Eric Dubay: Earth is not a planet
Transcript
Transcript
In the heliocentric model earth is just
one of eight planets in our solar system
all of which are said to be huge
spherical earth-like habitations or
globular gas giants millions of miles
away they claim the earth under our feet
along with these seven other planets
revolve concentric circles or ellipses
around the Sun hence the term
heliocentric the previously prevailing
geocentric model had placed earth as the
immovable center of the universe with
the Sun Moon stars and planets all
revolving around us just as they appear
in the heliocentric model however which
would be more appropriately titled the a
centric model the Sun is only the center
of our solar system while itself
supposedly simultaneously revolving five
hundred thousand mile-per-hour spirals
around the Milky Way galaxy which itself
is constantly shooting 670 million miles
per hour away from an alleged Big Bang
creationary explosion at the beginning
of time in the geocentric model the
seven planets were known as wandering
stars with the multitude of other stars
known as fixed stars the wandering stars
were so called because they can be seen
meandering their own unique paths around
the heavens while all the other stars
remain fixed in their study group
rotation around Polaris the wandering
stars also happen to be among the
brightest in the night sky and just as
heliocentric falsely claimed the moon to
be a mere reflector of the sun’s light
they claimed the bright starlight of
these planets is merely them reflecting
the sun’s light back at us this has
already been shown to be geometrically
impossible however as convex bodies do
not and cannot reflect light in this way
in the heliocentric model the wandering
stars are all supposedly spherical
earth-like places several million miles
away from us while the fixed
ours are all allegedly super distant
Suns similar to our own but several
trillion miles away complete with their
own solar systems and accompanying
planets perhaps even populated with
sentient alien beings like ourselves
NASA’s current official astronomical
statistics state that there are upwards
of 10 trillion such planets in our
galaxy alone
and at least 200 billion galaxies in the
universe therefore they claim earth is
only one of one septillion planets in
the universe David Ward law Scott said
our modern astronomers imagine the stars
to be immense worlds or Suns some of
them many thousands of times larger than
our own and at an enormous distance Sir
Robert Ball in his cause of an ice age
says of Sirius that it is a million
times as distant from us as the Sun that
it is 92 millions of millions of miles
from the earth it is thought that stars
are in a more or less advanced state of
development and that probably some of
them may be already inhabited by beings
suited to their spheres their distance
from us they calculate to be so immense
that according to Sir William Herschel
the light from some of them will take a
thousand years to reach this world of
ours dr. Samuel Rowbotham said again
these stars are assumed to have
positions so far from the earth but the
distance is almost inexpressible figures
indeed may be arranged on paper but in
reading them no practical idea is
conveyed to the mind many are said to be
so distant that they should fall with
the velocity of light or above a hundred
and sixty thousand miles in a second of
time six hundred million miles per hour
they would require nearly two million
years to reach the earth Sir William
Herschel in a paper on the power of
telescopes to penetrate into space
affirms that with his powerful
instruments he discovered brilliant
luminaries so far from the earth that
the light which they emitted
not have been less than 1 million nine
hundred thousand years in its progress
Albert Smith said the fixed stars are
so-called because except for very long
periods they do not appreciably alter
their relative positions and they are
mere points of light so small that the
most powerful telescopes cannot magnify
them into discs yet they are supposed to
be sons of immense size removed by the
astronomers to immeasurable distance
away from us for the credit and
convenience of their theories NASA even
claims to have sent several remote
controlled flying telescopes like the
popular Hubble camera into outer space
transmitting back to earth pictorial
proof of the validity of their model
these Hubble pictures show that the
wandering stars are all in fact
spherical earth-like planets just as the
heliocentric claimed all along the
Hubble pictures showed that the fixed
stars are also in fact distant Suns
trillions of miles away just as the
heliocentric lamed the Hubble pictures
and videos all of which are
indistinguishable from a good photoshop
or Hollywood production completely
confirmed for hypnotized heliocentric
the truth of nasa’s claims and the
existence of various celestial phenomena
which only nasa in their advanced
cameras can show like planets galaxies
black holes quasars etc using even the
most advanced non NASA telescopes
however the fixed and wandering stars
appear to be nothing more than tiny dots
of multicolored light it cannot be
ascertained whether fixed stars are
actually distant Suns whether wandering
stars are actually earth-like planets or
whether any of NASA’s claims hold any
validity outside of their alleged
Victoria lleva dense from the supposed
remote control flying Space Telescope
images outside of NASA what evidence do
we have that stars are actually distant
solar systems what evidence do we have
that planets are earth-like places in
space they are certainly interesting and
plausible ideas but there is absolutely
no empirical evidence to support them in
fact if NASA hadn’t implanted such ideas
into their heads
very few people would
I look up at the night sky and assume
those little pinpricks of light were all
earth-like objects
millions of miles away or Suns trillions
of miles away complete with orbiting
planets and moons just like ours the
only reason people believe wandering
stars are earth-like planets and fixed
stars our distant Suns is because of
NASA propaganda as Gabriele Henriette
said the planets are not solid opaque
masses of matter as is believed they are
simply immaterial luminous and
transparent disks if stars are all
distant planets or Suns how is it that
various phenomena have been observed
including stars changing color intensity
of light sudden appearance disappearance
or shooting quickly from one place to
another
I have watched single stars changing
their colors as regularly as a disco
ball others shooting through the sky and
disappearing and stranger still I once
saw a star shoot quickly straight
upwards through the sky for two seconds
and then stop again back in the late
16th century when the heliocentric
theory was starting to take hold over
the imaginations of an unsuspecting
public Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe he
famously argued for geo centricity
positing that if the earth revolved in
an orbit around the Sun the change in
relative position of the stars after six
months of orbital motion could not fail
to be seen stars should seem to separate
as we approach and come together as we
recede in actual fact however after 190
million miles of supposed orbit around
the Sun not a single inch of parallax
can be detected in the stars
Thomas Winship said in the time of Tycho
Brahe he it was said that the earth
revolved around the Sun but he argued
that if the earth revolved around the
Sun the relative position of the stars
would change very much and the matter
must in the nature of the case be easily
detected accordingly experiments were
tried at intervals of six months and the
result showed that the stars were in
exactly the same position as they had
occupied six months before thus proving
that the earth does not move
at all if the earth is at a given point
in space on say January 1st and
according to its present-day science at
a distance of 190 million miles from
that point six months afterwards it
follows that the relative position and
directions of the Stars will have
greatly changed however small the angle
of parallax may be that this great
change is nowhere apparent and has never
been observed incontestably proves that
the earth is at rest that it does not
move in an orbit around the Sun when
Tycho Brahe he demonstrated that after a
hundred ninety million miles of supposed
orbit around the Sun not a single inch
of parallax could be detected
heliocentric desperate to patch the
glaring hole in their theory pushed
their hypothetical distances to the
Stars into the trillions of miles
claiming the closest one Proxima
Centauri was a ludicrous 25 trillion
miles away and thereby making all the
stars so conveniently far that no
appreciable parallax could be detected
this expedient explanation which
heliocentrism clung to ever since has
proven satisfactory to silence the
manipulated minds of the masses but
still fails to adequately account for
several issues dr. Samuel Rowbotham
wrote it is found by observation that
the Stars come to the Meridian about
four minutes earlier every 24 hours than
the Sun taking the solar time as the
standard this makes 120 minutes every 30
days and 24 hours in the year hence all
the constellations have passed before or
in advance of the Sun in that time this
is the simple fact as observed in nature
but the theory of rotundity and motion
on axes and in an orbit has no place for
it visible truth must be ignored because
this theory stands in the way and
prevents its voter Eze from
understanding it William carpenter said
considerably more than a million earths
would be required to make up a body like
the Sun the astronomers tell us and more
than 53,000 Suns would be wanted to
equal the cubic contents of the star
Vega and Vega is a small star and there
are countless millions of these stars
and it takes 30 million years
for the light of some of those stars to
reach us at 12 million miles in a minute
and says mr. Proctor I think a moderate
estimate of the age of the earth would
be 500 million years it’s wait says the
same individual is six heptarian tons
now since no human being is able to
comprehend these things the giving of
them to the world is an insult an
outrage and though they have all arisen
from the one assumption that earth is a
planet instead of upholding the
assumption they dragged it down by the
weight of their own absurdity and leave
it lying in the dust a proof that the
earth is not a globe several experiments
have since been performed and repeated
by notable scientists like Albert
Mickelson Edward Morley George Airy
and George san yak proving that it is
the stars that revolve around a
stationary earth and not the other way
around the conclusive results of their
experiments are not contested or even
mentioned in modern astronomy books
rather they are conveniently swept under
the carpet to keep prying minds from
seeing through the lies for example the
experiment known as Aries failure since
it failed to prove heliocentrism
involved filling a telescope with water
to slow the speed of light inside
usually telescopes must be slightly
tilted to get starlight down the axis of
the tube supposedly due to Earth’s speed
around the Sun airy discovered that
actually the Starlight was already
coming in at the correct angle so no
change was necessary this demonstrated
that the stars move relative to a
stationary earth and not the other way
around because if it was the telescope
moving he would have to change the angle
gabrielle Henriette said all the planets
including the Sun revolve around the
earth these circumstances cannot be
denied since they are plainly visible
either in the ordinary way with the
naked eye or with the help of the
telescope it can be said in this
connection that in the case of a science
which should be based exclusively on
observation and not on speculation such
as astronomy the evidence of the senses
is the only factor upon which
conclusions can and must be based if the
planets can be seen revolving around the
earth it is for the decisive
that they do revolve in such a way it is
asserted that this is not so and it is
maintained that the earth and the
planets revolve around the Sun we note
with astonishment however the bizarre
and definitely suspicious fact that
these planetary movements are not
visible they cannot be seen and yet they
are called real how can these movements
be proved and their speed be ascertained
since they are invisible on the other
hand the existing geocentric planetary
motions which can be observed and
measured and which consequently
constitute a perfectly valid system are
condemned as unreal and apparent a
pertinent remark may incidentally be
made on the subject why do the
astronomical tables which are published
year after year give the so-called
apparent movements of the planets in the
zodiac why take the trouble of
calculating and putting them on record
at all if they are not real why is it
also that no mention is made of the
so-called real movements of the planets
Marshall Hall said trust your eyes and
your cameras they have no reason to
deceive you about whether the stars are
going around you nightly then get it in
your mind the single fact surrounding
star trails that has been photographed
thousands of times and cannot be denied
must be explained away by the
theoretical science establishment all of
the fact list allegations of rotating
and orbiting earth billions of light
years distance –is to the stars a
fifteen billion year old universe the
whole Big Bang paradigm all of the
alleged evolution of the universe earth
and mankind that is to say all of modern
evolution based cosmology controlling
knowledge today all of it is completely
undone if the stars are doing what
cameras show they are doing namely going
around the earth nightly if you can do
so for a few minutes just lay aside the
Copernican indoctrination that
accompanies such pictures and take a
good hard look at these photographs of
something that really really happens
every single night do you see what I see
I see all the visible stars in the
northern skies going around the North
Star in perfect circles in other words I
see all the stars
which these time exposures have recorded
actually going around that navigational
star that God put there for us in the
northern hemisphere
Thomas Winship said the plurality of
worlds is based on assumptions so
contrary to known possibilities that the
grand idea must be thrown into the
wastepaper basket
the supposed great distance of the Sun
from the earth is the main cause of the
delusions of the learned as to the so
called world’s above us being inhabited
this distance is based on a fictitious
idea that of the revolution of the earth
around the Sun which I have already
shown to be unconditionally false the
Sun is a small body of light and near
the earth therefore all the star
distances are wrong their sizes and all
other suppositions the plurality of
worlds is only the logical sequence of
belief if the earth be a rapidly
revolving globe but this has been shown
to be ridiculous in the extreme evidence
apart from any theory has been presented
which entirely nullifies such an
assumption and renders it absurd showing
that such an unnatural idea has not a
vestige of natural fact to support it
the grand doctrine of the plurality of
worlds therefore like all of the other
grand doctrines of modern astronomy must
be consigned to oblivion when it can be
shown that this world is a globe and by
what known principle the inhabitants can
hang on to the swinging ball like the
housefly crawls along the ceiling it
will be quite time enough to talk about
the plurality of worlds in other words
the plurality of worlds if there’s
supposed to be many many ball planets
spinning around in this infinite
universe that only makes sense in the
heliocentric spinning ball cosmology
it’s been shown that the earth is flat
and motionless so the idea that there
are many other earth-like planets out
there or there are many other ball
habitations spinning around in the sky
is ridiculous
you can see with a telescope but the
things that they call planets
look exactly like the things that they
call stars and
before they started calling them planets
they were called stars they were called
wandering stars if the planets are
supposed to be masses like Earth why is
it that their star light is often
brighter than the other stars which they
claim our Suns why would they have light
at all it’s the same like with the moon
they’ve claimed to land on the moon and
they show this desert planet but we look
up at the moon and see a shining light
coming from this disc if the moon is so
bright shining with light like that why
weren’t the astronauts constantly
illuminated by this huge light that
shines all the way two hundred and
thirty eight thousand miles to the earth
but then when they’re on the moon is
just dirt when you look at these things
through an actual telescope they just
look like disks of light they don’t look
at all like Suns or like ball planets
and when you take a good look at what
NASA is feeding you
it’s CGI all the ball planets every shot
that NASA shows of Mercury Venus Earth
Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto
did I miss any all these things of all
they’re pictures of these planets are
clearly made on a computer they are CGI
computer graphic images
computer-generated images so the idea
that there are many other spinning ball
planets out there in the sky
is false NASA doesn’t do science NASA
does science fiction heliocentrism is
not science it’s science fiction geo
centricity is what you actually
experience it’s what actually happens
the flat earth is what you actually
experience you do not experience a curve
you do not experience motion you don’t
feel yourself moving thousand miles an
hour the Stars don’t change their
relative positions they’re fixed because
they’re revolving around us just as it
appears think about it if we were
revolving around the Sun
and the Sun revolving around the galaxy
in the galaxy revolving around the
universe guess what all the stars would
change their position every single night
you wouldn’t be able to catch the same
star trails two consecutive nights let
alone four hundreds and hundreds of
years not changing positions if you had
those four different motions everything
spiraling around each other you can’t
have the North Star fixed and all the
other stars fixed in their
constellations revolving perfect circles
around it can’t happen you couldn’t even
have perfect circle star trails they
would be spirals they would be awkward
spirals they would be like elliptical
spirals so point is earth is not a
planet it’s a plane they just added a T
to the end and fooled everyone and then
they started saying this runs septillion
other planets too just like Earth and
then once they got people believe in
that now they’re saying and there must
be life on some of those so there’s
aliens and now they’re preparing you for
aliens that’s what’s coming next they
want you to believe in aliens they want
you to believe that there’s some
offworld enemy or friend that’s going to
come here to save or destroy us and
they’re going to use that as a false
flag event to further their agenda it’s
been in the works for a long time so
this is a big one you could even say
that this is the purpose of the ball
earth deception what’s the purpose to
create a world religion what do you
think NASA is what do you think the
spinning ball earth universe Big Bang
evolution is it’s a religion
people believe this and it doesn’t
exist so or why do they lie about the
Flat Earth
Eric because they’re making you believe
in a science fiction religion
that’s why you don’t even know that
you’re in a cult you don’t know that
you’ve been brainwashed and how deeply
you’ve been brainwashed you brainwash so
much that instead of thinking that you
come from a intelligent consciousness
you think that you come from nothing
and monkeys they brainwash you to think
that you and earth aren’t special or
unique but that there’s Infinite Earths
and worlds and beings and humans are not
the most intelligent of the intelligent
designers designs they want you to
believe that there’s some aliens out
there more intelligent I want you to
believe that they’re more intelligent
than you because only they have the
Hubble Space Telescope but only they
have all the technology necessary to
tell you that oh stars are really Suns
and the wandering stars are planets and
we found water on Mars with our little
probe rover thing check out these cgi
images we sent back on our million mile
internet connection that we have but you
don’t and you’ve never seen anywhere
think about how effective this religion
is its worldwide it is a world religion
they have successfully created a
worldwide religion and made people the
whole world over believe in it they
teach it to them in government schools
and they’re so indoctrinated into this
religion they have no idea that it’s a
religion that’s the point they call it
science they have no idea that they’re
in a cult being brainwashed by a bunch
of CGI pictures and fairy tales
so why the Flat Earth deception it’s the
most successful religious indoctrination
in history that’s why
Subscribe
Login
0 Comments
Oldest
