Select Page

44 Government Documents Prove Flat Earth

44 Government Documents Prove FLAT EARTH

Transcript

Anthony Skaar Moochie is a Trump advisor and he went on CNN and made an of

himself on the issue of climate science overwhelmingly census in the scientific community is that presented actions have

an impact on science race oh yeah I was interacting world and whenever it comes out creo had Chris there was an

overwhelming science that the earth was flat and there was an overwhelming sign learned over the time the Senate we were

the center of the world a hundred percent you know we get a lot of things wrong in the scientific community you

and I both know that no that’s called not science geocentrism to there was an

overwhelming signs have you believe no that wasn’t a scientific belief that was a belief that wasn’t scientific that was

a belief there’s a difference there’s a difference hello my name is Nathan Roberts thanks for tuning in to flat

earth doctrine I appreciate you being here please do subscribe if you haven’t yet done so though do not count on my

social media account always being active it’s at one point in time sometime in the future YouTube because it is censoring

flattered specifically you will not be able to find my account it will be gone because of YouTube so as a result to

stay in contact with me once all that goes down please go to my website flat

earth doctrine calm and you’ll see a pop-up appear on the web page please

provide your email address so that when things go down where I’m censored completely we will be able to stay in

contact through email so let’s go ahead and dive into these documents I’m here

to share with you 44 different documents from the government swear by they admit the earth is flat documents from the CIA

USSR US Army NASA Federal Aviation Administration the FFA US Navy national

imagery and mapping agency National geospatial intelligence agency and the US Marine Corps which

includes state-owned universities such as UCLA Penn State and Shang yang aerospace

university government admits Flat Earth document number one put out by the CIA

whereby it looks like they stole it from the USSR and this document was created

appears to be sometime around March of 1957 and you’ll notice that in the

bottom left-hand corner and you’ll see the title of the document the author if there is one cited unless there’s a ton

of them and I’m not gonna list them all and then you have the URL of this document so if you want to go download it yourself you were able to and when I

go through these documents themselves you’ll see on the bottom right-hand corner is the page number where you can

find these these phrases and words cited so beginning with page 19 of 104 this

dissertation there’s the brightness of the firmament the firmament is a biblical term which

is a just mentioned in Genesis chapter one eight different times and beginning with verse six and the firmament is is

was made to divide and separate the waters from above from below as well as

the Sun Moon and stars are placed within the firmament so please go reread

Genesis chapter one the firmament is also mentioned on page 20 also a near

Sun which means localized Sun is mentioned and it talks about the

brightness of the first order and derived on the assumption of a Flat Earth and giving some conclusions

derived on the basis of this formula so the formula is based upon the assumption of a Flat Earth there’s a near Sun and

there’s a firmament apparently government admits Flat Earth document

number two propagation of electromagnetic fields over Flat Earth you’ll notice it on page seven it says

flat idealized Earth on page 17 Flat Earth page 18 Flat Earth

page 28 Flat Earth page 35 Flat Earth government admits

Flat Earth document number three from the US Army titled an energy budget

model to calculate the low atmosphere profiles of effective Sound speed at night there’s an image in the document

where it shows a near and localised Sun crepuscular rays and a flat earth and

that again is on page 10 and then if you go to page 16 you see the word Flat

Earth government admits Flat Earth document number 4 put out by the United

States Army titled computationally efficient algorithms for estimating the

angle of arrival of helicopters using acoustic arrays let’s see what it has to

say on page 17 it says Flat Earth page

30 Flat Earth model page 31 Flat Earth

page 35 a flat earth government admits

flatter document number 5 this one is from United States Army titled adding liquid payloads effects to the 6 DOF

trajectory of spinning projectiles see what it has to say on page 7 says assume

a Flat Earth these equations assume a flat earth government admits Flat Earth

document number 6 this is put out by the United States Army in fact it’s the same author as document number 5 gene R

Cooper and in fact the title is almost eerily the same though what we’ll find

is that he didn’t make any Corrections for assuming a Flat Earth but let’s read

the title trajectory prediction of spin-stabilized projectiles with a steady liquid payload what does it say

page 10 it says these equations assume a Flat Earth

why would you assume a Flat Earth if you’re on a spinning ball govern

admits Flat Earth document number seven put out by NASA in August of 1988

derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model what does it have to say

let’s see here well starting with page six it says this report details the development of the

linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non

rotating earth it goes on to say on the same page by defining the initial conditions of the nominal trajectory for

straight in level flight and setting the asymmetric aerodynamic and inertia terms

to zero one can easily obtain the more traditional linear models from the linear model derived in this report on

page 35 it says this report derives and defines a set of linearized system

matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying in a stationary

atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth on page 55 it says based on

assumptions of symmetric mass distributions symmetric aerodynamics and straight in level flight and then on

page 102 this report documents the derivation and definition of a linear

aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non

rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 8 put out by NASA

titled general equations of motion for a damaged asymmetric aircraft and on page

2 it states in this paper the rigid body

equations of motion over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat

Earth document number 9 put out by NASA titled predicted performance of a thrust

enhanced sr-71 aircraft with an external payload this has put out in June of 1997

and it states non rotating earth right there page 10 and this this sr-71

blackbird has a top speed of 2,100 93 miles per hour and it doesn’t have to

account for a rotation of the earth the Coriolis effect the alleged Coriolis effect or even the curvature of the

earth at 2193 miles per hour certainly

would have to if it existed unless it was flying over a flat non rotating

earth government emits flat earth document number 10 put out by the Federal Aviation Administration in

conjunction with company named MIT re it’s derivation of a point mass aircraft

model used for fast time simulation this is from April 2015

says assuming a flat non rotating earth page 7 government admits Flat Earth

document number 11 put up by NASA in conjunction with the University of Kansas they contracted kayuu to do this

work with with them and it was put out June of 1971 it is titled a method for

reducing the sensitivity of optimal nonlinear systems to parameter uncertainty let’s see what has to say

page 14 it says the idealizing assumptions made are the following

number two is a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document

number twelve put out by NASA it is titled calculation of wind compensation

for launching of unguided rockets and on page eight and 10 we have a diagram as

well as it states the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat

non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by

NASA December of 1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to

derive linear aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft

flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating or

government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by NASA December of

1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to derive linear

aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft flying in a

stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat

Earth document number 14 put up by NASA in 1988 in fact it looks like to be an updated version from the document number

13 that I just went over same authors and almost the same exact if not same exact title which is user’s manual for

interactive linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it

states on page four equations with stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions same thing as

in document 13 same authors basically same title they didn’t make any adjustment going onto page 126 it states

the same thing stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions doesn’t look like they made a mistake

with that documentation their government admits Flat Earth document number 15 put

out by NASA this was put out in March of 1972 and it’s titled determination of

angles of attack and side slip from radar data and a roll stabilized platform what does it have to say well

page two it states the method is limited however to application where a flat non

rotating earth may be assumed if it’s limited to that assumption and the earth

is a spinning ball then this document is garbage unless the earth is truly flat

and non rotating government admits Flat Earth document number 16 put up by NASA

it’s titled US standard atmosphere what does it have to say well on page 22 it says for the

accuracy required in this document it suffices to treat the surface as an

ellipsoid whose flattening ellipticity that means they had to flatten the globe

why would you have to do that for accuracy maybe because the earth is government admits flatter document

number 17 put out by NASA in December of 1991 titled an aircraft model for the

AIAA controls design challenge and what does it have to say on page 13 it states

the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a

flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document number 18 put

out by NASA this was in December of 1978 titled investigation of aircraft landing

in variable wind fields and what does it have to say on page 14 it states the

aircraft trajectory model employed in this study was derived based on the following assumptions a the earth is

flat and non rotating government admits

flatter document number 19 put up by NASA titled a mathematical model of the CH – 53 helicopter and its states on

page 25 the helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with

respect to a flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document

number 20 put out by NASA titled development and validation of a piloted simulation of a helicopter and external

sling load well what does it have to say well on page six it states a general set

of nonlinear rigid body equations of motion for both the helicopter and external load determines the motion of

each vehicle with respect to a flat non rotating earth it states on page 37 the

equations of motion for both the helicopter and the external sling load are developed in body axes with respect

to a flat non rotating earth on page 48 it states the terrain is generally flat

government admits Flat Earth document number 21 put out by NASA and the US Air

Force in conjunction with research provided by Georgia Tech and it is and

it is titled atmospheric oscillations what does it

have to say well on page 13 it states a model frequently used is that of a flat

non rotating earth also States the most one can profitably simplify the problem

is to consider an isothermal atmosphere plane level surfaces and a non rotating

earth government admits flat earth document number 20 to put out by NASA

titled stability and control estimation flight test results for the sr-71

aircraft with externally mounted experiments and what does it have to say

well it states on page 18 and 19 if you put them together because there’s a

break in the paragraph it states these equations assume a rigid vehicle and a

flat non rotating earth not very safe for a vehicle that travels at a top

speed of 2000 193 miles per hour government admits Flat Earth document

number 23 put out by NASA in May of 1988 titled flight testing a V s tol aircraft

to identify a full envelope aerodynamic model and it states motion over a flat

non rotating earth page 9 of 18 government admits flatter document

number 24 put out by NASA it is titled singular arc time optimal climb

trajectory of aircraft in a two dimensional wind field what does it have

to say it states on page two in our minimum time to climb problem the

aircraft is modeled as a point mass of the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non

rotating flat earth government admits flatter document number 25 this is put

out by the United States Navy and it is titled studies on instabilities in long baseline two-way satellite time and

frequency transfer including a troposphere delay model and what does it have to state it states on

page two it shows a graphic which shows two ground stations on equal level

ground both ground stations on the same flat plane and then on page six it states assuming a flat earth and the

straight line of sight line of sight just so you know line of sight does not

apparently exist when you’re looking over the earth and I’m gonna get to that in another document pretty soon

government admits Flat Earth document number 26 United States Army it is

titled scale and sensitive detection algorithm for FLI our imagery what does

it have a state it states that in other scenarios only the range to the center

of the field of view and depressions angle is known so that a flat earth approximation provides the best estimate

that is page 6 of 22 government admits Flat Earth document number 27 put on it

again by the United States Army and it is titled user manual for the microsoft

windows edition of the scanning fast field program version 3.0 what does it

have to stay well it says on page 45 and 47 this model works over a flat and non

turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth document number 28 put out by

the United States Army titled path loss measurements in a forested environment at VHF and what do we have to find in

here but it states on page 8 Flat Earth age 16 over a flat earth age 17 over

flat earth page 18 over flat earth page 19 over flat earth h20 based on Flat

Earth theory not a theory it’s fact page 23 over Flat Earth page 25 Flat

Earth page 26 Flat Earth page 35 over Flat Earth over Flat Earth stated

twice government admits Flat Earth document number 29 this is the US Air

Force who contracted Brown University to put forth the docking

titled review of sound propagation in the lower atmosphere documented in May

1955 so what does it say on page 18 it says in most of the topics to be

discussed the problem is to describe the sound field in a region of atmosphere

above a flat earth and then it goes on to cite and page 208 cite a document an

article that was written in 1954 in physica xx

and it is titled the extension of summer fields formula for the propagation of

radio waves over a flat earth two different conductivities of the soil so

you may want to research that one a little bit further government admits Flat Earth document number 30 put up

with the United States Army entitled beacon position and altitude navigation aided by a magnet meter and it states on

page 11 it says that the first is the

earth fixed coordinate system which is fixed to the earth with a flat earth

assumption and just check out the diagram that they have associated with it are you serious government admits

Flat Earth document number 31 put up by the United States Army and it is titled automatic target acquisition of the demo

3 program and it states on page 9 only

the range to the center of the field of view and the depression angle is known so that a Flat Earth approximation

provides the best estimate government admits Flat Earth document number 32 put

up by the United States Army and it is titled modeling of atmospheric effects

see what it’s got to say well I’m page 28 it states this model works well over

a flat earth and non turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth

document number 33 put out by NASA in conjunction with an organization called

range commander’s Council telemetry group the cumin is titled telemetry standards this

organization range commander’s council their mission is dedicated to serving the technical and operational needs of

us test training and operational ranges the RCC provides a framework where in

common needs are identified and common solutions are sought technical standards are established and disseminated joint

procurement opportunities are explored technical and equipment exchanges are facilitated advanced concepts and

technical innovations are assessed and potential applications are identified the vision is the range commits

commander’s Council RCC will promote credible change to meet Department of Defense DoD tests and training

requirements while promoting the common good of its members and enhance and enhance sharing and interoperability of

infrastructure and resources and so apparently I’ve got a lot more than just

NASA who they serve they just they serve the Department of Defense the Air Force the Navy the army that’s who’s at least

listed here so back to the document which is to telemetry standards on page

172 it states although the equations for the terrain model can be rather daunting

in its simplest form one uses flat earth trigonometry to compute the difference

in path lengths between the direct and reflected signals you don’t use flat

earth trigonometry if you’re on a globe government admits Flat Earth document

number 34 put out by NASA in conjunction with UCLA that’s right the University of California this was put out in 1993 and

it is titled approximate optimal guidance for the Advanced Launch System

and it states that the equations of motion for the 0th order problem of

flight in a vacuum over a flat earth are presented that’s

page 32 of 164 and then on page 43 of 164 it states in this section the

three-dimensional equations of motion are reduced for flight in a great circle

plane the the xz-plane over a flat non-rotating

earth and in further states below it says equations of motion representing

flight in a vacuum over a flat earth government in MIT’s Flat Earth document

number 35 put out by NASA and October 1995 and it is titled flight simulation

software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and it states on page 4 this

structured with both flat and oblique earth versions has successfully supported more than 50 different

aircraft apparently it also has a flat earth version and in most cases Flat

Earth six degree of freedom equations of motion are used why would that be unless

here at this flat government admits Flat Earth document number 36 put up by NASA and it

is titled simulator arrow model implementation on page 10 it states for

the flat non rotating earth considered here and why are we considering to build

a software over a flat earth to be used for trainings when the earth is a

spinning ball maybe the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document

number 37 this is Shen yang aerospace University which is affiliated with

obviously China and the title is design and implementation of flight visual

simulation system and on page three it states and I’m gonna read this entire thinks it’s very important to understand

mathematical modeling of flight simulation the aircraft flight motion simulation as an important part of fvss

directly affects the reliability and authenticity of the system flight motion simulation of effect can be greatly

improved by relative mathematical models of aircraft flight dynamics in this paper the fvss is based on two

assumptions a flight area is the space above ground level level where the

rotation of the earth and the curvy motion of mass center of Earth are

neglected meaning they don’t take it to an account at all for this flight

simulation software why would they do that if the earth is a spinning ball why

would you create software to train people how to fly on flat non rotating

earth software why because government

admits flat earth document number 38 this is put up by Penn State which is a public university so state-owned the title is a discussion

of methods of real-time airplane flight simulation and what does it have to say

about flight simulation well on page 11 estates flat earth coordinates and many

flight simulators globe navigation is not important in such cases it is

appropriate to model the earth as a plane half-space rather than an oblate

spheroid then the simulator need not worry about how the local horizontal plane changes as the airplane flies

around the earth though we know from other documentation all flight is straight and level this simplifies the

bookkeeping in the simulator considerably the Flat Earth coordinate system is a Cartesian system Flat Earth

model Thank You Penn State government admits Flat Earth document number 39 and

this is in conjunction with nad the National imagery and mapping agency as well as the national

geospatial-intelligence agency and the document is titled the American practical navigator an epitome of

navigation this is the 1995 edition alright so what does it have to say well

it states well one is water line how can water have a line if it’s always curving

maybe because it’s level in any case this assumes that the observer is at sea

level the earth is flat between observer and object there is no refraction in the

object and it’s water line form a right angle for most cases of practical

significance these assumptions produce no large errors or

rather in fact no errors at all and that’s found on page 351 of 7:14 and

then we also find that they have curvature of surface at point 8 foot per

nautical mile which does workout with what commonly is known as the earth

curvature calculation for the statute mile for the statute mile it’s point six

six six foot per statute mile for the

curvature of the surface but for nautical mile it does work out to 0.8 fluid per nautical mile for the

curvature of the surface so apparently they’re using the same spherical trigonometry that flat earthers are

using to prove that the earth is not a globe and that’s found on page 355 of

7:14 and then this definition I think was very interesting it’s called back

shore the part of a beach which is usually dry being reached only by the

highest tides and by extension a narrow strip of relatively flat Coast bordering

the C flat Coast page 573 and then we

also have line of sight now this is a very interesting definition line of sight the straight line between two

points which does not follow the curvature of the earth the only way that

this apparent definition works out would mean that you’re only looking up in the

sky never looking straight out over the plain of the earth because if you were

then you would be following the curvature of the earth thereby it’s no longer the line of sight

but we commonly say in my line of sight I can see such-and-such when you’re

looking straight over the earth apparently we’ve been using it incorrectly government admits Flat Earth

document number 40 put up by the United States Army in November of 1969 titled

the production of firing tables for cannon artillery ballistic research laboratory

in Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland and what is it state right off the get-go on

page ten ms l equals mean sea level what does sea level mean well sea level it is

the level of the sea surface used in reckoning the height of geographical

features such as hills and as a barometric standard and then what is the definition of level but a horizontal

plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point a position on a real or imaginary scale of

amount quantity extent or quality having a flat or and even surface without

slopes or bumps at the same height as someone or something else give a flat or

even surface to begin to fly horizontally after climbing or diving

that’s the word level that’s what is attributed with the word for sea level

the phrase sea level the word level is in there because water always seeks to

find its level and okay so now

interestingly in this document it does state on page 22 and 34 rotation of the

earth that phrase rotation of the earth is cited three times between pages 22

and 34 however an equation based on a theory particle theory is not a proof

for rotation of the earth for each of the three variables for the rotation of the earth in the theoretical equation

the number zero can be plugged in without negatively impacting the

entirety of the equation thus it’s just a variable that has no bearing within

the equation and here was an interesting graphic on page 110 it shows a horizontal range in meters on

the far right the one is chopped off somehow that happened but it’s 12,000

meters that represents seven point four five miles and would be representative

of 37 foot drop if the earth is a ball but earth curvature is not necessary for

calculating ballistic artillery they put it on a until range no curvature government

admits Flat Earth document number 41 put out again by the United States Army April 2016 titled Field Artillery manual

cannon gunnery what do they have to say well no rotation of the earth that is

standard conditions no rotation of the earth that’s on page 175 however it does

state on page 192 theory of rotational effects but we understand if we look at

the word theory in the definition it is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something especially

one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained about hypotheses thesis conjecture

supposition speculation postulation postulate proposition premise surmise

assumption presumption presupposition notion guess hunch feeling suspicions do

you understand that the idea of a theory in science with until it’s been proven

anyways it is simply a form of mysticism even potentially so this idea that they

want to throw in the rotational effects and this document has no bearing because they admit that is just a theory a

supposition a speculation a postulation it’s not a fact so and this is

interesting to the m198 howitzer has a maximum range of 14 miles that would be

a hundred and fifty seven feet of dropped from the alleged earth curvature that goes unaccounted for why why would

you not account for the alleged drop if you’re living on a ball because you don’t have to here at this flat

government emits Flat Earth document number 42 United States Army put out in

July of 2006 titled field artillery gunnery and I’m not gonna go through all

the document but I’m gonna summarize what is in here and you can check it for yourself concepts not discussed or

disclosed in the document Coriolis rotation of the earth sphere curve

or even the motion of the earth however the concept that is discussed is azimuth

and azimuth proves that you have to be on a ground plane flat no curvature for

an azimuth now this image was not in the document itself but the concept itself

is used throughout the document proving that it’s flat government admits Flat

Earth document number 43 and this time it’s the United States Marine Corps and it is titled TTP for the field artillery

cannon gunnery and what is a state the same thing is the document number 42

which I just covered the concepts that are not discussed in this document include Coriolis rotation of the earth

sphere curvature and motion of the earth however azimuth is is discussed again

the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document number 44 put up by the

United States Marine Corps entitled tactics techniques and procedures for the field artillery manual cannon

gunnery what’s interesting about this document is that it does go into great lengths of

stating the words and phrase rotation of the earth and Coriolis it says it one

two three four five six seven seven different times at least however it also states that the standard

conditions by which it operates or expects to be operating is no rotation

of the earth at all so why is there this contradiction so how do we reconcile the

difference an apparent contradiction of whether or not rotation of the earth or Coriolis needs to be taken into account

well number one other than the mention of the terms rotation of the earth and Coriolis there is absolutely no

instruction in the documentation for how to account for the rotation of the earth so why is that number two the rotation

of the earth is a theory and just as in the quote equation cited in the u.s. army document report number thirteen

seventy one entitled the production of firing tables and for cannon artillery which was document number

it allows for the variable of alleged rotation of the earth to be zero leaving

the entirety of the equation unaffected and it is the same with this documentation produced by the United

States Marine Corps and if you’re interested in looking at document number

40 again one more time you can pause this this is for your help and research a little bit more right

here or you can just go to the document itself and check it for yourself but I’m gonna move on now what is discussed in

the document is azimuth and we understand that only works on a ground

level plane flat no curvature so I rest

my case the earth is flat so in the photo you see this curvature of Earth’s

surface Wow he’s in space look at that no he’s not at that point you don’t see you don’t

see the curvature of the earth if you are two millimeters above this beach ball he just don’t that stuff is what a

quick shout out to pasture Dean Hodel who was the first to expose many of these documents on June 10th 2018 if you

want to check out his website you can go to WWE know tool org and there’s also a

conference coming up and that is October 2nd through the 4th of 2019 and Auburn

Alabama if you would like to register assuming there’s still space for it which actually there is no space but if

there is space or room rather for the event you can go to Skyfall 2019 org and

register nearly everyone interested in space has seen this picture it was

released by NASA and has the iconic name the Blue Marble 2 you can find the

picture everywhere but one of the best places to find it is NASA’s own website

this photograph is iconic because NASA says it is one of the most detailed

true-color images of the entire Earth to date to put it in a nutshell the picture

is iconic well amazingly it turns out a number of sleuths have now found compelling new

evidence that the image is indeed a fake now let’s take a look at first the photo

seems legit I mean it looks like earth the earth that we have always been told

we live on but as the Savi Internet sleuths point out if you take a closer

look things start to take a somewhat sinister turn look closely at the

repeating cloud pattern here we can see clear examples that the photograph has

not only been doctored or constructed but also strong evidence that whoever

done the doctoring used repeating photographic templates that is they

cloned parts of the image and repeated it that is the photograph is a construction this does not happen in

nature clouds do not repeat in the same pattern like this the chances of this

happening in the same photograph are low the only way this could happen is if

someone has cloned clouds and painted them on this of course could be for a

number of reasons you could argue that NASA simply touched up the photograph or effect or that it was a problem with the

imaging systems that were used but still the question exists why is NASA

releasing fake pictures of Earth if they are going to release a picture of Earth to be used in museums and by educators

as they state for the blue marble – then should they not release real images of

Earth instead or manipulated or fake images since the natural extension of

this is what other images have they doctored the moon pluton Mars maybe all

of them and if they are faking pictures to such an extent whether by wanting them to look better or other reasons

then what real scientific value are they isn’t science about finding the truth and is that not hard to do when you are

being fed and accurate or in this case completely manufactured data NASA says

these images are to be used by educators museums and scientists which means they

are passing off the image as a real picture of Earth when it is not what do you guys think do you think

something sinister is going on or is there some harmless and less exotic reason there are great ideas

undiscovered breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truths

protective layers

then in 2002 Blue Marble 2.0 NASA’s Rob

simin made this and it had wide appeal – for example it ended up as the default background on the iPhone I didn’t even

know until I bought an iPhone and turned it on and kind of did a little happy

dance Simmonds job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of

datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture the to us the really cool thing was the

data set up until that point there was no realistic color map of the globe

anywhere so the land layer here comes from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer aboard Terra and the

tricky part here was the weather so we actually had to take clouds out they stashed the clouds for later went onto

the ocean that came from an instrument that measures phytoplankton in the sea where it was low I colored it dark blue

because they’re low mostly in mid oceans and then where’s a little bit higher it was like a little bit brighter green then add the clouds back in there’s a

small problem with it because there’s a very slight gap in between each orbit so

some of those are painted on it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of

simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlights so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water

those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat or the

clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world

what I imagined it to be unfortunately I’m not an astronaut I’ve never been to space but I’ve looked

at these images over and over again trying to sort of get the essence of it

you [Music]

[Applause] [Music]

[Music]

ha I know ranking centigrade could you show us somersault right now

[Laughter] [Applause]

[Applause]

[Laughter]

[Applause]

low Earth orbit is between 99 miles and 1200 miles away

the moon is claimed to be two hundred and thirty-eight thousand miles away that’s a big difference this is the

spacecraft that’s gonna take humans to explore the solar system it’s the next

big step for NASA in exploration called the Orion multi-purpose crew vehicle or MPCV this next generation spacecraft

will enable America to explore beyond low-earth man that NASA has is to build

a rocket called SLS which is a heavy lift rocket it’s something that is that is much bigger than what we have today

and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board as well as

Landers or other components to be it two destinations beyond Earth orbit right

now we only can fly in Earth orbit that’s the farthest that we can go right now we only can fly in Earth orbit

that’s the farthest that we can go in this new system that we’re building is gonna allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar

system to explore so the moon Mars asteroids there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building

these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually the moon Mars the moon the moon the moon

kinds of technologies that we’re testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going

beyond low-earth orbit our goals of going beyond low-earth orbit a set of crewed flights will test and prove the

systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit [Music]

it was all recorded on these telemetry tapes so where is this hard evidence I

haven’t seen anything that indicates the kilometer II data is even an existence

and as I said even if we had it we don’t have the machines to play it back but you’re you your own researchers show the

telemetry data is missing that’s right could this be true mankind’s first

interplanetary exploration and the original science data is missing if it’s

anywhere it should be here at NASA’s Goddard Space Center in Maryland home to

the national space science data archives Tim you’re making man what is it this is

this is a film trying to prove that Apollo 11 happened I just have an AI mean do you have you have a name for it yet or you okay did we go did we go okay

okay doesn’t have it either this was so

right as an ad right right right we’ve been unable to track it down I mean we

don’t know where this this telemetry data ended up and we don’t know the what

what path it may have taken so unfortunately I’m afraid I can’t really give you much of a clue as to as to

where this data ended up and whether it still exists or not [Music]

mr. look at the supposed to images provided from NASA of Jupiter here’s the

problem again 2016 2014 what’s the difference here no difference is they

how did the supposed Aurora’s on the North it’s nothing but a Christmas tree

give me a break take a look here mean all the clouds from the same exact

position just in 2016 images a bit will take darker it’s a bit lighter in 2014

here’s a side by side if you can’t see what’s taking place or if NASA nothing

more than faker to me give me a break this is completely an insult you have to be brain your head [Music]

so I keep digging a little bit deeper and I finally get underneath this cloud cover here and a few images pop up I

sell they were just really well this we got which I’m sure that looks familiar to you right looks just like the

pictures they give us a Mars so I’m just kinda creeping around here and definitely notice in the same kind of

undulation changes and same kind of rock same kind of dirt only thing it’s missing is that nice of a red tint that

they ate take somebody hundred fifty two thousand dollars a year to put on there

whose owner covers this okay that looks like an assistant well let’s do a little

further because I can’t really see anything on here then NASA simple

I can’t read that track cameras set up dance ATVs who have been there a while

it’s not a one-day trip tennis setup

no we’re in Greenland another ATV the left-wing bubbler

equipment so I keep kind of going through here and yeah so

I think I found out what Mars is guys it’s just 5,000 miles north of me

not quite the distance and essences I can’t find anybody who’s in charge this must be hiding behind these rocks oh no

they’re there I’m friendly with my standard lovely number one number two

number three thinks his travel around taking pictures

[Music]

Simmons job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of

datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture

[Music] um it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has

to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s

called the specular highlight so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just

slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat looks kind of flat looks kind of flat or the

clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world

[Music]

lish in reading too much but I’ve since grown out of that and I enjoy reading now and I played a lot of sports and all

of that happened at a little town called York Maine across the United States from where we’re talking to you right now us

the United States from where we’re talking to you right now boss the United States from where we’re talking to you right now

[Laughter]

and that enlist the help of a friend thanks you might know ladies and

gentlemen if you didn’t figure out by now I’m gonna be the first man to actually tell you this that teleportation is officially real we are

live in the ISS and let’s go back and relook at that clip again you see it now

watch whoa wait see this ladies and gentlemen should let you know that this

is only done through the usage of chroma key this is chroma key technology this is

green screen or blue screen technology that’s what is being utilized here this

is simply virtual reality that is actually being fed to you and you’re taking this virtual reality making it

the reality when in fact all this is is simply just virtual CGI computer

generated images them so you decide for yourself if we have the technology to

build the space station and have people go and live in the space station for months and months at a time and they are

they’re constantly reporting back to earth the things that they are finding there then the question is why go

through all this trouble as far as taking the space station itself why go through the trouble of making these

people in space who are supposed to be the astronauts who are in space and of their arms disappear from the screen

just like that why have that why go through all the trouble so this video is an astronaut

explaining the mission it’s not like practice footage or anything watch closely

[Music] dan said in the pilot seat during this

operation sort of monitoring the motion of the vehicle making sure that

it was steady and that the you know there were very few vibrations of any

sort here’s a picture of the inset actually being deployed from the

spacecraft you can see that the deploy went very smoothly at that moment did

you see it in the background there was a guy in the background man I’m not kidding you did

you can’t deny that that’s someone in the background there’s a guy moving in the background here and watch it again

watch it closely I looked up or I tried to lock up the

size of this rocket I found his picture you can see it’s massive so if that

rocket is in space and if there’s a guy in the background in that footage that

means that there are like giants like insane big giants floating around in

space looking at NASA that’s pretty that’s probably why they don’t dare to

go back to the moon and why they hide so much stuff space is full of giants and

explore 130 2,900 feet per second altitude now I know I got my downrange distance 7r huh this is not standard

this is not something that is planned of course I can see a solid rocket booster has broken away from shuttle Challenger

that’s what you’re looking at in the middle of your screen I cannot see the shuttle itself in 1986 the shuttle

Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after takeoff killing all seven astronauts insanity or did it

it turns out that six of the seven are still alive and kicking today Ellison

Onizuka claims to be his identical twin brother Claude yeah I’ve got an

identical twin brother Claude do the Challenger pilot Mickey Smith

hasn’t even bothered changing his name he’s now professor Michael J Smith of

University of Wisconsin now Christa McAuliffe was a bit of a sneaky

one she was the Challenger payload specialist quite famous for being a teacher it turns out during her

astronaut days she was using her middle name Christa and now all she goes by her

first name Sharon and she’s a Sorak whose law professor the Challenger

commander Frances Richards scoby is now on dick Scobee who sounds like a rather

unpleasant disease CEO of housing fees limited Judith Resnik the Challenger

mission specialist again hasn’t even bothered changing her name she’s a professor at Yale Law and finally Ronald

McNair another challenger mission specialist claims be is identical twin

brother Carl McNair [Music]

in the first round and white is flying at 17,000 miles per

hour 200 miles above the earth okay

if the spacesuit fails the difference in pressure will kill him instantly this

could be a serious problem because you don’t want your stop-motion toy to die in space as white floats in space a

glove drifts out of the capsule oh so garden glove you’re telling me there’s

an astronaut in space with no glove and a fair hand exposed and what blew it

away the wind today those pictures are are classic they’re

still overpowering today to realize number one has been done and that we did

it it blew me away how easy it was to deceive everyone it was quite easy

actually we all know nASA uses wired and sometimes we’ll catch them like this here the guy I pulled on his wire

however some days when you’re filming my things just don’t work out and it

becomes so blatantly obvious it’s ridiculous so in this clip they’re talking live

feed and what you know we have hey astronaut Tobias in the background

obviously trying to give it a more realistic Spacey station busy effect the

only problem is the camera that was supposed to mess this harness out or the video feed is not working and so we see

the guy come flying along in a harness on his wires pretty amazing but that’s

not all that goes wrong here

channel in 3d space it’s virtual reality he’s they’re wearing argumented contact

lenses so that they can interact with these 3d objects now in this scene the guy on the left and the green shirt he

thinks he sees an object in 3d space is being broadcast to him so he grabs it NE

puts it off to the side he’s looking straight ahead because he’s looking at an object rotating in front of him but

the video channel is down that is supposed to show the viewers what we’re

supposed to see and so we don’t actually get to see the object that he has seen and I would just sum this up as a very

terrible bad horrible day for NASA doing my feet as much fun as this was there is

a time coming when you and I will not be able to tell the difference

[Music]

[Applause] [Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

now I know what you’re thinking so NASA is fake big deal how does this affect me

blah blah blah or you’re thinking no no there’s no way my heroes could be lying

to me there’s no way that this whole world is in on this big scam this is just too much and that’s what I would

have thought too but here is what they are hiding and why NASA form in the

first place pay attention federal bird you’ve been to both the North Pole and the South

Pole is there any unexplored land left on this earth that might appeal to

adventurous young Americans oh yes there is and that up around the North Pole because it’s getting crowded up there

now because they find out it’s really usable not only to live in but militarily but strangely enough that is

left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by human being and that’s beyond

the pole on the other side of the South Pole from middle America

and it’s I think it’s quite astonishing that

there should be an area as big as that unexplored was the tremendous oil is a lot of adventure left down at the bottom

of the world a number of expeditions that will follow I think year after year bottom of the

world because the government has really become interested I tell you one reason

they’re interested it’s by far the most valuable important place left in the

world for science that’s where the scientific groups all over the nation are really interested

but more important than that it’s it has to do with the future of the nation

those to come after us or even during your lifetime because it happens to be

an untouched reservoir of natural resources you know as the world shrinks

with an ever increasing acceleration far-flung places once useless like we

thought the North Pole was and no-man’s land become very useful a the bottom of

the world will be important not only to us but to our allies then it’s the most

peaceful place in the world I’m sure that won’t last very long what are the

natural resources there well a we found enough of coal within

180 miles of the South Pole in a great region Mountain it’s not covered as snow

enough to supply the whole world for quite a while well and that’s that’s the

coal now there’s evidence of other many other minerals we have pretty sure of

this oil now that call shows the bottom of the world now by far the coldest spot

in the world where that coal is gets a hundred below zero in the weather well where’s lunch tropical so we think

there’s oil there and there’s evidence probably uranium there is it any secret

is there uranium there that would be the only thing it would be practical to actually go after I suppose everything

else would be economically unfeasible wouldn’t it well as really recklessly

expend their resources the time common we can we’ll have to go after that stuff down there well Admiral Byrd

our private expedition is a thing of the past is that his expedition and exploration making expedition

exploration now a purely a government function because I think them South it

may be more or less a thing of the past but not other other expeditions and go

there a lot I’m going off now there the North Pole is the sound of an ocean 10,000 feet deep the South Pole the

scent of a plateau 10,000 feet high [Music]

Government Documents Prove FLAT EARTH

ALL the governments on the face of the earth are controlled by Satan, he has deceived the entire world (Revelation 12:9). Just as it was foretold in the following three passages we now are able to clearly see who the enemy is and his inequities.

“For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.” Luke 8:17 (KJV)

“But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” Daniel 12:4 (KJV)

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” Romans 1:18-22 (KJV)

(1) Dissertations Defended in the Scientific Council of the Institute of Physics of the Earth
Pages: 19, 20
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3.pdf

(2) Propagation of Electromagnetic Fields Over Flat Earth
Pages: Cover Page, 7, 17, 18, 28, 35
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TR-2352.pdf

(3) An Energy Budget Model to Calculate the Low Atmosphere Profiles of Effective Sound Speed at Night
Pages: 10, 16
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-MR-563.pdf

(4) Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Estimating the Angle of Arrival of Helicopters Using Acoustic Arrays
Pages: 17, 30, 31, 35
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2009/ARL-TR-4998.pdf

(5) Adding Liquid Payloads Effects to the 6-DOF Trajectory of Spinning Projectiles
Page: 7
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-TR-5118.pdf

(6) Trajectory Prediction of Spin-Stabilized Projectiles With a Steady Liquid Payload
Page: 10
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2011/ARL-TR-5810.pdf

(7) Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model
Pages: 6, 35, 55, 102
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf

(8) General Equations of Motion for a Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf

(9) Predicted Performance of a ThrustEnhanced SR-71 Aircraft with an External Payload
Page: 10
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88507main_H-2179.pdf

(10) Derivation of a Point-Mass Aircraft Model used for Fast-Time Simulation
Page: 7
https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/publications/pr_15-1318-derivation-of-point-mass-aircraft-model-used-for-fast-time-simulation.pdf

(11) A Method for Reducing The Sensitivity of Optimal Nonlinear Systems to Parameter Uncertainty
Page: 14
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf

(12) Calculation of Wind Compensation for Launching of Unguided Rockets
Pages: 8, 10
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf

(13) User’s Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (2768)
Page: 16
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

(14) User’s Manual for LINEAR, a FORTRAN Program to Derive Linear Aircraft Models (2835)
Page: 4
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88112main_H-1443.pdf

(15) Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll-Stablized Platform
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

(16) U.S. Standard Atmosphere (1962)
Page: 22
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19630003300.pdf

(17) An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge
Page: 13
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

(18) Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields
Page: 14
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

(19) A Mathematical Model of the CH-53
Page: 25
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf

(20) The Development and Validation of a Piloted Simulation of a Helicopter and External Sling Load
Pages: 6, 37, 48
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005912.pdf

(21) Atmospheric Oscillations
Page: 13
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf

(22) Stability and Control Estimation Flight Test Results for the SR-71 Aircraft With Externally Mounted Experiments
Page: 19
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf

(23) Flight Testing a V/STOL Aircraft to Identify a Full-Envelope Aerodynamic Model
Page: 9
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf

(24) Singular Arc Time-Optimal Climb Trajectory of Aircraft in a Two-Dimensional Wind Field
Page: 2
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf

(25) STUDIES ON INSTABILITIES IN LONG-BASELINE TWO-WAY SATELLITE TIME AND FREQUENCY TRANSFER (TWSTFT) INCLUDING A TROPOSPHERE DELAY MODEL
Pages: 2, 6
https://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/2007papers/paper21.pdf

(26) Scale-Insensitive Detection Algorithm for FLIR Imagery
Page: 6
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2001/ARL-TN-175.pdf

(27) User Manual for the Microsoft Window Edition of the Scanning Fast-Field Program (WSCAFFIP) Version 3.0
Page: 45
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2003/ARL-TR-2696.pdf

(28) Path-Loss Measurements in a Forested Environment at VHF
Pages: 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 35
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-2156.pdf

(29) Review of Sound Propagation in the Lower Atmosphere
Page: 18, 208
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/067880.pdf

(30) Beacon Position and Attitude Navigation Aided by a Magnetometer
Page: 11
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2010/ARL-CR-650.pdf

(31) Automatic Target Acquisition of the DEMO III Program
Page: 9
http://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2002/ARL-TR-2683.pdf

(32) Modeling of Atmospheric Effects
Page: 13
https://www.arl.army.mil/arlreports/2000/ARL-TR-1812.pdf

(33) Telemetry Standards
Page: 172
http://www.irig106.org/docs/106-17/106-17_Telemetry_Standards.pdf

(34) Approximate Optimal Guidance for the Advanced Launch System
Page: 172
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

(35) Flight Simulation Software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Pages: 4, 10
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88380main_H-2052.pdf

(36) Simulator Aero Model Implementation
Page: 10
https://www.aviationsystemsdivision.arc.nasa.gov/publications/hitl/rtsim/Toms.pdf

(37) Design and Implementation of Flight Visual Simulation System
Page: 3
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.0365.pdf

(38) A Discussion of Methods of Real-Time Airplane Flight Simulation
Page: 11
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.510.7499&rep=rep1&type=pdf

(39) The American Practical Navigator: An Epitome of Navigation
Pages: 351, 355, 573, 636
http://geocenter.survey.ntua.gr/main/labs/carto/academic/persons/bnakos_site_nafp/documentation/american_practical_navigator.pdf

Doc #39 on page 11 of 714 states, “The earth is an oblate spheroid (a sphere flattened at the poles).” This statement is in direct contradiction to at least 5 different statements within the document itself:

————————–

Page 351 of 714 states, “This assumes that the observer is at sea level, the earth is flat between observer and object, there is no refraction, and the object and its waterline form a right angle. For most cases of practical significance, these assumption produce no large errors.”
1) Waterline, assumes the water has a FLAT line
2) “Earth is Flat between observer and object”

————————–

Page 355 of 714 states, “Curvature of surface _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = 0.8 foot per nautical mile”
3) If the earth was “flattened at the poles” then this calculation of the curvature is blatantly inaccurate, as the curvature of the surface of the earth would vary.

————————–

Page 574 of 714 states, “back shore, n. That part of a beach which is usually dry, being reached. Only by the highest tides, and by extension, a narrow strip of relatively flat coast boarding the sea. See also FORESHORE.”
4) How can the there exist a “flat coast” bordering the sea if the sea curves? It can’t.

————————–

Page 636 of 714 states, “line of sight. The straight line between two points, which does not follow the curvature of the earth.”
5) If the earth is a globe and curving in every direction downward from the observer, given the definition of “line of sight” it is impossible to achieve “line of sight” for every observation necessitates that it occurs over the “curvature of the earth”.

(40) The Production of Firing Tables for Cannon Artillery
Pages: 10, 22, 34, 110
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/826735.pdf

Doc #40 on pages 66 – 68 of 115 references “Rotation of Earth”:
1) Doc #40 does NOT account for curvature of earth
2) Doc #40 represents the “Rotation of Earth” in an equation for “particle theory”, whereby, when the numerical value of zero (0) is plugged in for the variable to account for the alleged rotation it does not negatively impact the rest of the equation and it is able to compute.

(41) Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery
Page: 175, 192
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/tc3_09x81.pdf

I should have done a better analysis on doc #41. Sorry about that, and now here it is. 

————————–

Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 48 of 664:
“3-55. If a round were fired in a vacuum, gravity would cause the projectile to return to the surface of the earth. The path or trajectory of the projectile would be simple to trace. All projectiles, regardless of size, shape, or weight, would follow paths of the same parabolic shape and would achieve the same range for a given muzzle velocity and quadrant elevation.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: The “parabolic shape” of the trajectory of the bullet is caused by density, not gravity or the alleged curvature of a spherically shaped earth.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 48 of 664:
3-57. Gravity causes a projectile in flight to fall to the earth. Because of gravity, the height of the projectile at any instant is less than it would be if no such force were acting on it. In a vacuum, the vertical velocity would decrease from the initial velocity to zero on the ascending branch of the trajectory and increase from zero to the initial velocity on the descending branch, Zero vertical velocity would occur at the summit of
the trajectory. For every vertical velocity value on the upward leg of the ascending branch there is an equal vertical velocity value downward on the descending branch. Since there would be no resistance to the forward motion of the projectile in a vacuum, the horizontal velocity component would be a constant. The acceleration caused by the force of gravity (9.81 m/s) affects only the vertical velocity.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: Gravity is an unproven theory, buoyancy is proven. Bullets fall because they are heavier than the medium they are within, that being the air.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 49 of 664:
“The standard (chart) range is the range opposite a given elevation in the firing tables. It is assumed to have been measured along the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth and passing through the muzzle of a weapon. For all practical purposes, standard range is the horizontal distance from the origin of the trajectory to the level point.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: IF “It is assumed to have been measured along the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth”, then why in the very next sentence does it state “For all practical purposes, standard range is the horizontal distance from the origin of the trajectory to the level point.”
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 51 of 664:
“Deflection effects. Some of the deviations from the standard conditions affecting deflection
are:
* Drift.
* Crosswind.
* Rotation of the earth.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: On page 192, “Rotation of the earth” is established as an “unproven theory”, which holds zero bearing in reality.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 132 of 664:
5-36. The third condition is valid met corrections considered by each of the firing platoons. This includes the met message valid for the firing platoon, propellant temperature, projectile weight, vertical interval, and corrections for earth rotation.

Nathan Roberts’s reply: On page 192, “Rotation of the earth” is established as an “unproven theory”, which holds zero bearing in reality.
————————–
Doc #41, “Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery”, page 186 of 664:
“Range (Column 1). This is the distance measured from the muzzle to the target on the surface of a sphere concentric with the earth. When chart range is used as the entry argument for this table, it is expressed to the nearest 10 meters and interpolation is necessary.”

Nathan Roberts’s reply: The same response given to “sphere concentric with earth” mentioned on page 49 applies here too.

(42) Field Artillery Gunnery
http://militarynewbie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/FM-3-09.8-FIELD-ARTILLERY-GUNNERY.pdf

(43) TTP for the Field Artillery Cannon Gunnery
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/usmc/mcwp/3-16-3/mcwp3-16-3.pdf

(44) Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the field artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery
https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/mcwp3_16_4.pdf

FLATLANDERS Episode 1: We See Too Far

FLATLANDERS Episode 1: We See Too Far

“The Bonneville Salt Flats are one of seven locations around the world where the curvature of the earth is purportedly visible to the naked eye.” –Bureau of Land Management, Utah

A group of researchers embark on a journey to test this claim. This is the first episode of a docuseries. Featuring experts: Ryan Walker, Sydney Silver, Daryle Marble, Robert Scott, David Hunt, Jay Tolan, Dr. Nyeng Gyang, Dan the Waterman, Rene Kalucea, and Shelley Lewis.

The Final Nail In The Coffin of the Helio-nonsensical Model

The Final Nail In The Coffin of the Helio-nonsensical Model

Transcript

in the coffin of the heliocentric model

I understand that you go through the

stages of grief when you realize that

you’ve been lied to

you’re gonna get you’re gonna feel angry

you’re gonna bargain you’re gonna do all

this stuff I understand this is the

absolute proof and you never have to say

another thing about it

and people get so mad I get it you’re

going through grief you’re mourning

grief ready when people forget is that

it’s not a circle around the Sun even if

it was a circle would still be

impossible but it’s an ellipse which

means that it changes speed it unlike

the evolution line where you can just

keep adding billions of years but the

billions and billions of years in the

but it’s one year that’s a fixed amount

of time and a fixed amount of speed the

earth their length of Earth’s

trajectories around the Sun is 940

million kilometers thus the earth

travels about a hundred and seven

thousand kilometers per hour this means

that our planet moves around the Sun at

an average speed of 30 km/s or Mach 8888

times the speed of sound just let that

sink in earth speed this is the this is

the kicker earth speed is not constant

as the Earth orbits elliptical orbit let

that sink in if you’re going 66,000

miles an hour and you change 1% of your

speed and in this model it’s

significantly more in the moment well

you ready to feel it no just listen it’s

a fixed amount of time it’s one year if

you’re uh if you change one percent

that’s 660 miles an hour that would that

would liquefy all flesh if you change

one mile an hour I I challenge you to

walk on a treadmill at one mile an hour

and tell a friend to randomly unplug it

you will trip and you will fall down I

challenge you to hold a coffee that’s

full to the brim as you drive down the

street at 60 miles an hour just tap on

the brake to go 59

the coffee will spill when you’re going

88 times the speed of sound and you have

to change speeds you would feel it now

even if the psychotic people going

through the stages and morning want to

sit there you go one now 2.97 you would

be able to measure it can’t have it both

ways guys not only would you you can do

the math on it because the ellipse is

fixed and the time is fixed one year and

you can check out the math of the

ellipse there’s a change of speed every

year at minimum went twice a year at

minimum the way that let’s work okay you

can break that down into any fraction

you want it’s still one fixed year not

only would you feel it it would kill you

but forget all that you could measure it

you can measure it and if you don’t

think you can measure a change in speed

you’re lying

look at a swimming pool look at any

water if you just go like this ripple

ripple ripple my labels open for ya it’s

over

guys this heliocentric model is over the

Earth changes speed going around the Sun

at Mach 88 and that’s why they sent in

Einstein and said it’s all relative no

it isn’t if you’re going 66,000 miles

per hour and there is any change

whatsoever in speed you would feel it

forget about thousand mile an hour spin

how that couldn’t you couldn’t operate a

plane or you couldn’t forget just this

is it you need no more explanation if

you’re going one not 66,000 one mile per

hour and it goes to zero from one you

would trip and listen I’m not here to

I’ve heard the arguments I hear the

argument all the time I could read you a

hundreds of them of cognitive dissonance

of people be like one of the biggest

things you’ll hear is anger they’re

going through the stages grief I don’t

know if you realize that that’s what it

is I deal with this all the time it’s

one reason why my banhammer is so

intense its grief they’ll get mad at me

they’ll say you don’t care you mean it’s

so easy to understand even an idiot

could lol I mean inertia time for text

that’s grief and then they’ll bargain

well it could be it could be that it’s

just cute and then depression well what

do we do now I mean my whole childhood

just stop it’s not that big a deal it’s

more beautiful than it isn’t spinning

endlessly around the Sun it’s way better

it’s just like and this is one of those

torpedoes that you can’t get around and

there’s people that spend their whole

day I think just trying to troll me and

just being like you sir it’s like how

dare you that’s 1% of speed change which

is it’s way more than that and in the

given ellipse in the given year you

can’t change the numbers the calendar

here is set the rotation is set so you

can’t do what they do in evolution say

well in 20 billion years you know a

hurricane can just create a Ferrari

no you can’t just keep adding years one

year one ellipse change in speed how do

you not measure it how do you not feel

it how do things that fall over we’re

talking about Mach 88 1% change would

liquefy all flash there’s more than 1%

change in speed in the given ellipse in

the given year in a given moment yes

also included is a plug for the grip now

he’s telling bugs the greatest app of

all time exposing the helio nonsensical

model the flattest Sun Moon and so da

clock app available at the App Store and

Google Play there it was there it was

had to do it

Is Antarctica The Key To Flat Earth? INFO WARS Reports

Is Antarctica The Key To Flat Earth? INFO WARS Reports

 
Transcript
in the age of social media censorship

questioning whether or not the earth is

a globe has been deemed harmful thought

but why is this we seem to be

conditioned to think that the issue has

been scientifically settled but this is

not the case our most popular scientists

recognize that the geocentric model

where the earth is at the center of the

universe is observably accurate Edwin

Hubble and Stephen Hawking went as far

as to say that they reject the

geocentric model not based on scientific

reasoning but rather because they find

the thought of being at the center of

the universe to be emotionally

disturbing physicist George Ellis stated

that you cannot disprove the geocentric

model you can only exclude it on

philosophical grounds the Michelson

Morley experiment in the 1880s proved

the earth was stationary an Albert

Einstein claimed this was a serious

embarrassment and intended to disprove

it with his relativity theory but later

admitted that he had failed to do so we

were conditioned to think that the

heliocentric model is scientifically

superior to the geocentric model but

when we apply scientific reasoning we

discover that this is not true

contrary to popular thought the

scientific community has disputed the

heliocentric model for centuries such as

the Earth’s curvature according to the

heliocentric earth model the earth is

twenty-four thousand miles in

circumference and if one were standing

at sea level they should only be able to

see less than three miles before the

surface of the earth curves out of view

but this has been proven to be false for

centuries from the Bedford level

experiments of 1838 to modern

photography this photograph of Chicago

was taken almost 60 miles away from

Grandmere State Park in Michigan on a

spherical earth this would be impossible

using the Pythagorean theorem and the

current dimensions of the earth the top

of the tallest skyscraper should be 900

feet below the observable horizon local

news explain this anomaly by claiming

the image was a mirage and what you’re

seeing here is a mirage we typically

would not be able to see this from the

Lake Michigan shore we talked

this last night conditions are right on

the lake that we’re actually seeing a

mirage they claimed that somehow light

refraction in perfect weather conditions

are responsible for creating a

photorealistic Mirage of the Chicago

skyline appearing to sit on the flat

horizon from almost 60 miles away

anomalies in the Earth’s curvature can

also be found in old lighthouses able to

be seen for several miles past what is

possible on the heliocentric model and

weapons guidance systems that are

capable of sighting targets that would

only be possible on a flat plane we are

accustomed to observing ships

disappearing over the curve but with

modern consumer cameras we can observe

that this seems to be an optical

illusion based on light reflection and

the laws of perspective many of us tend

to think the planet is too big to

observe curvature but the empirical

evidence tells us that either the

surface of the earth is a flat plane or

the planet is at least 100 times bigger

than we are told another very intriguing

argument for flat earthers is Antarctica

the mysterious massive continent at our

southern pole that nobody is allowed to

explore after sailing over 60,000 miles

along the Antarctic coastline Captain

Cook was never able to complete the

journey around the ice continent which

is supposed to be just under 12,000

miles around

neither was James Clark Ross or the

British ship Challenger

nobody has ever successfully

circumnavigated Antarctica many

so-called flat earthers claim that these

attempts failed because Antarctica is

actually a massive ice barrier that

surrounds the flat surface of the earth

the azimuthal equidistant projection map

produced by the US Geological Survey has

been used for centuries for the fact

that all directions or azmuth s– are

correct and all distances are at true

scale studying this map one can clearly

see how man has been able to accurately

circumnavigate the earth on a flat plane

model and if it is in fact accurate then

it explains why after 60,000 miles

nobody has been able to completely

circumnavigate Antarctica interestingly

this is also the math used by the United

Nations Admiral Richard Byrd Medal of

Honor winner youngest Admiral in the

history of the Navy and recipient of

three ticker-tape parades in his honor

led four expeditions to Antarctica the

fourth being a military operation known

as operation Highjump with an aircraft

carrier group 4,700 men 13 support ships

and 33 aircraft their stated mission was

to establish the Antarctic research base

little America four but many believe the

true nature of the secret mission was to

root out the Nazis who arrived in 1939

claiming new Swabia and setting up a

Nazi presence in Antarctica in 1954

Admiral Richard Byrd spoke on TV of an

area bigger than the United States with

valuable resources and announced a

future of international exploration a

very distinguished guest for this

evening is that Richard Ebert strangely

enough that is left in the world today

an area as big as the United States

that’s never been seen by human being

and that’s beyond the pole on the other

side of the South Pole from middle

America we found enough coal within a

hundred and eighty miles of the South

Pole

in a great region mountains it’s not

covered as snow enough to supply the

whole world for quite a while and it’s a

I think it’s quite astonishing that

there should be an area as big as that

unexplored with the tremendous oil

there’s a lot of adventure left down at

the bottom of the world well do you hope

to see that I do so I’m willing to say

to you that there will be a number of

expeditions that will follow

I think year after year bottom of the

world because the government has really

become interested but this never

happened

in 1957 Admiral Byrd died in his sleep

of a heart ailment at the age of 68 and

on December 1st 1959 all 12 countries

active in Antarctica signed a United

Nations treaty that outlawed all public

travel south of the 60th southern

parallel this was the same time that

NASA was formed the world’s attention

was pulled away from exploring

Antarctica and directed firmly on the

moon

in 1962 a series of high-altitude

nuclear tests was carried out by the

United States

it was called Operation fishbowl which

has caught the curiosity of many Flat

Earth researchers because the Flat Earth

model shared by the ancients was one

where we lived within a sphere upon a

flat surface and surrounded by a massive

dome like a fishbowl or the Truman Show

in 2012 the secret lost diary of Admiral

Richard Ebert was published wherein

Admiral Byrd allegedly claimed to enter

a Hollow Earth through a hole in the

center of Antarctica and meet with an

advanced alien civilization the diary

provides no evidence of being authentic

and many would suggest that it portrays

the distinguished Admiral as a crackpot

and strange tales of Antarctica as

fantasy to this day the public is

strictly prohibited from traveling below

the 60th southern parallel

nobody has ever completely

circumnavigated Antarctica and airplanes

are prohibited from flying over the icy

continent what are they hiding there is

now talk of investing trillions of

dollars to explore Mars why not

Antarctica if sharing videos about Flat

Earth is harmful why not put it all to

rest by circumnavigating Antarctica

documenting everything and prove that

the earth is a spinning globe

for infowars.com this is Greg Reese

[Music]

[Music]

Infowars tomorrow’s news today

it’s for Joseph awesome widths summit

news in Action 7 News were here in Hong

Kong savannah Hernandez for info

wars.com I’m reporting to you from Hong

Kong where I’m joined by reporter

Gregory’s for the next week this is

Gregory’s free info wars.com in Hong

Kong our recent trip to Hong Kong was a

new achievement for infowars.com despite

being the most banned broadcast in the

free world we continue to win because of

our great strong loyal audience we have

Dan Lyman covering Infowars Europe Paul

Joseph Watson in the UK Millie Weaver

and Caitlyn Bennett in the American

heartland and from Austin Texas a team

of reporters and crew ready to be

dispatched wherever the story is going

down we are not done winning and with

your support we will keep winning we

Flatten The Curve ! The Documentary by Vikka Draziv

Flatten The Curve ! The Documentary by Vikka Draziv

the transcription for Flatten The Curve ! The Documentary by Vikka Draziv
01:01
we built this film on a foundation of
01:04
love
01:06
its purpose
01:07
to shatter the mental barriers
01:09
constructed from a lifetime of
01:11
indoctrination
01:14
the eyes are useless when the mind is
01:16
blind
01:18
we are participants in a prison system
01:21
we are unable to see
01:23
once the veil is lifted there is no
01:26
turning back
01:29
many of us rarely realize we are the
01:31
victims of indoctrination
01:34
we follow the pre-planned layout of life
01:37
living in a state of confusion
01:40
controlled by a small group of
01:41
individuals who possess great wealth
01:44
estate and control
01:48
they monetarily benefit by keeping us
01:50
blind to the true nature of the shape of
01:53
the earth
01:55
most are too busy to question what they
01:57
are told or investigate the scientific
02:00
theory about the physical world and its
02:02
shape
02:03
wrongly taught in schools as fact
02:06
inquiries made on a controlled platform
02:09
such as youtube or facebook are quickly
02:12
rerouted to videos and content that hold
02:15
no merit
02:17
misconceptions occur either
02:19
intentionally or due to lack of research
02:23
by mixing heliocentric and geocentric
02:25
cosmology together
02:27
causing incoherence that pushes the
02:29
viewer away from learning
02:33
why would a lie like this exist
02:36
what purpose does this level of
02:38
deception seek to gain
02:41
the hard solid truth is that all the
02:44
known space agencies and related
02:46
industries have made untold amounts of
02:49
money for many many years
02:52
providing nothing but cgi
02:54
fish islands curvature and hollywood
02:57
style productions as proof
03:00
the following evidence should speak for
03:02
itself through the testimonies of these
03:04
professionals
03:05
pilots and witnesses
03:08
to find yourself
03:10
think for yourself
03:12
the most courageous act is to think for
03:15
yourself
03:17
our greatest wish is for minds opened
03:20
questions answered
03:21
and the reign of freedom through truth
03:24
revealed
03:41
[Music]
03:58
anyhow you know i’ve been hitting these
04:01
you know questions regarding platforms
04:04
trying to get information out of me
04:09
help me out
04:12
yes sir i’ll do that i’ll give you a
04:13
couple of
04:14
relatively quick examples that you can
04:16
also research and elaborate as well
04:20
um number one you know pilot and when i
04:22
used to fly out of long island
04:24
georgetown topic
04:26
bottom line here is gonna give you some
04:28
type of formula for every hundred miles
04:30
you’re gonna give you some type of xyz
04:32
per kilometer squared
04:35
keep it very very simple every 100 miles
04:37
would be approximately one mile one mile
04:40
is five thousand hundred 5280p
04:42
the actual number
04:45
is 6666 which now is a luciferian origin
04:49
which really reveals who’s behind
04:51
all the conspiracy and cover-ups you
04:54
know for everything but the bottom line
04:56
here is a very simple formula for every
04:58
100 miles you have 5400 feet which is
05:02
one mile of curvature so 100 miles
05:05
equals one mile curve now but if i’m
05:07
going let’s say hypothetically
05:09
from long island to nantucket that’s
05:12
about a buck and a half it’s about 150
05:14
miles so it should be a mile and a half
05:17
so let’s just take a mile
05:19
so with aviation you fly from now
05:22
whether you’re trying
05:29
[Music]
05:36
which is an even number if you add five
05:38
thousand feet of curvature that would be
05:40
around nine pounds
05:42
which does not exist so the bottom line
05:45
is i would know every hundred miles that
05:47
you travel you would be dipping the nose
05:49
down
05:54
of curvature so there’s the proof right
05:56
there that there’s something very fishy
05:58
with this glover situation because
06:00
scientifically it doesn’t matter
06:09
my name is joshua silva i am a licensed
06:12
commercial pilot and flight instructor i
06:16
have had a lifelong
06:18
love of aviation and aerospace
06:20
and when growing up i even fancied
06:22
myself an amateur astronomer and i would
06:25
drag my family and friends anybody i
06:28
could to every air show i could possibly
06:31
find in northern california i was the
06:33
only kid you knew or anybody knew that
06:36
knew the various components on aircraft
06:38
spacecraft by heart
06:40
i absolutely loved anything to do that
06:43
anything to do with flying or space but
06:45
my love of aviation and aerospace never
06:47
stopped i
06:49
continued studying had an entire library
06:52
full of aviation books of various
06:54
military and civilian aircraft military
06:57
history every aviation
06:59
campaign and theater in almost any war i
07:03
studied
07:04
religiously and it was just out of pure
07:06
passion
07:07
later in life many years later i decided
07:10
to
07:12
become a pilot
07:13
as strange as it may sound it hadn’t
07:15
occurred to me become a pilot up to that
07:16
point i just simply loved aviation and
07:19
aerospace but i decided to become a
07:20
pilot and i began
07:23
attending a prestigious flight academy
07:26
in the midwest and attending university
07:29
at the same time
07:30
and to gain a degree in aeronautics and
07:32
aerospace
07:34
shortly thereafter i began flying
07:37
twin turboprop aircraft out of northern
07:39
california for
07:40
several
07:42
non-profit organizations and years after
07:45
that i found myself
07:47
flight instructing for various small
07:49
flight schools both in california and in
07:53
arizona and then on to large academies
07:56
that trained for the airlines and even
07:58
some military flights
08:00
shortly thereafter i began flying
08:03
regional business jets and that’s when
08:06
the story of me finding the topic of
08:09
flat earth started
08:24
is
08:48
[Music]
09:26
been a military brat all my life
09:28
however i’ve been in the industry of
09:30
aviation for the last 21 years
09:33
and i became an fe somewhere around 15
09:37
or 16
09:38
when i really started looking at
09:39
conspiracies i looked into benghazi
09:42
because i happen to work on government
09:43
contracts abroad
09:45
overseas
09:47
but i’ve been in aviation for 21 years
09:49
anything from helicopters to aerostats
09:51
to big birds little birds
09:53
fighter jets
09:54
things with engines no engines big
09:56
blades little blades compressor blades
09:59
which by the way that one’s
10:01
not a hoax
10:02
jets do not run only on compressed air
10:05
contrary to popular belief it takes
10:06
compressed air in a blended ratio of air
10:08
to fuel to drive the now heated gas and
10:12
rotate the compressor blades
10:14
this has been a topic of discussion
10:16
between fe and
10:18
you know not everything’s a hoax
10:21
coriolis effect with that ties into
10:24
obviously with no spin
10:25
around the axis points that they say
10:27
exist at 23.4 conveniently
10:30
66 off the 90 degrees right
10:33
everything ties into 666 with nasa and
10:36
all the bs scientists
10:38
our aircraft have things called adis
10:40
attitude direction indicator which gives
10:43
cool relation between the aircraft
10:46
housing or the shell around the gyro
10:49
itself the adi is nothing more than a
10:50
gyro that will always reference level i
10:53
don’t care what any pilot says i don’t
10:55
care what any mechanic tells you
10:57
you know there’s a reason that pilots
10:58
have one book called a pilot operating
11:00
handbook and there’s every other book
11:02
right from structures to avionics to
11:05
wiring diagrams
11:07
to the actual components that make up
11:09
these systems that is a standalone
11:11
system
11:12
the adi does not lie you don’t care how
11:14
cold it is how high you are and
11:17
some of these guys are pretty damn high
11:19
it doesn’t can’t matter where you’re
11:21
going it doesn’t matter where you’ve
11:22
been it doesn’t matter where you are
11:25
over the realm itself
11:34
i woke up to the truth of the flat earth
11:38
shape of the earth
11:39
as an engineer and a pilot so i’ve
11:43
studied
11:44
engineering
11:45
physics
11:46
three different ways basic physics
11:48
electric physics
11:50
and construction physics
11:52
and also as a pilot as a rotary wing
11:55
pilot that is helicopter pilot i studied
11:58
aeronautical physics as well so i can
12:01
cover
12:02
and discuss just about
12:05
any factor of flat earth
12:08
not that i’m any smarter than anybody
12:09
else but i’ve studied
12:11
quite a bit of factors that
12:13
analyze
12:14
shape and motion of of just about any
12:17
object that’s physics
12:18
also aeronautical physics and principles
12:21
of flight
12:22
i can tell you this airplanes fly
12:25
straight and level that’s even an
12:27
aviation term straight and level
12:30
airplanes will fly for hours at the same
12:32
altitude never
12:34
dipping their nose down to follow the
12:37
curve of the earth an aircraft on a
12:39
12-hour or even 18-hour flight from
12:42
portland oregon to seoul korea
12:45
that would have that aircraft starting
12:47
at one point and then flying so far
12:49
around the earth that it’s flying
12:51
downwards with its nose vertically
12:53
downwards and then starting to go around
12:56
around the curve of the earth so that
12:58
the airplane is now flying upside down
13:01
would have to
13:02
make that kind of a flight path on a
13:04
globe which is it’s such an absurdity
13:08
so that being said i come into
13:10
the true shape of the earth the flat
13:12
earth as a skeptic like most anyone else
13:16
i’ll tell you my story my buddy told me
13:18
about this he said rob you need to learn
13:20
about the ice ring you need to learn
13:22
that the earth doesn’t move this globe
13:23
is garbage and i laughed at him i said
13:26
are you kidding me i’m not gonna i’m not
13:28
even gonna look into that he said that’s
13:30
fine he said that’s fine you don’t have
13:31
to look into flat earth
13:33
but until you do he said until you do
13:36
look into flat earth you will remain a
13:38
slave of the matrix
13:40
and interestingly enough at this point
13:43
this was more or less november december
13:45
2015 i had already mentally resigned
13:48
from the u.s military for three years i
13:51
had already resigned because of benghazi
13:53
i realized and i saw for myself i’d been
13:56
working with us as an army officer
13:58
working for state department for a good
14:00
10 years
14:02
and so what i did i turned my physics
14:06
awareness i turned my my studies
14:10
into
14:11
analysis
14:12
of the shape of the earth
14:20
i have a bachelor’s degree in english an
14:22
international business
14:24
and a master’s degree in emergency
14:26
management emergency management is an
14:28
area of study that deals with lessening
14:31
the effects of natural or man-made
14:34
disaster
14:35
areas i had to study related to
14:37
emergency management were meteorology
14:41
geology geography hydrology
14:44
and oceanography you have to know well
14:47
how earth works in order to prevent or
14:50
lessen the consequences of a natural
14:52
disaster
14:54
in 2019 i wrote the book called 60
14:58
emergency landings proving flat earth
15:01
not many people know that when i was
15:04
younger i worked for an international
15:06
airline
15:07
i worked at the international cargo
15:09
logistics division of the company at sao
15:12
paulo international airport i had to
15:14
know all international routes in order
15:17
to provide our clients the precise
15:19
information about import and exports as
15:22
well as the logistics of transporting
15:24
cargo internationally
15:26
our company transported from a simple
15:28
parcel package to cars and helicopters
15:31
to anywhere in the world
15:33
having access to all areas of the
15:35
airport 1988 the brazilian soccer team
15:38
was about to board their flight towards
15:40
australia to take part of the
15:42
bicentennial soccer cup in australia it
15:45
was a tournament to celebrate
15:47
australia’s 200th birthday
15:49
two south american teams were invited to
15:51
take part in this tournament brazil and
15:54
argentina
15:55
at that time we had access to several
15:58
maps all based on the global model the
16:01
brazilian squad left to australia a
16:04
natural conclusion is that this starter
16:06
flight was going to australia over the
16:08
pacific ocean as the global model
16:10
suggests perhaps he stopped in santiago
16:13
chile and then head to australia
16:16
to my surprise the flight to went to los
16:18
angeles for several days i could not
16:20
comprehend the reason why that flight
16:23
went to los angeles in north america to
16:25
then go towards australia in the
16:28
southern hemisphere
16:29
this thing kept alive in the back of our
16:31
mind for all these years
16:34
[Music]
16:41
i’m a merchant marine i’ve been selling
16:43
15 years
16:44
i graduated from the paul hall maritime
16:47
center out of piney point maryland i
16:49
primarily sell on container ships
16:51
tankers
16:52
drill ships
16:54
military cargo vessels
16:56
you name it i can sell on it my selling
16:58
capacity of boson my whole title is a b
17:01
unlimited that primarily sailed deep sea
17:04
and coastal meaning up and down the
17:06
coast west coast east coast and deep sea
17:09
is out deep sea across to other
17:12
continents
17:13
what led me to the flat earth was
17:15
actually my sister we’ve always been
17:17
into the conspiracies and the 911 and
17:21
sandy hook and all that stuff and uh one
17:24
day she said hey you want to see a
17:25
conspiracy you should look into the flat
17:27
earth and i i looked at her and laughed
17:29
because i had seen the videos come up in
17:31
the feed and they showed that disc thing
17:32
in the space and i laughed at it
17:35
whatever and she showed it to me and i
17:37
laughed at her and i went and pulled out
17:38
my phone and i looked up a video you can
17:40
look it up it’s called dragon link
17:43
fpv to space
17:45
and what you’ll see is basically an rc
17:47
airplane that’s been taken up about 80
17:49
000 feet and they release it and then
17:51
the airplane comes down with power and
17:53
it has the drag link system which is
17:55
capable of
17:57
making control and video anyways and but
17:59
they had a gopro so you see this curved
18:01
globe and you know that said it for me
18:03
when i saw that i was like oh wow look
18:05
at that so i brought that down to her
18:07
she put it right in her face and said
18:09
look at that and i looking back i
18:11
remember her smile on it was like you
18:13
know okay she wasn’t gonna argue with me
18:15
and she said okay later on i don’t know
18:17
a couple days later whenever i seen it
18:19
in there and i said all right i had
18:20
nothing to watch i hid it on the youtube
18:22
and i knew within 10 minutes of it i
18:25
forget which one it was i think it was
18:26
probably one of the documentaries but it
18:29
was almost like i instantly knew and
18:31
then what happened was is a lot of the
18:33
proofs that i had were before i was a
18:36
flat earther such as
18:37
seeing contacts at 30 miles out with the
18:41
naked eye on the horizon which is
18:43
impossible on the globe model so much so
18:46
it was me the third officer and the
18:48
lookout we were standing our watch and
18:51
we were i believe we were in the
18:52
mediterranean sea look out looking
18:54
looking watch and say okay we got a
18:56
contact out there we look and we look
18:58
and we try and get it on the radar we
18:59
get it at 30 miles out when the chief
19:02
mate came up we had told him hey mate we
19:04
got a contact earlier 30 miles out he
19:06
said bull crap i don’t believe you we
19:08
all looked at each other and shook our
19:10
heads and yeah yep they got it we he
19:12
stormed off the bridge ran down came
19:15
back up he had the boutique which is a
19:17
great thick green book that’s everything
19:19
you ever need to know about being on the
19:21
ocean sailing navigation everything
19:24
and he comes up and he says the math
19:26
doesn’t line he slams down this piece of
19:28
paper and he says our bridge height is
19:30
at 100 feet versus how far 30 miles it
19:34
should have been behind like 600 foot of
19:37
curve i remember 600 something foot he
19:40
had all the mathematical of course i
19:41
didn’t know you know okay that’s good
19:43
all right he must know what he’s talking
19:45
about but we’re looking like well i
19:47
don’t know we got it on the rain then
19:48
the radar must not know what it’s doing
20:00
you can just call me jay that’s what my
20:02
friends call me that’s what i go by i
20:04
just go by jay my
20:06
work experience i joined the navy when i
20:08
was 17 years old i had a secret security
20:11
clearance there’s different levels of
20:12
security clearance there’s a like a
20:13
lower level then there’s a secret which
20:15
is what i had which is like a mid-level
20:17
and there’s a top secret i did not have
20:19
a top secret clearance so there’s a lot
20:20
that i don’t know
20:22
but i did have a secret clearance
20:24
so it’s basically the the mid-level
20:25
security clearance um for the government
20:28
that i had and i did that job for eight
20:30
years i worked in operational
20:31
intelligence
20:32
specifically
20:34
the radar navigation
20:36
there’s a limited scope of what we’re
20:39
able to see now granted this is 15
20:43
or 20 years ago
20:45
what i mean by that is with it being 15
20:47
or 20 years ago
20:48
the technology nowadays on the new
20:50
warships i would imagine are just off
20:53
the charts advanced compared to what we
20:56
had you know 20 years ago in the early
20:57
2000s when i was
20:59
doing deployments for the navy
21:01
we’re looking at the scope of the radar
21:03
now this is just going off of the actual
21:05
screen that we can see now there’s
21:06
there’s three different screens there’s
21:08
the basic radar screen where we have
21:09
this limited scope it only goes out like
21:11
25 miles right
21:13
then there’s this other bigger screen
21:15
and i forgot the name of it but this
21:17
like it goes on to this huge projection
21:18
in the combat information center
21:21
basically is where all of the
21:22
information is housed and on this huge
21:24
screen we can actually zoom out and see
21:27
a significant portion of our area of
21:29
responsibility i can’t say the exact
21:31
number again a lot of this is classified
21:33
basically when we zoom out onto this
21:36
large projectile screen it goes in and
21:38
out right so the reason why we’re able
21:40
to zoom in and then pull back out is
21:42
just for accuracy so if we’re looking at
21:44
something that could just be like a buoy
21:46
in the water right you know just one of
21:47
the little tiny buoys that track that
21:49
the ships can use as kind of placements
21:51
to track where they’re going
21:52
that can be mistaken for an actual like
21:55
small watercraft so we have to be able
21:57
to differentiate between that and some
21:59
of the ships that we’re looking for
22:01
because some of the deployments were on
22:02
we’re out there looking for drug ships
22:04
we’re looking for
22:06
other types of ships submarines
22:08
basically just to keep track of
22:09
everything that’s basically what the
22:11
navy and coast guard do they want to
22:12
make sure that they know what’s going on
22:14
in the seas and that’s kind of the way
22:15
the united states navy run operates
22:18
they’re basically dictating what happens
22:19
in international waters
22:33
[Music]
22:59
i will be providing my in-depth
23:01
experience of u.s navy submarines and
23:04
how they prove we do not live on a globe
23:06
earth
23:15
however
23:16
due to the nature of my job and the
23:18
security clearance that i hold i wish to
23:20
remain anonymous
23:26
[Music]
23:28
i have worked for the us department of
23:30
the navy as a submarine quality
23:32
assurance specialist for the last five
23:34
years
23:39
my job is to ensure that each submarine
23:42
is built properly safely into the
23:44
engineer’s plan
23:51
i have an intimate knowledge of every
23:53
aspect of each submarine being built in
23:56
the shipyard i work in
23:58
now that you heard a little bit of my
24:00
background
24:01
let me explain how i arrived at the
24:04
crazy notion that the earth is visibly
24:07
and observably flat
24:08
[Music]
24:11
i have always questioned the reality
24:13
around me since i was little
24:17
i never followed anything mainstream
24:19
and i was never interested in what the
24:21
news had to say
24:24
as i got older i started looking into
24:26
more and more things out of my own
24:29
curiosity
24:30
911 school shootings
24:33
i eventually started researching the
24:35
moon landing because it just never said
24:37
well of me
24:38
and it didn’t take long
24:40
for me to completely unravel that for
24:42
the hopes that it is
24:51
after that
24:52
i was starting to realize that we have
24:54
been lied to
24:56
on so many levels
24:58
what else could there possibly be
25:00
then i saw a video about the flat earth
25:03
pop up on my youtube recommendations
25:10
at first
25:12
even with my awakened mind i thought
25:15
this was absolutely ridiculous
25:19
i decided that i’d look into it simply
25:22
to disprove it and move on
25:24
it should be easy right
25:31
that was over six years ago
25:33
i still can’t disprove the flat earth in
25:36
fact
25:37
the more i research it the more it
25:39
reveals
25:41
leads me into my submarine experience
25:45
looking back on everything i had
25:47
accomplished while on active duty with
25:49
eyes to see
25:50
i was
25:51
has only served to solidify my stance
25:55
that we live on a flat and motionless
25:57
plane
26:07
the theory of more land being hidden on
26:09
earth as one of the possible motives to
26:12
hide the fact that the earth is not a
26:14
spinning waterfall corkscrewing through
26:16
space
26:18
it’s something that many flat earth is a
26:20
postulated over the years
26:23
and i just couldn’t shake the concept
26:25
from my mind where just like re-admiral
26:28
richard bird suggested during his
26:30
antarctic expedition operation high jump
26:34
that there is undiscovered land on earth
26:37
and that possibility spawned an idea to
26:40
write the elusive verb
26:42
a modern day quest to discover another
26:45
world
26:46
[Music]
26:47
the elusive curve is a fictional novel
26:50
created to convey a very non-fictional
26:52
message
26:53
but the earth is a flat motionless level
26:56
plane devoid of any furniture
26:58
when max carter discovers irrefutable
27:01
proof of the true shape of the earth the
27:03
course of his life drastically changes
27:06
and he becomes a man obsessed convinced
27:09
that there is more land being hidden
27:10
beyond antarctica
27:13
and that he is going to reach it
27:15
the elusive curve debunks typical globe
27:18
claims including ships disappearing over
27:20
the horizon due to the curve of the
27:22
earth
27:23
the foucault’s pendulum and the coriolis
27:26
effect
27:27
whilst presenting flat earth proofs like
27:29
visual perspective
27:31
level water over vast distances and long
27:34
distance photography
27:36
all within the context of max’s very and
27:39
colorful relationships
27:44
[Music]
27:53
uh also there’s a semi-classified naval
27:56
communications device when ships are
27:58
communicating
28:00
ship to ship on the ocean u.s navy
28:03
semi-classified laser
28:06
communication that pound device which
28:08
also does data as well so if they’re
28:10
communicating on ships 70 miles 100
28:13
miles or more like i said every hundred
28:15
miles mild curvature so it wouldn’t work
28:19
because lasers operate light of sight
28:21
they operate in a straight line there’s
28:23
no curvature to the laser
28:25
so the bottom line here is
28:28
the naval map prime classified semi
28:32
platforms that they use communicate ship
28:34
the ship that operates on a laser and if
28:37
there was curvature anything over
28:40
like i said 100 miles
28:42
is 580 feet of curvature the ship’s
28:45
diameter is nowhere near that which you
28:47
know so there’s another example the
28:50
naval map communication device
28:52
also there’s a woman
28:54
a female klh pilot alh
29:04
[Music]
29:10
she’s a very shady rational woman if
29:12
they ask her you know what happened if
29:14
she starts talking it’s going to raise
29:16
serious questions so we got the klh
29:18
pilot
29:18
we got the
29:20
laser napcon us navy
29:23
we’ve got my personal experience flying
29:25
from long island again i think this will
29:26
be at least
29:28
5188 curvature added to the 4 000
29:32
altitude average while heading
29:35
easterly
29:36
so there’s something very wrong that
29:38
never don’t work
29:42
could the earth actually be flat i began
29:44
to see opinions and arguments that
29:46
seemed logical but i heard several
29:49
arguments which i now know were most
29:51
likely disinformation easily disprovable
29:53
in the aviation world but there were
29:55
some that stuck with me and so
29:57
myself being the way i am i ran quickly
30:01
metaphorically to my old textbook and i
30:04
opened my old textbooks found them
30:07
unpacked them cracked them all open and
30:09
even downloaded new brand new copies and
30:12
pdf form offline of all these books to
30:14
make sure that nothing had been changed
30:16
i thought for certain that i knew
30:18
exactly what compensation pilots are
30:20
trained while flying to compensate for
30:23
the spin or the rotation of the earth
30:25
for instance as far as falling around a
30:28
globe that assume i assume to my mind
30:30
would be an aircraft’s angle of attack
30:33
but upon more study i found that not to
30:35
be true the angle of attack being the
30:38
angle between the aircraft’s flight path
30:40
and the relative wind which is something
30:42
that pilots are very familiar with and
30:44
it’s the idea that aircraft has to be
30:46
slightly pitched up essentially to stay
30:48
airborne or a surface of that aircraft
30:51
has to be pitched slightly to create a
30:53
difference in air pressure to hold the
30:55
aircraft aloft and that is assumed or
30:59
was assumed it might at that time by
31:00
myself and the pilots to be the
31:03
compensation one would make for
31:05
falling around a globe while flying
31:08
period but upon further research i found
31:11
that this was not the case and it was
31:13
not even mentioned anywhere this
31:15
compensation was not mentioned anywhere
31:18
i could find in any resource that i had
31:21
gone to flight school with and they were
31:23
extensive there were many many books
31:25
especially as one progressed towards the
31:27
commercial flying side especially
31:29
elective courses especially if you’re
31:31
going to university as i was studying
31:33
aerospace then you would assume and i
31:36
had assumed that this was calculated for
31:41
again as far as adis
31:44
in every aircraft it references the
31:46
level
31:48
horizon or references sea level always
31:52
there’s no way
31:54
that you can convince
31:56
somebody of sound mind that if you take
31:59
off from new york and immediately flip
32:02
upside down
32:03
now your housing or your adi
32:07
is referencing upside down to you
32:09
because you’re upside down it’s right
32:10
side up it cannot deviate off level it
32:14
doesn’t matter how much fuel you got in
32:15
your tanks it doesn’t matter if you’re a
32:17
helicopter or an aerostat or a fighter
32:20
jet
32:21
that gauge will always reference level
32:25
it has to
32:26
because otherwise it would be a pull
32:27
reference and if you could manipulate it
32:30
why would you even have it in the
32:31
airplane
32:32
or your aircraft
32:34
but if you go and take off two miles
32:36
away do a barrel roll you’re now flying
32:38
upside down at what point does that
32:40
gauge show you back right side up
32:43
a half a hemisphere away is that what is
32:45
that what we’re led to believe is that
32:47
what we’re supposed to believe at what
32:49
point does it does it write itself
32:52
if you never flipped back over
32:54
and continue flying level you know you
32:56
see what i’m saying is it’s it’s
32:57
ridiculous
32:58
it’s ludicrous to think that that thing
33:01
compensates for curvature in straight
33:03
level flight
33:09
the big one that is oftentimes quoted is
33:13
compensation for coriolis effect while
33:16
flying this is something i’d even taught
33:17
my students about and it’s always
33:20
assumed to be correct we just assume
33:23
we’re given the narrative from a young
33:25
age and we everything is built upon that
33:28
assumption upon the theory and so i
33:30
thought i had the the silver bullet ah
33:32
coriolis effect we always calculate for
33:34
that well as i begin to look through the
33:37
books and to look into the calculations
33:41
given for coriolis effect the narrative
33:43
began to fall apart even further i began
33:45
to see things i didn’t notice when i was
33:48
in school such as coriolis effect is
33:50
actually never calculated for but is
33:52
assumed to be a part of wind correction
33:55
angle wind correction angle is one of
33:56
the many calculations pilots of all
33:58
kinds make while flying to correct
34:01
against winds in whatever
34:03
volume or section of air they’re flying
34:05
through which it could be from any
34:06
direction and you’re flying through it
34:08
so you have to compensate a certain
34:10
angle into that wind to hold a straight
34:12
line
34:15
interesting side note i worked on
34:16
aerostats for several years
34:18
and i always ask people who try to bring
34:21
up gravity
34:22
well how come my 4 000 pound 74 000
34:25
cubic foot aerostat isn’t getting pushed
34:28
towards ground
34:29
it weighs more than you do which you
34:31
believe gravity is pushing you down
34:32
right because these are some dense ass
34:34
people but how come the aerostats not
34:36
getting driven into the ground it weighs
34:38
more it’s definitely larger than a you
34:41
know the size of a house it’s more than
34:42
most size of most houses you know so why
34:45
is it getting driven to the ground
34:46
well that’s because it’s displacing
34:50
less weight than the atmosphere or the
34:53
medium that it’s in and i try explaining
34:54
that
34:56
i don’t know how many times you’ve
34:57
probably posted something on this i
34:59
don’t know how many times we’re gonna
35:00
have to post something on this but every
35:02
time that little kid let’s go that
35:03
helium balloon starts crying
35:06
radar is simply another form of radio
35:08
transmission
35:10
radio in includes anything within the
35:13
the range of the electromagnetic
35:15
spectrum
35:16
electromagnetic spectrum also known as
35:19
light
35:20
radio is the transmission of light
35:22
whether it’s visible light or radio
35:24
waves which are not visible
35:27
when it comes to radio transmissions
35:29
there must be a transmitter and a
35:32
receiver there can be a reflector or a
35:35
trans
35:36
middle unit along the way
35:39
however in the end there’s going to be
35:40
at least transmitter and a receiver and
35:44
in the case of radar radar transmits a
35:46
signal and it bounces off a reflector
35:50
and then it comes back to the receiving
35:52
station or it can go to other stations
35:55
if they’re set up in the network
35:56
properly long story short radar emits a
35:59
signal it bounces off something and then
36:02
and then it returns to a receiving unit
36:05
and the receiving unit maps that
36:07
reflection accordingly if there is no
36:11
reflector then there’s no return signal
36:14
and then the object does not show up on
36:17
the radar for example it’s the script
36:19
off the screen
36:20
notice there’s no curving around
36:22
anything it goes out in a straight line
36:25
radio signals always travel in a
36:26
straight line so the transmitter sends
36:29
this the signal out to the the target
36:31
bounces off and it comes back in a
36:33
straight line radar cannot travel over
36:36
the curve and hence radar is dependent
36:39
on line of sight direct
36:41
direct beam from the transmission to the
36:44
target it reflects and it comes straight
36:46
back there is no curving around anything
36:49
thus is radar
36:55
also radar radar works in straight lines
36:58
the radar is incapable of curving
37:01
around a curve picking up and bouncing
37:04
back the reflection of what it’s picking
37:07
up so if you can imagine a ship on the
37:09
other side of the curve we’ll say 30
37:12
miles 40 miles out it sends out the
37:14
radar beam the radar beam is supposedly
37:17
curving around this ball
37:19
bouncing back and then bouncing the
37:22
reflection curving back around to be
37:24
picked up by the radar that’s not
37:26
happening it’s flying out straight and
37:27
when it picks up something it hits it
37:29
back it’s not going around any curve
37:31
that’s that’s plain symbol that can be
37:33
looked up on your youtube and see how
37:36
radar waves work they don’t go around
37:38
the curve every diagram shown will show
37:41
you straight lines they don’t they don’t
37:42
show you curved lines
37:46
as we zoom out to look at the larger
37:48
scope of things once we verify that
37:50
we’re able to zoom out over a large
37:52
distance now over this screen at the
37:54
time i was like 18 or 19 years old all
37:57
right when i was doing this job i wasn’t
37:59
thinking about flat earth and any of
38:00
this other i i was still
38:02
indoctrinated and under the assumption
38:05
that the earth is a spinning ball i
38:07
never thought about flat earth or
38:08
anything like that but i always thought
38:10
it was weird that as i’m looking at this
38:13
massive radar screen i always used to
38:15
think
38:16
how come we’re looking at this and i can
38:19
see like we’re off of the coast of
38:21
argentina for for instance right like
38:23
how is it that i can see this far out
38:26
and it’s not like over the horizon or
38:29
curve because it’s so far like i said we
38:32
use a lot of these other link signals
38:34
and they’re called links they go by
38:36
different names i can’t say the code
38:37
names some of them i forgot some of them
38:39
are again this is classified information
38:42
i
38:43
can’t give any specifics on these
38:46
but um some of the links that we use not
38:48
only do like i said not only do we speak
38:51
to the actual ships and track them
38:53
but we speak to aircraft ten thousand
38:56
twenty thousand
38:57
thirty and higher thirty thousand feet
38:59
and higher is what i’m saying it’s not
39:01
just a matter that they’re 30 000 feet
39:03
directly it’s not like they’re directly
39:05
above the ship this is what’s
39:06
interesting is this aircraft could be
39:09
50 60 miles away and 30 000 feet in the
39:12
air so you understand like the angle
39:14
that you have to take to be able to
39:15
track this aircraft from a ship that’s
39:18
moving on the water think about that for
39:20
a second
39:26
i served on board of united states 688i
39:30
fast attack nuclear submarine
39:33
and i can personally attest
39:36
that we never constantly angled down
39:38
during our submarine deployments
39:42
one of our longest transits went from
39:44
the gulf of oman around the southern tip
39:47
of africa and back to connecticut
39:50
we were underwater
39:52
for almost three months straight
39:58
my job on board as a regular
40:01
meant that i spent a lot of time
40:03
both in the radio room and in the
40:05
control room
40:08
the control room is where they navigate
40:10
and drive the submarine
40:16
i never once
40:18
in my five years active duty
40:21
heard the officer of the deck
40:23
or the diving officer
40:25
give the order to consistently change
40:27
the angle of the submarine to compensate
40:30
for the curvature of the earth
40:37
the primary task of the diving officer
40:39
and the helms and planesmen is to
40:41
maintain the submarine as level as
40:43
possible while in transit
40:47
if the earth had any
40:50
measurable curvature i am certain we
40:53
would not have been able to make this
40:54
incredibly long transit without
40:57
accounting for it
41:05
and then the big one is given after that
41:06
well gps auto corrects for it and that
41:09
sent me down on yet another path gps
41:11
auto corrects for it if it’s a satellite
41:14
based system how is it correcting for
41:16
spin if it’s also spinning over the same
41:18
body and why are there large gaps in gps
41:22
coverage over large oceanic bodies do
41:24
they just turn them off it’s just not
41:26
worthwhile there have been enough
41:28
aviation accidents at sea very far from
41:31
shore that would say otherwise and if
41:33
you gave the american taxpayers the ones
41:35
funding these satellites are supposed to
41:37
track aircraft the information that well
41:39
we’re just shutting them off because
41:41
it’s not worthwhile those three or four
41:43
jets full of hundreds of passengers just
41:45
have to use other navigation methods
41:47
such as dead reckoning which is
41:49
basically using a stopwatch and guessing
41:52
to the next checkpoint essentially if
41:54
you were to tell them that they would be
41:56
infuriated so that could not be the case
41:59
coverage was a problem even over large
42:01
and non-densely populated areas you
42:03
would lose gps coverage even in jets at
42:06
times
42:07
so this began to
42:09
unravel the thread of satellites and
42:12
satellite timing and the fact that many
42:15
reels of footage show these satellites
42:17
being launched by balloon rather than by
42:20
rockets how the concept of these rockets
42:22
doesn’t even work to make it past the
42:25
atmosphere much less leave something in
42:27
perfect geosynchronous orbit i actually
42:30
had the privilege of working a short
42:31
time at a satellite manufacturing
42:34
company in northern california got to
42:36
see the assembly and participate in the
42:38
assembly of satellites
42:41
base based satellites or so they are
42:43
said there would be small bottles
42:45
encased in these structures that were
42:48
encased by another structure the small
42:50
bottles were the fuel cells these fuel
42:52
cells were incredibly small smaller than
42:55
a diver’s tank in most cases much
42:57
smaller and this was supposed to be all
42:59
the fuel that the craft needed to run
43:01
and operate as most are not actually
43:04
electric they’re becoming electric now
43:06
and sustain itself in a perfect orbit by
43:09
just small bursts from its engine or its
43:12
propulsion system
43:17
the truth be told i’ve been to many
43:18
countries done many things all things
43:20
aviation
43:22
i can say with absolute certainty and i
43:24
can attest
43:25
the plane does not dip nose down to
43:27
follow the curvature of the earth ever
43:30
matter of fact most planes have an
43:31
airflow that are three degrees nose up
43:33
in straight and level flight and the
43:35
reason that is is simple if the nose of
43:37
the aircraft was at zero degrees or
43:39
level flying through the air
43:41
then it would porpoise right it would be
43:43
quite a violent because some of the air
43:45
would go over the nose and some of the
43:46
air would go under the nose and it would
43:48
cause that nose to go up down up and
43:49
down which is literally like a porpoise
43:51
or a dolphin out of water
43:53
and that’s exactly what would happen so
43:54
it’s the wings are designed
43:56
when they are level the nose is three
43:58
degrees nose up
44:01
the fact proven from multiple points
44:03
that there is no coriolis to the motion
44:05
of the earth and i’m speaking from a
44:08
pilot’s perspective also an engineer’s
44:11
perspective because i
44:13
obtained a degree as an engineer before
44:15
i went to flight school so i’m both a
44:18
pilot engineer at once
44:20
so number one there is no rotation of
44:22
the earth proven by the fact that a
44:25
helicopter pilot can hover the aircraft
44:28
indefinitely motionless
44:30
above a single point of the earth if the
44:32
earth were spinning as soon as that
44:34
aircraft left the ground the earth would
44:36
spin out from under it now somebody may
44:38
say that the air of the atmosphere
44:40
rotates along with the earth which is
44:42
one of the most absurd concepts
44:44
imaginable because if that were the case
44:47
then all wind would travel with the
44:48
earth there would be no
44:50
alternating wind currents when we know
44:52
that the jet streams fly overhead
44:54
clouds move in multiple directions
44:56
overhead and a kite flying over the
44:59
stationary earth
45:00
the fact that a kite flies because of
45:02
wind passing through that proves that
45:04
the earth does not that produce that the
45:06
air does not move in unison with the
45:08
earth number two airstrips do not rotate
45:11
away from a landing aircraft anybody
45:13
who’s seen a pilot’s view when an
45:15
aircraft lands well the aircraft lands
45:18
through a motionless
45:20
airstrip if the earth were rotating the
45:23
pilot would have to turn
45:24
to
45:25
the angle at which the airstrip is
45:27
rotating away and land at the speed of
45:30
the airstrip which is absurd simply
45:32
absurd
45:33
airstrips do not rotate away from the
45:35
aircraft and on an east to west landing
45:38
strip if the aircraft is landing to the
45:40
west the airstrips do not land
45:43
moving towards the air airplane that’s
45:45
that’s insanity okay simply stating
45:50
if the earth was a spinning ball
45:53
it is
45:54
virtually impossible for a ship to be
45:57
moving at 25 to 30 knots on this curved
46:00
spinning ball while tracking an aircraft
46:03
that’s probably going 300 miles per hour
46:05
50 to 100 miles away really i mean these
46:08
like p3 aircrafts were pretty far and 20
46:11
000 feet in the air it’s just virtually
46:13
impossible it doesn’t make sense again
46:15
at the time i wasn’t thinking like this
46:17
but looking back on the information that
46:19
i had i’m like yeah there’s no way
46:21
there’s no way that that was done on a
46:23
curved earth
46:25
literally the only way that could work
46:27
is if we are on a flat stationary plane
46:30
we’re cruising along the boat is
46:32
cruising along in the water like think
46:34
about it in terms of like a large like
46:35
you know like those backyard swimming
46:37
pools picture the swimming pool filled
46:39
up right and then your ship you put a
46:41
little boat on the swimming pool and
46:42
then you know put like a little fake
46:44
aircraft in the air now from that ship
46:46
you’re able to see the aircraft it
46:48
doesn’t matter where you are in that
46:49
pool you can track that aircraft if
46:52
you’re on a spinning ball curve how the
46:54
hell can you track an aircraft that
46:56
could be in a position that’s 100 to 200
46:58
miles away from you 30 000 feet in the
47:00
air from a different angle that’s around
47:02
the curve it’s impossible there’s no way
47:04
that you could there’s no radio
47:05
frequency that could track that
47:07
i’d like to point out that i see now
47:09
that i didn’t see before is that you
47:11
have a magnetic compass and you have a
47:15
gyro on any ship and i’m not talking
47:17
about your little crabberman show
47:20
fishing boat one of the deadliest k i’m
47:22
talking about a real deep sea going
47:24
unlimited tonnage boat it’s going to
47:26
have a gyro and it is a big huge box
47:28
that sits by usually behind the bridge
47:30
or in the chart room it’s a big box and
47:33
it’s basically the gyro compass now if
47:35
you had two models i guess wouldn’t you
47:38
have to have one making the corrections
47:40
because it almost never matches the co
47:43
the the magnetic almost never matches
47:45
the gyro it’s very rare that we’re
47:47
steering the same course and they say
47:49
it’s due to deviation and variation is
47:52
where you you know like the metals of
47:54
the ship causes it to differ and then
47:56
you have the variation of the magnetic
47:58
fields over the earth is i guess they
48:00
change you know true north and magnetic
48:02
north but the way i look at it is man
48:04
they got two different machines one is a
48:06
machine and one is from god the way to
48:09
get around the earth god’s not a dummy
48:11
he put the way to get around the earth
48:13
with the compasses if back in the day
48:15
they had motorized vessels that can get
48:17
them around they would probably have got
48:18
around a lot better but they were at the
48:20
mercy of the wind it was like oh they
48:22
didn’t know their way or you know they
48:24
were using the stars and stuff and they
48:26
you know so i just believe that the two
48:29
compasses the dyro compass that’s
48:31
electronic and then our regular compass
48:33
is because they are switching the ways
48:35
you know the maps there’s two different
48:36
ways to get around the earth you’re
48:37
tricking us
48:40
here is another flatter proof that i
48:42
never noticed while i was on active duty
48:45
thanks to years of indoctrination
48:49
periscope observations
48:52
when the submarine is at periscope depth
48:56
and the observer is looking for ships on
48:58
the horizon
48:59
they will start to see masts at about
49:02
eight to nine miles depending on
49:04
atmospheric occlusion and sea state
49:12
the whole of the ships won’t be visible
49:14
until about 5 miles depending on
49:16
atmospheric occlusion and sea state
49:19
at 9 miles away
49:21
the target should be 26 feet behind the
49:25
curve
49:26
but this isn’t what’s observed
49:41
my final flat earth point on submarines
49:44
is with regard to the an wsn tax 7
49:48
ring laser gyro that is used on board of
49:51
u.s navy submarines
50:03
a typical gyroscope
50:04
like the ones used on board of an
50:06
aircraft
50:07
is a device used for measuring or
50:10
maintaining orientation and angular
50:12
velocity
50:14
it is either a spinning wheel or disc
50:16
with a counterweight in which the axis
50:18
of rotation is free to assume any
50:21
orientation by itself
50:28
when rotating
50:30
the orientation of this access
50:33
is unaffected by tilting or rotation of
50:36
the mounting
50:37
according to the conservation of angular
50:40
momentum
50:41
however
50:42
a ring laser gyro doesn’t have any
50:45
established weight
50:47
they use light
50:49
as a point of reference it spins up a
50:51
disc that shoots out lasers and it has a
50:54
digital encoder that deciphers where the
50:56
laser strikes inside of the gimbal
50:58
system
51:00
no make believe gravity required
51:03
let’s just say we’re like 30 miles away
51:05
these missiles can shoot much further
51:07
than that i can’t give you the exact
51:08
number but let’s say we’re 30 miles away
51:10
okay 30 miles is far
51:12
so from our ship we can track on our
51:15
little we have like a missile projectile
51:16
it’s like a radar but it’s a little bit
51:18
different it’s specifically designed to
51:19
track the missiles you and actually
51:21
input the coordinates latitude and
51:23
longitude of where you want the missile
51:24
to strike really really high precision
51:27
accuracy i’m i mean really act really
51:29
really really active we hit that launch
51:31
and the missile and it will hit that
51:33
target 30 miles away even longer than
51:35
that now here’s the thing again that’s
51:38
not possible on a curved earth these
51:39
missiles are huge you know 50 caliber
51:42
will project that are carrying massive
51:44
amounts of explosives in them okay each
51:47
one of these missiles are probably worth
51:48
hundreds of thousands of dollars so
51:50
whenever you’re lining up these missiles
51:53
to shoot at targets that are 30 plus
51:55
miles away if the earth is spinning
51:58
again now think about this we’re not
52:00
we’re not sitting like on land holding a
52:02
gun alright so picture this
52:06
we’re on a ship
52:08
like actually in the middle of the water
52:11