1.0×
The Mechanical Realm Flat Earth Documentary A Working FE Model Antikythera Mechanism
Antikythera Mechanism, the First Computer.
The Antikythera Mechanism, an ancient analog computer, is presented as proof of a geocentric, flat Earth. The text argues mainstream science suppresses this truth, advocating for open-mindedness and trusting direct observation over complex heliocentric theories.
“The Mechanical Realm” by Vikka Draziv presents a comprehensive exploration of the Antikythera Mechanism, an ancient Greek analog computer discovered in 1901, and uses it as evidence to support flat Earth and geocentric cosmological theories. The document argues that this 2,000-year-old mechanical device demonstrates that ancient civilizations possessed sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on a stationary, flat Earth model rather than the modern heliocentric understanding of the solar system.
The work is structured in three main sections: an introduction that challenges modern scientific consensus and discusses the social stigma surrounding flat Earth theories, a detailed examination of the Antikythera Mechanism and its historical significance, and a concluding argument that positions the device as proof of geocentric cosmology. Throughout, the author contends that mainstream science has deliberately suppressed alternative cosmological models and that the precision of ancient astronomical calculations supports a flat, stationary Earth model.
Introduction and Philosophical Framework
The document begins by establishing a contrast between modern technological advancement and ancient wisdom, suggesting that while we live in an era of remarkable scientific progress, we may have lost touch with fundamental truths about our world’s nature. The author positions 2023 as a pivotal moment where technological capabilities seem almost science-fictional, yet argues that this progress may be leading humanity away from essential truths about Earth’s structure and our place in the cosmos.
Central to the author’s argument is the assertion that questioning the shape of the Earth has become socially taboo, creating divisions within families, workplaces, and educational institutions. The text emphasizes that until approximately 500 years ago, geocentric and flat Earth models were widely accepted across various cultures and religious traditions. Ancient texts including the Torah, Bible, Vedas, and other religious manuscripts are cited as supporting evidence for a flat, immovable Earth surrounded by celestial bodies in motion.
The author particularly highlights a Vedic map from the 1900s that allegedly illustrates a flat Earth surrounded by other Earths hidden behind ice walls, suggesting that alternative cosmological models have persisted even into relatively recent times. This historical perspective forms the foundation for the argument that modern heliocentric theory represents a departure from long-established understanding rather than scientific progress.
The Problem of Scientific Orthodoxy
A significant portion of the introduction addresses what the author perceives as unfair treatment of flat Earth proponents by the mainstream scientific community. The text argues that questioning heliocentric theory—the model placing the sun at the center of the solar system—provokes responses ranging from ridicule to moral outrage, comparing the social reaction to that faced by Holocaust deniers. This comparison is used to illustrate the intensity of social pressure against questioning established cosmological models.
The author contends that while scientists freely investigate and debate numerous other theories, including the existence of a Creator, flat Earth theories are uniquely subjected to ridicule and dismissal. This selective skepticism is presented as evidence of a potential conspiracy or cover-up within the scientific establishment. The text suggests that mainstream scientists may be “protesting too much” and potentially hiding important information from the public.
The document extensively discusses the role of media and popular culture in reinforcing spherical Earth concepts. From the invention of cinema and television to modern advertising, logos, and science fiction, the author argues that globe imagery has been systematically embedded in public consciousness. This constant exposure is characterized as a form of psychological conditioning or “brainwashing” that makes it difficult for individuals to consider alternative models.
Drawing on psychological principles, the text explains how repeated exposure to ideas creates deeply ingrained beliefs that become resistant to change. This process is compared to techniques used by advertising agencies, governments, schools, and religious organizations to influence public opinion. The author suggests that the heliocentric model may have been deliberately promoted to diminish humanity’s sense of special significance, reducing human beings from divinely created beings at the center of creation to insignificant products of random evolutionary processes on a small planet in an vast, meaningless universe.
The Flat Earth Community and Scientific Method
Contrary to mainstream portrayals, the author presents flat Earth proponents as thoughtful, well-researched individuals who have extensively studied astronomical and cosmological topics. These individuals are described as having been raised with conventional globe Earth beliefs but possessing the critical thinking skills necessary to evaluate new information objectively. The text emphasizes that serious flat Earth advocates typically invest considerable time and effort in research before adopting their positions.
The author argues that flat Earth researchers demonstrate genuine scientific reasoning and methodology, conducting experiments and investigations based on logic and empirical observation rather than pseudoscience. This characterization directly challenges the common perception of flat Earth believers as scientifically illiterate or gullible. Instead, they are presented as individuals who have courageously questioned established orthodoxy despite significant social pressure.
The difficulty of changing deeply held belief systems is acknowledged, particularly when new ideas challenge fundamental assumptions about reality. The author suggests that societal conditioning has made geocentric models appear “idiotic,” but argues this perception results from deliberate manipulation rather than scientific evidence. The solution proposed is simple: approach alternative ideas with an open mind, listen to the arguments, and make individual judgments rather than accepting predetermined conclusions.
The Antikythera Mechanism: Historical Discovery
The second major section of the document focuses on the Antikythera Mechanism, discovered by Greek sponge divers near the island of Antikythera in the early 1900s. The discovery story is presented dramatically, with divers initially mistaking ancient bronze and marble statues for corpses on the seafloor. This shipwreck yielded one of the largest collections of ancient treasures ever found, with artifacts now displayed in the National Archaeological Museum of Athens.
The mechanism itself was initially overlooked, appearing as an unremarkable corroded rock among other artifacts. It wasn’t until the 1950s that researchers noticed inscriptions on the device, leading to the realization that this was some form of clockwork mechanism that seemingly shouldn’t have existed in the ancient world. This delayed recognition is presented as evidence of how revolutionary discoveries can be initially dismissed or ignored when they don’t fit established historical narratives.
The Antikythera Mechanism is described as an ancient analog computer capable of accurately calculating the motions of celestial bodies using only metal and wood components, without electricity. The device, approximately the size of a shoebox, contains dozens of interlocking gears with synchronized pointers on its exterior surfaces. The sophistication of this 2,000-year-old technology is emphasized as evidence of advanced ancient engineering capabilities that exceed modern expectations of Greek and Roman technological development.
Technical Analysis and Functionality
The document provides detailed technical analysis of the mechanism’s operation, explaining how gears with different numbers of teeth work together to recreate the relative motions of celestial objects. A hand crank operates the main gear representing the solar year, with power transmitted through connected gears to simulate the movements of the sun, moon, planets, and constellations. This mechanical complexity required extraordinary precision and craftsmanship.
The text draws comparisons between ancient analog computers and modern digital systems, noting that while contemporary computers process information using binary code, analog computers use mechanical principles for calculations. Examples of familiar analog computers include clocks and wind-up toys. The historical timeline is emphasized: while most historians dated the first analog computers to the 14th century, the Antikythera Mechanism predates these by over a millennium.
Dr. Derek J. de Solla Price of Yale University is credited as a pioneer in bringing the mechanism’s significance to public attention. For the first 50 years after its discovery, scholars struggled to understand the device’s purpose and capabilities. Price’s careful examination in the late 1950s provided the first comprehensive understanding of its true function. His comparison of the discovery to finding recognizable combustion engine parts in King Tutankhamun’s tomb illustrates the anachronistic nature of such advanced technology in the ancient world.
Price’s analysis revealed that the front dial was divided into 12 sections corresponding to zodiac constellations, with Greek words for Libra and Virgo clearly visible. This led to the understanding that the device represented the 12 zodiacal constellations that mark the ecliptic—the annual path of the sun and the primary zone of lunar and planetary activity. The mechanism thus served as a comprehensive astronomical calculator and educational device.
Mechanical Engineering and Precision
The document emphasizes the extraordinary precision required for the mechanism’s construction, noting that gear meshing is technically challenging even with modern tools. The historical context is significant: complex gear trains weren’t found in European clocks until the 1400s, making the ancient Greek device’s sophistication remarkable. Modern applications of similar gearing systems include grandfather clocks, analog watches, locks, and telescope focusing mechanisms.
X-ray analysis revealed the internal structure, showing six smaller gears attached to the main drive gear in a configuration known as a gear train. The specific example given involves a 64-tooth gear driving a 38-tooth gear through a series of intermediate gears, achieving a precise ratio of 254 to 19. This ratio corresponds to the Metonic cycle, named after Greek astronomer Meton, which describes the relationship between solar and lunar calendars over a 19-year period.
The Metonic cycle represents 254 tropical months and 19 solar years, the time required for lunar and solar cycles to realign. The mechanical implementation of this calculation demonstrates sophisticated mathematical understanding translated into physical engineering. The device could represent the sky at any given time and predict the positions of celestial bodies through simple mechanical operation.
The mechanism contained approximately 30 gear wheels, all visible in X-ray images. With a single control, operators could reproduce the movements of all visible celestial bodies, making it a miniature mechanical representation of the cosmos. This functionality required precise knowledge of astronomical cycles and the engineering capability to translate that knowledge into a working mechanical system.
Astronomical Knowledge and Calendrical Systems
The document details how ancient Greek astronomers had established precise understanding of celestial cycles, including the complex relationship between lunar and solar calendars. The 19-year Metonic cycle provided a framework for reconciling these different timekeeping systems, with 235 lunar months corresponding to 19 solar years. This knowledge was later refined and incorporated into the mechanism’s design.
The device featured multiple display systems: seven pointers tracking planets from Mercury to Saturn as viewed from Earth, positioned according to zodiacal coordinates. A central lunar display changed color from black to white as the mechanism operated, simulating lunar phases. Instruction manuals were inscribed on doors and panels, indicating the device was designed for educational use.
The back of the mechanism contained two large dials: a lunar calendar and a solar/lunar eclipse prediction system. These components worked together with the front display to determine when eclipses would occur. The precision required for eclipse prediction demonstrates the sophisticated astronomical knowledge embedded in the device’s design.
The mechanism’s construction required gears fitted with extraordinary precision—tolerances measured in tenths of millimeters rather than full millimeters. Some gears were only six millimeters in diameter, with matching requirements of less than half a millimeter for proper operation. Dial and axle wobble had to be controlled to within 0.5 millimeters, achievable only through careful craftsmanship and possibly the use of primitive lathes.
Evidence for Geocentric Cosmology
The author’s central argument positions the Antikythera Mechanism as evidence for geocentric, flat Earth cosmology. The device features a stationary center representing Earth, with all other celestial bodies moving around this fixed point. The author argues that if Earth were actually moving through space, as proposed in heliocentric models, this motion would have been incorporated into the mechanism’s design alongside the movements of other known planets.
The text emphasizes that ancient Greek astronomers knew of five planets beyond Earth but designed their mechanism with Earth as the stationary reference point. This design choice is presented as evidence that the builders had no concept of heliocentric solar systems or Big Bang cosmology. The author argues that if Earth were actually in motion, the consistent appearance of the night sky over thousands of years would be impossible, and the mechanism wouldn’t function accurately at any location on a moving planet.
The precision of ancient astronomical calculations is highlighted as evidence supporting the geocentric model. The author notes that 2,000 years ago, astronomers achieved predictive accuracy that “holds up better than today’s standards” and knew their calculations would remain valid indefinitely. This consistency is presented as proof that the underlying cosmological model must be correct.
Inscriptions on the mechanism’s back cover describe external features and displays that incorporated pointers and spheres representing all five known planets in their motions around Earth. Each planetary sphere moved through its designated circle, suggesting that the front display represented the complete Aristotelian conception of the universe with Earth at the center.
Cosmological Implications and Modern Applications
The document argues that the mechanism served dual functions: as an analog computer for quantitative astronomical calculations and as an educational device demonstrating the hierarchical structure and movements of celestial bodies. This combination made it a comprehensive representation of ancient cosmological understanding, earning it designation as a “cosmos” in its own right.
The author connects the Antikythera Mechanism to later astronomical instruments, including medieval astronomical clocks in Prague and Cremona, Italy. These later devices similarly show celestial bodies moving around a stationary, flat Earth represented as a circle at the center. The continuity of this design approach across centuries is presented as evidence for the persistence of geocentric understanding.
Modern planetarium projectors and telescopes are described as descendants of the ancient mechanism, though the author argues that contemporary instruments have been corrupted by heliocentric assumptions. The original geocentric approach is presented as more accurate and truthful than modern astronomical models.
The text emphasizes that the mechanism represents “simple arithmetic and simple geometry, but put together in an absolutely beautiful way.” This mathematical elegance is contrasted with what the author characterizes as the unnecessarily complex theories required to support heliocentric models, including gravity, relativity, and various cosmological concepts that require additional theories for support.
Critique of Modern Cosmology
The final section presents a comprehensive critique of contemporary astronomical and cosmological theories. The author argues that heliocentric models require numerous supporting theories—gravity, relativity, wormholes, black holes, string theory—that don’t work effectively in real-world applications. This theoretical complexity is contrasted with the elegant simplicity of geocentric models demonstrated by the Antikythera Mechanism.
The document characterizes modern cosmology as presenting existence as “accidental, random, chaotic, and often meaningless,” disconnecting humanity from recognition of divine creation. The author argues that this “fake world reality” has been systematically promoted to prevent people from understanding the true nature of their environment as a specially created realm.
The text advocates for trusting direct sensory experience over theoretical constructs, noting that the sun and moon appear to be the same size and that all celestial bodies appear to revolve around Earth. The geocentric system is presented as adequately explaining all observable phenomena without requiring the complex theoretical framework of modern astronomy.
The author argues that the consistent, repeatable cycles demonstrated by the Antikythera Mechanism would be impossible in a heliocentric model where Earth moves through space at incredible speeds in multiple directions simultaneously. The mechanical precision of ancient astronomical predictions is presented as proof that the underlying geocentric model accurately represents reality.
Historical and Cultural Context
Throughout the document, the author emphasizes that geocentric, stationary Earth models were “common knowledge” and “widely accepted by philosophers, astronomers, and other scholars” throughout most of human history. The relatively recent adoption of heliocentric models is presented as an aberration rather than scientific progress.
Ancient civilizations worldwide are noted for constructing massive architectural projects aligned with celestial bodies, demonstrating sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on geocentric principles. The author argues that these cultures had no concept of heliocentric models because such models simply didn’t exist in their understanding of reality.
The text suggests that the transition to heliocentric thinking represents the influence of “maniacs” who promoted “psychobabble” about nuclear furnaces in space being chased by planets across vast distances over billions of years. Gravity is dismissed as an inadequately explained force with multiple contradictory versions, none of which make logical sense.
The document concludes by wondering what ancient astronomers and engineers would think of modern cosmological theories, implying that they would find contemporary models absurd compared to their elegant, functional understanding of a geocentric cosmos.
Conclusion
“The Mechanical Realm” presents the Antikythera Mechanism as compelling evidence for reconsidering fundamental assumptions about Earth’s nature and humanity’s place in the cosmos. The author argues that this ancient device demonstrates sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on geocentric principles that produced accurate, long-lasting predictions impossible under heliocentric models.
The document challenges readers to question established scientific orthodoxy and consider alternative cosmological models based on direct observation and ancient wisdom rather than complex theoretical frameworks. The precision and functionality of the 2,000-year-old mechanism is presented as proof that geocentric, flat Earth models represent accurate understanding of reality rather than primitive misconceptions.
While the arguments presented reflect a minority viewpoint within contemporary scientific discourse, the document provides detailed technical analysis of the Antikythera Mechanism’s construction and operation, highlighting the remarkable engineering achievements of ancient Greek civilization and raising questions about the development of astronomical knowledge throughout human history.
Transcript
The Mechanical Realm
Introduction
We find ourselves in the most amazing of times, 2023. Even the numerical date still sounds like one from science fiction. We have technologies that enable us to communicate across the world instantaneously, medicines that boggle the mind, and scientists even proclaiming coming advancements where machine and human unite to benefit humanity. Whether we think these things are for good or not is unimportant. It seems the future is beyond our control to a large degree. Progress is inevitable and for the greater good, if we are to heed the words of world organizations such as the World Economic Forum.
Some of us are looking to the past. We are looking to ancient evidence that causes us to ask many questions. Questions that have the possibility to divide families, friends, work colleagues, and educators. All can suddenly turn against a person who decides to question the shape of our home, our world. Why is this subject so taboo? Up until 500 years ago, it was commonly accepted that the Earth was the center of the universe. The Sun and the Moon revolved around us in the sky, and we lived on a stationary Flat Earth. Some of the oldest books in existence—the Torah, Bible, Vedas, and many ancient texts—even describe the Earth being flat and immovable. Nearly every culture and religion had its own mimicry of disbelief to varying degrees. There is a Vedic map from the 1900s that illustrates a flat Earth with other Earths surrounding, which are hidden by ice walls. There are so many stories that are there to show us that questioning the globe theory is actually a valid thing to do, one that scientists should embrace, not ridicule.
So why does this area of science have so much negative stigma attached to it? To question the heliocentric model—the theory that the sun is the center of the universe—and all its relevant theories that help to back it up can bring responses that range from complete ridicule to utter horror, as if you are akin to a Holocaust denier. No one wants to be ridiculed, and they definitely do not want to offend to the degree that this topic can bring. There is no reason for the scientific community to see the topic as ridiculous. Scientists are seriously trying to prove and/or disprove so many things, even the existence of the Creator, and strangely, no ridicule is seen there. So why the Flat Earth? We don’t know. Maybe they protest too much, and maybe they are hiding something. We won’t know until the Flat Earth community can be taken seriously and intelligently. That is not too much to ask, is it?
The globe has been flooding our consciousness since the invention of the silver screen and later the television. The globe Earth is seen on film, logos, food advertising, and airlines, just to name a few. Science fiction novels, film, TV, and comics all continue to bombard us with planets that are immeasurably far from Earth—all globes, all hurtling through space and time. We have been inundated with the globe since childhood. We are taught it as a fact when they fail to tell us that it’s still just a theory, as is gravity, relativity, wormholes, black holes, string theory, etc., etc. All these ideas have had to be theorized about to try to make sense of the globe and its relation to its environment, the universe.
A psychologist will tell you that if someone repeats an idea or a phrase often enough, it becomes a belief that is very hard to remove from your psyche. This is part of the process of what is commonly called brainwashing. No one wants to admit they have been the victim of brainwashing, but unfortunately, it’s a very common effect used on the human mind, from advertising agencies to governments, schools, religious cults, and many more areas of society. The field of behavioral science is being used to make people change their ideas about so many things. We see changes in how society sees religion and medical procedures such as abortions, gender realignment, to name a few very current cultural changes. 100 years ago, these things would never have even been heard of and would be seen as terrible. Is it a natural evolution of society, or does society have its mind changed from the top down?
It doesn’t seem so strange to consider that the heliocentric model was a programmed idea to change the role of humanity as a special creation on Earth to nothing more than meaningless results of evolution from a random, meaningless explosion floating on a blue speck in an ever-expanding universe. There are many scientists that have spoken for or have had their theories used to create the heliocentric theory, from Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, and Albert Einstein, and promoted today by modern mainstream scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, Bill Nye, etc. These theories are promoted by the mainstream science community as fact to keep the population on their spinning ball. The modern scientists’ names are given almost rock star status, and they refuse to acknowledge that there is a debate to be had with the Flat Earth community.
The Flat Earth community is portrayed by mainstream science as cult-like and ignorant, when in reality the opposite is more than true. A typical Flat Earth proponent will have been brought up to totally believe in the Disney-style globe, just like everybody else. They usually have the ability to use critical thought and see new information as a reason to get excited about exploring the possibilities of holding a new idea in their minds. They hold the value of scientific reasoning as central to their ideas. They are good at researching and evaluating their research to the extent that, despite not being university graduates in astronomy or astrophysics, they can be seen as an expert in these fields as they have spent many years studying them. It’s very hard to find someone who is brave enough to stand up and say the Earth is flat who hasn’t done hours and hours of research to back the statement up. Why is it so hard for others to let go of their belief system? Because, simply speaking, it is hard to let go of any old belief system, especially if the new one is as challenging as society has made the geocentric model look. Regardless of why society has made the model look so idiotic, they have.
How do we get out of this bind and open our minds to the possibilities? Personally, I think it’s easy: you give it a chance and simply listen to the ideas and choose whether it’s for you or not. If we don’t give another’s ideas a chance, we could lose our freedom of thought simply because we have been encouraged to think something was stupid. No one should be told what to think; it’s always ours to choose. Well, you are in for a surprise. Flat Earth science, research, and experiments are based on logic and truth, not pseudoscience. Be prepared to have your mind blown.
The Antikythera Mechanism
Two thousand years ago, a shipwreck created a time capsule hidden beneath the waves. Untouched by time, the secrets it held would challenge our understanding of the past and reveal the incredible ingenuity of our ancestors. Journey with us as we dive into the depths of history, uncovering the enigmatic ancient marvel that defies the limits of its time. Rediscovered a century ago by another shipwreck, nature seemed to guard its secrets, preserving a device that would rewrite our understanding of ancient technology. The mechanical realm beckons us to unlock its mysteries. Through history, archaeology, astrophysics, and astronomy, we embark on a quest to decipher the intricate workings of the past. The pieces of the puzzle come together as we explore the convergence of art, science, and philosophy. Prepare for an extraordinary journey where hidden truths come to light. The secrets of the mechanical realm will redefine our perception of history and reshape our appreciation of the past and the shape of our Earth. Get ready to witness the unveiling of the extraordinary: a geocentric, stationary Flat Earth working model that has defied the passage of time.
So, according to the historical accounts, Greek sponge divers stopped close to Antikythera, an island in the Aegean Sea, back in the 1900s. An underwater suit consisted of a thick, heavy suit and a large metal helmet with glass windows. Fresh air was pumped into the helmet through a pipe by someone on the boat. So, one man descends looking for sponges, but soon enough comes back up horrified, ranting about the pile of dead bodies he had seen on the seafloor. So the captain went down to take a look for himself and discovered that these were not dead bodies but ancient bronze and marble statues. It turned out to be the discovery of one of the largest hoards of ancient treasure ever made. The artifacts that were found onboard this old wreck are today on display at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens. While the artifacts looked about, the strange cracked rock was put aside with many other pieces, and it wasn’t until the 1950s that someone noted its inscriptions. According to recorded accounts of the time, this appeared to be some sort of clockwork device that simply shouldn’t have existed in the ancient world.
The Antikythera Mechanism is an ancient computer. It could accurately calculate the motions of the heavenly luminaries. It’s only built with metal and wood, and it doesn’t use electricity. Predicting the patterns of what we see in the sky above us requires sophisticated calculations, and it’s already been done in Greece 2,000 years ago. This ancient computer, this ancient machine, is only about the size of a shoebox. Inside are dozens of interlocking gears, and on the outside, on the front and the back, are several synchronized pointers. It was built by someone who could decode the solar system. By hand-cranking, what more precise ways of building a machine precisely mimic this behavior? Not refuse the far greater mastery of complex miniaturization of mechanical devices than anyone dared think existed in ancient Greece and Rome. Around the first century BC, it has sparked the imagination of thousands of anthropologists and historians as to the many secrets that may yet remain in European history. The mechanism’s calculations occur when the gears with different numbers of teeth are put together to recreate the appropriate relative motion of different celestial objects. The side handle, meant to be operated by a person, turns the main gear, which represents the solar year. Power from this gear is variously reduced or enlarged by subsequent connected gears to produce the motion of different objects, including the sun, the moon, the planets, and the constellations. In order to achieve this, a dazzling display of mechanical workmanship was required.
Everyone today is familiar with a digital computer, a machine that deals in ones and zeros, a few million at a time. But have you heard about analog computers? Or perhaps not as much as you probably should have. An analog computer is a computational device that uses mechanical principles rather than digital math to make calculations. You may have seen one or two in your lifetime, like a wind-up toy or a clock, for example. Quite how long these devices have been around is debatable, but most agree that the first analog computers, mostly astronomical clocks, were first invented around the 14th century. That was until a discovery in 1901 near Antikythera in Greece that changed our understanding of the history of computers forever. A discovery so shocking that nearly 70 years of mainstream historians and technologists dismissed it as either fake or a fluke. That was until one group of dedicated researchers and rebellious minds proved that the ancient Greeks did indeed possess complex analog computers of their own, nearly a millennium and a half earlier than we thought. Dr. Derek J. de Solla Price of Yale University was one of the first to bring the Antikythera Mechanism’s historical significance to the public’s attention. Price is a pioneer, and we all owe him a great debt of gratitude. For the first 50 years, scholars, scientists, and historians had no idea of putting the pieces of this puzzle back together. Price was the first person to examine the device carefully enough to have a basic understanding of what its true capabilities really were. And he even said that this was as spectacular as if we had opened King Tut’s tomb to find decayed but recognizable parts of a combustion engine. And because it was too far outside the realm of what academics were comfortable with, very few people were prepared to think seriously about the Antikythera before Price.
Scientific historian interested in the history of scientific technology, he set out in about 1958 to examine the Greek gears to determine just what they were used for. He noticed that the front dial was divided into 12 sections. When he saw that Eli is printed on one of the sections, Eli is the Greek word for Libra. And then further around the dial, he noticed two of the letters for the Greek word for Virgo, leading Price to conclude that what he was looking at was a representation of the 12 zodiac constellations. A total of 88 constellations are noted and recognized today. They were all documented 5,000 years ago in Mesopotamia, but these are the 12 that provide the annual path of the sun along with most of the lunar and planetary activity, and this is called the ecliptic. The sun tells us the time of the day, the moon tells us the time of the month, and the stars tell us the time of the year. It preceded such gears by more than a thousand years. This ancient Greek device is now known as the Antikythera Mechanism, in honor of the land where it was discovered. Even today, more than a century after its discovery, scientists are still studying it to comprehend what it does.
Meshing gears is a difficult task, but our world would be very different without these gears and the people who have the patience, knowledge, and understanding to make them. During the Industrial Revolution, they were the driving force behind the development of factory machinery, which made assembly lines possible. Without gears, there would also be no trains or automobiles. Prior to the discovery of the Antikythera Mechanism, the earliest complex gear trains were discovered in European clocks around the 1400s, when the Middle Ages were just giving way to the Renaissance. Although this ancient Greek computer is a thousand years older, it contains gears that are just as complex as those found in medieval clocks. In modern times, you will still find gears in grandfather clocks, analog watches, locks, and telescope focus adjustments. One of the intriguing things about the Antikythera Mechanism is how they considered carefully how to make it both small enough and functional. X-rays of the crusty metal show six smaller gears attached to the main drive gear, known as a gear train. So you have a 64-tooth gear moving a 38-tooth gear, moving this gear, moving this gear, moving this gear, achieving the same ratio of 254 to 19. The discovery that the Sun and the Moon orbit the same points in the sky is attributed to a Greek astronomer named Meton. The Metonic cycle is deeply ingrained in the Antikythera Mechanism. It is 254 tropical months and 19 solar years, which is the amount of time it takes the planets to rotate around each other. To think about this and to see how gears can calculate ratios, think of a large gear with 254 teeth and a much smaller gear with 19 teeth. 19 turns of the large gear makes 254 turns on the smaller gear. It is essentially simple math, so the division can be broken down into chunks instead of done all at once. 30 gear wheels, and the gears are very visible on the X-rays. This could represent the sky at any given time or use them in a date from a specific rotation of the luminaries. With just one button, you could reproduce all the movement of the visible luminaries: the Sun and the Moon. The device is a miniature mechanical representation of the cosmos. Geocentric astronomy at the time of Antikythera had been established for a while. They knew precisely the cycle of each of the luminaries, including the issue of the offset between the lunar and the solar calendars, identified by the Greeks. For the course of 19 years or 19 solar years, they were precise: 235 lunar months, and that was fine-tuned a century later. If you take four times the Metonic cycle, which is 4 into 19, which equals 76, then we remove one day, then we have the concordance of the dial is the Babylonian zodiac. There are seven pointers for the planets all the way out to Saturn that point to the positions of the planets as viewed from the Earth along the zodiac. In the middle of the dial, there is a little moon that changes color from black to white as you rotate the mechanism. The doors and panels are all inscribed with an instruction manual. The back of the mechanism has two large dials. The top dial is a lunar calendar, and the bottom dial is the most important one, which is the lunar and solar eclipse dial, and that is used in conjunction with the front of the mechanism to determine whether there would be a lunar or solar eclipse. Its gears must be utterly precise and fitted ever so perfectly in place for the device to have worked.
It is in this example, in order to calculate the 19-year cycle in which the solar and lunar years overlap and to accurately show where the moon will be in the sky at any given point during that cycle, gears that indicated a solar day and the lunar day are connected by a series of smaller gears which translate the motion of the solar day into the corresponding motion of the lunar day. The mechanism also appears to contain a number of novel complications, a name given by horologists within a device which subtly changes its operation. These complications seem to be inserted into the mechanism. We know this device is a working Flat Earth model because this device has a stationary center where everything else goes around the stationary center, which is the Earth, gauging all of this motion from the Earth, and that has nothing to show that it’s moving. If it was moving, if the Earth was moving with all the other planets and the Sun and the Moon, it would have been represented with the five other planets they knew before they built this machine. No idea about the heliocentric solar system, Big Bang idea, let alone for 5,000 years of all recorded history. If we were moving, we wouldn’t see the same nighttime sky twice in a row, let alone for thousands of years, and the Antikythera Mechanism wouldn’t work in any location on Earth, anywhere, ever, for any reason, because it’s moving. Here we have more of a chance of seeing the pyramids shift position than we do any of the stars ever shift in position. It’s amazing that 2,000 years ago they knew this planetary motion with precision that holds up better than today’s standards, and they knew it would never change. And the Antikythera Mechanism proves undeniably, and the software that runs it was based on information handed down for thousands of years. Improved readings of an inscription that was on the mechanism’s back cover, describing its external features and displays, leaves little room for doubt that the front display incorporated evolving pointers, varying little spheres to represent all five planets known in antiquity, making their upfront motions around the Earth. Each sphere is set to move through a circle belonging to the planet, strongly suggesting that a certain feature of the front display that the inscription called Cosmos was in fact the entire front dial, portraying in cross-section the Aristotelian conception of the universe. It will track the 29 and a half days, for example. You could advance until Mercury goes retrograde and see what constellation that occurs in, or see how long Venus will be visible at sunrise, or what constellation the moon will be in at the next lunar eclipse. The Antikythera Mechanism is the cosmos. The cosmos is on the front of the mechanism, and the stars are represented in a more conceptual manner by the fixed graduated dial inscribed with the names of the zodiacal signs and with key letters referring to the list of dates of first and last risings and settings of constellations in the parapagma inscription. Above and below the central dials, visual representations of the ancient geocentric cosmology and medieval and Renaissance manuscripts and artwork commonly use the Zodiac in this way to stand for the hemisphere of fixed stars. A dial constructed in this manner would have elegantly combined two functions of the mechanism: one as an analog computer permitting quantitative read-off of the longitudinal positions and motions of the heavenly luminaries, and two as an educational, wonder-working device portraying its constituent parts in their hierarchical structure and intricate movements. The entire complex of dials and pointers of the mechanism’s front could by manual autonomy be itself called the cosmos. The mechanism was an important precursor to modern astronomical instruments, including telescopes and planetarium projectors. The construction of the mechanism was a testament to the skill and ingenuity of ancient engineers and craftsmen. In addition to its scientific uses, the Antikythera Mechanism was likely used for astrological and religious purposes, reflecting the importance of astronomy in ancient cultures.
Geocentric Model and Flat Earth
Changes that always appear at the end of one Platonic month and the beginning of the next, which are roughly every 2,100 years. It seems there are changes that occur when a new constellation takes psychic dominance of the archetype or god, as they used to be called, brings about and accompanies long-lasting transformations of the collective psyche. These changes arise in nature and are due to certain gradual transformations of the archetype. They indicate that the clock is active and is continuously moving, passing from one cyclic division into another. Kepler discovered over a couple of hundred years ago about the elliptical movements of the luminaries. He also mentioned that the universe is a giant clock. It’s a mechanism. He knows what he means. That’s why he could predict or discover these motions. People think of the ancients as immature or primitive because they believed in a geocentric, stationary Earth. These ancients were using a fully functional device like an Antikythera Mechanism and all the science related to it 2,000 plus years before, and that was based on the geocentric, stationary Flat Earth. The Antikythera Mechanism was a testament to the importance of astronomy in ancient Greek culture, reflecting the desire of Greek astronomers and mathematicians to understand the workings of the cosmos. Though the word cosmos had a range of possibilities outside of scientific context, in Hellenistic astronomy it always meant either the aggregate of the heavens and the Earth or the heavens as distinct from the Earth. All these relations are why the Antikythera Mechanism is often called an analog computer, and because of its complexity and sheer number of scenarios it could replicate, is a primary reason that it remains one of the most fascinating objects of the ancient world.
The Antikythera Mechanism is the cosmic planetarium. The nested geocentric cosmology had wide acceptance in Greek science in the 4th century BC on, and it was one of the parts of astronomy that an educated layman could be expected to know. The figures, for example, in the first chapter of Geminus’s Introduction to the Phenomena, a popularization of astronomy from the 1st century BC. Although no pictorial representation has survived from before late antiquity, diagrams showing the cosmos in cross-section, a series of concentric circular rings surrounding a flat, stationary Earth, frequently occurred in medieval manuscripts and even in Renaissance paintings. The outermost cycle of the fixed stars is very often represented in these pictures as a ring containing the names, symbols, or pictures of the 12 zodiacal signs, just as we find it in the Antikythera Mechanism. Probably one of the most special things on the ship full of treasures. Some people say that watching the stars was like watching TV for the ancients, and if the narrative is accurate, I don’t think that could be true because they’d be way too occupied with feeding themselves and basic survival skills back then. So, while watching the stars may have been entertaining, I don’t think that was the purpose. It was much more functional in their daily lives, and they had good reason, hundreds of reasons, to observe and record all of the subtle motions of the cosmos. Thousands of years, culture after culture, a common thread in all the ancient cosmologies. The other reason that the base of the mechanism is a stationary realm could be comparable to devices like the astrolabe, which is used for a particular day and the position of the luminaries above, having scripture in Sanskrit, and the plate below represents the Bhu-mandala, the physical flat realm with all the movements above. And the same thing goes for the Antikythera Mechanism. They say Bhu-mandala representing a solar system, but the fact is that Bhu-mandala is the physical plane with rings of oceans and land. How’s that possible in space? The Antikythera Mechanism base reflects the same purpose of a geocentric, stationary level realm as an astrolabe. The Antikythera Mechanism seems to be the predecessor of clocks like the astronomical clock in Prague and the Torreso in Cremona, Italy. Here we can observe how the geocentric model comes to life on a non-movable Flat Earth. These clocks show the positions of the Sun, the Moon, and stars, and also other cyclical formations like day and night, lunar and solar eclipses, the seasons, and solstices. In the inner circle, we see the Earth represented as a flat circle, establishing the geocentricity of the model. On the inner ring, we see the 12 calendar months represented by the symbol. On the outer ring, we see the 24 hours dividing the clock, and all the rings and pointers are in constant motion, circling the flat Earth in the center and giving the exact solar date, just like the Antikythera Mechanism. This mechanism is an instrument of mathematical astronomy. It’s intensely rich in mathematics. It’s not complicated mathematics; it’s simple arithmetic and simple geometry, but put together in an absolutely beautiful way. This new paper brings together many ideas from the past, but it puts them forward in a synthesis which shows an absolutely dazzling display of the ancient Greek cosmos, how they saw planets, the moon, and the sun. Patterns of pillars on this wheel, it had structure, some sort of structure that revolved like a merry-go-round, and what I ended up with was models of the planets. This is a model of the Greek cosmos, geocentric. You can think of this cover plate in the middle as representing the Earth, and everything goes around it. This is a model of the Greek cosmos, geocentric. You can think of this cover plate in the middle as representing the Earth, and everything goes around it. It’s geocentric, geocentric, geocentric. So what the Antikythera Mechanism teaches us is that the heliocentric hypothesis is false. The sun is not the center of anything. Nothing is going around the sun. Everything is going over the surface of our flat and stationary Earth. The Sun, the Moon, and the stars, they move in perfect, precise order. They are absolute perfection, and they work almost like a divinely inspired clock. So this realm that we live in works in perfect order. It is not chaotic. It is not the result of some random explosion of nothing that created everything that we see. It works with precision, and what you will see if you look at the Antikythera Mechanism and compare it to what we see in our observable reality is that everything moves over the surface of our flat and stationary Earth. Nothing goes around the sun. The sun is not the center. The heliocentric hypothesis is false. The geocentric hypothesis is reality. The geocentric idea of the Earth is reality, but not geocentric, meaning that the Earth is a globe. The Earth is flat and stationary. The geocentric model is a flat and stationary Earth and an enclosed electrical topographical stationary plane where everything we see in the sky is moving in a perfect pattern over us, replicated patterns that repeat themselves. It seems like every 19 years the Sun, the Moon, and the stars move under Polaris around the surface of our flat and stationary Earth, making nine gears one inside the other and inside the other nine times. The tolerance is not of a millimeter, thickness of a fingernail, but a tenth of a millimeter. More than that, there are four gears that are only six millimeters in diameter. The gears matched by less than half a millimeter for the gears to operate correctly. You need to keep the dial and axle wobble less than 0.5 of a millimeter, and you can do that by trial and error. It takes a long time, but you need a lathe to rotate the gear and without any wobble. The model of engineering displayed by these people so recently out of the Iron Age is how they were able to flatten that brass and fit those gears so perfectly. Soldering also historically absent before it was made and again after it was made. The clocks were introduced for another 1,400 years later, and two astrolabes gave us historical luck. We have to challenge the science. I mean, theories that need other theories to support it, formulas that don’t work in real life, that’s not real science. But yet you still believe this is the universe we live in, an accidental, random, chaotic, and often meaningless existence. Over and over again, this fake world reality has been presented to you as an absolute truth to keep you disconnected from the real truth that this is a divine creation. The fact of the matter is that everything is actually just as you see and experience it. Trust your senses. The Sun and the Moon are the same size, and all celestial bodies revolve around us. The geocentric system adequately explains all earthly as celestial phenomena. It tells me is that the luminaries are moving in a circular motion in relation to the Earth below them. It would be impossible to see this cycle in the heliocentric model, which has us moving in at least four different ways at incredible speeds to run endless space. This mechanism is based on a geocentric model with us in the center and all luminaries circling above us in a repeatable cycle. Our whole Earth system with the Sun, the Moon, and stars is a magnificent timepiece, divinely created for us to keep count of the days, the months, and the years in such a way that we can see it with our naked eyes. Who could have taken all that knowledge and put it in a gear mechanism in such an incredible way? Think of the Earth as a bullseye, and in the middle of the Earth or the middle of that bullseye is Polaris up in the sky. But down below is possibly a tree, possibly a black rock, or the stump of a tree. You can hypothesize that all you want. I don’t know. But what I do know from what the Antikythera Mechanism shows us and what we’ve seen when we look into the sky is that everything is circling in a spirograph pattern all around the surface of our flat, stationary Earth, and nothing is going around the sun. The sun is part of this realm that moves in perfect precision with everything else in the sky. It is not the center. It is not a huge ball of mass that’s attracting all these other planets that are rotating it or revolving, tilting, wobbling it. None of that. The heliocentric hypothesis is false. The geocentric view of this world or this realm is reality, but not a globe. The Earth is flat and stationary. Geocentric means everything is moving around the center of our flat and stationary Earth. The geocentric stationary Earth model, common knowledge that the Earth was stationary and located at the center of the universe with the sun, moon, and luminaries moving around it in circular paths around the Earth, was widely accepted by philosophers, astronomers, and other scholars. The mechanism also used epicyclical gears to track the motions of the planets. Epicyclical gears were used to track the movements of the planets as they moved across the sky from the perspective of an observer on Earth. Precision couldn’t have been achieved in the heliocentric model. Nearly all throughout the world, ancients also built structures of amazing size and spectacle that were aligned with certain constellations. They had no idea about the heliocentric model because it simply was none. No one thought they were moving around until maniacs took over, started talking psychobabble about an uncontained pressurized nuclear furnace like the sun being chased by planets over millions of miles through billions of years, all caused by gravity, which is a force they still can’t really explain. They have three different versions, and neither one of them makes sense. I wonder what they would think about this.
This Should Not Exist
Transcript
Transcript
a merchant ship is on its way to
Rome it is loaded to the brim with
treasure just past Creek it gets into a
heavy
storm the 300 tons of cargo make it very
heavy possibly too
heavy the ship sinks
[Music]
history became legend legend became myth
and for over 2,000 years the ship passed
out of all
knowledge perhaps it would have been
forgotten forever swallowed by the Sea
like so many ships before
it that was until a sponge diver from a
small town of Simi makes a dive into the
ocean
on the sea floor he discovers a bronze
hand sticking out of the mud heavily
corroded but still
recognizable he reports his findings to
his captain with the help of the Greek
government the crew recovers what must
have been a
shipwreck ancient bronze and marble
statues fragmented pots and
bases it’s the largest collection of
Greek artifacts ever
found they take everything to Athens
Museum staff are piecing together the
artifacts
meanwhile this corroded lump of bronze
still sits there unnoticed over the
course of the next few months it dries
up and cracks
open the shattered Rock reveals
something very strange a large wheel
engraved letters and a number of smaller
gears it looks like an ancient machine a
sophisticated device that simply should
not exist with a mechanism over a
thousand years ahead of its
time for over a century archaeologist
engineers and physicists from all over
the world will try to solve the riddle
of the world’s first
computer this video is largely based on
the Fantastic book decoding the heavens
by Joe Marchant Link in the
description Greek archaeologist Valerio
sty is the first person to examine the
strange objects the many traces of Gears
lead him to believe that this must be
some kind of ancient clock but
mechanical clocks were not invented
until the Renaissance 1,400 years later
and when while there are mentions of
tooth Wheels no gears from Antiquity has
ever been found before at least until
now sty soon realizes that he needs the
expertise of others he invites John
Soros and Adolf Wilhelm both experts in
ancient text they decipher the
scribblings as ancient Greek
letters another scientist named Pericles
rtis studies the inscriptions and
suggest that they must be operating
instructions this word in particular
stands out to him it’s an old an unusual
word for the Zodiac scale a scale
dividing the year in 12 zodiac
constellations Rus and Soros conclude
that the device must be an astrolabe an
ancient calculator to measure the
position of stars and planets but
traditionally astrolabes don’t need
gears Maybe This Strange astap was
somehow able to determine the position
of stars
mechanically in the following years the
fragments are carefully cleaned Albert
REM an expert from ancient languages
from Germany travels to Athens to
inspect a device he discovers another
word previously hidden an ancient
Egyptian month in Greek letters what if
REM argues this machine is able to
simulate the movement of celestial
objects throughout the year shortly
after his Discovery work on the antitha
mechanism stalls years pass without any
new major breakthroughs two world wars
hamper the
excitement the machine survives at the
bottom of some store room crates in
danger of being forgotten
again computer technology has come a
long way today we don’t just study stars
or track time mechanically we can now
access and control our most powerful
tools from halfway across the world this
is possible because of services like our
sponsor nesk nesk is a free lightning
fast tool that lets you access all of
your devices remotely whether you’re
making complex 3D animations on your
laptop from the the coast of Greece or
just helping a family member
troubleshoot Tech issues any desk is
here to help with reliable and secure
connections even in low bandwidth
situations the clean interface makes any
desk of Breeze for anyone to use it’s
available for all platforms from your
laptop into your phone all the way to
your grandmother’s Windows XP machine if
the antio mechanism would have had an
internet connection maybe it could have
run any desk as well if you want to
check out what nides has to offer go to
nid desk.com Fern and try it for free
fast forward to 1953 a new generation of
divers is in the waters near anira among
them Shak custo filmmaker and Pioneer
thanks to him diving gear went from this
to this divers can go much deeper now
there are many stories of treasures that
fell over the cliff beneath the recite
they were out of reach for the sponge
divers back then but not for custo and
his crew after days of searching they
find something buried under a thick
layer of sand
the sunken ship’s hole almost perfectly
preserved but the crew does not have the
necessary equipment to unearth it they
return two decades later with better
gear and a
camera the crew finds more treasure but
no new parts from the mechanism luckily
science itself is developing rapidly
Derek price a historian from the UK uses
newly developed x-ray technology to scan
the existing fragments
he finds more gears and is able to build
the first model of the antitha mechanism
he calls it a calendar
computer but his model isn’t very
accurate for it to work price had to
change the number of teeth on the gears
despite his x-ray images showing
otherwise the researchers Michael Wright
and Alan Bramley see that price clearly
made some mistakes so they decide to
solve the mechanism
themselves the two fly to Athens for a
month they reexamine measure and
photograph the 82 remaining pieces of
the device but after 2,000 years and
likely passing through as many hands the
inevitable
happens maybe an x-ray was the right
call after all the two learn of a
relatively new technique called
tomography it basically works by taking
multiple slices of pictures from an
object and putting them together
afterwards they take a total of 700
images with them they can have a clear
look at the inside after after years of
work Wright and Bramley are this close
to unraveling the mystery but suddenly
Bramley Cuts ties with
Wright he thinks right for his work
takes the images and
leaves a few years later Bramley is
diagnosed with cancer on his deathbed he
confesses to WR he alone wanted to be
known for solving the antitha mechanism
but he failed in the end Bry hands over
his 3D scans to Wright Wright had
already designed a prototype in 2002 but
with these images he would be finally
able to solve the device or so he
thought Tony free a mathematician and
filmmaker gathers a group of researchers
under the anic era mechanism research
project the group scans and measures the
fragments yet again this time with even
better and newer technology the quality
of their images is astonishing even the
smallest inscriptions hidden deep within
the stone are now readable in sharp
detail they regularly publish new papers
of the device there are few more
expeditions to the Shipwreck with
drastically changed diving gear but
again no one can find New pieces of the
mechanism on the
seabed in 2021 free and the others are
finally able to put together all the
pieces of the puzzle they are able to
combine all the evidence of the last
century in one
machine The Mystery of the world’s
oldest computer is finally solved
so what does it
do a computer is a device that can store
and process information any device that
is able to solve math equations and show
you the result can therefore technically
be considered a computer there are two
types digital computers like the phone
you’re watching this video on and analog
ones so you have this task 8 * 2 digital
computers work with ones and zeros to
solve the task it first needs to
translate the numbers in binary 1 0 * 0
1 0 one way to multiply the numbers
would just be to multiply the individual
numbers one by one and add the
individual results just like in school
translate the number back to decimal and
there’s your result but there is also
another way the same task can be
represented by an analog computer with
gears this can be translated into one
Gear with eight teeth and a larger one
with 16 each time you turn the larger
gear once the smaller one turns twice
mathematically speaking your input has
been multiplied by
two this is basically what clocks do
transforming seconds into minutes and
minutes into
hours and this is also what the anthura
mechanism does only that it’s much more
complex the device originally sat in
this wooden box it had a handle on the
side to control the complex internal
mechanism these gears move a series of
pointers at the front and back back the
ancient Greeks believed the Earth was at
the center of the universe that’s why
Earth sits right in the middle around it
orbits the moon as well as the sun and
the five planets that were known at the
time there are also rings for the
Egyptian months and dates with its
respective
zodiac Additionally the front is full
with step-by-step instructions on how to
use
it the back shows two spiral rings with
large pointers in the
middle the upper one shows the 19-year
matonic cycle it’s the basis for many an
ancient calendars inside these Rings is
a smaller scale showing the 4-year cycle
of the Olympic Games the lower ring is
an eclipse predictor that well predicts
eclipses the antitha mechanism is a
complex simulation of the cosmos pick
any day the machine shows you where the
moon stood which Star constellation was
rising or when the next eclipse was
coming all this in a wooden case as
large as a book perhaps it was used by
astronomers or by teachers but one
common the suggests otherwise it most
likely wasn’t a tool it was probably a
luxury toy a very impressive and also
very expensive piece of tech for anyone
who can afford
it some suggest it might have been used
to cast
horoscopes the ancient Greeks like
strangely many people today believed in
astrology the idea that the position of
the stars and planets at your birth have
an influence on your life say you want
to know what Mercury was doing when you
were born today you just Google it in
ancient Greece you need an astronomer at
the time of your birth to write down the
exact constellations otherwise this
information would be lost with the
antitha mechanism you could set it to
your birthday only to realize that
mercury was in
retrograde over 2,000 years ago some
wealthy owner took the device with him
on a trip to
Rome but he never reached his
goal the antitha mechanism is a
technological Masterpiece that no one
would have thought possible at the time
there is a slight catch however the
device actually sucked it wasn’t very
accurate ancient Greeks didn’t have the
scientific tools to measure the universe
like we do they mostly looked up at the
sky for a very long time wrote down what
they saw and develop theories about the
universe when you look up at Mercury
long enough you realize something very
strange at first Mercury becomes slower
and slower until suddenly it changes
Direction and seems to move backwards
but the way this is actually what people
are talking about when they say Mercury
is in retrograde which is a bad sign
apparently or
whatever in fact every planet has these
little Loops called epicycles if you
write it all down this is what the
geocentric Universe looks
[Music]
like thanks to cernus we know that the
universe is heliocentric these epicycles
are only an optical illusion this is
what the two models look like side by
side
translating the geocentric model into
the right gears is an incredibly
difficult task sure you can calculate it
but the model is very prone to error
every gear needs to accurately simulate
the different speeds of the planets
during these epicycles and even the
apparent retrograde motion this is why
the inside of the antier mechanism is so
mind boogly complex building a machine
like this without modern technology also
adds mechanical
errors ultimately the antier mechanism
is off by about one whole zodiac
considering the age of the machine that
is of course still incredibly
[Music]
impressive for a long time historians
believ that the ancient Greeks were
talented but not very practically minded
philosophy yes pretty sculptures sure
but building a space computer out of
Gears absolutely impossible but they
somehow did the tiic mechanism is so
unbelievable that some people believe it
actually came from Aliens and was used
by them to navigate the stars for others
it is an ancient time machine and plot
device in a Hollywood movie fact is the
antiac mechanism is real and it most
likely wasn’t even the first of its kind
several ancient texts mention a device
designed by Archimedes a sphere that
shows the motion of the sun moon and
planets around the Earth but it was lost
the bronze inside the Machinery melted
into coins in a weird since we might be
lucky that the merchant ship sank during
that storm 2,000 years ago
