re looking at in the middle of your screen I cannot see the shuttle itself in 1986 the shuttle

Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after takeoff killing all seven astronauts insanity or did it

it turns out that six of the seven are still alive and kicking today Ellison

Onizuka claims to be his identical twin brother Claude yeah I’ve got an

identical twin brother Claude do the Challenger pilot Mickey Smith

hasn’t even bothered changing his name he’s now professor Michael J Smith of

University of Wisconsin now Christa McAuliffe was a bit of a sneaky

one she was the Challenger payload specialist quite famous for being a teacher it turns out during her

astronaut days she was using her middle name Christa and now all she goes by her

first name Sharon and she’s a Sorak whose law professor the Challenger

commander Frances Richards scoby is now on dick Scobee who sounds like a rather

unpleasant disease CEO of housing fees limited Judith Resnik the Challenger

mission specialist again hasn’t even bothered changing her name she’s a professor at Yale Law and finally Ronald

McNair another challenger mission specialist claims be is identical twin

brother Carl McNair [Music]

in the first round and white is flying at 17,000 miles per

hour 200 miles above the earth okay

if the spacesuit fails the difference in pressure will kill him instantly this

could be a serious problem because you don’t want your stop-motion toy to die in space as white floats in space a

glove drifts out of the capsule oh so garden glove you’re telling me there’s

an astronaut in space with no glove and a fair hand exposed and what blew it

away the wind today those pictures are are classic they’re

still overpowering today to realize number one has been done and that we did

it it blew me away how easy it was to deceive everyone it was quite easy

actually we all know nASA uses wired and sometimes we’ll catch them like this here the guy I pulled on his wire

however some days when you’re filming my things just don’t work out and it

becomes so blatantly obvious it’s ridiculous so in this clip they’re talking live

feed and what you know we have hey astronaut Tobias in the background

obviously trying to give it a more realistic Spacey station busy effect the

only problem is the camera that was supposed to mess this harness out or the video feed is not working and so we see

the guy come flying along in a harness on his wires pretty amazing but that’s

not all that goes wrong here

channel in 3d space it’s virtual reality he’s they’re wearing argumented contact

lenses so that they can interact with these 3d objects now in this scene the guy on the left and the green shirt he

thinks he sees an object in 3d space is being broadcast to him so he grabs it NE

puts it off to the side he’s looking straight ahead because he’s looking at an object rotating in front of him but

the video channel is down that is supposed to show the viewers what we’re

supposed to see and so we don’t actually get to see the object that he has seen and I would just sum this up as a very

terrible bad horrible day for NASA doing my feet as much fun as this was there is

a time coming when you and I will not be able to tell the difference

[Music]

[Applause] [Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

now I know what you’re thinking so NASA is fake big deal how does this affect me

blah blah blah or you’re thinking no no there’s no way my heroes could be lying

to me there’s no way that this whole world is in on this big scam this is just too much and that’s what I would

have thought too but here is what they are hiding and why NASA form in the

first place pay attention federal bird you’ve been to both the North Pole and the South

Pole is there any unexplored land left on this earth that might appeal to

adventurous young Americans oh yes there is and that up around the North Pole because it’s getting crowded up there

now because they find out it’s really usable not only to live in but militarily but strangely enough that is

left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by human being and that’s beyond

the pole on the other side of the South Pole from middle America

and it’s I think it’s quite astonishing that

there should be an area as big as that unexplored was the tremendous oil is a lot of adventure left down at the bottom

of the world a number of expeditions that will follow I think year after year bottom of the

world because the government has really become interested I tell you one reason

they’re interested it’s by far the most valuable important place left in the

world for science that’s where the scientific groups all over the nation are really interested

but more important than that it’s it has to do with the future of the nation

those to come after us or even during your lifetime because it happens to be

an untouched reservoir of natural resources you know as the world shrinks

with an ever increasing acceleration far-flung places once useless like we

thought the North Pole was and no-man’s land become very useful a the bottom of

the world will be important not only to us but to our allies then it’s the most

peaceful place in the world I’m sure that won’t last very long what are the

natural resources there well a we found enough of coal within

180 miles of the South Pole in a great region Mountain it’s not covered as snow

enough to supply the whole world for quite a while well and that’s that’s the

coal now there’s evidence of other many other minerals we have pretty sure of

this oil now that call shows the bottom of the world now by far the coldest spot

in the world where that coal is gets a hundred below zero in the weather well where’s lunch tropical so we think

there’s oil there and there’s evidence probably uranium there is it any secret

is there uranium there that would be the only thing it would be practical to actually go after I suppose everything

else would be economically unfeasible wouldn’t it well as really recklessly

expend their resources the time common we can we’ll have to go after that stuff down there well Admiral Byrd

our private expedition is a thing of the past is that his expedition and exploration making expedition

exploration now a purely a government function because I think them South it

may be more or less a thing of the past but not other other expeditions and go

there a lot I’m going off now there the North Pole is the sound of an ocean 10,000 feet deep the South Pole the

scent of a plateau 10,000 feet high [Music]

Government Documents Prove FLAT EARTH

ALL the governments on the face of the earth are controlled by Satan, he has deceived the entire world (Revelation 12:9). Just as it was foretold in the following three passages we now are able to clearly see who the enemy is and his inequities.

“For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.” Luke 8:17 (KJV)

“But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” Daniel 12:4 (KJV)

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” Romans 1:18-22 (KJV)

(1) Dissertations Defended in the Scientific Council of the Institute of Physics of the Earth
Pages: 19, 20
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3.pdf

(2) Propagation of Electromagnetic Fields Over Flat Earth
Pages: Cover Page, 7, 17, 18, 28, 35
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TR-2352.pdf

(3) An Energy Budget Model to Calculate the Low Atmosphere Profiles of Effective Sound Speed at Night
Pages: 10, 16
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-MR-563.pdf

(4) Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Estimating the Angle of Arrival of Helicopters Using Acoustic Arrays
Pages: 17, 30, 31, 35
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2009/ARL-TR-4998.pdf

(5) Adding Liquid Payloads Effects to the 6-DOF Trajectory of Spinning Projectiles
Page: 7
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-TR-5118.pdf

(6) Trajectory Prediction of Spin-Stabilized Projectiles With a Steady Liquid Payload
Page: 10
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2011/ARL-TR-5810.pdf

(7) Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model
Pages: 6, 35, 55, 102
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf

(8) General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf

(9) Predicted Performance of a ThrustEnhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload
Page: 10
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88507main_H-2179.pdf

(10) Derivation of a Point-Mass Aircraft Model used for Fast-Time Simulation
Page: 7
https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr_15-1318-derivation-of-point-mass-aircraft-model-used-for-fast-time-simulation.pdf

(11) A Method for Reducing The Sensitivity of Optimal Nonlinear Systems to Parameter Uncertainty
Page: 14
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf

(12) Calculation of Wind Compensation for Launching of Unguided Rockets
Pages: 8, 10
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf

(13) User’s Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (2768)
Page: 16
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

(14) User’s Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (2835)
Page: 4
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88112main_H-1443.pdf

(15) Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll-Stablized Platform
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

(16) U.S. Standard Atmosphere (1962)
Page: 22
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19630003300.pdf

(17) An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge
Page: 13
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

(18) Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields
Page: 14
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

(19) A Mathematical Model of the CH-53
Page: 25
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf

(20) The Development and Validation of a Piloted Simulation of a Helicopter and External Sling Load
Pages: 6, 37, 48
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005912.pdf

(21) Atmospheric Oscillations
Page: 13
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf

(22) Stability and Control Estimation Flight Test Results for the SR-71 Aircraft With Externally Mounted Experiments
Page: 19
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf

(23) Flight Testing a V/STOL Aircraft to Identify a Full-Envelope Aerodynamic Model
Page: 9
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf

(24) Singular Arc Time-Optimal Climb Trajectory of Aircraft in a Two-Dimensional Wind Field
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf

(25) STUDIES ON INSTABILITIES IN LONG-BASELINE TWO-WAY SATELLITE TIME AND FREQUENCY TRANSFER (TWSTFT) INCLUDING A TROPOSPHERE DELAY MODEL
Pages: 2, 6
https://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/2007papers/paper21.pdf

(26) Scale-Insensitive Detection Algorithm for FLIR Imagery
Page: 6
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TN-175.pdf

(27) User Manual for the Microsoft Window Edition of the Scanning Fast-Field Program (WSCAFFIP) Version 3.0
Page: 45
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-TR-2696.pdf

(28) Path-Loss Measurements in a Forested Environment at VHF
Pages: 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 35
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-2156.pdf

(29) Review of Sound Propagation in the Lower Atmosphere
Page: 18, 208
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/067880.pdf

(30) Beacon Position and Attitude Navigation Aided by a Magnetometer
Page: 11
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-CR-650.pdf

(31) Automatic Target Acquisition of the DEMO III Program
Page: 9
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2002/ARL-TR-2683.pdf

(32) Modeling of Atmospheric Effects
Page: 13
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-1812.pdf

(33) Telemetry Standards
Page: 172
http://www.irig106.org/docs/106-17/106-17_Telemetry_Standards.pdf

(34) Approximate Optimal Guidance for the Advanced Launch System
Page: 172
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

(35) Flight Simulation Software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Pages: 4, 10
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88380main_H-2052.pdf

(36) Simulator Aero Model Implementation
Page: 10
https://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/publications/hitl/rtsim/Toms.pdf

(37) Design and Implementation of Flight Visual Simulation System
Page: 3
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0365.pdf

(38) A Discussion of Methods of Real-Time Airplane Flight Simulation
Page: 11
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.510.7499&rep=rep1&type=pdf

(39) The American Practical Navigator: An Epitome of Navigation
Pages: 351, 355, 573, 636
http://geocenter.survey.ntua.gr/main/labs/carto/academic/persons/bnakos_site_nafp/documentation/american_practical_navigator.pdf

Doc #39 on page 11 of 714 states, “The earth is an oblate spheroid (a sphere flattened at the poles).” This statement is in direct contradiction to at least 5 different statements within the document itself:

————————–

Page 351 of 714 states, “This assumes that the observer is at sea level, the earth is flat between observer and object, there is no refraction, and the object and its waterline form a right angle. For most cases of practical significance, these assumption produce no large errors.”
1) Waterline, assumes the water has a FLAT line
2) “Earth is Flat between observer and object”

————————–

Page 355 of 714 states, “Curvature of surface _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = 0.8 foot per nautical mile”
3) If the earth was “flattened at the poles” then this calculation of the curvature is blatantly inaccurate, as the curvature of the surface of the earth would vary.

————————–

Page 574 of 714 states, “back shore, n. That part of a beach which is usually dry, being reached. Only by the highest tides, and by extension, a narrow strip of relatively flat coast boarding the sea. See also FORESHORE.”
4) How can the there exist a “flat coast” bordering the sea if the sea curves? It can’t.

————————–

Page 636 of 714 states, “line of sight. The straight line between two points, which does not follow the curvature of the earth.”
5) If the earth is a globe and curving in every direction downward from the observer, given the definition of “line of sight” it is impossible to achieve “line of sight” for every observation necessitates that it occurs over the “curvature of the earth”.

(40) The Production of Firing Tables for Cannon Artillery
Pages: 10, 22, 34, 110
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/826735.pdf

Doc #40 on pages 66 – 68 of 115 references “Rotation of Earth”:
1) Doc #40 does NOT account for curvature of earth
2) Doc #40 represents the “Rotation of Earth” in an equation for “particle theory”, whereby, when the numerical value of zero (0) is plugged in for the variable to account for the alleged rotation it does not negatively impact the rest of the equation and it is able to compute.

(41) Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery
Page: 175, 192
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/tc3_09x81.pdf

I should have done a better analysis on doc #41. Sorry about that, and now here it is. 

————————–

Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 48 of 664:
“3-55. If a round were fired in a vacuum, gravity would cause the projectile to return to the surface of the earth. The path or trajectory of the projectile would be simple to trace. All projectiles, regardless of size, shape, or weight, would follow paths of the same parabolic shape and would achieve the same range for a given muzzle velocity and quadrant elevation.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: The “parabolic shape” of the trajectory of the bullet is caused by density, not gravity or the alleged curvature of a spherically shaped earth.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 48 of 664:
3-57. Gravity causes a projectile in flight to fall to the earth. Because of gravity, the height of the projectile at any instant is less than it would be if no such force were acting on it. In a vacuum, the vertical velocity would decrease from the initial velocity to zero on the ascending branch of the trajectory and increase from zero to the initial velocity on the descending branch, Zero vertical velocity would occur at the summit of
the trajectory. For every vertical velocity value on the upward leg of the ascending branch there is an equal vertical velocity value downward on the descending branch. Since there would be no resistance to the forward motion of the projectile in a vacuum, the horizontal velocity component would be a constant. The acceleration caused by the force of gravity (9.81 m/s) affects only the vertical velocity.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: Gravity is an unproven theory, buoyancy is proven. Bullets fall because they are heavier than the medium they are within, that being the air.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 49 of 664:
“The standard (chart) range is the range opposite a given elevation in the firing tables. It is assumed to have been measured along the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth and passing through the muzzle of a weapon. For all practical purposes, standard range is the horizontal distance from the origin of the trajectory to the level point.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: IF “It is assumed to have been measured along the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth”, then why in the very next sentence does it state “For all practical purposes, standard range is the horizontal distance from the origin of the trajectory to the level point.”
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 51 of 664:
“Deflection effects. Some of the deviations from the standard conditions affecting deflection
are:
* Drift.
* Crosswind.
* Rotation of the earth.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: On page 192, “Rotation of the earth” is established as an “unproven theory”, which holds zero bearing in reality.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 132 of 664:
5-36. The third condition is valid met corrections considered by each of the firing platoons. This includes the met message valid for the firing platoon, propellant temperature, projectile weight, vertical interval, and corrections for earth rotation.

Nathan Roberts’s reply: On page 192, “Rotation of the earth” is established as an “unproven theory”, which holds zero bearing in reality.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 186 of 664:
“Range (Column 1). This is the distance measured from the muzzle to the target on the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth. When chart range is used as the entry argument for this table, it is expressed to the nearest 10 meters and interpolation is necessary.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: The same response given to “sphere concentric with earth” mentioned on page 49 applies here too.

(42) Field Artillery Gunnery
http://militarynewbie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/FM-3-09.8-FIELD-ARTILLERY-GUNNERY.pdf

(43) TTP for the Field Artillery Cannon Gunnery
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/usmc/mcwp/3-16-3/mcwp3-16-3.pdf

(44) Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the field artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery
https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/mcwp3_16_4.pdf

Categories

Biblical-NONOrthodoxy-logo