Select Page
Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist Pt2

Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist Pt2

Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist

Part 2

It is ironic that it was Einstein himself who destroyed his own theory of special relativity, and yet the mainstream scientism community still propagates the lie that the aether does not exist. The fact that we have so much technology that utilizes the aether itself to function is a slap in the face of any thinking individual that can see the obviousness of its existence. This video is part 1 of a multi part series that utterly destroys the Einsteinian nonsense that is being forced upon the scientific community. To go against this nonsense will surely mean the end to one’s scientific career so regardless of the fact that so many scientists are fully aware of the preposterousness of special relativity, acceptance of it is mandatory or they will be exiled right out of science. Big thanks to YouTuber odiupicku for putting together these clips from a Robert Sungenis presentation which thoroughly debunks the scientism of Einstein.

Watch Part 1 here.

Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist Pt1

Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist Pt1

Einstein Spilled the Beans! The Aether DOES Exist

Part 1

It is ironic that it was Einstein himself who destroyed his own theory of special relativity, and yet the mainstream scientism community still propagates the lie that the aether does not exist. The fact that we have so much technology that utilizes the aether itself to function is a slap in the face of any thinking individual that can see the obviousness of its existence. This video is part 1 of a multi part series that utterly destroys the Einsteinian nonsense that is being forced upon the scientific community. To go against this nonsense will surely mean the end to one’s scientific career so regardless of the fact that so many scientists are fully aware of the preposterousness of special relativity, acceptance of it is mandatory or they will be exiled right out of science. Big thanks to YouTuber odiupicku for putting together these clips from a Robert Sungenis presentation which thoroughly debunks the scientism of Einstein.

Watch Part 2 here.

Magic Frequency Will Revolutionize Our Future

Magic Frequency Will Revolutionize Our Future

Transcript

 So now we’re searching for the magic frequency and we start with the hundred Hertz and we look through the microscope to see if anything’s happening we watch for five minutes nothing happens we try hundreds and hundreds of frequencies if not thousands until we find the magic combination because we believed we just had to be a better way there had to be a better way and we think that we may have found it I have here two identical tuning forks both tuned to the note aid the note in Orchestra Tunes to these forks are both made to vibrate times per second we say their frequency is Hertz if I tap this fork putting little pulses of energy into it the second fork will also vibrate in sympathy and if I silence this fork we just may may hear the other singing its tone we say that I’m inducing a sympathetic resonant vibration in the second fork it only works because both forks are tuned to the exact same frequency now many of us have seen this very charming young man and the internet who shatters crystal glasses with his powerful voice but if you watch him carefully you’ll see that first he taps the glass with his finger and listens the glass sings its natural resonant pitch that he takes a deep breath and sings a loud long note he induces a resonant vibration in the crystal glass the vibration grows larger and larger and larger until the glass is shattered on the other end of the scale we have a giant bridge made out of concrete and steel a suspension bridge the Tacoma Narrows Bridge cars and trucks and buses are going over it every day and unfortunately where they built this bridge there was a steady wind blowing across it and one day this wind induces a small vibration in the bridge hardly noticeable but the frequency of the vibration matches the resonant frequency of some part of the bridge and the vibration gets larger and larger and larger until the bridge collapses into the river below a destructive resonant frequency so on one end of the scale we have a giant concrete and steel bridge destroyed by resonance and on the other we have a small crystal glass shattered so maybe we could shatter something even smaller something really small something you would need a microscope to see maybe we could shatter a living microorganism so maybe we could change a biological living liquid crystal with a special electronic signal but in order to do that we would need some kind of device so we searched the US Patent database we find this invention by a physician dr. James Baer of Albuquerque New Mexico it’s called a resonant frequency therapy device and its purpose is to induce a resonant vibration in a living organism or cell if I put in say Hertz out will come pulses per second if I put in Hertz we’ll get pulses so now we’re searching for the magic frequency and we start with the hundred Hertz and we look through the microscope to see if anything is happening we watch for five minutes nothing happens so we try a hundred and one Hertz we look through the scope for five minutes and nothing happens so we try and so on over the course of months we try hundreds and hundreds of frequencies if not thousands until we find the magic combination the answer is you have to have two input frequencies one low one high and the higher frequency must be times the lower it’s what we musicians would call the eleventh harmonic when we add the eleventh harmonic we begin to shatter microorganisms like a crystal glass these are the first videos taken we show these videos to our friends in the biology department they said they hadn’t seen anything quite like it seems to be a new phenomenon these organisms are being shattered by our electronic signals we now know that cancer is vulnerable between the frequencies of , Hertz and , Hertz so now we attack leukemia cells leukemia cell number one tries to grow a copy of itself but the new cell is shattered into dozens of fragments and scattered across the slide leukemia cell number two than hyper inflates and also dies leukemia cell number three then tries to make another cancer cell the new cell is shattered and the original cell dies you

American Moon: Best Hoax Documentary Massimo Mazzucco

American Moon: Best Hoax Documentary Massimo Mazzucco

American Moon: Massimo Mazzucco

Has man really been to the moon? It’s been 50 years, and the debate rages on. For the firs time, a film compiles in a single piece of work, all the best evidence in favor of the moon landings and the evidence contrary to them. For the first time we can also analyze the Apollo pictures in detail, with the aid of some among the top photographers in the world. What was the Apollo project really? The biggest achievement in the history of mankind, or the biggest fakery of all times, watched on live television by more than half a billion people?

COMMENTS

frogchris998 • 3 months ago
what a fantastic docu!
Not the first.. or the most original.. but probably the best assembly of all relevant info on why nobody has ever been to the moon.

TitusVolturcius frogchris998 • 2 months ago
Great documentary indeed. But they didn´t see the most convincing piece of evidence: that Buzz Aldrin was replaced with an actor. If you compare the old and new pictures and videos you can see that the supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE, he has more HAIR today than 50 years ago, his CHIN and his NOSE are different. It´s amazing that most haven´t noticed this yet.

Mulysses TitusVolturcius • 22 days ago
I was thinking about how crazily different he looks and how much shorter he is now when I was watching it!

TitusVolturcius Mulysses • 21 days ago
spread the word, bro. It’s very important

Sasha82 • 5 months ago
A great collection of all the items that don’t add up.

TitusVolturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago
But they didn´t see the most convincing piece of evidence: that Buzz Aldrin was replaced with an actor. If you compare the old and new pictures and videos you can see that the supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE, he has more HAIR today than 50 years ago, his CHIN and his NOSE are different. It´s amazing that most haven´t noticed this yet.

Uncle Timo TitusVolturcius • 24 days ago
“supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE”

happens to old people

Sasha82 TitusVolturcius • 2 months ago
Wow, is that right? Now that you mention it, I did pick up on him looking a little different. Do you have a video or link showing this?

TitusVolturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago
https://www.youtube.com/cha…

Titus Volturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago
I have videos on my Bit Chute channel. And on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/fee…
But I don´t know if you can watch them because they made them invisible

Cosmic Toolbox • 13 days ago
So is the Myth Busters program extremely incompetent at busting myths, or just another corporate media propaganda show full of shit?

Phone7018 • 2 months ago
Kinda long at 3.5 hours but its very complete

Phone7018 • 2 months ago
Great documentary very well made

Bavo Dekker • 14 days ago
Why has the “Apollo Moon” no color? Why was (and still today) the surface of the Apollo Moon always presented as monochrome, black & white like cement with never any color shades? But colors are clearly seen on other solar-bodies like Io, Phobos, Mercury, Mars in our Solar system? Also here on Earth, the deserts all are loaded with different combinations of colorful minerals. The obviously (color) censored Japanese Lunar Orbiter SELENE (2007) shows a similarly colorless fake looking black & white ‘Apollo Moon’ in contrast to the sudden appearance of the vivid ‘Blue Marble’ over the horizon during its orbits, exactly matching the old Apollo’s Ektachrome color film pictures showing the same colorless lunar landscape. And now the Chinese Moon pictures are color censored too, behind the scenes they all comply to the 1969 Apollo Moon color standards. Could this be one of the reasons NASA can’t go ‘back’ and then be forced by 21century technology to expose the Apollo Hoax, this time showing a colorful moon surface with a starry sky above? NASA is its own worst enemy blocking progress since 1973 “unable to remove one of truth protective layers”, and refuse to come clean after 50 years, but sadly the deception is still continuing with the NASA Mars Rovers. NASA wants us to believe that it’s possible to land safely on the Red Planet by parachute in a near-vacuum with a pressure ranging from 0.0044 psi to 0.087 psi in the Mars atmosphere! This also proves that the sky on Mars is not red or blue but black.

Cosmic Toolbox Bavo Dekker • 8 days ago
I’ve had those Mars questions I’m undecided. A camera pointed straight
up should see black but at an angle there is much more atmosphere to
diffuses light. Why they havent taken a vertical picture I’m unsure of. NASA claims their giant parachute only slows it some.
Either retro rockets or airbags were needed. The dust storms
photographed by landers would require much thicker atmosphere also.
Those of the electric universe theory believe these are electrical
discharges. I still lean towards the Mars probes being real but I have
an open mind.

Soft_Dystopia • 24 days ago
When all this information stacks up it becomes very convincing.

kati7 • 20 days ago • edited
Hard to believe our governments anything these days, lies everywhere, but then there are also lots deceptions/diversions so i wont believe both sides and just stay neutral or even better ignore this topic.
Still sure upvoted cause its more plausible then the NASA/gov version.

Bak • 20 days ago
Great documentary, the best I have seen yet on the Apollo hoax. 3 and a half hours well spent.

Math & Physics • a month ago
I skipped through, did they bother to cover the thermodynamics of a BLACK BODY IN SPACE?

Rich • 13 days ago
Fk all you down voting idiots… Do some fkn research!!!! https://www.skyandtelescope…

Rich • 23 days ago
Only one problem with all of this…. You can buy a telescope now with which you can see the landing sites… So there’s that…

Bak Rich • 20 days ago
Have you ever seen any landing site with a telescope? NASA has some really good telescopes but I am not aware of any pictures they have that show the landing sites photographed through a telescope.

Rich Bak • 13 days ago
I’ll just leave this here.. https://www.skyandtelescope…

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 11 days ago
That’s nothing. NASA has been doctoring and smudging out their own photos for years. A few blips supposedly by one of their own orbiters that cannot be corroborated. Means nothing. You originally said with the telescopes WE have these days. WE have no way to verify. This movie reveals them doctoring the timing of their conversations. So they can’t photoshop a shiney spot? Paleeease! Why don’t you address any of the 3 1/2 hrs of evidence.

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 10 days ago
@Rich Was just rewatching and the spots that are supposedly proof in your skyandtelescope link are even addressed in this movie, making me wonder if you even watched the movie

VeganCaramel Rich • 22 days ago
No you can’t.
Do you actually believe that or were just hoping everyone would be too lazy to check into it?

Additionally, I have no doubt that people will eventually be able to see the landing sites some day using some form of technology because NASA is, and always has been, planning to reconstruct the studio sets on the Moon at some point.
As this documentary points out, NASA didn’t want the Lunar X Prize teams to go near the landing sites because they have not yet had a chance to reconstruct the studio sets.

Cosmic Toolbox VeganCaramel • 13 days ago
There are many that think there has been a secret space program for a long time that is responsible for some of the ufo’s we see in the sky. If so I’m sure they would have reconstructed the scene by now. some think Kennedy suspected it and thought this his proposal might force it out in the open. If so it didn’t

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 13 days ago
There is one telescope that could- the Hubble. And users of it are forbidden to point it at the moon.

Rich Cosmic Toolbox • 13 days ago
ya ok… https://www.skyandtelescope…