Flat Earth Advanced with Kevin Bobick

by fevideo | Jan 9, 2026 | Flat Earth

Flat Earth Advanced with Kevin Bobick

Introduction

The transcript begins with Kevin Bobick recounting a personal revelation from God, which compelled him to share the “truth” about creation, despite the potential for ridicule and opposition. This sets a deeply religious tone for the subsequent arguments, framing the flat earth theory not just as a scientific debate but as a matter of spiritual truth.

Mathematical Framework for a Flat Earth

Bobick lays out a mathematical foundation for his arguments, starting with the standard model of the Earth’s dimensions. He calculates the expected curvature of the Earth using the formula 8 inches per mile squared. This formula becomes the cornerstone of his observational analysis, as he uses it to predict how much of a distant object should be hidden by the Earth’s curvature.

Key Calculations:

Distance	Expected Curvature
3 miles	6 feet
15 miles	150 feet

Observational Evidence Against the Globe Model

The core of Bobick’s argument rests on a series of long-distance observations he conducted in Florida and New Mexico. He uses a Nikon P1000 camera to zoom in on distant objects and compares the visible portion of these objects with the expected hidden height calculated from the Earth’s curvature formula.

Observations in Florida:

•Location: Okaloosa Island Pier, Fort Walton Beach

•Target: Sundunes Condominiums, 17.77 miles away

•Expected Hidden Height: 81.6 feet

•Observation: Bobick claims to see far more of the condominiums than should be possible if the Earth were a globe, suggesting a lack of curvature.

Observations in New Mexico:

•Location: Placitas, New Mexico

•Target: Cabazon Peak, 41.38 miles away

•Expected Hidden Height: 1,141 feet

•Observation: Bobick asserts that the entire mountain is visible from bottom to top, which he presents as definitive proof against the Earth’s curvature. He repeats this observation with an infrared filter to minimize atmospheric refraction, claiming the results remain consistent.

Counterarguments and Explanations

Bobick addresses common counterarguments to his observations, particularly the question of why the bottom of distant objects is not always visible on a flat Earth. He attributes this to:

•The Law of Perspective: Objects converge at a vanishing point on the horizon, causing them to disappear from the bottom up.

•Atmospheric Conditions: Factors like air density, water vapor, haze, and atmospheric lensing can obscure the lower portions of distant objects, especially over water.

Celestial Navigation and Star Trails

The transcript delves into celestial observations, where Bobick challenges the conventional understanding of star trails and their relationship to the Earth’s rotation. He argues that:

•Star trails can be observed rotating in both clockwise and counter-clockwise directions from the Northern Hemisphere, depending on the direction the camera is facing. He presents his own time-lapse videos as evidence.

•Celestial navigation using a sextant requires a flat horizon, which he claims is incompatible with a curved Earth.

•The visibility of Polaris (the North Star) from the equator is impossible on a globe model but can be explained on a flat Earth with local stars.

Conspiracy and Religious Conclusion

Bobick concludes by weaving his scientific arguments into a broader narrative of a global conspiracy and a spiritual battle. He suggests that the globe model is a deception designed to hide the true nature of creation and God’s proximity to humanity. He references biblical passages and historical artifacts like the Georgia Guidestones and the Antikythera mechanism to support his claims of a long-standing conspiracy.

The transcript ends with a rap performance that reinforces the religious themes of his presentation, emphasizing faith, spiritual warfare, and the pursuit of divine truth.

In summary, the transcript presents a multifaceted argument for the flat earth theory, combining mathematical calculations, observational evidence, and a strong religious and conspiratorial worldview. Bobick’s primary evidence is the alleged discrepancy between the expected curvature of the Earth and what he observes in his long-distance photography experiments.

Transcript

Once God showed me the truth from Genesis to Revelation about creation, I asked the Lord, “Lord, people are going to call me crazy. It’s going to bring reproach and ridicule and attacks, and it may even run people off who listen to us and get fed.” I said, “Lord, do you want me to go down this road?” And this is what He said to me.

“Have I ever told you to hold back any of my truth?” I heard the Spirit of God say this. I said, “No, no, Lord. You have never told me that.” He said, “Then you have your answer.” And I was like, “Well, here we go.”

What’s the circumference of Earth? Earth’s circumference is said to be 24,901 miles. What about Earth’s radius? To find Earth’s radius, you take 24,901 divided by 2π. To find 2π, you take 2 × 3.14159, depending on how far out you want to go with π. Or 2π can equal 3.14159 + 3.14159. So, Earth’s radius will equal 24,901 / 6.28318, which equals 3,963.12059. For number’s sake, we will round down to 3,963. So, Earth’s radius equals 3,963 miles.

I understand, Daddy. That makes sense. You’re really smart.

Biblically speaking, the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy is understanding. And although I appreciate the compliment, there’s still a lot to learn.

Okay, Daddy, I understand. Do you know how to calculate the rate of Earth’s curvature?

I created this image to clarify the concept. Let’s use the Pythagorean theorem expressed as a² + b² = c² in relation to this right triangle. In this context, Sw represents the surface of the Earth. W stands for the angle, d₁ indicates the distance to an object, and r is the radius. Our main goal is to solve for h₁.

We know that a² + b² equals the hypotenuse of the triangle. The hypotenuse of the triangle, in this case, is the radius plus h₁. As I apply the Pythagorean theorem for the variables, we know that r² + d₁² will be equal to (r + h₁)².

To solve for (r + h₁)², we will simply use the distributive property. r × r is r² + r × h₁. Then we have h₁ × r + h₁². To write this out formally, we have r² + h₁² + 2 × r × h₁.

Are you following me, baby?

I’m following you, Daddy. Keep going.

So, (r + h₁)² can be written out as r² + h₁² + 2 × r × h₁. Now that we have our formula properly written out, we can go ahead and cancel the radius squared on each side. That leaves us with d₁² = h₁² + 2 × r × h₁.

At this point, we can go ahead and ignore h₁² as it is much less than the radius. That leaves us with d₁² = 2 × radius × h₁. We’re going to go ahead and rearrange the formula so it’s written as h₁ = d₁² / (2 × radius). Remember this for later.

Next, we will create a relationship between d₁ and Sw. Remember, w stands for the angle. The tangent of any angle is the ratio of the length of the opposite side divided by the adjacent side. For small angles, in this case, w is equal to d₁ over the radius. Since angle by definition is arc over radius, we also have w equals Sw over radius.

Comparing the two, we have d₁ over radius equals Sw over radius. Now that we know d₁ and Sw are the same and we are solving for h₁, it can be written out as h₁ = Sw² / (2 × radius). Considering d₁² and Sw² are equivalent, we will proceed by using Sw² to solve.

The reason we’ve been focusing on determining the value of h₁ is that we want to calculate the amount of curvature drop over a specific distance. Understanding this drop is crucial for our analysis of the observation you are about to witness.

Now that we have the equation properly formulated, let’s go ahead and solve for a distance of 1 mile. h₁ = (1 mile)² / (2 × radius), known as the diameter. We found out the radius is 3,963 miles. So the diameter will be 7,926.

Let’s solve: h₁ = (1 mile)² / 7,926, which then equals 0.000126167045 miles. That amount of miles equals 7.994 inches. For number’s sake, we will round up to 8 inches.

Now, we know that h₁ equals 1 mile divided by the diameter, which is 8 inches. We have h₁ = 8 inches × miles squared, which is more popularly known as 8 inches per mile squared.

Okay, let’s go. Can you elaborate on that more?

Absolutely. Although we did a very minute amount of rounding, it is still known that the Earth should curve at a rate of 8 inches × the miles squared if it had a circumference of 24,901 miles.

To solve for that is quite simple. Let’s say we have a distance of 3 miles. We square the amount of miles, meaning we take 3 × 3, then times that by 8. That will give us the amount in inches. So we can divide that by 12 to give us the amount in feet.

So we have 3 × 3 which equals 9 × 8 / 12 = 6 feet. So in 3 miles there should be 6 feet of curvature.

What about the distance of 15 miles? The same rules apply. You take 15 × 15 × 8 / 12 = 150. So in 15 miles there should be 150 feet of curvature.

Is this rate of curvature provable and observable reality?

I think we both know the answer to that, babe.

Now that we know the Earth must curve at a certain rate if we lived on a globe, let’s go over some long-distance observations I made in Okaloosa Island, Fort Walton Beach, Florida.

My exact viewing location was on the Okaloosa Island Pier. This pier stands at a height of 25 feet above the water. With my Nikon P1000 and its tripod adding about another five feet, we can safely say that my viewing height was 30 feet above sea level.

And just to show you, I did my due diligence on what we’re zooming in on. We have this observation tower on Eglin Air Force Base. We also have the Navarre Beach Water Tower, also known as the Holly Navarre Water System. We have this group of condominiums—that is, this entire group of buildings behind the water tower just viewed at a different angle. Then we have the Bell condos.

The main one I want to focus on is the Sundunes condominiums, which are the farthest away from my viewing location.

All of these locations were not easy to find on Google Earth because they were flattened out. So I asked Google, “How come some areas on Google Earth are not 3D?” And the response admits that it’s using low-flying aircraft, not satellites, also known as aerial photography.

I just figured if there are that many satellites up there, why not take an updated photo? Not that we have issues with satellites, but the real photos of satellites seem to always have balloons attached to them. If you Google satellites and go to images, all you get are computer-generated images of satellites in space.

Are you starting to smell a conspiracy here? Let’s stay on track.

From my viewing position, the Sundunes Condos are 17.77 miles away. The height of the Sundunes condos is said to be 90 to 108 feet tall. For number’s sake, we will say these condos stand at 100 feet tall.

The great part about the rate of curvature we just learned is that there’s a calculator we can use that can factor in the height of the observer. I’ll leave a link in the description below.

For the height of the observer or eye height, we will put 30 feet. For the target distance, we will factor in 17.77 miles. Now, this will show us how much curvature there should be in h₁, which is the target hidden height.

As we can see, the target hidden height is 81.6 feet. We should only be able to see the top 18.4 feet of the condos. This isn’t adding up.

Let’s repeat the observation. This next location I’m viewing the condos from is on a boardwalk with an observer height of 15 feet and a distance of 15.52 miles.

That gives us the target hidden height h₁ of 77.45 feet. We should only be able to observe the top 22.5 feet of the building. Again, we seem to be observing a lot more.

Now, I know what might be coming to mind. If the Earth is flat, why can’t we see the bottom of these buildings?

The reason we can’t see the bottom of these condos is that the bottom of these condos is beyond the range of my camera. We have a limit of sight with the naked eye, but with the super zoom camera, it will allow us to see further than we usually could.

Even then, objects will always converge into the horizon and start vanishing from bottom up. It took me a while to comprehend the law of perspective and the vanishing point. But after you understand how your eyes work, the truth of your reality will start making a lot more sense to you.

The other reason we can’t see the base of these condos is that the horizon can sometimes appear optical, especially over water or the ocean.

Just like with this sunset over the ocean, certain atmospheric conditions, including air density, water vapor, glare, haze, and atmospheric lensing, will obscure the lower portion of distant objects.

As with this sunset producing a superior mirage below it, on another day, these buildings created a similar effect. This is optical, not physical. To put it another way, it’s about how something looks or appears rather than its physical properties.

The physical properties of large bodies of H₂O will always need a container and will always remain level. You will never find someone giving you a conclusion on what scale water starts to convey and convex around an uncontained spinning water ball adjacent to a vacuum because it is strictly theoretical and not provable on any scale ever.

Let’s continue with some long-distance observations I did here in New Mexico where there is no ocean to cause these effects.

Another great part about doing long-distance observations here in New Mexico is its high elevation and very dry climate, which minimizes the effect of atmospheric refraction. But since we’re not at sea level, elevation must be accounted for.

This observation was conducted in Placitas, right down the street from the fire station. Zooming in on Cabezon Peak, which happens to look like a giant tree stump, but besides the point.

The elevation of my first viewing location is 5,867 feet. The bottom of Cabezon Peak has an average elevation of 6,400 feet. Adding 5 feet for my tripod and camera, I’m still 528 feet below the average elevation of the base of Cabezon Peak. So there’s no need to account for eye height in the earth curve calculator.

The top of Cabezon Peak is said to be 7,785 feet. And if the bottom of Cabezon Peak is 6,400 feet, the elevation difference from bottom to the top is 1,385 feet. I hope I’m not losing you guys with all these numbers.

I hope this visual helps: The average elevation of the bottom of Cabezon Peak is 6,400 feet. The peak is at 7,785 feet. From the bottom to the top is 1,385 feet. My viewing height is 528 feet below the bottom’s elevation. The total equals 1,913 feet. The eye height stays at zero. The distance from my viewing location is 41.38 miles.

The target hidden height h₁ becomes 1,141 feet. 1,913 minus 1,141 equals 772. We should only be able to see the top 772 feet of Cabezon Peak. No curvature is observed.

And just to really shut up the refraction claim, I repeated this observation with an infrared filter. An infrared filter can minimize atmospheric refraction because it helps to reduce the effects of scattering and distortion caused by the atmosphere.

Infrared light is less affected by these atmospheric conditions compared to visible light. By using an infrared filter, I can focus on the wavelengths that are less prone to refraction, which results in clear images and improved accuracy in observations.

All data confirms if the Earth curved at 8 inches per mile squared, we would only be able to see the top 772 feet of Cabezon Peak. Yet, we can see the entire mountain, indicating it’s visible from bottom up.

Let’s repeat the observation from a higher elevation.

My next viewing location has an elevation of 5,988 feet with a distance of 41.44 miles, making the target hidden height h₁ of 1,145 feet.

From the bottom to the top of Cabezon Peak is 1,385 feet. My viewing location has an elevation of 5,988 feet. I add my 5 feet for my camera and tripod.

The difference between the bottom of the mountain and the viewing location is 407 feet, bringing my viewing elevation to the top of these mountains to 1,792 feet. The target hidden height is 1,145.

We should only be able to observe the top 647 feet of Cabezon Peak. Again, there is no detectable curvature. Again, with the infrared filter.

If you really want to get technical with the math, since I’m about a mile high here in New Mexico, we can add 2 miles to the Earth’s diameter, and it will give us 7.992 inches × the mile squared, which is still safe to round up to 8 inches. That one may take a minute to sink in.

This is a mathematical analysis that destroys the idea of Earth having a curvature rate of 8 inches per mile squared. And this might be a hard pill to swallow, but it’s the reality we live in.

And just to really hammer this home, the pitcher steroid Santa Claus kicks and deals. It’s a long fly ball going back, back, and the ball shatters the sky, bringing the ocean itself down into the stadium. Oh, Simpson just broke this dream’s reality wide open.

I repeated this observation from an even higher and more distant location.

My following viewing location is at an elevation of 6,100 feet, 43.43 miles away, yielding a target hidden height of 1,257 feet.

Good morning.

If anyone’s curious to check out the location of this next observation, it’s in Santa Fe, New Mexico at the Arroyo Hondo Open Space Trail. Shout out to my good friend David Gordon for finding this spot. It’s a bit of a hike, but once you get to the top, you can observe the peak of the Manzano Mountains from just under 80 miles away.

What was interesting about this was that you could barely see these mountains with the naked eye, but with the infrared filter, you can see the mountains from bottom up.

The bottom of the Manzano Mountains has an average elevation of 7,142 feet. The highest peak in the Manzano Mountains is 10,098 feet above sea level.

The bottom to the top of these mountains stands at 2,956 feet. My viewing location has an elevation of 7,300 feet. I add 5 feet for my camera and tripod. That puts me at 163 feet above the bottom of the Manzano Mountains.

We’ll factor in the eye height at 163 feet. The target distance is 76.96 miles, which implies a target hidden height h₁ of over 2,500 feet. We should only be able to observe the top 449 feet of these mountains. But again, there’s no observable curvature obstructing our viewing from nearly 80 miles away.

By now your mind might be scapegoating to other asinine ideas like, “What if the Earth is a lot bigger than what they tell us? It has to be a globe, right? I’ve been indoctrinated with that since I was a baby.”

Let me explain how illogical that is. The entire heliocentric religion is based on the Earth’s radius being accurate. If the Earth’s radius is larger than what they tell us, the circumference would have to be much larger. If the circumference is larger, Earth’s spin would have to be a lot faster. This would result in the orbit having a different speed. In other words, we wouldn’t have 24-hour days, nor would a year amount to 365 days.

The accuracy of the radius is the foundation of this lie. This is the reason I’m not using Walter Bislin’s advanced earth curve calculator. There is an interface controller for refraction, but raising the refraction increases the radius. If the radius is off, the entire heliocentric delusion collapses.

I’m not finding flat spots on a globe because there needs to be consistent curve throughout the whole Earth. Otherwise, we wouldn’t see a perfect circle during a total lunar eclipse, which also completely refutes the idea of Earth being an oblate spheroid.

If you think lunar eclipses are proof that the Earth is a globe, you’re going to have a hard time learning about the Selenelion eclipse.

It’s a lunar eclipse that occurs when the sun and the moon are both above the horizon. If both celestial bodies can be seen simultaneously during a lunar eclipse, then the Earth’s shadow is not the cause of the lunar eclipse.

Ron shot this footage from Chipley, Florida on January 31st, 2018. On that day in Chipley, the moon set at 6:34 and the sun rose at 6:34. So both sun and eclipsed moon were on, or at the very least at, the horizon at the same time.

So here’s Ron on the terminator line in Chipley, Florida. And here’s his sun, earth, and eclipsed moon in a geometrically straight line in space, 180° apart in the sky in a perfect syzygy alignment. And Ron is able to experience both sun and eclipsed moon on his horizon because he’s actually seeing them in the refracted positions, right?

But did you notice that Ron’s moon wasn’t fully eclipsed? It was in the process of eclipsing from the top down, no less, at the time it set in Chipley.

So let’s add in the Earth’s umbra, which is said to be 2.6 moon diameters wide at the point the moon crosses it, and see how that works in this view.

As it turns out, Ron’s moon set at 6:34 in Chipley, 52 minutes before peak full moon, which wasn’t until 7:26 a.m. Ron’s time.

So, the reason Ron’s moon was only in the process of becoming eclipsed when it set is that the actual position of the moon at that time wasn’t here, but here. And it’s going to take one heck of a lot of dip angle and refraction for Ron to see the moon set from his terminator line when it’s still an hour on the other side of peak full.

Now take a look at this time lapse of this moon where both the sun—again, this is the sunrise—and the moon are both above the horizon. Look at the top portion of the moon; it is darkened.

Again, going back—pause here for a second—going back to this model, the top portion should be illuminated, of course, and the bottom portion darkened. And you’re not getting that. You’re getting the exact opposite.

Okay, play this again. You understand what’s taking place here?

So, this definitely proves this is not caused by the so-called ball Earth.

The most common explanation of lunar eclipses on a flat earth is that an unseen celestial body blocks the moon’s self-illuminating surface. You know, kind of like a new moon and a solar eclipse.

A heliocentric lunar or solar eclipse would cause a three-body problem to begin with. It is physically and scientifically impossible to have more than two bodies of mass orbiting each other in observable reality.

In the 300-plus years since Newton, no one has been able to find such a method. There is no general solution to the three-body problem. It’s called a three-body problem for a reason.

The three-body problem also gives the most acceptable theory of gravity—the bending of space-time—huge issues.

The only applicable visualization of the bending of space-time I can think of is the circular spandex with the weight in the middle. This analogy illustrates how mass influences the fabric of spacetime.

While two spheres can orbit each other in a stable manner, introducing a third mass complicates the dynamics significantly.

And speaking of problems, for those who believe in outer space but then believe in a young earth, you have what is called a distant starlight problem.

If the stars are light years away, it would have taken billions of years for the light to get here. A young earth needs local stars. You can’t have it both ways.

You need the big bang cosmology for the big bang. The scientific absurdities of the globe still continue to amaze me.

And for those who haven’t seen, I was able to zoom in on Mount Taylor from 98.9 miles away from Sunrise General Store in Santa Fe, which was missing 1.24 miles of curvature.

One of the things you can see yourself with a pair of binoculars is if you actually go out to a lake and there are boats on that lake, the farther away a boat is, the more the bottom of the boat will disappear and you’ll basically just see the mast of the boat.

And as a boat goes farther and farther away, the last thing you will see is the very top of the mast of that boat.

And that’s because the boat is actually going over the horizon that’s curved. You can see that with binoculars, by an ocean, by a lake. It’s really easy.

That wouldn’t happen if the Earth were flat.

I won’t be spending too much time on this observation since it is common knowledge in the truth community.

Boats do not go over Earth’s curve.

Globe believers need to understand that the illusion of a ship crossing over Earth’s curvature is actually the result of a ship’s angular resolution becoming compressed at the vanishing point, causing convergence at a distance.

I’ve sat on the beach with my Nikon P900 doing this observation multiple times.

The horizon, you know, the flat and level line where the sky and earth meet, is the vanishing point, not Earth’s curvature.

Once you can wrap your head around that, all of the other puzzle pieces will start coming together.

Also, if there’s an obvious curve on the y-axis of a sphere in just a few miles, there would need to be an even more obvious curve on the x-axis within just a few more miles.

That is not what we observe.

There are other ways you can measure Earth’s x-axis as well.

If this handrail is flat and level, then you can bet that the horizon behind it is perfectly flat and level as well.

The other issue that boats going over the curve is proof that we live on a spinning, orbiting, uncontained ball in outer space is that, if that’s where the curve is, that’s where the curve is going to remain, as you can see in this demonstration here.

What you’re watching right now is a computer simulation of the globe showing how much curvature should be visible and what curvature drop would happen as you increase altitude from 0 feet all the way up to 329,400 feet.

Also, an aspect to take into consideration under visual flight rules (VFR) conditions when the weather is clear and the horizon is visible: pilots rely on the natural horizon as their primary reference, aligning the aircraft’s nose with a specific point to maintain a straight and level flight.

So your attitude direction indicator—that’s that guy—yeah, you see that? Yeah. See right now it’s at zero.

So yeah, normally if you’re flying it’ll be pitched a few degrees to maintain level flight.

Okay.

Yeah. So it’s an angle.

Yeah.

Pilots rely heavily on the ADI for maintaining straight and level flights.

The attitude direction indicator measures the orientation of the aircraft relative to the horizon.

A gyroscope maintains its orientation regardless of the motion of the vehicle it’s in.

In inertial guidance systems, you have a spinning wheel. But that spinning wheel is mounted in such a way that you cannot put a torque on the axis of rotation of the spinning wheel. That’s the way it’s mounted. We call it three-axis gimbaled gyros.

So the moment that you put a torque on it, the housings—in this case, the yellow and the black housing—will start to rotate and you never manage to get that torque on the spinning wheel. You never get it on this axis.

And therefore, if now you put it on your boat or you put it in a plane, a missile for that matter, if you can never put a torque on the spinning wheel and if the angular momentum for spin is in this direction, it will stay there forever and ever.

And if then the plane turns, the direction of the spin angular momentum will not change.

But what will happen, of course, is that this yellow frame will rotate or this black frame will rotate.

And in these bearings here are shaft encoders and they sense the rotation that the outer housing makes in order to keep this thing pointing at the same direction.

And that signal is being fed back to the autopilot and that keeps the plane flying in the direction that you want to.

You cannot put a torque on it even when the plane changes direction.

And I want to show that to you.

Okay, this is the direction of my spin angular momentum.

And I’m the airplane and I’m going to fly.

Look at that spin angular momentum. It has no respect for me. It stays in the same direction no matter how I fly.

And the arrow signals that come from the bearings of the yellow housing and the black housing, those arrow signals are fed back to the autopilot and so the plane will stay on course.

Think about this: An airplane that flies at 37,000 feet that uses an ADI to maintain a straight and level flight for thousands of miles can still use the horizon as a reference point.

But you think boats are going over a curve at sea level? Do you really think that’s logical?

And not to beat a dead horse here, but the Blue Origin back in 2016 was able to see the horizon perfectly flat and level at 62.4 miles high.

I’m excited to share this last set of observations with you. It’s an aspect that completely destroys the globe religion that the truth community needs to be aware of.

If you’re at a northerly latitude facing northwards and you watch the stars for a while, you will notice that they appear to rotate counterclockwise around a point in the sky. This point is roughly aligned with the star Polaris, which we call the North Star.

If you were to then travel south for a while and at the equator, all the stars move directly east to west through the sky.

Then heading towards the southerly latitudes and facing south, you will see a whole new batch of stars you couldn’t see in the north, and they will again be rotating around a point in the sky, though this time clockwise instead of counterclockwise.

There is no need to depart from the northern regions of Earth to witness the stars rotating in a clockwise direction.

Likewise, there is no need to travel to the equator to observe their east to west motion.

The celestial patterns can be observed from here in the north.

Let me explain.

This star trajectory was over in Pagosa Springs, Colorado, pointing my camera south. We can see the stars are going clockwise.

This next time lapse was in Fort Walton Beach, pointing my camera south. And again, you can see the stars going clockwise.

I repeated this one here multiple times.

And over here in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, again, with my camera pointing south, you can observe the stars rotating right in a clockwise rotation.

You might ask, why are we getting this effect in the northern hemisphere if it’s supposedly proof we live on a spinning planet?

Well, first of all, this cannot be used as a proof of a spinning globe if it’s not subject to the latitude of the observer and can be observed in different locations on Earth.

Especially if we can observe the stars going right in a clockwise rotation north of the equator pointing the camera south.

If we are standing outside looking directly up, our eyes will reach a limit. We can’t see forever. This is referred to as the zenith.

The zenith relates to the point in the sky directly above the observer.

If you’re able to observe the horizon doing a 360° spin, that would be considered the azimuth.

This is how celestial navigation works.

You need a flat horizon to use a sextant.

A flat horizon is necessary because the sextant measures the angle of elevation from the horizon to a celestial object, and a curved or obstructed horizon makes this measurement unreliable.

Why a flat horizon is essential:

Angular measurement: A sextant measures angles. The angle is calculated from the horizon, which is considered a flat horizontal line.

Accuracy: A true flat horizon allows for a precise reading of the angle between the celestial body and the sea, which is critical for accurate navigation.

A distorted or curved horizon would lead to inaccurate calculations and a wrong position.

In addition to a flat horizon, we also have this field of vision around us that some refer to as the celestial dome.

Again, this is how celestial navigation is measured.

This is what creates this effect of the stars going in a clockwise rotation here in the northern regions of Earth.

Told you, how are you getting the sky to rotate in opposite directions depending on where you’re standing?

Let’s start with there. How observable is that? How does that fit in there?

In the north, you get counterclockwise rotation. In the south, you get clockwise rotation.

Explain that to me on your default flat plane. Explain it.

Just looking opposite directions make them go opposite directions. They all go east, right?

You don’t get it.

The stars drop due to perspective. So, we’re actually looking out towards them, not directly up, which depends on your latitude, right? Depends on your latitude.

If you’re at the equator, they’re going from horizon to horizon.

This is another time lapse I did over here in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, pointing my camera about 237° southwest, tilted up at about a 45° angle, proving you do not have to go to the equator to get this effect.

Wait, do you agree that if I was looking out and something was spinning one way and then I looked at it from the other direction, it looked like it was spinning the opposite way?

Yesterday? It wouldn’t.

It wouldn’t.

As you can see, these light beams move left in a counterclockwise rotation, diverging outward.

When I look in the opposite direction, they rotate right in a clockwise rotation, converging inward.

This is a prime example of how our celestial dome causes lights to appear to rotate in different directions depending on where we are looking.

It’s also a great example of crepuscular and anti-crepuscular rays.

Just to show you how this is possible with this demonstration, my daughter rolls the PVC pipes in one direction. If this were looking south, they go in a clockwise rotation.

Then pointing north, they go counterclockwise.

Here’s another time lapse I did in Rio Rancho, New Mexico pointing my camera 124° southeast, witnessing the stars going from east to west.

Again, no need to travel to the equator to witness this happening.

When we do go to the equator to witness the time lapse of the stars, we can still see the north star Polaris.

Okay, think about this critically. I mean for yourself. Don’t let your indoctrination think for you. Develop your own opinion on this.

Imagine being on a spinning globe. You know, like being so sucked out of your skull that you can’t comprehend reality to the point you conform to sun god worshippers to form your matrix for you.

I digress…

Imagine being at the equator on a globe looking up at the stars or even at the horizon.

Even if you had a wide-angle lens that could see 180 degrees, do you really think it would be possible to see Polaris?

The only way this is possible is on a flat earth with local stars.

Understanding perspective and recognizing that objects appear lower as they get further away.

I verified that stars rotate in both directions in the southern regions of Earth as well as the north thanks to a good friend in South America.

When it comes to the center point of rotation in the southern parts of the world, the southern star Sigma Octantis can’t even be observed because its magnitude of 5.42 and it is not a practical navigational star because of its low visibility.

The center point of rotation is only possible within our celestial dome of vision, which is personal to the observer.

I’m just blown away by how manipulative the globe religion is.

They use the star trails as proof of Earth’s curvature and motion when in fact it is the exact opposite.

Take this into consideration.

They say we see star trails because of Earth’s rotation.

But what about the trajectory from Earth’s elliptical orbit, its axial precession, or the corkscrew path it follows around the sun at 500,000 mph?

Is it really believable that the only visible effect we observe from the star trails is from the least significant motion the Earth is supposed to be doing?

The Georgia Guidestones, which was suspiciously destroyed in July 2022, the Antikythera mechanism, the astrolabe, and archaeoastronomy all demonstrate the constellations have remained in their unchanging pattern since the beginning of star history.

But we’ve been told the solar system is doing this.

Remember, it is in the north where Lucifer wanted to ascend into heaven to exalt the throne above the stars of God, but instead will be brought down to hell (Isaiah 14:12-15).

It is in the north where God stretched out the empty place and hung the earth on nothing (Job 26:7).

And the northern lights just happen to radiate the same colors as the throne set in heaven as described in Revelation 4:3.

The way the Bible describes Earth is this, and this is what they are hiding from us.

They don’t want you to know that God is in heaven and has been right above us the entire time.

My ability to go grill on a beat is from Elohim. Ain’t no competition in my game. It’s just me on me. And this composition ain’t fame. It’s for GOD.

Tell the devil go back where you came ’cause we walking free.

Hop on the stage and I’m ready for war.

I’m not the same person I was before.

I see revival bringin’ on the floor.

I pray it makes its way out of the door.

In Jesus’ name we breaking out of Hades.

I might be doing this until I’m 80.

I leveled up all the way just to say that ain’t how you start is how you finish.

Like 9 to 5. We stand on business.

Just to catch up, you’re gonna need a village.

Okay. Okay. Okay.

We got no limits. We got no limits.

Put on my, put on my…

Is Earth Really Spinning Under Your Airplane?

by fevideo | Apr 8, 2025 | Airplanes, Flat Earth, Spinning

Is Earth Really Spinning Under Your Airplane?

This video takes a bold and focused approach to questioning the spinning globe narrative by examining one clear, everyday example: roundtrip flights between Atlanta and San Diego. Using simple math and observable reality, it challenges the mainstream belief that the Earth is rotating at 870 mph.

Here’s the issue: If the Earth is really spinning eastward at such a high speed, then flights going east (with the rotation) and west (against the rotation) should not take the same amount of time. Yet, in reality, they do — roughly 3.45 hours in both directions. This glaring contradiction is swept under the rug by official explanations, which rely on vague, unobservable principles like “conservation of momentum.”

The video points out the flaws in that argument. Once a plane leaves the ground, how can it maintain the Earth’s rotational speed? Air resistance, gravity, and engine thrust should logically override any “inherited” momentum. And if the atmosphere is supposedly rotating with the Earth, dragging planes along — how exactly does light, low-density air manage to push a 500,000+ pound plane? The comparison to a boat floating down a river falls flat when you realize air isn’t water.

The analysis even challenges the idea that planes are secretly flying at over 1,400 mph — something never mentioned by pilots or flight crews. Instead, the only speed consistently referenced is the airspeed or ground speed of 550 mph. Nothing more.

The conclusion is simple and powerful: the Earth is not spinning. The near-identical flight durations make far more sense on a stationary, flat Earth. This doesn’t require convoluted theories or imaginary forces — just observation, logic, and common sense.

Why complicate the truth when the simplest explanation — that the Earth is still and unmoving — fits the evidence right in front of us?

Transcript

easily understood modern-day scenario

that questions the widely accepted

belief that the Earth is a spinning

globe by examining one example in detail

we aim to present compelling evidence

that the Earth is in fact stationary

instead of briefly touching on multiple

contemporary examples that may lack

overall depth and impact we will

concentrate on one particular example

that clearly evidences the Earth’s fixed

and stationary nature our primary

objective is to cast significant doubt

on the credibility of the mainstream

narrative endorsed by NASA and the

conventional principles of flight

dynamics that posit the theory of a

rotating spherical Earth through this

detailed examination we aim to reveal

how easily the public continues to

accept official explanations without

substantial scrutiny we will refute

these commonly accepted explanations

highlighting their inherent flaws and

lack of plausibility when examined

closer in our analysis we will focus on

roundtrip flights between Atlanta

Georgia and San Diego California these

coast to coast flights typically cruise

at an average speed of 550 mph and have

an average flight duration of

approximately 3.45 hours assuming no

wind or turbulence 1900 m / 550 mph

equals 3.45 hours this should raise

obvious and critical questions at this

latitude considering that the Earth is

said to rotate west to east at 870 mph

beneath the plane during flight how do

flights in both directions report nearly

identical flight times in other words if

a plane flies at a constant speed of 550

mph between these two cities how can the

flight times be the same in both

directions given that the Earth is said

to rotate from west to east moving with

the plane in one direction and directly

against the plane in the other examining

closer on an eastbound flight from San

Diego to Atlanta the Earth’s rotation

moves in the same direction as the

aircraft conversely on a westbound

flight from Atlanta to San Diego the

Earth rotates in the opposite direction

to the aircraft’s travel these opposing

dynamics present significant challenges

that become apparent upon closer

examination in our first scenario when

heading east once our plane is airborne

and detached from the Earth’s surface it

leaves San Diego heading for Atlanta the

Earth is said to rotate eastward below

our flight with us at 870 mph while our

plane eventually reaches its own

independent cruising speed of 550

mph how then will our plane ever arrive

in Atlanta to clarify our plane’s

cruising speed of 550 mph is 320 mph

slower than the Earth’s rotational speed

of 870 mph beneath us during our flight

as the Earth’s direction of spin and our

plane are heading in the exact same

direction and latitude in our second

scenario as we begin our return flight

to San Diego from Atlanta the dynamics

change entirely further complicating the

official explanations as to why the

flight times in both directions are

almost identical once the aircraft lifts

off and disconnects from the Earth’s

surface San Diego is now approaching our

plane at a speed of 870 mph due to the

eastward spin of the Earth bringing San

Diego directly to us while

simultaneously directly approaching San

Diego our destination city at an

independent flight speed of 550 mph our

plane and San Diego are now closing in

on each other this should in reality

significantly reduce our flight time as

the two combined speeds effectively

create a far faster convergence speed of

1,420

mph the actual flight duration should

now be shortened to just 1.33 hours

rather than the actual 3.45 hours

observed daily for this specific flight

1,900 m / 1420 mph equals 1.33 hours the

fact that the actual daily flight times

between these two cities are almost

identical in both directions assuming no

wind or turbulence should clearly reveal

that the Earth does not rotate but

rather rests

the first counterargument within the

official narrative attempts to explain

the identical flight times between these

opposing scenarios by invoking the

principle of conservation of momentum a

fundamental concept in physics according

to this explanation when our plane flies

from San Diego to Atlanta it retains the

eastward spin imparted from the Earth’s

rotation at takeoff which is

approximately 870 mph at this latitude

the plane is then said to add its own

separate cruising speed of 550 mph to

this conserved momentum therefore the

plane’s total air speed is said to be a

combination of the 870 mph imparted by

the Earth’s rotation at takeoff and its

own cruising speed of 550 mph in effect

the plane is then alleged to be moving

at a total air speed of

1,420

mph 870 mph plus 550 mph equals 1,420

mph how does an airplane once airborne

and detached from the ground maintain

the momentum it is said to inherit from

the Earth’s rotation at takeoff during

its flight to Atlanta consider a

baseball being thrown from west to east

similar to an airplane does it continue

on its initial trajectory unchanged or

does it begin to arc towards the ground

due to gravity and air resistance almost

immediately conventional wisdom tells us

that a baseball will indeed begin arcing

downward would an airplane not be

subject to these same principles the

continuing argument to this states that

an airplane maintains its initial

velocity inherited from the earth’s

rotation at takeoff through continuous

propulsion from its engines which

counteracts any slowdown however we must

remember that once an airplane leaves

the ground it is no longer propelled by

the force of a spinning earth

additionally air resistance acting

against the plane increasing with speed

continually works against any initial

velocity boost provided by the Earth’s

rotation the net result is that once

airborne and disconnected from the

ground the airplane’s forward motion

relies solely on engine thrust to

maintain the required speed of travel

this is because any initial contribution

from the Earth’s rotation at takeoff is

soon negated by continual air resistance

to further support this it is important

to recognize that passengers on

commercial flights are never informed

that they are traveling at speeds

upwards of

a,420 mph to counteract the Earth’s

rapid rotation during some flights we

never hear relative motion mentioned or

referenced at any point past or present

concerning commercial flights the only

speed ever mentioned is the ground speed

which is typically around 550 mph or

slightly higher with a tailwind it

should be quite apparent that the plane

maintains an air speed and ground speed

of 550 mph in both directions which

supports the consistent flight times

observed for these daily flights

aligning perfectly with the scenario of

a non-rotating Earth beneath it a

stationary Earth logically explains

identical flight times in both

directions eliminating the need for the

adjustments and complex explanations

required for a spinning Earth in summary

the concept of conservation of momentum

proves ineffective in our scenario once

the plane becomes airborne although the

airplane would theoretically inherit an

initial burst of momentum from a

rotating Earth at takeoff this momentum

is quickly negated by air resistance and

gravity once airborne the plane operates

as an independent entity with external

forces continuously counteracting any

inherited momentum effectively

nullifying the predicted effects of the

conservation of momentum principle the

second common counterargument suggests

how gravity and friction cause earth’s

atmosphere to rotate in conjunction with

the earth this argument states that

airplanes are transported not only by

the previously mentioned conservation of

momentum but also by the air which is

itself influenced by earth’s rotation it

implies that the earth its atmosphere

and the airplane move together as a

single system according to this claim in

our scenario the airplane maintains the

870 mph speed it initially gains from

the Earth’s rotation thanks to

atmospheric cohesion this cohesion is

alleged to help the airplane preserve

and maintain the speed inherited from

the rotating Earth at takeoff

subsequently the airplane’s engines are

said to provide the additional thrust

needed to reach the higher speeds which

are required for progress towards

Atlanta for this theory to be valid it

must account for the scenario where an

airplane turns off its engines

mid-flight in such a case the airplane

would need to be significantly carried

along by the atmosphere thereby

supporting the claim of the atmosphere’s

significant role in this case however

common understanding tells us that much

like a thrown baseball an airplane in

this scenario would immediately begin to

descend this illustrates that

atmospheric drag does not significantly

influence its forward momentum to help

sustain its flight next the idea that

atmospheric drag a form of cohesion

could attach to and sustain the momentum

of a commercial airplane weighing

between 500,000 and a million pound by

dragging it along is beyond difficult to

such theories and explanations seemingly

require us to disregard logic common

sense and reason to consider them

feasible the concept of atmospheric drag

is quite often compared to a boat being

carried by a river’s current however

this analogy quickly falls short upon

closer examination recognizing that

water has significant density and

cohesive properties that air simply does

not match given air’s considerably low

density and minimal cohesive potential

the idea that it can mimic the cohesive

behavior of water adhering to and

carrying along an extremely heavy

compact object like a commercial

airplane is fundamentally flawed to

demonstrate a valid example of

atmospheric drag consider the observable

phenomenon where a cigarette smoke

appears stationary and aligned inside a

moving car with closed windows and

inactive air vents this occurs because

both the air inside the car and the

cigarette smoke share similar properties

of density and buoyancy as a result when

the car moves the entire body of air

inside including the smoke moves

uniformly with it this is a valid

example of atmospheric drag now consider

a scenario where a ball is tossed upward

inside a moving car if the brakes are

abruptly applied while the ball is still

in midair the ball would trend forward

toward the dashboard or windshield this

phenomenon demonstrates that the

atmosphere inside the car does not

significantly adhere to the ball and

slow its forward momentum to match the

rapidly decelerating vehicle’s internal

atmosphere even if there is a slight

effect it is far too negligible to be

noticeable

this example with a ball illustrates

that low density air does not

substantially adhere to or considerably

affect denser objects this observation

directly challenges the notion that air

can adhere to a denser object such as an

airplane and significantly contribute to

dragging it along in a moving atmosphere

despite this evidence we are expected to

believe that an airplane with its

considerable density and weight can be

effectively carried along by atmospheric

drag maintaining the momentum acquired

from the Earth’s rotation at takeoff

while atmospheric drag might have a

brief effect it is not substantial

enough to significantly influence the

behavior in our airplane scenario thus

rendering it a negligible factor

it is surprising to see even prominent

highly intelligent individuals

attempting to justify atmospheric drag

and conservation of momentum as

plausible explanations for consistent

flight durations observed in our two

flight scenarios it would not be

surprising if quantum mechanics were

introduced at some point in the future

as yet another means to further perplex

and confuse us our tendency to readily

accept scientific explanations or

passively conform to official narratives

highlights an enduring pattern within

society revisiting the application of

AAM’s razor to our flight scenarios

reveals that the simplest explanation is

clearly a stationary non-rotating Earth

this model plausibly explains why

flights between the east and west coasts

have nearly identical times with no need

for complex explanations adjustments or

fixes required by a spinning Earth model

the official explanation from NASA and

the field of modern flight dynamics

attempting to account for these

identical flight times despite an

allegedly spinning Earth is entirely

untenable

HOW TO SPOT A PSYOP- The Final Experiment Edition

by fevideo | Mar 10, 2025 | Experiments, Fake, Flat Earth

HOW TO SPOT A PSYOP- The Final Experiment Edition

The Final Experiment hits all 10 criteria for being an “engineered reality,” also called “a psyop.” The only reason someone can still believe this was a real event after watching this, is because there is a deep emotional connection that has been implemented. It’s the same process that MK Ultra uses. It’s called brainwashing. It’s time to wake up to the reality around you and for you to start seeking the truth about the ground you walk on and the luminaries that go over your head every day.

Transcript

named will Duffy to try to discredit Flat Earth AKA biblical cosmology they

supposedly went to Antarctica to film a 24-hour son that somehow was Never filmed properly without suspicious edits

yes a mysticism practicing hermeticism promoting Bible denying heretic of a pastor that says

this so please I beg you we have to stop

claiming that the Ten Commandments prohibit lying that’s not true the Ten

Commandments prohibit bearing false witness against your neighbor

okay we finally get to my conclusion on the matter of lying in deception and

that is this after carefully looking at both sides of the debate and after

taking a very deep dive into everything I could possibly find in scripture regarding lying and

deception I have come to the conclusion that neither lying nor deception are

inherently immoral this deceitful Pastor must have not made it to Psalms 1017

that states he that worketh deceit shall not dwell within my house he that tell lies shall not tar in my sight or he

must have not have made it to Revelations 218 that states but the fearful and unbelieving and the

Abominable and murderer and whoremongers and Sorcerers and idolators and all

liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death or he must

have not have read Proverbs 12:22 that states lying lips are Abomination to the

Lord but they that deal truly are his Delight so in light of this movement

it’s been my honor to edit this video for you enjoy

most people have no awareness of how easily our behavior and even our identity can be completely taken

over but people are waking [Music]

up I spent 20 years in the US military I’m a behavior expert I’ve trained Sops

I’m the bestselling author in behavioral psychology I want to show you exactly how to identify what we call engineered

reality or what some people call scops

[Music]

at the end of this I’m going to give you a tool that’s literally going to give you a score out of 100 that shows you

how likely something is to be a scop let’s do

this so the first thing you need to know is following the Fate model Focus

Authority tribe and emotion this is what triggers the mamalian part of our brain that makes all of our real decision

decisions the first part is focus Sops always aim to hijack your attention with

repetition so with this pause and ask why is this message being pushed so

aggressively they consistently pushed this narrative over the past few months because they understood the importance

of a first impression if someone’s first impression of Flat Earth or biblical cosmology is this final experiment then

of course they are going to disregard it and not take the time to properly and thoroughly research it it only takes 7

seconds to form a first impression this movement has been gaining so much momentum that they are willing to do

whatever it takes to try to slow it down let alone whoever orchestrated this must have also known the psychology behind a

lasting impression cognitively speaking what we say at CIA is your last

impression is the impression that lasts the second part here is Authority trusted figures might shift their tone

or positions unnaturally to support the narrative we’ll uh now turn it over to the flat

earthers so obviously you all know jiren Campanella of jiren ism one of the most

popular Flat Earth YouTube channels not for long all right guys uh sometimes you are

wrong in life and I thought that there was no 24-hour son in fact I was pretty sure of it kept saying it was true I

kept saying it wasn’t it’s uh a fact the sun uh does Circle you in the South that

the sun does exactly what these guys said as far as circles the southern continent so I honestly believe there

was no 24-hour Sun I honestly now believe there is they’re holding guns on the other side of this camera this is

all stage this is all stage I mean I was one of the people that said I definitely

didn’t think that there was a 24-hour son we were wrong it is doing what they

said it would do truth doesn’t fear investigation truth doesn’t fear investigation so watch very closely for

expert panelists or endorsements where authority figures might speak outside of

their expertise pay close attention to that one then we have tribe so messages

that polarize opinions or create Stark in groups versus out groups or exploit

our tribal instincts for example labeling groups as Patriots versus traitors or scientific versus deniers be

very careful when you hear that language finally we have emotion so be wary of any communication that

triggers strong emotions like fear hope or outrage without any clear verifiable

evidence so emotional responses suppress critical thinking at the same time but

from a stationary standpoint in relation to other stationary standpoints Parallax should still show

up okay first of all it does like if I look if I pull my footage back up right now as I turn it around the relative

positioning of the items absolutely changes as you have you interacted with the video I’ll share it secondly it is

obviously different if the camera’s physically moving around and dude this is this is the thing bro you can just

come and interact with it and this is I don’t understand kind of annoying but

here we’ll just we’ll just show it emotional responses suppress critical thinking so as a tip here analyze the

evidence that’s presented to you if facts are replaced by appeals to emotion you need to be very very very

cautious so if I keep the sun still that means the camera is rotating and the

Earth is moving it’s the same thing so don’t let them bamboozle

you so it’s the same is if I’m using a camera a single lens camera or I’m using

a 360 camera and I rotate the footage to keep the Sun Center it’s the same

thing it’s the same for

both so here’s the point if there is a south pole with a 24-hour Sun then there

must be extreme parallel shift we don’t see that in their footage because the Earth is not

rotating and if the Earth’s not rotating there cannot be a South Pole so they’re lying to you so don’t

think they went there oh it was a sunny day that they were lucky no because it’d be hard to fake that so

let’s look at the footage so the claim here is that it’s a 360 camera the camera must be turning

because the the Earth is turning and I can see the cameras moving

because the Earth is

turning if I’ve got a rotating platform I put a spit level and I put a the capup

must have a left hand side and a right hand side so if the Earth is turning what

would my camera see so remember when even if you’re using a 360 camera I just in my nle isolate the Sun and keep the

sun standing still well the the spirit level can’t bend around me the spirit

level must turn rotate like this you’ll see one side of the spirit level then

you’ll see the other side of the spirit level you see one side of the robot then you see the other side of the robot the

same with the spirit level in the cup you must see the left side and the right side because it must rotate because the

Earth is supposed to be rotating right so we’re looking at parallel

shift so let’s put it into perspective

remember the camera if I’m rotating the camera or I’m rotating the footage it’s

the same thing things are in their relative position

and distances from the center of the camera so you must see paralle

shift and things can’t bend around you right as we see in their footage

things will move at different speeds and the table can’t

bend mountains can’t bend around you they must keep their same north and

south and east and west must be the same so you see this

bending is because they’re using a psych next question novelty our brains are

wired to focus on Sudden or unusual changes because they signal potential

threats or opportunities and this is an evolutionary survival mechanism scops

exploit this by creating events that break normal expectations you really

want to believe that YouTube shills went to Antarctica and got a 24-hour son on

video when there’s no government agency that has ever recorded a 24-hour son in

Antarctica and there’s government bases down there for over a 100 years some of them you really want to believe that

YouTube shills got a 24-hour Sun recorded in 2024 as Flat Earth is

exploding and there’s no 24-hour Sun videos from any University or any

scientist or or any astrophysicist there’s a few random ones starting I think around the year 2017

but no 24-hour Sun videos from 2010 or 2005 or the 1990s there’s no other

24-hour Sun videos in Antarctica but we’re supposed to believe that YouTube

shills got a video of a 24-hour son in Antarctica in 2024 that defies all reason all logic

all common sense so ask yourself why is this new so consider if the event or

somebody’s message has been artificially manufactured or timed look for patterns

like sudden shifts in public opinion trending hashtag that are unusual or viral videos that seem very coincidental

the timing shifts public Focus all of this is part of the NCI system I

developed for teaching tradecraft in extreme psychological operations and there’s even a gigantic textbook for all

of this stuff in the description definitely not for everybody but it’s definitely the most comprehensive guide

in the world on this stuff so next item look for multiple sources centralized

narratives create an echo chamber and they silence dissent and they narrow perspectives for example if all media

Outlets present identical talking points it is a humongous red flag so actively

seek out contrarian or independent voices even if they challenge something that’s already in your head so in

reality an example all the major news outlets report on the exact same study

but independent researchers reveal the study was funded by a company selling

the solution so watch for that group speak next is identify cognitive dissonance weapons let’s talk about how

this works so cognitive dissonance comes up when new information clashes with our

Identity or our beliefs so scops exploit the hell out of this by uh including

micro agreements micro Agreements are little small seemingly harmless

concessions to shape your identity and over time you’re going to unconsciously align your behavior to reduce that

internal conflict and as a weaponization example of this a scop might present you

as a part of moral or intelligent Enlightenment like only good citizens do

XYZ if you disagree with that you risk some identity conflict there so reflect

on your identity and ask am I being nudged to identify with some other group

you can Google or YouTube the final experiment and it’s easy to tell you were being fed one side of the

story remember once you decide on a subject it can take a long time and a lot of information to rethink

it it’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled

Mark TW so be very careful of any campaigns that

are asking for seemingly minor commitments as an example of this let’s say a company launches an ad campaign

and they claim real Patriots by local if you disagree with their product it feels

like rejecting your identity as a patriot so this pushes you to conform to

be very very skeptical about those identity statements next is looking for

those emotional scripts and what I mean by this is the scripts that were written in our brains by our ancestors so

manipulated narratives trigger instincts round round round round lumbo the world

she’s flat the world she’s around she’s

flat look King she’s around like a the APPA she’s flat like the pancake POA

she’s round she’s a firm she’s a fully packed she’s round like my head she’s

flat like your [Music]

head a

[Music] biscuit yeah and what up do I’m a

disgust and nobody believes in the world that she’s around

me she looks around to me DC Oh by come here a Queen Isabella if you can

prove the world is round Chris I’ll give you my Jewels have Tribal rejection

these are threats of being socially Outcast like you’re selfish if you don’t comply and those things override logic

every time and as a tip for this break the script by focusing on the facts like

what’s the likelihood of this scenario so compare the claims with other sources

if the 24-hour Sun existed in Antarctica then it would be reasonable to assume that North facing Shadows should be

found with some images taken during the Antarctic Summer come to find out the

vast majority if not all of Google Earth’s images of Antarctica were taken

during its summer that is great news for shadow research sech it will depend on the time of day the footage was taken

but if we look over all of Antarctica and find no North facing Shadows then that is some strong evidence for no

24-hour Sun remember that what we call Satellites operate at all times of the

day a certain percentage of Shadows must be facing north than if a 24-hour Sun

actually existed let’s find out pay attention to the compass in the upper

right corner and the imagery date below [Music]

and again this is at it start I noticed it like 51 minutes in to video and now

at 52 minutes and six seconds it’s just

obvious

that there is angle and a blue line that cuts all the way up and across this is

all stage this is all stage next is follow the money so there’s a trail of

beneficiaries here so identifying who benefits always is going to reveal the motive okay five yeah no let’s do it I

I’m very I’m here for this actually okay how much are you getting paid

how much am I getting paid listen wait don’t answer that Jonathan don’t answer that yeah Will Duffy will Jonathan needs

to get paid for his time will hired him okay we could hire we we could hire somebody so I’m gonna stand up for will

on that one he hired him so look for funding sources like sponsorships or political connections that are tied to

the narrative at Amazon Studios we think big

and that’s why we’ve invested in the newest Technologies expand ing our

creative possibilities and offering our filmmakers an experience like no other

introducing Amazon Studios virtual production we ourselves are the

filmmaker so we’re trying to make a safe place for storytellers to be ambitious bigger than traditional walls that have

been built in the past just so we’re able to Encompass full World building shows there’s such a wonderful realism

that’s created with virtual production the ability to experiment with it on on this piece felt really f fitting it

definitely gives the ability for filmmakers to be able to visualize and utilize different locations within the same stage there are going to be aspects

of it as we shoot different content for different shows we could have a setup in the morning of one environment to have foreground set

pieces camera please shoot all that and then after wrap be able to swap out all the foreground step pieces switch out

the background and shoot a totally different environment the next morning could be a whole different part of the world this type of film making tool

makes location shooting around the world accessible to budgets big and small

next and this one is very important is analyze the context boundary the

mechanism here is context and context defines what is permissible so

manipulative people shift contexts to normalize extreme behavior on yah I

swear on everything that I went to Antarctica and that I did not went to

Antarctica he looks to the right he’s lying and he also doesn’t say that I

swear I saw a 24-hour son in an Arctica so that’s interesting so ask what is the

context compare some similar events in different settings to see if the rules or responses seem disproportionate look

for contradiction compare some similar events in different settings to see if the rules or responses seem

disproportionate look for contradictions so for lots of the students who are brand new to to NCI University this

right here is the most massive realization when they realize that the ability to weaponize cognitive

dissonance and then shift the context and get anyone to do almost anything

this changes the context to make previously unacceptable actions seem absolutely necessary next spot the use

of archetypes because they’re woven into our brains Sops simplify narratives by

using Arch types like heroes and villains and saviors deconstruct the story ask who are the characters and

what roles are they playing making a documentary I’m the filmmaker in the group I’m a flat earther as

well it’s hard to say what I think these days um but I’ll tell you this the AE map seems to be inaccurate um I think

some of the things with the Flat Earth now give me reason to investigate a little different um you know when you

see the sun circle around you it’s pretty clear just based on where we are that it couldn’t be happening where the

rest of the the planet is getting day and night every day as they do with the exception of the North Pole but that’s

for the same reason that down here in the South Pole we’re getting this 24-hour

sunlight I that doesn’t make any sense you’ve been a flat earther for eight or nine years and you just said we go to

space another red flag bro okay well excuse my uh my grammar

but my my my thoughts were send us up in a ship as high as it’ll go with one of these ships and like obviously if they

don’t send us in a ship high enough oh there’s an issue if they do send us what will we see Jonathan’s a real flat

earther simplistic like good versus evil stories usually signal manipulation just

about every time so always seek Nuance there the final

experiment uh is about the fact that a 24-hour sun in Antarctica does not work on a flat Earth

it’s not possible on a flat Earth and it’s obviously what the globe says

happens and the narrative ignores their mistakes and oversimplifies the conflict

to prevent a lot of scrutiny now what is VAP gate you might ask well one comment

that kept cropping up during people’s live streams was the lack of visible

breath with conspiracy theorists arguing that this was somehow proof that we

weren’t outside in a cold environment but instead we must be in a studio

somewhere then during Austin wit’s live stream he’d already been asked a few times about breath and was then asked to

pick up some snow so he went back into the Hut off camera to go and get his

gloves and when he came back onto camera he then produced two visible breaths

which then stopped again and what I’m seeing from that is thick foggy breath

being exhaled as he exits the hot then clearly holding what appears to be a vape pen to his mouth for quite a while

as he’s walking back then putting something in his pocket and then blowing thick fog from his mouth before getting

back to the computer which to me personally seems to fit the argument of him vaping I live in Florida bro where

it’s warm humid and close to sea level this was a complete flip on his head for

me I literally got sick okay now what I want you to actually address though is

I’m telling you factually I did not hit a vape walk over to the camera and

exhale a vape the first time I was asked if I Vaped in antic I said yes yes I Vaped I’m telling you actually I did not

hit a vape yes I Vaped I used to vape I quit vaping I found a vape in my bag

everyone claiming that’s a lie I I guess I can see why that’s coincidental or whatever but but the more words you use

the less believable you sound the more words it takes to tell the truth the farther it looks from I found an old

vape and I hit it because I wasn’t at home right so like I I wouldn’t Vape around my children you know like I

wasn’t going to smoke when I had children or whatever I also had a cigarette there I hate cigarettes think they smell terrible would never smoke

around my children ETA so the idea that I was away from my house is the only reason I would be vaping or smoking a

cigarette okay I never lied about hitting a vape I’m telling you actually I did not hit a vape yes I Vaped what I

said and still say to this day which is just the truth is that I did not hit a vape and walk over to the camera to try

to fake my breath less is more when you overe explain it’s because you have this fear that they’re not going to believe

you so you give more detail and hopes that they believe that you’re telling the truth or believe you know what you’re talking about so like if you

actually look at the video real closely you’ll see every time I hit a vape I’m trying to hide it from the camera and that’s because I would never Vape on

camera the more words you use the less believable you sound the more words it takes to tell the

hit a vape I walk over there I exhale out away from the camera like I turn my head away from the camera and everything

try to get another there’s more when you overe explain it’s because you have this fear that they’re not going to believe

you so you give more detail and hopes that they believe that you’re telling the truth or believe you know what you’re talking about hot water because

if you want it to be cold you just throw snow in there like the water just comes from the snow anyway right so when you drink hot water and you walk outside you

see your breath more and it takes like a couple minutes so you don’t really see your breath so I just assumed that that’s what my breath was from which is

why I said what’s up now and took two deep breaths after that thinking you keep seeing it and you didn’t why isn’t

your breath

FY S as Fogg as it was a second

ago it’s kind of foggy right now but right before I started the stream I I tested it so I knew you guys were going

to say that and my breath was like super foggy earlier but it’s not really talk you right

now there’s a little breath what’s up

now you have to take like deeper breath and it sucks it hurts your lungs stop the

cap stop right now stop no but Marty you wanted to bring up

some points um about what we care about and what we’re saying and what we mean here yeah so let’s just go let’s just go

on the list right away okay so are we proclaiming without question that they faked the 24-hour Sun as of right now

I’m leaning very strongly yes and I think Dave is pretty much there too but we you know there there other possibilities is do we still have to

take into consideration that there could be a rational reasonable explanation for there is a 24-hour sun down there and there’s a reasonable explanation in our

Flat Earth model because of Optics Dome that sort of thing yes that’s still a possibility as well but do we do we

believe that this Avenue should be specifically looked at yes and once you start looking at that this Avenue I

think the rest of them are going to fall off and you’re going to start to see that this actually makes a whole lot of sense next evaluate the frame so let’s

do a step-by-step evaluation here first one is expectation what are you expected to believe or do based on this thing

that you’re exposed to in the media next is belief what assumptions are being made about you like your values or your

fears then we have perception so how is reality being shaped like selective

facts or missing contexts and definition is the final step here when it comes to a frame what truth is being asserted as

something that’s completely unchallengeable they expect to get you to believe in a perception to accept

this fallacy of a reality so they can control your mind more easily when

someone is sucked out of their skull so far beyond comprehension that they can’t trust their own senses you can imagine

how easily manipulated they are when it comes to other deceptions I do not know of one seasoned flat earther who fell

for the planemic and actually got injected with this comes up with information

suppression so really look for topics that are being avoided critics that are being silenced if somebody needs to be

silenced in order for an idea to make it then the idea is not good so alternative

viewpoints being discredited that’s a big one to look out for you can actually take the same link from your YouTube

video and post it on the RTS platform and it’ll lift the shadow Banning sometimes YouTube will only show less

than 1% of the views that are actually being viewed this is a good example here of

one of my videos where it shows 419 views but somehow 3,000 likes I’ve

literally caught them sabotaging My Views terms of conspiracy theory content generally our goal is to promote

authoritative content to our users so we have two principles that guide the way here that’s the first one is we want to

provide users with authoritative trustworthy I’m sorry to cat you off I only have a minute half and I I I don’t

really need to hear what you’re trying to provide I want to know how you’re dealing with all these conspiracy theorists on your platform so the the

first way is by demoting lowquality content and promoting more authoritative content and the second is by providing

more transparency for users so we’re introducing boxes that provide factual

information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual

such as searching for the Earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of your response is to put a box saying nope the

Earth is not flat correct okay so cross check timelines of events and notice if

critics are labeled conspiracists or if algorithms are suppressing some kind of

specific search and this is a big one especially in today’s time this should go without saying but I will go ahead

and say it anyway whenever you Google Flat Earth all of the information is completely one-sided it’s either

misinformation a strawman fallacy world opposition or information that’s

steering you away from Flat Earth it’s not giving you any credible content from

a real flat earther perspective why isn’t there better content like TR Earth Wiki that comes up where you can look up

whatever you want regarding Flat Earth that will give you a credible resource it’s because they are hiding

the truth from you that should be very easy to understand so next be alert to

Rapid compliance shifts this one is scary and it’s happening every day scops

create urgency to drive rapid compliance and these tactics are stuff like

emotional appeals staged group behaviors or False Consensus for this it’s really

important to slow down and resist the pressure to act to question the Conformity as much as possible and test

the message engaging the Skeptics there then we have this controlled opposition

named Robbie Davidson who is now coming out on his Facebook saying that he is going back to the globe if that is not a

rapid compliance shift I don’t know what is study the timing of the events and

this one’s huge especially right now timing is everything ask yourself why is

this happening now so what other events or scandals might this thing be distracting everybody from so look for

very coincidental timing with unrelated major news stories or political

movements Sops can very often be uh smoke screens ironically right after the

final experiment is finished and all the information starts blowing up La starts burning down to the point where only

some of the trees burned but somehow was melting aluminum down to a liquid

coincidence probably not the next thing I want you to do is to sharpen your brain to start hearing and understanding

these manipulation tactics and one of the biggest things that you can do the most effective way that I could train

you right now just you and me is to teach your brain to recognize logical

fallacies so let’s go through these cuz Sops very often use these flawed arguments to convince people and if you

know how to spot them it makes you a lot harder to manipulate let me give you 10 of these so that your brain gets

hardwired to start seeing everything a whole lot differently so the first one

that you’re going to see all the time appeal to emotion so this uses fear and anger and hope to bypass logic this

Exodus will continue until a flat earther can show how tf’s experiments

and observations can work on a flat Earth but instead of doing this the Flat

Earth Community as a whole is taking the position that we did not actually go to

Antarctica or that we did not see the real sun or that there is no 24-hour sun

in Antarctica despite the fact that we all witnessed it with our own eyes they

are arguing that we were in a giant Studio filled with LED screens or that

the sun was created with a giant laser pointer to fool us no one ever said that next is the

straw man argument this misrepresents somebody’s argument so they can attack

it better don’t let anybody trick you that Flat Earth is a flat disc in outer

space so somebody might say they oppose the lockdowns because they don’t care

about lives think about that one number three is the bandwagon policy so this

claims that something is true because everyone supports it and this is you hear this all the time millions of

people agree with X Y and Z you should agree with it too I had asked you to debate one of them Flat Earth guys no I

don’t I can’t no I know we talked about it and we’re going to have him on Skype no that is something that should not be

debated does not belong in front of an audience getting debated only 64% are

convinced that the world is a ball the world is a circle that the world is a

what is it a spheroid only 64% are convinced that the world is a

ball please don’t cry like that please don’t

[Applause] Brennon number four is the false dilemma

this presents only only two extreme options and it ignores Alternatives so

it’s the either you’re with us or you’re against us fallacy there it doesn’t

matter when there’s a 24-hour sun in Antarctica if there is that falsifies

Flat Earth and it confirms the globe number five is the ad homonym attacks this is the attack of the person and not

the argument be very observant for this so this is when you hear you can’t trust

her she’s not a scientist you can’t do X because they’re not qualified based on X

ad homonym is very common and I want your brain to be able to spot it why do people think the Earth is flat the Earth

is clearly round right that’s why we have the Horizon time zone Seasons day and night cycle weing seen it from space

we know more about the curvature of the earth and the vast majority of things in our world how can someone get confused about the shape of the earth well the

answer is actually more annoying than you’d think flat earthers aren’t coming to the conclusion that the Earth is flat the same way we came to understand that

the Earth is round scientific experiments General observations and mathematical equations all prove to us that the Earth was round but flat

earthers belief isn’t based on evidence it’s based on distrust they believe that people in power are lying to them that

experts are full of sh there is no actual evidence that proves the Earth is flat the whole conspiracy is based

solely on the distrust of authority that’s it and hey I told you the answer was annoying number six is appeal to

Authority and this is a claim that something is true because an authority figure said so so like Dr X supports it

so it’s absolutely right you have to trust the science we should speak of seeking evidence that dis favors the

hypothesis that the Earth is flat of which there is plenty starting with the

historical evidence about how Stellar constellations shift if you travel how the length of Shadows changes to

Newton’s 1 over R square Force law that is the law for a sphere not a dis not to

mention Einstein and gravitational red shift and the peralan Precision of mercury and so on and so forth the

problem that flat earthers have is that they cannot do most of these observations themselves so if you buy

the idea that it’s only your personally collected evidence that you should accept then it seems you cannot refute

the idea that the Earth is flat number seven is the slippery slope these are claims that one action is going to lead

to some extreme negative outcome so you’ve heard this before somebody says

something like if we allow this we’re going to lose all of our freedoms all of our freedoms are Gone the country is

gone all of that kind of talk like that be very attuned to when you hear that

and very cautious when you hear that if you do not think about your sensory input if you do not properly decode it

you arrive at the wrong conclusion flat earther similarly arrive at the wrong

conclusion by failing to decode evidence indeed by simply ignoring a lot of evidence that their own censors deliver

this is evidence about how society and how science Works whether we are

scientists or not we all constantly use this evidence to navigate life and I’m

sure flat earthers are no exception number eight Hasty generalizations and

these are broad claims that are made with very little evidence so the example

is two politicians lied so all of them must be corrupt so giant claim tiny bit

of evidence two politicians might have lied so they’re all corrupt these controlled opposition’s

accusation do not speak for the entire Flat Earth Community you don’t have to be a Jack Parsons to figure that one out

number nine is huge it’s the red herring so this distracts people with irrelevant

information you’ve heard this maybe as an example when somebody says why are we worrying about climate change when we

have so much crime going on right now it’s an argument of distraction number 10 is false equivalence all right so

anybody can go to these two websites or any website really and um check out the

AI detection software this first one I uploaded the video from

mckagan’s the first one that was uploaded and it took like eight still shots or whatever came back as multiple

fake indicators shows you the image manipulation that 39% of it is

manipulated so they probably use some fake some real um here’s this footage or this picture

coming back as being AI or not or maybe computer generated not necessarily AI

but tampered with um same with this one there’s dozens of them that I put in

here I I took a picture from my window to show what it looks like a real

picture just to for as like a comparison and obviously that came back

with the green saying it’s fine so here’s another one that’s like the

little tents from jiren’s chest cam footage got quite a bit of jiren’s chest

cam footage that’s fake this one actually said that it looked legit but then I noticed it looked like I didn’t

see a sun I just saw the mountains there so then I decided to crop just zoom in

take the picture just cropped out the Sun as you can see here put that in and

all of a sudden Bam um computer generated modified

image that’s a very damaging

one I know there’s a lot of information here so I want to give you access to the actual tool that we use to identify Sops

that even rates the likelihood on a 1 to 100 scale I’m going to add that into the description right below this video but

keep this in mind throughout history the people who stood tallest in the storm

were not not the ones who knew all the answers they were the ones who asked the right questions they weren’t the loudest

voices they were the calmest they were the people that had composure thanks for

spending some time with me one

love I hope that was easier to watch than it was to edit now I’m going to do

something I don’t usually do I’m going to ask you to share this video I’m obviously not doing it for the views I’m

doing this to get the truth out this is deceiving some people and they do need to see the light so to all the deceivers

out there let this be a message from the real Flat Earth Community you cannot

pull a stunt like this without us honest researchers picking it apart this movement is not being stopped let alone

slow down you are fighting against God’s creation you’re at a lost cause the

truth will always prevail

The Final Strawman Experiment

by fevideo | Dec 21, 2024 | Experiments, Flat Earth, Spinning

The Final Strawman Experiment

Dec 21, 2024

The Final Experiment – TFE – has finally happened, after half a year of hype, Will Duffy’s band of globe defenders have performed what they deem a death blow to flat Earth…

Transcript

the final experiment has finally

happened after half a year of hype will

Duffy’s band of globe Defenders have

performed what they deem a death blow to

Flat Earth so how did they do it did

they find and measure the globe’s

mythical curvature did they film a

convex Horizon without using a fisheye

lens did they circumnavigate in a

perfectly straight line and return to

their starting point or did they

construct a demonstrable model of water

sticking to a spinning ball no they

didn’t even attempt any of these things

that flat earthers have actually called

for and admitted would provide evidence

for the globe instead they made up their

own strawman experiment and labeled it

final with the hope that their results

would be the last words on the flat

versus Globe debate unfortunately for

Will and to the surprise of no flat

earthers the results of his experiment

haven’t changed people’s minds and

aren’t the final words of on anything as

I said would happen back when this idea

was introduced in typical Globe

apologist fashion the final experiment

has conflated a Celestial observation

with our terrestrial Foundation they are

attempting to claim that the motion of a

light in the sky overhead somehow gives

proof of the shape of the ground

underfoot flat earthers warned them for

months that this is simply a strawman

argument that isn’t going to convince

any critical thinkers

but still they went ahead anyway now

they have allegedly traveled to

Antarctica during the southern summer to

film The Midnight Sun and succeeded in

convincing no one in the Flat Earth

Community to go back to the globe as

will was warned it’s analogous to

inviting a contractor to measure the

dimensions of your floor space but

instead of taking measurements of the

floor he climbs a ladder and starts

measuring the recessed lights in the

ceiling then after doing some

calculations and extra ation based on

his ceiling lighting measurements he

tells you definitively that your floor

is a spinning ball the only reason flat

earthers have claimed there likely isn’t

a midnight sun in Antarctica is because

there are countless clearly genuine

videos of the phenomenon in the Arctic

and only a couple dubious doctored ones

claiming to show a 24-hour sun in the

South if this is such a common and

easily filmed phenomenon why has it

taken this final experiment to finally

get footage of it

the jury is still out as more videos

from the final experiment trickle in but

already there are anomalies and issues

surfacing for example notice the extreme

change in Shadow length that takes place

as mkun from the final experiment Paces

around the base camp in the space of

walking no more than 10 to 20 M while

the sun is still quite High overhead his

shadow somehow triples in length this is

more what would be expected Ed from a

large overhead Studio light than a

heliocentric Sun 93 million mil away

personally I am quite skeptical of both

the footage and the people involved in

this final experiment but time will tell

as it always does now let’s assume all

the videos of the Antarctic Sun filmed

by the final experiment crew are all

100% genuine and filmed in the exact

location and time claimed this still

makes no difference to Flat Earth

whether or not they filmed an Antarctic

Midnight Sun Still Water remains level

The Horizon remains flat and there

remains no measurable curvature the

Earth is still a level plane regardless

of any solar

observations the motion of a light in

the sky overhead cannot possibly prove

the shape of the ground underfoot the

Flat Earth Community has long had models

that explain a 24-hour sun in Antarctic

including lady blunt and Albert Smith’s

model in their 19th century book zetic

astronomy more recently Joseph heni has

also done excellent work constructing a

demonstration using lights projected off

a dome firmament showing exactly how an

Antarctic 24-hour Sun works on Flat

Earth using a two-way mirror to

demonstrate a super fluid ceiling inside

a dome over a flat Earth Map a

flashlight is shined down to represent

the Sun moving moving over and around

the earth as the sun circles its way

from the Tropic of Cancer to the equator

and outwards Beyond there is only one

Spotlight appearing in the sky but as

the flashlight widens its circuit

outwards towards the Tropic of Capricorn

suddenly a second apparent projected Sun

appears and begins circling the opposite

direction over and around

Antarctica not only this but since the

projection is only apparent it is based

on the position of the Observer so as

the camera moves 360° around the outer

circumference of the model the 24-hour

Sun still circles overhead regardless of

where in Antarctica The Observer is

located due to the vastness of our realm

and the nature of the projection very

rarely would anyone anywhere on Earth be

able to see both the actual and apparent

Sun but it has been captured on film

several times these videos which are

easily explained able in the doed Flat

Earth model have no explanation in the

heliocentric Globe model there is no

reason why their giant Sun 93 million

miles away in outer space would ever

show a projected apparent second sun but

we even have video showing both Suns

reflecting their lights into the water

below since we cannot see the entire

expanse of the planetarium sky above us

our eyes create an apparent Sky Dome as

shown here each person has their own

unique Skydome perspective based on

where and when they are observing from

we know this to be true from the fact

that three people in three different

locations will observe the same Sun

appearing differently one will see the

sun rising another will see the sun

setting and another between them will

see the Sun at its apex overhead proving

that everyone sees their own personal

perspective of the sun’s current

location and not its actual location

this is also why all all the stars in

the celestial sphere move the same

direction around us east to west but

depending on where the Observer is

located and what direction they’re

facing a second Circle of Stars will

appear moving around the other way we

can see Polaris Ursa major and minor and

other Northern constellations from every

Point north of the equator

simultaneously but conversely cannot see

the so-called South Pole star Sigma

octantis the Southern Cross or other

constellations simultaneously from every

point south of the Equator because they

all sweep over a Great Southern Ark from

their rise in the evening to their

setting in the morning all of this just

goes to show that regardless of what the

sun moon and stars look like or what

they’re doing over our heads has no

bearing on what the earth looks like or

what it’s doing under our feet the final

experiment straw man whether the footage

is faked or Genuine is simply an appeal

to the sky fallacy where these desperate

Globe apologists insist that a solar

observation somehow proves the shape of

our terrestrial

Foundation the fact of the matter is

even will Duffy himself when asked Point

Blank about this issue admits his

supposed final experiment hasn’t

actually disproved Flat Earth at all and

like I I I would put it to you like this

if if there’s a dome if we’re in an

enclosed

system does that mean does that not mean

that there are a whole lot of variables

that we don’t know about that could

affect the lights and the

ceiling yeah I can grant that

Watch more videos regarding TFE The Final Experiment here.

Timelapse of the 24 hour Antarctic Sun Proving More Than One Sun

by fevideo | Dec 18, 2024 | Antartic, Experiments, Fake, Flat Earth

Timelapse of the 24 hour Antarctic Sun Proving More Than One Sun

It was either another sun or a fake projected one. Regardless, they have always covered up MORE LAND and possibly an EXTENDED/INFINITE PLANE with MORE LUMINARIES! This light in the sky has only started up MORE research! Don’t you EVER put limitations on the creator!

Here are some images of two suns being seen in the sky at the same time.

2-suns-Progue

2-suns-1

2-suns-3

2-suns-2

See many more examples/images of Two Suns

(opens in new tab): Google Images Search = Two Suns

Transcript

that large round thing to the right of

the sun well that’s our second sun I

don’t know if you knew that we had a a

second son but uh there it is uh it’s

normally hidden from view uh NASA and

other organizations they usually hide

that stuff away from us they don’t tell

us the truth but you there it is it’s

true it’s true it’s true

[Music]

if you’re at the bottom of a ball there

in Antarctica okay flip it around from

their perspective the Sun is up really

really high it’s up here in like two or

3:00 range right it should be we down in

here makes no sense

[Music]

the fact that you see the Sun up high

over here lighting up the realm over

there Mars or whatever it is now that

makes more sense

Celestial Navigation on Our Flat Earth

by fevideo | Nov 30, 2024 | Experiments, Flat Earth, Flat Earth Proof, Talking Flat Earth

Celestial Navigation on Our Flat Earth

Nov 30, 2024

NathanOakley1980: https://www.youtube.com/live/DFQChtlG… mitchell fromAustralia: • FLAT EARTH SCHOOL – The Number One Fl… Rob Durham: • A Sextant and a Circle (improved qual… Contact me at TabooConspiracy@protonmail.com Backup Channel at Odysee: https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c?r=2q… Gab: https://gab.com/Taboo_Conspiracy As always, my videos are free to use, edit, mirror, share, criticize, claim as your own, or whatever. I will never file a copyright claim against anyone. For the globe trolls (whether you’re paid trolls or just insane globe zealots who have nothing better to do than attack flat earthers) – this is my classroom and if you want to comment here, there are a few rules: (1) no spamming, including group attacks – keep to your one comment and its thread; (2) no personal insults; (3) do not link to propaganda videos; (4) stay relevant to the topic at hand; (5) treat everyone here, especially my friends, with respect and kindness; and, (6) I’m not here to help you earn your income as a globe propagandist and so if you’re incapable of actually mustering an independent thought and just want to repeat shill talking points – good riddance. Violators will be banned immediately and I don’t think anyone’s going to shed any tears for you. Please remember, YouTube actively promotes globe propaganda videos and suppresses flat earth videos and and our comments on all other channels. If you can get YouTube to change that policy, then I will allow all globe propagandist comments here.

Transcript

many people consider Celestial

navigation as the number one proof of

the Flat Earth and they could be right

but I still like my long-distance

observations Celestial navigation refers

to the practice of a navigator using

angles to the apparent positions of

celestial objects in the sky to

determine his location on the Earth’s

surface Celestial navigation has been

used for thousands of years by various

civilizations to safely navigate oceans

and other large bodies of water forther

more nautical Maps were built on these

Celestial angle

measurements without question all angle

measurements require a flat Baseline

therefore Celestial navigation can only

work on a flat Earth it’s that

simple let’s spend a few minutes and

watch a couple of video clips to get a

better understanding of this evidence

the first clip is an old instructional

video from the United States military

notice that even though the video

falsely uses an image of a globe for the

instruction the circles are still flat

which is impossible on a globe the

second video comes from the channel

Mitchell from Australia the third clip

is from Rob Durham’s Channel and the

last video is from Nathan Oakley 1980

and Flat Earth debate

enjoy an important conception for the

Navigator is the circle of position it

is still another way of showing the

relationship between between the

observer’s position and the geographical

position of the celestial body being

observed Zenith distance is the radius

of this

circle this navigational Aid can be

Illustrated easily the top of the pole

represents a star under observation the

base of the pole represents the

geographical position of that star the

length of tape along the ground

represents the Zenith

distance to see the top of the pole or

the star always at the same angle or

altitude ude The Observer must stay on a

circle if the radius is lengthened the

altitude or angle of observation is

decreased if the radius is shortened the

altitude is

increased the Navigator circle of

position however is on a much larger

scale to repeat its Center is the

observed Celestial body’s geographical

position and its radius is the Zenith

distance between the geographical

position and the observer’s position

obviously an observer at any point on

the circle will observe the same

Celestial body at the same

altitude therefore an altitude say of

62° and 33 minutes for a particular

Celestial body must be secured from any

point on a definite

Circle but the question that confronts

the Navigator is at what particular

Point am I

to answer this he constructs another

circle of positions for another body

observed at the same time he can be on

both circles at only two points the two

intersections of the circles are

normally so far apart that one may be

disregarded because it is obviously

incorrect according to his dead

reckoning every Star in the flat

Celestial plane has a position relative

to our flat plane where it will be

90° this is called the geographical

position or the GP of that star relative

to our flat plane here on

Earth when the Observer is at the GP of

the star it appears 90° above their head

Celestial navigation works by using a

seant to measure the angle of that known

St are and using its relative GP

geographical position to know where you

are and I’ll continue to point out that

measuring angles to celestial bodies

only works if we are on a flat plane now

if one Observer measures 30° to a star

and another Observer measures 30° to

that same star we can conclude that they

are both on what’s called a a circle of

equal

altitude and this is another killer blow

to the globe right here everything on

that Circle of equal altitude is exactly

that equal altitude no matter where you

are on that Circle you’re going to

measure

30° and through being able to measure an

angle to that star relative to the

Horizon

everything on that Circle in between

that Circle in the area of that circle

is absolutely flat and level by doing

this once with a seant you know you are

somewhere on that Circle of equal

altitude to triangulate your actual

position you need to repeat these steps

with other stars your position is where

all these areas of equal altitude meet

this is how Celestial navigation works

and has always worked on our flat level

plane so if Observer a measures an angle

to the star and observer B measures an

angle to the star the same Star both

angles are the same

30° knowing the GP of that

star they can conclude that they are on

the same circle of equal altitude itude

distance between Observer A and B and

the area inside that circle is all in

the circle of equal altitude it is all

flat it is all the same level this is

the killer blow to the

globe not only is our world observably

and obviously flat it is measurably flat

look at this map with all the GPS of the

navigational sty on them and the reason

why this is the number one Flat Earth

proof is because using just one area of

equal altitude proves that that large

area that we’re navigating on is

absolutely flat but by doing this

multiple times to create multiple areas

of equal altitude we can literally

measure our entire world as flat just so

you understand the enormity of this

proof we can literally measure our

entire world as flat we are living on a

flat

Earth now in order to do a triangulation

using a seant we use the M projection

map as shown here so we all know that in

order to do a seant triangulation you

need to use a nautical Almanac to give

you the Zenith of the celestial bodies

and you draw Circles of equal altitude

from that Zenith to determine where they

cross and hence where your location

is okay to briefly touch on what the

guys over at Flat Earth debate have been

saying we’re going to use the exact same

examples of the GP positions here I’m

going to look at it from an orthographic

view okay if we’re standing here on the

earth this is the angle to the celestial

body let’s take a line from our position

representing the

Horizon the angle formed here is

definitely not

90° and even at the position where it

meet the Earth you can’t have a 90°

angle to a curved

surface my general view of why Celestial

navigation would be put forward as the

number one Flat Earth proof is because

it’s the heart of our statement all

roads lead to a flat Earth it’s based on

elevation angles and elevation angles

are the origin measurement of all of our

mapping and charting of the known

territories the expansion of the known

world so the reason we can argue against

there being no need to speculate about

ice walls when we’ve utiliz elevation

angles and the geographic positions

ground positions of the stars on a flat

plane with elevation angles to expand

the

territories so they are the heart of our

current 2024 argumentation in terms of

all roads leading to a flat Earth the

reason you can launch forward as a flat

earther on the front foot talking about

Flat Earth is because we measure earth

flat and elevation angles for Celestial

navigation as described on screen now in

this diagram is what you do with them

measuring angles to a star with a flat

Baseline and a 90° at the ground

position of each star to find where you

are on earth if you get lost the only

reason you can do this on the maps

is because we have utilized these angle

measurements to plot the World We Now

map it’s part of the systems that we use

to measure the stars in the first place

with these

angles you can stop yourself from being

dead you can stop yourself from dying at

Sea if you have the means of measuring

the angles to find where the hell you

are and not die or to put it another way

the globe is derived from Flat Earth

elevation angles used in Celestial

navigation but for the fact that we

measure earth flat with these angles you

wouldn’t have a globe to believe

in Earth is measured Flat Earth will

always be flat these measurements prove

it Celestial navigation proves it Nathan

Oakley 1980 follow his he does Flat

Earth debates every day you know Nathan

Oakley is my favorite right now I love

Nathan Oaky he demolishes absolutely

« Older Entries

Flat Earth Advanced with Kevin Bobick