Select Page

Photoshop: James Webb Space Telescope Hubble Telescope Carina Nebula Stephan’s Quintet Southern Ring

Photoshop: James Webb Space Telescope Hubble Telescope Carina Nebula Stephan’s Quintet Southern Ring

In this video, from the famous James Webb Space Telescope, a bunch of Photoshop manipulated imagery can be seen through the EXIF reader, what this means, you can see on the EXIF where this was created and software used, as well as the history or the actions done in the image/file.

Know the difference from the truth and a lie and its deception.

GoFast Rocket Launch Black Rock Desert Nevada 2014

GoFast Rocket Launch Black Rock Desert Nevada 2014

Let us never forget what happened in Nevada… Go Fast CSXT & JPI launched the highest and fastest rocket with GoPro cameras (FISHEYE LENS) mounted on the sides to achieve some amazing footage. Feel free to leave your thoughts and comments below. Thanks for watching.

Watch at 7 min 32 seconds when the rocket suddenly, at 73 miles, smashes into the dome – the “waters above”. It sounds like a toilet flush –  an obvious water sound.



so i’m the i’m the team leader of the
and designer of the rocket really kind
of managed the whole event
and then i was also the launch conductor
um you know did all the countdown
the gopro cameras actually all three of
them did shut down on temperature
and the cameras were all mounted to the
outer skin
of the rocket which does get really hot
from the aerodynamic heating
uh during the the boost portion of
flight in fact some of those areas can
get upwards of
you know three or four hundred degrees
and the photographs from space or the
first that’s ever been captured
from uh amateur rocket that’s actually
reached space
and on top of that um you could actually
see the moon
in in those um off you know off from the
horizon which makes those photographs
even more spectacular
um that white object that goes
fluttering by
um could have been an alien for all we
know it’s uh
i have no idea what it is it might have
been something that was in the
booster when it separated and yeah we
saw that too it’s a curious object
we weren’t too far from where we had
actually tracked it was on the other
side of those mountains in that uh
in that on that desert floor um and we
were probably
on the helicopter we were probably still
maybe maybe three or four miles from
where it was but
you know unless you know where it’s at
or have a good idea it’s really hard to
see it we first got down on the ground
in the area where the where the rocket
was we couldn’t see it we could not find
it and
we actually found these drag marks we
followed that drag mark
about three quarters of a mile and then
and then
came right up to uh where the payload
in the course of the month that it was
sitting out there the winds had picked
up that parachute and dragged that
payload section
uh at least three quarters of a mile to
its final resting spot where we found it
i was talking to kai michaelson a couple
of nights ago and we were
just reminiscing about this flight and
all the things that we experienced
and uh both of us felt like the you know
10 years is just way too long to wait
for another one so hopefully it won’t be
too many more years and we’ll be out
there again to defeat our record

The Final Nail In The Coffin of the Helio-nonsensical Model

The Final Nail In The Coffin of the Helio-nonsensical Model


in the coffin of the heliocentric model

I understand that you go through the

stages of grief when you realize that

you’ve been lied to

you’re gonna get you’re gonna feel angry

you’re gonna bargain you’re gonna do all

this stuff I understand this is the

absolute proof and you never have to say

another thing about it

and people get so mad I get it you’re

going through grief you’re mourning

grief ready when people forget is that

it’s not a circle around the Sun even if

it was a circle would still be

impossible but it’s an ellipse which

means that it changes speed it unlike

the evolution line where you can just

keep adding billions of years but the

billions and billions of years in the

but it’s one year that’s a fixed amount

of time and a fixed amount of speed the

earth their length of Earth’s

trajectories around the Sun is 940

million kilometers thus the earth

travels about a hundred and seven

thousand kilometers per hour this means

that our planet moves around the Sun at

an average speed of 30 km/s or Mach 8888

times the speed of sound just let that

sink in earth speed this is the this is

the kicker earth speed is not constant

as the Earth orbits elliptical orbit let

that sink in if you’re going 66,000

miles an hour and you change 1% of your

speed and in this model it’s

significantly more in the moment well

you ready to feel it no just listen it’s

a fixed amount of time it’s one year if

you’re uh if you change one percent

that’s 660 miles an hour that would that

would liquefy all flesh if you change

one mile an hour I I challenge you to

walk on a treadmill at one mile an hour

and tell a friend to randomly unplug it

you will trip and you will fall down I

challenge you to hold a coffee that’s

full to the brim as you drive down the

street at 60 miles an hour just tap on

the brake to go 59

the coffee will spill when you’re going

88 times the speed of sound and you have

to change speeds you would feel it now

even if the psychotic people going

through the stages and morning want to

sit there you go one now 2.97 you would

be able to measure it can’t have it both

ways guys not only would you you can do

the math on it because the ellipse is

fixed and the time is fixed one year and

you can check out the math of the

ellipse there’s a change of speed every

year at minimum went twice a year at

minimum the way that let’s work okay you

can break that down into any fraction

you want it’s still one fixed year not

only would you feel it it would kill you

but forget all that you could measure it

you can measure it and if you don’t

think you can measure a change in speed

you’re lying

look at a swimming pool look at any

water if you just go like this ripple

ripple ripple my labels open for ya it’s


guys this heliocentric model is over the

Earth changes speed going around the Sun

at Mach 88 and that’s why they sent in

Einstein and said it’s all relative no

it isn’t if you’re going 66,000 miles

per hour and there is any change

whatsoever in speed you would feel it

forget about thousand mile an hour spin

how that couldn’t you couldn’t operate a

plane or you couldn’t forget just this

is it you need no more explanation if

you’re going one not 66,000 one mile per

hour and it goes to zero from one you

would trip and listen I’m not here to

I’ve heard the arguments I hear the

argument all the time I could read you a

hundreds of them of cognitive dissonance

of people be like one of the biggest

things you’ll hear is anger they’re

going through the stages grief I don’t

know if you realize that that’s what it

is I deal with this all the time it’s

one reason why my banhammer is so

intense its grief they’ll get mad at me

they’ll say you don’t care you mean it’s

so easy to understand even an idiot

could lol I mean inertia time for text

that’s grief and then they’ll bargain

well it could be it could be that it’s

just cute and then depression well what

do we do now I mean my whole childhood

just stop it’s not that big a deal it’s

more beautiful than it isn’t spinning

endlessly around the Sun it’s way better

it’s just like and this is one of those

torpedoes that you can’t get around and

there’s people that spend their whole

day I think just trying to troll me and

just being like you sir it’s like how

dare you that’s 1% of speed change which

is it’s way more than that and in the

given ellipse in the given year you

can’t change the numbers the calendar

here is set the rotation is set so you

can’t do what they do in evolution say

well in 20 billion years you know a

hurricane can just create a Ferrari

no you can’t just keep adding years one

year one ellipse change in speed how do

you not measure it how do you not feel

it how do things that fall over we’re

talking about Mach 88 1% change would

liquefy all flash there’s more than 1%

change in speed in the given ellipse in

the given year in a given moment yes

also included is a plug for the grip now

he’s telling bugs the greatest app of

all time exposing the helio nonsensical

model the flattest Sun Moon and so da

clock app available at the App Store and

Google Play there it was there it was

had to do it

Tracing the occult history of Scientism to Today

Scientism has created secret societies, ancient Egyptian mysticism, Hermeticism and Alchemy. You will be horrified and amazed as we reveal the truth regarding the sciences of today. We reveal how the foundations of modern science were based around a desire to destroy the Protestant Church. The great pioneering scientists of the Renaissance and the early Enlightenment were fervent devotees of Scientism and  Hermeticism. Many of the most important scientists of this age, including Galileo, Copernicus, and Sir Isaac Newton belonged to secret societies. They had the agenda to overthrow the True Church and establish a new age of Hermetic, sun worshipping religion.

American Moon: Best Hoax Documentary Massimo Mazzucco

American Moon: Massimo Mazzucco

Has man really been to the moon? It’s been 50 years, and the debate rages on. For the firs time, a film compiles in a single piece of work, all the best evidence in favor of the moon landings and the evidence contrary to them. For the first time we can also analyze the Apollo pictures in detail, with the aid of some among the top photographers in the world. What was the Apollo project really? The biggest achievement in the history of mankind, or the biggest fakery of all times, watched on live television by more than half a billion people?


frogchris998 • 3 months ago
what a fantastic docu!
Not the first.. or the most original.. but probably the best assembly of all relevant info on why nobody has ever been to the moon.

TitusVolturcius frogchris998 • 2 months ago
Great documentary indeed. But they didn´t see the most convincing piece of evidence: that Buzz Aldrin was replaced with an actor. If you compare the old and new pictures and videos you can see that the supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE, he has more HAIR today than 50 years ago, his CHIN and his NOSE are different. It´s amazing that most haven´t noticed this yet.

Mulysses TitusVolturcius • 22 days ago
I was thinking about how crazily different he looks and how much shorter he is now when I was watching it!

TitusVolturcius Mulysses • 21 days ago
spread the word, bro. It’s very important

Sasha82 • 5 months ago
A great collection of all the items that don’t add up.

TitusVolturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago
But they didn´t see the most convincing piece of evidence: that Buzz Aldrin was replaced with an actor. If you compare the old and new pictures and videos you can see that the supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE, he has more HAIR today than 50 years ago, his CHIN and his NOSE are different. It´s amazing that most haven´t noticed this yet.

Uncle Timo TitusVolturcius • 24 days ago
“supposed Aldrin is today SHORTER than the real Aldrin, he has a DIFFERENT VOICE TYPE”

happens to old people

Sasha82 TitusVolturcius • 2 months ago
Wow, is that right? Now that you mention it, I did pick up on him looking a little different. Do you have a video or link showing this?

TitusVolturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago…

Titus Volturcius Sasha82 • 2 months ago
I have videos on my Bit Chute channel. And on youtube:…
But I don´t know if you can watch them because they made them invisible

Cosmic Toolbox • 13 days ago
So is the Myth Busters program extremely incompetent at busting myths, or just another corporate media propaganda show full of shit?

Phone7018 • 2 months ago
Kinda long at 3.5 hours but its very complete

Phone7018 • 2 months ago
Great documentary very well made

Bavo Dekker • 14 days ago
Why has the “Apollo Moon” no color? Why was (and still today) the surface of the Apollo Moon always presented as monochrome, black & white like cement with never any color shades? But colors are clearly seen on other solar-bodies like Io, Phobos, Mercury, Mars in our Solar system? Also here on Earth, the deserts all are loaded with different combinations of colorful minerals. The obviously (color) censored Japanese Lunar Orbiter SELENE (2007) shows a similarly colorless fake looking black & white ‘Apollo Moon’ in contrast to the sudden appearance of the vivid ‘Blue Marble’ over the horizon during its orbits, exactly matching the old Apollo’s Ektachrome color film pictures showing the same colorless lunar landscape. And now the Chinese Moon pictures are color censored too, behind the scenes they all comply to the 1969 Apollo Moon color standards. Could this be one of the reasons NASA can’t go ‘back’ and then be forced by 21century technology to expose the Apollo Hoax, this time showing a colorful moon surface with a starry sky above? NASA is its own worst enemy blocking progress since 1973 “unable to remove one of truth protective layers”, and refuse to come clean after 50 years, but sadly the deception is still continuing with the NASA Mars Rovers. NASA wants us to believe that it’s possible to land safely on the Red Planet by parachute in a near-vacuum with a pressure ranging from 0.0044 psi to 0.087 psi in the Mars atmosphere! This also proves that the sky on Mars is not red or blue but black.

Cosmic Toolbox Bavo Dekker • 8 days ago
I’ve had those Mars questions I’m undecided. A camera pointed straight
up should see black but at an angle there is much more atmosphere to
diffuses light. Why they havent taken a vertical picture I’m unsure of. NASA claims their giant parachute only slows it some.
Either retro rockets or airbags were needed. The dust storms
photographed by landers would require much thicker atmosphere also.
Those of the electric universe theory believe these are electrical
discharges. I still lean towards the Mars probes being real but I have
an open mind.

Soft_Dystopia • 24 days ago
When all this information stacks up it becomes very convincing.

kati7 • 20 days ago • edited
Hard to believe our governments anything these days, lies everywhere, but then there are also lots deceptions/diversions so i wont believe both sides and just stay neutral or even better ignore this topic.
Still sure upvoted cause its more plausible then the NASA/gov version.

Bak • 20 days ago
Great documentary, the best I have seen yet on the Apollo hoax. 3 and a half hours well spent.

Math & Physics • a month ago
I skipped through, did they bother to cover the thermodynamics of a BLACK BODY IN SPACE?

Rich • 13 days ago
Fk all you down voting idiots… Do some fkn research!!!! https://www.skyandtelescope…

Rich • 23 days ago
Only one problem with all of this…. You can buy a telescope now with which you can see the landing sites… So there’s that…

Bak Rich • 20 days ago
Have you ever seen any landing site with a telescope? NASA has some really good telescopes but I am not aware of any pictures they have that show the landing sites photographed through a telescope.

Rich Bak • 13 days ago
I’ll just leave this here.. https://www.skyandtelescope…

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 11 days ago
That’s nothing. NASA has been doctoring and smudging out their own photos for years. A few blips supposedly by one of their own orbiters that cannot be corroborated. Means nothing. You originally said with the telescopes WE have these days. WE have no way to verify. This movie reveals them doctoring the timing of their conversations. So they can’t photoshop a shiney spot? Paleeease! Why don’t you address any of the 3 1/2 hrs of evidence.

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 10 days ago
@Rich Was just rewatching and the spots that are supposedly proof in your skyandtelescope link are even addressed in this movie, making me wonder if you even watched the movie

VeganCaramel Rich • 22 days ago
No you can’t.
Do you actually believe that or were just hoping everyone would be too lazy to check into it?

Additionally, I have no doubt that people will eventually be able to see the landing sites some day using some form of technology because NASA is, and always has been, planning to reconstruct the studio sets on the Moon at some point.
As this documentary points out, NASA didn’t want the Lunar X Prize teams to go near the landing sites because they have not yet had a chance to reconstruct the studio sets.

Cosmic Toolbox VeganCaramel • 13 days ago
There are many that think there has been a secret space program for a long time that is responsible for some of the ufo’s we see in the sky. If so I’m sure they would have reconstructed the scene by now. some think Kennedy suspected it and thought this his proposal might force it out in the open. If so it didn’t

Cosmic Toolbox Rich • 13 days ago
There is one telescope that could- the Hubble. And users of it are forbidden to point it at the moon.

Rich Cosmic Toolbox • 13 days ago
ya ok… https://www.skyandtelescope…