44 Government Documents Prove Flat Earth

Anthony Skaar Moochie is a Trump advisor and he went on CNN and made an of himself on the issue of climate science overwhelmingly census in the scientific community is that presented actions have an impact on science race oh yeah I was interacting world and whenever it comes out creo had Chris there was an overwhelming science that the earth was flat and there was an overwhelming sign learned over the time the Senate we were the center of the world a hundred percent you know we get a lot of things wrong in the scientific community you and I both know that no that’s called not science geocentrism to there was an overwhelming signs have you believe no that wasn’t a scientific belief that was a belief that wasn’t scientific that was a belief there’s a difference there’s a difference hello my name is Nathan Roberts thanks for tuning in to flat earth doctrine I appreciate you being here please do subscribe if you haven’t yet done so though do not count on my social media account always being active it’s at one point in time sometime in the future YouTube because it is censoring flattered specifically you will not be able to find my account it will be gone because of YouTube so as a result to stay in contact with me once all that goes down please go to my website flat earth doctrine calm and you’ll see a pop-up appear on the web page please provide your email address so that when things go down where I’m censored completely we will be able to stay in contact through email so let’s go ahead and dive into these documents I’m here to share with you 44 different documents from the government swear by they admit the earth is flat documents from the CIA USSR US Army NASA Federal Aviation Administration the FFA US Navy national imagery and mapping agency National geospatial intelligence agency and the US Marine Corps which includes state-owned universities such as UCLA Penn State and Shang yang aerospace university government admits Flat Earth document number one put out by the CIA whereby it looks like they stole it from the USSR and this document was created appears to be sometime around March of 1957 and you’ll notice that in the bottom left-hand corner and you’ll see the title of the document the author if there is one cited unless there’s a ton of them and I’m not gonna list them all and then you have the URL of this document so if you want to go download it yourself you were able to and when I go through these documents themselves you’ll see on the bottom right-hand corner is the page number where you can find these these phrases and words cited so beginning with page 19 of 104 this dissertation there’s the brightness of the firmament the firmament is a biblical term which is a just mentioned in Genesis chapter one eight different times and beginning with verse six and the firmament is is was made to divide and separate the waters from above from below as well as the Sun Moon and stars are placed within the firmament so please go reread Genesis chapter one the firmament is also mentioned on page 20 also a near Sun which means localized Sun is mentioned and it talks about the brightness of the first order and derived on the assumption of a Flat Earth and giving some conclusions derived on the basis of this formula so the formula is based upon the assumption of a Flat Earth there’s a near Sun and there’s a firmament apparently government admits Flat Earth document number two propagation of electromagnetic fields over Flat Earth you’ll notice it on page seven it says flat idealized Earth on page 17 Flat Earth page 18 Flat Earth page 28 Flat Earth page 35 Flat Earth government admits Flat Earth document number three from the US Army titled an energy budget model to calculate the low atmosphere profiles of effective Sound speed at night there’s an image in the document where it shows a near and localised Sun crepuscular rays and a flat earth and that again is on page 10 and then if you go to page 16 you see the word Flat Earth government admits Flat Earth document number 4 put out by the United States Army titled computationally efficient algorithms for estimating the angle of arrival of helicopters using acoustic arrays let’s see what it has to say on page 17 it says Flat Earth page 30 Flat Earth model page 31 Flat Earth page 35 a flat earth government admits flatter document number 5 this one is from United States Army titled adding liquid payloads effects to the 6 DOF trajectory of spinning projectiles see what it has to say on page 7 says assume a Flat Earth these equations assume a flat earth government admits Flat Earth document number 6 this is put out by the United States Army in fact it’s the same author as document number 5 gene R Cooper and in fact the title is almost eerily the same though what we’ll find is that he didn’t make any Corrections for assuming a Flat Earth but let’s read the title trajectory prediction of spin-stabilized projectiles with a steady liquid payload what does it say page 10 it says these equations assume a Flat Earth why would you assume a Flat Earth if you’re on a spinning ball govern admits Flat Earth document number seven put out by NASA in August of 1988 derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model what does it have to say let’s see here well starting with page six it says this report details the development of the linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non rotating earth it goes on to say on the same page by defining the initial conditions of the nominal trajectory for straight in level flight and setting the asymmetric aerodynamic and inertia terms to zero one can easily obtain the more traditional linear models from the linear model derived in this report on page 35 it says this report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth on page 55 it says based on assumptions of symmetric mass distributions symmetric aerodynamics and straight in level flight and then on page 102 this report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 8 put out by NASA titled general equations of motion for a damaged asymmetric aircraft and on page 2 it states in this paper the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 9 put out by NASA titled predicted performance of a thrust enhanced sr-71 aircraft with an external payload this has put out in June of 1997 and it states non rotating earth right there page 10 and this this sr-71 blackbird has a top speed of 2,100 93 miles per hour and it doesn’t have to account for a rotation of the earth the Coriolis effect the alleged Coriolis effect or even the curvature of the earth at 2193 miles per hour certainly would have to if it existed unless it was flying over a flat non rotating earth government emits flat earth document number 10 put out by the Federal Aviation Administration in conjunction with company named MIT re it’s derivation of a point mass aircraft model used for fast time simulation this is from April 2015 says assuming a flat non rotating earth page 7 government admits Flat Earth document number 11 put up by NASA in conjunction with the University of Kansas they contracted kayuu to do this work with with them and it was put out June of 1971 it is titled a method for reducing the sensitivity of optimal nonlinear systems to parameter uncertainty let’s see what has to say page 14 it says the idealizing assumptions made are the following number two is a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number twelve put out by NASA it is titled calculation of wind compensation for launching of unguided rockets and on page eight and 10 we have a diagram as well as it states the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by NASA December of 1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating or government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by NASA December of 1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 14 put up by NASA in 1988 in fact it looks like to be an updated version from the document number 13 that I just went over same authors and almost the same exact if not same exact title which is user’s manual for interactive linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it states on page four equations with stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions same thing as in document 13 same authors basically same title they didn’t make any adjustment going onto page 126 it states the same thing stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions doesn’t look like they made a mistake with that documentation their government admits Flat Earth document number 15 put out by NASA this was put out in March of 1972 and it’s titled determination of angles of attack and side slip from radar data and a roll stabilized platform what does it have to say well page two it states the method is limited however to application where a flat non rotating earth may be assumed if it’s limited to that assumption and the earth is a spinning ball then this document is garbage unless the earth is truly flat and non rotating government admits Flat Earth document number 16 put up by NASA it’s titled US standard atmosphere what does it have to say well on page 22 it says for the accuracy required in this document it suffices to treat the surface as an ellipsoid whose flattening ellipticity that means they had to flatten the globe why would you have to do that for accuracy maybe because the earth is government admits flatter document number 17 put out by NASA in December of 1991 titled an aircraft model for the AIAA controls design challenge and what does it have to say on page 13 it states the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document number 18 put out by NASA this was in December of 1978 titled investigation of aircraft landing in variable wind fields and what does it have to say on page 14 it states the aircraft trajectory model employed in this study was derived based on the following assumptions a the earth is flat and non rotating government admits flatter document number 19 put up by NASA titled a mathematical model of the CH – 53 helicopter and its states on page 25 the helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with respect to a flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document number 20 put out by NASA titled development and validation of a piloted simulation of a helicopter and external sling load well what does it have to say well on page six it states a general set of nonlinear rigid body equations of motion for both the helicopter and external load determines the motion of each vehicle with respect to a flat non rotating earth it states on page 37 the equations of motion for both the helicopter and the external sling load are developed in body axes with respect to a flat non rotating earth on page 48 it states the terrain is generally flat government admits Flat Earth document number 21 put out by NASA and the US Air Force in conjunction with research provided by Georgia Tech and it is and it is titled atmospheric oscillations what does it have to say well on page 13 it states a model frequently used is that of a flat non rotating earth also States the most one can profitably simplify the problem is to consider an isothermal atmosphere plane level surfaces and a non rotating earth government admits flat earth document number 20 to put out by NASA titled stability and control estimation flight test results for the sr-71 aircraft with externally mounted experiments and what does it have to say well it states on page 18 and 19 if you put them together because there’s a break in the paragraph it states these equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat non rotating earth not very safe for a vehicle that travels at a top speed of 2000 193 miles per hour government admits Flat Earth document number 23 put out by NASA in May of 1988 titled flight testing a V s tol aircraft to identify a full envelope aerodynamic model and it states motion over a flat non rotating earth page 9 of 18 government admits flatter document number 24 put out by NASA it is titled singular arc time optimal climb trajectory of aircraft in a two dimensional wind field what does it have to say it states on page two in our minimum time to climb problem the aircraft is modeled as a point mass of the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non rotating flat earth government admits flatter document number 25 this is put out by the United States Navy and it is titled studies on instabilities in long baseline two-way satellite time and frequency transfer including a troposphere delay model and what does it have to state it states on page two it shows a graphic which shows two ground stations on equal level ground both ground stations on the same flat plane and then on page six it states assuming a flat earth and the straight line of sight line of sight just so you know line of sight does not apparently exist when you’re looking over the earth and I’m gonna get to that in another document pretty soon government admits Flat Earth document number 26 United States Army it is titled scale and sensitive detection algorithm for FLI our imagery what does it have a state it states that in other scenarios only the range to the center of the field of view and depressions angle is known so that a flat earth approximation provides the best estimate that is page 6 of 22 government admits Flat Earth document number 27 put on it again by the United States Army and it is titled user manual for the microsoft windows edition of the scanning fast field program version 3.0 what does it have to stay well it says on page 45 and 47 this model works over a flat and non turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth document number 28 put out by the United States Army titled path loss measurements in a forested environment at VHF and what do we have to find in here but it states on page 8 Flat Earth age 16 over a flat earth age 17 over flat earth page 18 over flat earth page 19 over flat earth h20 based on Flat Earth theory not a theory it’s fact page 23 over Flat Earth page 25 Flat Earth page 26 Flat Earth page 35 over Flat Earth over Flat Earth stated twice government admits Flat Earth document number 29 this is the US Air Force who contracted Brown University to put forth the docking titled review of sound propagation in the lower atmosphere documented in May 1955 so what does it say on page 18 it says in most of the topics to be discussed the problem is to describe the sound field in a region of atmosphere above a flat earth and then it goes on to cite and page 208 cite a document an article that was written in 1954 in physica xx and it is titled the extension of summer fields formula for the propagation of radio waves over a flat earth two different conductivities of the soil so you may want to research that one a little bit further government admits Flat Earth document number 30 put up with the United States Army entitled beacon position and altitude navigation aided by a magnet meter and it states on page 11 it says that the first is the earth fixed coordinate system which is fixed to the earth with a flat earth assumption and just check out the diagram that they have associated with it are you serious government admits Flat Earth document number 31 put up by the United States Army and it is titled automatic target acquisition of the demo 3 program and it states on page 9 only the range to the center of the field of view and the depression angle is known so that a Flat Earth approximation provides the best estimate government admits Flat Earth document number 32 put up by the United States Army and it is titled modeling of atmospheric effects see what it’s got to say well I’m page 28 it states this model works well over a flat earth and non turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth document number 33 put out by NASA in conjunction with an organization called range commander’s Council telemetry group the cumin is titled telemetry standards this organization range commander’s council their mission is dedicated to serving the technical and operational needs of us test training and operational ranges the RCC provides a framework where in common needs are identified and common solutions are sought technical standards are established and disseminated joint procurement opportunities are explored technical and equipment exchanges are facilitated advanced concepts and technical innovations are assessed and potential applications are identified the vision is the range commits commander’s Council RCC will promote credible change to meet Department of Defense DoD tests and training requirements while promoting the common good of its members and enhance and enhance sharing and interoperability of infrastructure and resources and so apparently I’ve got a lot more than just NASA who they serve they just they serve the Department of Defense the Air Force the Navy the army that’s who’s at least listed here so back to the document which is to telemetry standards on page 172 it states although the equations for the terrain model can be rather daunting in its simplest form one uses flat earth trigonometry to compute the difference in path lengths between the direct and reflected signals you don’t use flat earth trigonometry if you’re on a globe government admits Flat Earth document number 34 put out by NASA in conjunction with UCLA that’s right the University of California this was put out in 1993 and it is titled approximate optimal guidance for the Advanced Launch System and it states that the equations of motion for the 0th order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat earth are presented that’s page 32 of 164 and then on page 43 of 164 it states in this section the three-dimensional equations of motion are reduced for flight in a great circle plane the the xz-plane over a flat non-rotating earth and in further states below it says equations of motion representing flight in a vacuum over a flat earth government in MIT’s Flat Earth document number 35 put out by NASA and October 1995 and it is titled flight simulation software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and it states on page 4 this structured with both flat and oblique earth versions has successfully supported more than 50 different aircraft apparently it also has a flat earth version and in most cases Flat Earth six degree of freedom equations of motion are used why would that be unless here at this flat government admits Flat Earth document number 36 put up by NASA and it is titled simulator arrow model implementation on page 10 it states for the flat non rotating earth considered here and why are we considering to build a software over a flat earth to be used for trainings when the earth is a spinning ball maybe the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document number 37 this is Shen yang aerospace University which is affiliated with obviously China and the title is design and implementation of flight visual simulation system and on page three it states and I’m gonna read this entire thinks it’s very important to understand mathematical modeling of flight simulation the aircraft flight motion simulation as an important part of fvss directly affects the reliability and authenticity of the system flight motion simulation of effect can be greatly improved by relative mathematical models of aircraft flight dynamics in this paper the fvss is based on two assumptions a flight area is the space above ground level level where the rotation of the earth and the curvy motion of mass center of Earth are neglected meaning they don’t take it to an account at all for this flight simulation software why would they do that if the earth is a spinning ball why would you create software to train people how to fly on flat non rotating earth software why because government admits flat earth document number 38 this is put up by Penn State which is a public university so state-owned the title is a discussion of methods of real-time airplane flight simulation and what does it have to say about flight simulation well on page 11 estates flat earth coordinates and many flight simulators globe navigation is not important in such cases it is appropriate to model the earth as a plane half-space rather than an oblate spheroid then the simulator need not worry about how the local horizontal plane changes as the airplane flies around the earth though we know from other documentation all flight is straight and level this simplifies the bookkeeping in the simulator considerably the Flat Earth coordinate system is a Cartesian system Flat Earth model Thank You Penn State government admits Flat Earth document number 39 and this is in conjunction with nad the National imagery and mapping agency as well as the national geospatial-intelligence agency and the document is titled the American practical navigator an epitome of navigation this is the 1995 edition alright so what does it have to say well it states well one is water line how can water have a line if it’s always curving maybe because it’s level in any case this assumes that the observer is at sea level the earth is flat between observer and object there is no refraction in the object and it’s water line form a right angle for most cases of practical significance these assumptions produce no large errors or rather in fact no errors at all and that’s found on page 351 of 7:14 and then we also find that they have curvature of surface at point 8 foot per nautical mile which does workout with what commonly is known as the earth curvature calculation for the statute mile for the statute mile it’s point six six six foot per statute mile for the curvature of the surface but for nautical mile it does work out to 0.8 fluid per nautical mile for the curvature of the surface so apparently they’re using the same spherical trigonometry that flat earthers are using to prove that the earth is not a globe and that’s found on page 355 of 7:14 and then this definition I think was very interesting it’s called back shore the part of a beach which is usually dry being reached only by the highest tides and by extension a narrow strip of relatively flat Coast bordering the C flat Coast page 573 and then we also have line of sight now this is a very interesting definition line of sight the straight line between two points which does not follow the curvature of the earth the only way that this apparent definition works out would mean that you’re only looking up in the sky never looking straight out over the plain of the earth because if you were then you would be following the curvature of the earth thereby it’s no longer the line of sight but we commonly say in my line of sight I can see such-and-such when you’re looking straight over the earth apparently we’ve been using it incorrectly government admits Flat Earth document number 40 put up by the United States Army in November of 1969 titled the production of firing tables for cannon artillery ballistic research laboratory in Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland and what is it state right off the get-go on page ten ms l equals mean sea level what does sea level mean well sea level it is the level of the sea surface used in reckoning the height of geographical features such as hills and as a barometric standard and then what is the definition of level but a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point a position on a real or imaginary scale of amount quantity extent or quality having a flat or and even surface without slopes or bumps at the same height as someone or something else give a flat or even surface to begin to fly horizontally after climbing or diving that’s the word level that’s what is attributed with the word for sea level the phrase sea level the word level is in there because water always seeks to find its level and okay so now interestingly in this document it does state on page 22 and 34 rotation of the earth that phrase rotation of the earth is cited three times between pages 22 and 34 however an equation based on a theory particle theory is not a proof for rotation of the earth for each of the three variables for the rotation of the earth in the theoretical equation the number zero can be plugged in without negatively impacting the entirety of the equation thus it’s just a variable that has no bearing within the equation and here was an interesting graphic on page 110 it shows a horizontal range in meters on the far right the one is chopped off somehow that happened but it’s 12,000 meters that represents seven point four five miles and would be representative of 37 foot drop if the earth is a ball but earth curvature is not necessary for calculating ballistic artillery they put it on a [ __ ] until range no curvature government admits Flat Earth document number 41 put out again by the United States Army April 2016 titled Field Artillery manual cannon gunnery what do they have to say well no rotation of the earth that is standard conditions no rotation of the earth that’s on page 175 however it does state on page 192 theory of rotational effects but we understand if we look at the word theory in the definition it is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained about hypotheses thesis conjecture supposition speculation postulation postulate proposition premise surmise assumption presumption presupposition notion guess hunch feeling suspicions do you understand that the idea of a theory in science with until it’s been proven anyways it is simply a form of mysticism even potentially so this idea that they want to throw in the rotational effects and this document has no bearing because they admit that is just a theory a supposition a speculation a postulation it’s not a fact so and this is interesting to the m198 howitzer has a maximum range of 14 miles that would be a hundred and fifty seven feet of dropped from the alleged earth curvature that goes unaccounted for why why would you not account for the alleged drop if you’re living on a ball because you don’t have to here at this flat government emits Flat Earth document number 42 United States Army put out in July of 2006 titled field artillery gunnery and I’m not gonna go through all the document but I’m gonna summarize what is in here and you can check it for yourself concepts not discussed or disclosed in the document Coriolis rotation of the earth sphere curve or even the motion of the earth however the concept that is discussed is azimuth and azimuth proves that you have to be on a ground plane flat no curvature for an azimuth now this image was not in the document itself but the concept itself is used throughout the document proving that it’s flat government admits Flat Earth document number 43 and this time it’s the United States Marine Corps and it is titled TTP for the field artillery cannon gunnery and what is a state the same thing is the document number 42 which I just covered the concepts that are not discussed in this document include Coriolis rotation of the earth sphere curvature and motion of the earth however azimuth is is discussed again the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document number 44 put up by the United States Marine Corps entitled tactics techniques and procedures for the field artillery manual cannon gunnery what’s interesting about this document is that it does go into great lengths of stating the words and phrase rotation of the earth and Coriolis it says it one two three four five six seven seven different times at least however it also states that the standard conditions by which it operates or expects to be operating is no rotation of the earth at all so why is there this contradiction so how do we reconcile the difference an apparent contradiction of whether or not rotation of the earth or Coriolis needs to be taken into account well number one other than the mention of the terms rotation of the earth and Coriolis there is absolutely no instruction in the documentation for how to account for the rotation of the earth so why is that number two the rotation of the earth is a theory and just as in the quote equation cited in the u.s. army document report number thirteen seventy one entitled the production of firing tables and for cannon artillery which was document number it allows for the variable of alleged rotation of the earth to be zero leaving the entirety of the equation unaffected and it is the same with this documentation produced by the United States Marine Corps and if you’re interested in looking at document number 40 again one more time you can pause this this is for your help and research a little bit more right here or you can just go to the document itself and check it for yourself but I’m gonna move on now what is discussed in the document is azimuth and we understand that only works on a ground level plane flat no curvature so I rest my case the earth is flat so in the photo you see this curvature of Earth’s surface Wow he’s in space look at that no he’s not at that point you don’t see you don’t see the curvature of the earth if you are two millimeters above this beach ball he just don’t that stuff is what a quick shout out to pasture Dean Hodel who was the first to expose many of these documents on June 10th 2018 if you want to check out his website you can go to WWE know tool org and there’s also a conference coming up and that is October 2nd through the 4th of 2019 and Auburn Alabama if you would like to register assuming there’s still space for it which actually there is no space but if there is space or room rather for the event you can go to Skyfall 2019 org and register nearly everyone interested in space has seen this picture it was released by NASA and has the iconic name the Blue Marble 2 you can find the picture everywhere but one of the best places to find it is NASA’s own website this photograph is iconic because NASA says it is one of the most detailed true-color images of the entire Earth to date to put it in a nutshell the picture is iconic well amazingly it turns out a number of sleuths have now found compelling new evidence that the image is indeed a fake now let’s take a look at first the photo seems legit I mean it looks like earth the earth that we have always been told we live on but as the Savi Internet sleuths point out if you take a closer look things start to take a somewhat sinister turn look closely at the repeating cloud pattern here we can see clear examples that the photograph has not only been doctored or constructed but also strong evidence that whoever done the doctoring used repeating photographic templates that is they cloned parts of the image and repeated it that is the photograph is a construction this does not happen in nature clouds do not repeat in the same pattern like this the chances of this happening in the same photograph are low the only way this could happen is if someone has cloned clouds and painted them on this of course could be for a number of reasons you could argue that NASA simply touched up the photograph or effect or that it was a problem with the imaging systems that were used but still the question exists why is NASA releasing fake pictures of Earth if they are going to release a picture of Earth to be used in museums and by educators as they state for the blue marble – then should they not release real images of Earth instead or manipulated or fake images since the natural extension of this is what other images have they doctored the moon pluton Mars maybe all of them and if they are faking pictures to such an extent whether by wanting them to look better or other reasons then what real scientific value are they isn’t science about finding the truth and is that not hard to do when you are being fed and accurate or in this case completely manufactured data NASA says these images are to be used by educators museums and scientists which means they are passing off the image as a real picture of Earth when it is not what do you guys think do you think something sinister is going on or is there some harmless and less exotic reason there are great ideas undiscovered breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truths protective layers then in 2002 Blue Marble 2.0 NASA’s Rob simin made this and it had wide appeal – for example it ended up as the default background on the iPhone I didn’t even know until I bought an iPhone and turned it on and kind of did a little happy dance Simmonds job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture the to us the really cool thing was the data set up until that point there was no realistic color map of the globe anywhere so the land layer here comes from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer aboard Terra and the tricky part here was the weather so we actually had to take clouds out they stashed the clouds for later went onto the ocean that came from an instrument that measures phytoplankton in the sea where it was low I colored it dark blue because they’re low mostly in mid oceans and then where’s a little bit higher it was like a little bit brighter green then add the clouds back in there’s a small problem with it because there’s a very slight gap in between each orbit so some of those are painted on it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlights so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat or the clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world what I imagined it to be unfortunately I’m not an astronaut I’ve never been to space but I’ve looked at these images over and over again trying to sort of get the essence of it you [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Music] ha I know ranking centigrade could you show us somersault right now [Laughter] [Applause] [Applause] [Laughter] [Applause] low Earth orbit is between 99 miles and 1200 miles away the moon is claimed to be two hundred and thirty-eight thousand miles away that’s a big difference this is the spacecraft that’s gonna take humans to explore the solar system it’s the next big step for NASA in exploration called the Orion multi-purpose crew vehicle or MPCV this next generation spacecraft will enable America to explore beyond low-earth man that NASA has is to build a rocket called SLS which is a heavy lift rocket it’s something that is that is much bigger than what we have today and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board as well as Landers or other components to be it two destinations beyond Earth orbit right now we only can fly in Earth orbit that’s the farthest that we can go right now we only can fly in Earth orbit that’s the farthest that we can go in this new system that we’re building is gonna allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore so the moon Mars asteroids there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually the moon Mars the moon the moon the moon kinds of technologies that we’re testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going beyond low-earth orbit our goals of going beyond low-earth orbit a set of crewed flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit [Music] it was all recorded on these telemetry tapes so where is this hard evidence I haven’t seen anything that indicates the kilometer II data is even an existence and as I said even if we had it we don’t have the machines to play it back but you’re you your own researchers show the telemetry data is missing that’s right could this be true mankind’s first interplanetary exploration and the original science data is missing if it’s anywhere it should be here at NASA’s Goddard Space Center in Maryland home to the national space science data archives Tim you’re making man what is it this is this is a film trying to prove that Apollo 11 happened I just have an AI mean do you have you have a name for it yet or you okay did we go did we go okay okay doesn’t have it either this was so right as an ad right right right we’ve been unable to track it down I mean we don’t know where this this telemetry data ended up and we don’t know the what what path it may have taken so unfortunately I’m afraid I can’t really give you much of a clue as to as to where this data ended up and whether it still exists or not [Music] mr. look at the supposed to images provided from NASA of Jupiter here’s the problem again 2016 2014 what’s the difference here no difference is they how did the supposed Aurora’s on the North it’s nothing but a Christmas tree give me a break take a look here mean all the clouds from the same exact position just in 2016 images a bit will take darker it’s a bit lighter in 2014 here’s a side by side if you can’t see what’s taking place or if NASA nothing more than faker to me give me a break this is completely an insult you have to be brain your head [Music] so I keep digging a little bit deeper and I finally get underneath this cloud cover here and a few images pop up I sell they were just really well this we got which I’m sure that looks familiar to you right looks just like the pictures they give us a Mars so I’m just kinda creeping around here and definitely notice in the same kind of undulation changes and same kind of rock same kind of dirt only thing it’s missing is that nice of a red tint that they ate take somebody hundred fifty two thousand dollars a year to put on there whose owner covers this okay that looks like an assistant well let’s do a little further because I can’t really see anything on here then NASA simple I can’t read that track cameras set up dance ATVs who have been there a while it’s not a one-day trip tennis setup no we’re in Greenland another ATV the left-wing bubbler equipment so I keep kind of going through here and yeah so I think I found out what Mars is guys it’s just 5,000 miles north of me not quite the distance and essences I can’t find anybody who’s in charge this must be hiding behind these rocks oh no they’re there I’m friendly with my standard lovely number one number two number three thinks his travel around taking pictures [Music] Simmons job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture [Music] um it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlight so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat looks kind of flat looks kind of flat or the clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world [Music] lish in reading too much but I’ve since grown out of that and I enjoy reading now and I played a lot of sports and all of that happened at a little town called York Maine across the United States from where we’re talking to you right now us the United States from where we’re talking to you right now boss the United States from where we’re talking to you right now [Laughter] and that enlist the help of a friend thanks you might know ladies and gentlemen if you didn’t figure out by now I’m gonna be the first man to actually tell you this that teleportation is officially real we are live in the ISS and let’s go back and relook at that clip again you see it now watch whoa wait see this ladies and gentlemen should let you know that this is only done through the usage of chroma key this is chroma key technology this is green screen or blue screen technology that’s what is being utilized here this is simply virtual reality that is actually being fed to you and you’re taking this virtual reality making it the reality when in fact all this is is simply just virtual CGI computer generated images them so you decide for yourself if we have the technology to build the space station and have people go and live in the space station for months and months at a time and they are they’re constantly reporting back to earth the things that they are finding there then the question is why go through all this trouble as far as taking the space station itself why go through the trouble of making these people in space who are supposed to be the astronauts who are in space and of their arms disappear from the screen just like that why have that why go through all the trouble so this video is an astronaut explaining the mission it’s not like practice footage or anything watch closely [Music] dan said in the pilot seat during this operation sort of monitoring the motion of the vehicle making sure that it was steady and that the you know there were very few vibrations of any sort here’s a picture of the inset actually being deployed from the spacecraft you can see that the deploy went very smoothly at that moment did you see it in the background there was a guy in the background man I’m not kidding you did you can’t deny that that’s someone in the background there’s a guy moving in the background here and watch it again watch it closely I looked up or I tried to lock up the size of this rocket I found his picture you can see it’s massive so if that rocket is in space and if there’s a guy in the background in that footage that means that there are like giants like insane big giants floating around in space looking at NASA that’s pretty that’s probably why they don’t dare to go back to the moon and why they hide so much stuff space is full of giants and explore 130 2,900 feet per second altitude now I know I got my downrange distance 7r huh this is not standard this is not something that is planned of course I can see a solid rocket booster has broken away from shuttle Challenger that’s what you’re looking at in the middle of your screen I cannot see the shuttle itself in 1986 the shuttle Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after takeoff killing all seven astronauts insanity or did it it turns out that six of the seven are still alive and kicking today Ellison Onizuka claims to be his identical twin brother Claude yeah I’ve got an identical twin brother Claude do the Challenger pilot Mickey Smith hasn’t even bothered changing his name he’s now professor Michael J Smith of University of Wisconsin now Christa McAuliffe was a bit of a sneaky one she was the Challenger payload specialist quite famous for being a teacher it turns out during her astronaut days she was using her middle name Christa and now all she goes by her first name Sharon and she’s a Sorak whose law professor the Challenger commander Frances Richards scoby is now on dick Scobee who sounds like a rather unpleasant disease CEO of housing fees limited Judith Resnik the Challenger mission specialist again hasn’t even bothered changing her name she’s a professor at Yale Law and finally Ronald McNair another challenger mission specialist claims be is identical twin brother Carl McNair [Music] in the first round and white is flying at 17,000 miles per hour 200 miles above the earth okay if the spacesuit fails the difference in pressure will kill him instantly this could be a serious problem because you don’t want your stop-motion toy to die in space as white floats in space a glove drifts out of the capsule oh so garden glove you’re telling me there’s an astronaut in space with no glove and a fair hand exposed and what blew it away the wind today those pictures are are classic they’re still overpowering today to realize number one has been done and that we did it it blew me away how easy it was to deceive everyone it was quite easy actually we all know nASA uses wired and sometimes we’ll catch them like this here the guy I pulled on his wire however some days when you’re filming my things just don’t work out and it becomes so blatantly obvious it’s ridiculous so in this clip they’re talking live feed and what you know we have hey astronaut Tobias in the background obviously trying to give it a more realistic Spacey station busy effect the only problem is the camera that was supposed to mess this harness out or the video feed is not working and so we see the guy come flying along in a harness on his wires pretty amazing but that’s not all that goes wrong here channel in 3d space it’s virtual reality he’s they’re wearing argumented contact lenses so that they can interact with these 3d objects now in this scene the guy on the left and the green shirt he thinks he sees an object in 3d space is being broadcast to him so he grabs it NE puts it off to the side he’s looking straight ahead because he’s looking at an object rotating in front of him but the video channel is down that is supposed to show the viewers what we’re supposed to see and so we don’t actually get to see the object that he has seen and I would just sum this up as a very terrible bad horrible day for NASA doing my feet as much fun as this was there is a time coming when you and I will not be able to tell the difference [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] now I know what you’re thinking so NASA is fake big deal how does this affect me blah blah blah or you’re thinking no no there’s no way my heroes could be lying to me there’s no way that this whole world is in on this big scam this is just too much and that’s what I would have thought too but here is what they are hiding and why NASA form in the first place pay attention federal bird you’ve been to both the North Pole and the South Pole is there any unexplored land left on this earth that might appeal to adventurous young Americans oh yes there is and that up around the North Pole because it’s getting crowded up there now because they find out it’s really usable not only to live in but militarily but strangely enough that is left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by human being and that’s beyond the pole on the other side of the South Pole from middle America and it’s I think it’s quite astonishing that there should be an area as big as that unexplored was the tremendous oil is a lot of adventure left down at the bottom of the world a number of expeditions that will follow I think year after year bottom of the world because the government has really become interested I tell you one reason they’re interested it’s by far the most valuable important place left in the world for science that’s where the scientific groups all over the nation are really interested but more important than that it’s it has to do with the future of the nation those to come after us or even during your lifetime because it happens to be an untouched reservoir of natural resources you know as the world shrinks with an ever increasing acceleration far-flung places once useless like we thought the North Pole was and no-man’s land become very useful a the bottom of the world will be important not only to us but to our allies then it’s the most peaceful place in the world I’m sure that won’t last very long what are the natural resources there well a we found enough of coal within 180 miles of the South Pole in a great region Mountain it’s not covered as snow enough to supply the whole world for quite a while well and that’s that’s the coal now there’s evidence of other many other minerals we have pretty sure of this oil now that call shows the bottom of the world now by far the coldest spot in the world where that coal is gets a hundred below zero in the weather well where’s lunch tropical so we think there’s oil there and there’s evidence probably uranium there is it any secret is there uranium there that would be the only thing it would be practical to actually go after I suppose everything else would be economically unfeasible wouldn’t it well as really recklessly expend their resources the time common we can we’ll have to go after that stuff down there well Admiral Byrd our private expedition is a thing of the past is that his expedition and exploration making expedition exploration now a purely a government function because I think them South it may be more or less a thing of the past but not other other expeditions and go there a lot I’m going off now there the North Pole is the sound of an ocean 10,000 feet deep the South Pole the scent of a plateau 10,000 feet high [Music]