Is Earth Really Spinning Under Your Airplane?

by fevideo | Apr 8, 2025 | Airplanes, Flat Earth, Spinning

Is Earth Really Spinning Under Your Airplane?

This video takes a bold and focused approach to questioning the spinning globe narrative by examining one clear, everyday example: roundtrip flights between Atlanta and San Diego. Using simple math and observable reality, it challenges the mainstream belief that the Earth is rotating at 870 mph.

Here’s the issue: If the Earth is really spinning eastward at such a high speed, then flights going east (with the rotation) and west (against the rotation) should not take the same amount of time. Yet, in reality, they do — roughly 3.45 hours in both directions. This glaring contradiction is swept under the rug by official explanations, which rely on vague, unobservable principles like “conservation of momentum.”

The video points out the flaws in that argument. Once a plane leaves the ground, how can it maintain the Earth’s rotational speed? Air resistance, gravity, and engine thrust should logically override any “inherited” momentum. And if the atmosphere is supposedly rotating with the Earth, dragging planes along — how exactly does light, low-density air manage to push a 500,000+ pound plane? The comparison to a boat floating down a river falls flat when you realize air isn’t water.

The analysis even challenges the idea that planes are secretly flying at over 1,400 mph — something never mentioned by pilots or flight crews. Instead, the only speed consistently referenced is the airspeed or ground speed of 550 mph. Nothing more.

The conclusion is simple and powerful: the Earth is not spinning. The near-identical flight durations make far more sense on a stationary, flat Earth. This doesn’t require convoluted theories or imaginary forces — just observation, logic, and common sense.

Why complicate the truth when the simplest explanation — that the Earth is still and unmoving — fits the evidence right in front of us?

Transcript

easily understood modern-day scenario

that questions the widely accepted

belief that the Earth is a spinning

globe by examining one example in detail

we aim to present compelling evidence

that the Earth is in fact stationary

instead of briefly touching on multiple

contemporary examples that may lack

overall depth and impact we will

concentrate on one particular example

that clearly evidences the Earth’s fixed

and stationary nature our primary

objective is to cast significant doubt

on the credibility of the mainstream

narrative endorsed by NASA and the

conventional principles of flight

dynamics that posit the theory of a

rotating spherical Earth through this

detailed examination we aim to reveal

how easily the public continues to

accept official explanations without

substantial scrutiny we will refute

these commonly accepted explanations

highlighting their inherent flaws and

lack of plausibility when examined

closer in our analysis we will focus on

roundtrip flights between Atlanta

Georgia and San Diego California these

coast to coast flights typically cruise

at an average speed of 550 mph and have

an average flight duration of

approximately 3.45 hours assuming no

wind or turbulence 1900 m / 550 mph

equals 3.45 hours this should raise

obvious and critical questions at this

latitude considering that the Earth is

said to rotate west to east at 870 mph

beneath the plane during flight how do

flights in both directions report nearly

identical flight times in other words if

a plane flies at a constant speed of 550

mph between these two cities how can the

flight times be the same in both

directions given that the Earth is said

to rotate from west to east moving with

the plane in one direction and directly

against the plane in the other examining

closer on an eastbound flight from San

Diego to Atlanta the Earth’s rotation

moves in the same direction as the

aircraft conversely on a westbound

flight from Atlanta to San Diego the

Earth rotates in the opposite direction

to the aircraft’s travel these opposing

dynamics present significant challenges

that become apparent upon closer

examination in our first scenario when

heading east once our plane is airborne

and detached from the Earth’s surface it

leaves San Diego heading for Atlanta the

Earth is said to rotate eastward below

our flight with us at 870 mph while our

plane eventually reaches its own

independent cruising speed of 550

mph how then will our plane ever arrive

in Atlanta to clarify our plane’s

cruising speed of 550 mph is 320 mph

slower than the Earth’s rotational speed

of 870 mph beneath us during our flight

as the Earth’s direction of spin and our

plane are heading in the exact same

direction and latitude in our second

scenario as we begin our return flight

to San Diego from Atlanta the dynamics

change entirely further complicating the

official explanations as to why the

flight times in both directions are

almost identical once the aircraft lifts

off and disconnects from the Earth’s

surface San Diego is now approaching our

plane at a speed of 870 mph due to the

eastward spin of the Earth bringing San

Diego directly to us while

simultaneously directly approaching San

Diego our destination city at an

independent flight speed of 550 mph our

plane and San Diego are now closing in

on each other this should in reality

significantly reduce our flight time as

the two combined speeds effectively

create a far faster convergence speed of

1,420

mph the actual flight duration should

now be shortened to just 1.33 hours

rather than the actual 3.45 hours

observed daily for this specific flight

1,900 m / 1420 mph equals 1.33 hours the

fact that the actual daily flight times

between these two cities are almost

identical in both directions assuming no

wind or turbulence should clearly reveal

that the Earth does not rotate but

rather rests

the first counterargument within the

official narrative attempts to explain

the identical flight times between these

opposing scenarios by invoking the

principle of conservation of momentum a

fundamental concept in physics according

to this explanation when our plane flies

from San Diego to Atlanta it retains the

eastward spin imparted from the Earth’s

rotation at takeoff which is

approximately 870 mph at this latitude

the plane is then said to add its own

separate cruising speed of 550 mph to

this conserved momentum therefore the

plane’s total air speed is said to be a

combination of the 870 mph imparted by

the Earth’s rotation at takeoff and its

own cruising speed of 550 mph in effect

the plane is then alleged to be moving

at a total air speed of

1,420

mph 870 mph plus 550 mph equals 1,420

mph how does an airplane once airborne

and detached from the ground maintain

the momentum it is said to inherit from

the Earth’s rotation at takeoff during

its flight to Atlanta consider a

baseball being thrown from west to east

similar to an airplane does it continue

on its initial trajectory unchanged or

does it begin to arc towards the ground

due to gravity and air resistance almost

immediately conventional wisdom tells us

that a baseball will indeed begin arcing

downward would an airplane not be

subject to these same principles the

continuing argument to this states that

an airplane maintains its initial

velocity inherited from the earth’s

rotation at takeoff through continuous

propulsion from its engines which

counteracts any slowdown however we must

remember that once an airplane leaves

the ground it is no longer propelled by

the force of a spinning earth

additionally air resistance acting

against the plane increasing with speed

continually works against any initial

velocity boost provided by the Earth’s

rotation the net result is that once

airborne and disconnected from the

ground the airplane’s forward motion

relies solely on engine thrust to

maintain the required speed of travel

this is because any initial contribution

from the Earth’s rotation at takeoff is

soon negated by continual air resistance

to further support this it is important

to recognize that passengers on

commercial flights are never informed

that they are traveling at speeds

upwards of

a,420 mph to counteract the Earth’s

rapid rotation during some flights we

never hear relative motion mentioned or

referenced at any point past or present

concerning commercial flights the only

speed ever mentioned is the ground speed

which is typically around 550 mph or

slightly higher with a tailwind it

should be quite apparent that the plane

maintains an air speed and ground speed

of 550 mph in both directions which

supports the consistent flight times

observed for these daily flights

aligning perfectly with the scenario of

a non-rotating Earth beneath it a

stationary Earth logically explains

identical flight times in both

directions eliminating the need for the

adjustments and complex explanations

required for a spinning Earth in summary

the concept of conservation of momentum

proves ineffective in our scenario once

the plane becomes airborne although the

airplane would theoretically inherit an

initial burst of momentum from a

rotating Earth at takeoff this momentum

is quickly negated by air resistance and

gravity once airborne the plane operates

as an independent entity with external

forces continuously counteracting any

inherited momentum effectively

nullifying the predicted effects of the

conservation of momentum principle the

second common counterargument suggests

how gravity and friction cause earth’s

atmosphere to rotate in conjunction with

the earth this argument states that

airplanes are transported not only by

the previously mentioned conservation of

momentum but also by the air which is

itself influenced by earth’s rotation it

implies that the earth its atmosphere

and the airplane move together as a

single system according to this claim in

our scenario the airplane maintains the

870 mph speed it initially gains from

the Earth’s rotation thanks to

atmospheric cohesion this cohesion is

alleged to help the airplane preserve

and maintain the speed inherited from

the rotating Earth at takeoff

subsequently the airplane’s engines are

said to provide the additional thrust

needed to reach the higher speeds which

are required for progress towards

Atlanta for this theory to be valid it

must account for the scenario where an

airplane turns off its engines

mid-flight in such a case the airplane

would need to be significantly carried

along by the atmosphere thereby

supporting the claim of the atmosphere’s

significant role in this case however

common understanding tells us that much

like a thrown baseball an airplane in

this scenario would immediately begin to

descend this illustrates that

atmospheric drag does not significantly

influence its forward momentum to help

sustain its flight next the idea that

atmospheric drag a form of cohesion

could attach to and sustain the momentum

of a commercial airplane weighing

between 500,000 and a million pound by

dragging it along is beyond difficult to

such theories and explanations seemingly

require us to disregard logic common

sense and reason to consider them

feasible the concept of atmospheric drag

is quite often compared to a boat being

carried by a river’s current however

this analogy quickly falls short upon

closer examination recognizing that

water has significant density and

cohesive properties that air simply does

not match given air’s considerably low

density and minimal cohesive potential

the idea that it can mimic the cohesive

behavior of water adhering to and

carrying along an extremely heavy

compact object like a commercial

airplane is fundamentally flawed to

demonstrate a valid example of

atmospheric drag consider the observable

phenomenon where a cigarette smoke

appears stationary and aligned inside a

moving car with closed windows and

inactive air vents this occurs because

both the air inside the car and the

cigarette smoke share similar properties

of density and buoyancy as a result when

the car moves the entire body of air

inside including the smoke moves

uniformly with it this is a valid

example of atmospheric drag now consider

a scenario where a ball is tossed upward

inside a moving car if the brakes are

abruptly applied while the ball is still

in midair the ball would trend forward

toward the dashboard or windshield this

phenomenon demonstrates that the

atmosphere inside the car does not

significantly adhere to the ball and

slow its forward momentum to match the

rapidly decelerating vehicle’s internal

atmosphere even if there is a slight

effect it is far too negligible to be

noticeable

this example with a ball illustrates

that low density air does not

substantially adhere to or considerably

affect denser objects this observation

directly challenges the notion that air

can adhere to a denser object such as an

airplane and significantly contribute to

dragging it along in a moving atmosphere

despite this evidence we are expected to

believe that an airplane with its

considerable density and weight can be

effectively carried along by atmospheric

drag maintaining the momentum acquired

from the Earth’s rotation at takeoff

while atmospheric drag might have a

brief effect it is not substantial

enough to significantly influence the

behavior in our airplane scenario thus

rendering it a negligible factor

it is surprising to see even prominent

highly intelligent individuals

attempting to justify atmospheric drag

and conservation of momentum as

plausible explanations for consistent

flight durations observed in our two

flight scenarios it would not be

surprising if quantum mechanics were

introduced at some point in the future

as yet another means to further perplex

and confuse us our tendency to readily

accept scientific explanations or

passively conform to official narratives

highlights an enduring pattern within

society revisiting the application of

AAM’s razor to our flight scenarios

reveals that the simplest explanation is

clearly a stationary non-rotating Earth

this model plausibly explains why

flights between the east and west coasts

have nearly identical times with no need

for complex explanations adjustments or

fixes required by a spinning Earth model

the official explanation from NASA and

the field of modern flight dynamics

attempting to account for these

identical flight times despite an

allegedly spinning Earth is entirely

untenable

NASA Funds Program To Indoctrinate Kids Towards Globe View

by fevideo | Apr 5, 2025 | Government, NASA, Space

NASA Funds Program To Indoctrinate Kids Towards Globe View

Study of how to make kids conform to the globe ideology

NASA vs. The Children: A Flat Earth Tragedy

Once upon a time, in classrooms across Greece and America, innocent children looked out their windows, used their eyes, and—gasp—thought the Earth was flat. Naturally, this posed a catastrophic threat to the scientific orthodoxy. Enter the National Science Foundation, a proud arm of NASA, wielding its mighty grant money like a globe-shaped hammer.

In 1990, a study was launched—not to understand what kids thought, but to correct them. Because clearly, if 5-year-olds think the Earth is flat, the only logical response is to stage a full-scale psychological reprogramming operation. The mission? Make these round-Earth heretics conform to the sacred doctrines of sphericalism.

The kids, bless them, described the Earth as flat, stationary, and with an actual edge (where you might fall off if you’re not holding on tight enough). But instead of giving them a gold star for observational accuracy, the researchers labeled them “naive” and got to work reshaping their tiny minds with styrofoam balls and carefully-worded questions.

Responses like “the Earth is a circle” or “you could fall off the edge” were treated like dangerous propaganda, while “sphere” was praised as the correct answer—because nothing says “critical thinking” like learning to repeat what your textbook says.

To make matters more educational, the study even modified the questionnaire for Greek kids—just in case cultural variation got in the way of spherical conformity. Turns out, whether in Athens or Arkansas, kids start off flat and have to be rounded out by the system.

In the end, NASA achieved its goal: a new generation of globe believers. Sure, they had to override children’s natural perceptions, but hey—what’s a little mental gymnastics when you’re defending the honor of a spinning space ball?

Transcript

publication was based was supported in

part by grant

number NSF now for those don’t know it

says it plain as day National Science

Foundation the National Science

Foundation is an arm of

NASA let me say that again the National

Science Foundation is an arm of

NASA so this was a NASA

grant conducted

there was a NASA grant issued for this

specific

study so that NASA could get an

understanding

of how they were going to affect the

psychology of our future

generation now the paper was put out in

1990

so if you have any children that were

born in the

80s you can

Bet that if you start researching

the policy changes

in preliminary middle school and high

school education the curriculums you can

guarantee that from say 2000 on when you

compare the

curriculums they NASA had the

curriculums changed and the textbooks

changed to reflect the worldwide view

they need our future

children to agree

to let’s go to the abstract

here in this

report we present the results of a

cross-cultural study on children’s

knowledge about the shape gravity

movement and location of the earth and

about the day night cycle the subjects

of the study were elementary school

students from

Greece numbering 90 and equals 90 that’s

what it means 90 students and the United

States 60 students the results of the

study showed that the children in both

samples constructed similar initial

concepts about the earth and went

through similar steps in the process of

changing these concepts to make them

conform to the currently accepted

scientific notions

both the Greek and the American children

conceptualized the earth as

flat and stationary and thought it was

located in the middle of the solar

system they also thought that the things

that things fall down not toward the

center of the spherical

earth and that the day night cycle is

caused by the movement of the sun and

the moon

in the process of changing these

concepts the Greek and American children

formed similar

misconceptions now let me comment on

this key words

here changing these concepts to make

them

conform make them

conform to the currently accepted

scientific

notions so they’re not going to allow

these children they didn’t they didn’t

want these children thinking for

themselves they didn’t want these

children being aware of what they see

every single day as prelim elementary

school students and these are students

from 3 years

old 3 or four years

old all the way to 12 years old keep

going okay misconceptions in science

they immediately begin the

paper defending the National Science

Foundation and NASA’s ideology a

cross-cultural investigation of

children’s conceptions about the Earth

the Sun and the Moon greek and American

data misconceptions in science one of

the most interesting results of research

in cognitive science and science

education during the last 10 years has

been the realization that students often

often construct powerful misconceptions

of science con concepts

okay naive concepts in the process of

knowledge acquisition in our studies of

knowledge acquisition in astronomy we

have identified a number of

misconceptions that elementary school

children in the United States have

regarding the shape of the earth

erggo bisad 1987 1988 i don’t want to

keep quoting the authors because they’ve

already gotten me upset the way they’ve

drafted this biased paper and this and

conducted this biased research

on the basis of this research we have

come to the conclusion that children

form misconceptions of the earth’s shape

because they find it very difficult to

give up the idea that the earth is

flat the presence of these

misconceptions reveals that children are

not blank slates with respect to earth’s

shape when they receive the information

that the earth is a sphere but that they

have constructed an initial naive

concept of the earth according to which

the earth is flat keep calling these

children naive because they’re

young let’s go to procedure questioning

procedure we follow renee first

grade if you walked and walked for many

days in a straight line where would you

end up she

answers you’d end

where you’d end up somewhere where you

where you lost yourself what if you kept

on walking if you turned around you’d be

lost would you ever reach the end of the

earth yes could you fall off the edge of

the earth no why not because once you

fall off you can’t get back on well

would you ever fall off though no but

there is an edge of the earth yes what

if what if you could get back on do you

think you could fall off then yes if you

took the edge of the thing and you had

one hand on it you could fall off

easier wow the questionnaire was

originally developed in the United

States as part of a larger project on

knowledge acquisition in astronomy and

was first administered to the American

children it was translated by the first

author who is a native speaker of Greek

and was administered to the Greek

children with a few modifications such

as the addition of styrofoam models to

investigate the earth earth shape

concept let’s go to

results earth shape table two presents

the American and Greek children’s

responses to the factual question what

is the shape of the earth as can be seen

the same kinds of verbal responses were

obtained by both groups of children but

with a different distribution round was

the preferred response by the younger

group in the Greek sample 60% for the

kindergarten and 86.6% for the third

grade children and the older children in

the American sample 85% 90% for the

third and fifth grade respectively the

Greek sixth graders preferred the term

sphere

43.3% which was not used by the American

fifth grade children only

5% the majority of the first grade

children in the American sample said

that the Earth’s shape is a circle 70% a

response not nearly as common in the

Greek sample 3.3% finally some of the

the kindergarten children in the Greek

sample 13.3% said that the earth is

shaped like a triangle a square or just

flat revealing the presence of an

initial naive concept there we go again

with

naivity this type of verbal response was

not present in the American first grade

children although it is present in our

studies of American preschoolers except

for one child who did not respond to

this question but who later drew a

rectangle to indicate the shape of the

earth

‘Father of NASA’ Confesses on Deathbed: “We Faked Everything”

by fevideo | Mar 27, 2025 | Fake, Government, History, NASA, New World Order, Secret Society, US Military

Werner von Braun was the Father of NASA and has a deathbed confession from a long time ago. He controlled every aspect of rocketry. Everything is compartmentalized and even von Braun wasn’t filled in on everything. This goes way above the Presidential Security Clearance level. NASA is just a front agency. The real space agencies are all the private Multi-Million dollar Aeronautics Corporations, Raytheon, Northrup-Grumman, Boeing, & about six others, (the REAL Deep State), and those are just the American ones, Germany and China, Japan have their own as well. NASA shows you poorly constructed deceptions, that people can easily see through, and then they think that ALL space flight is NOT real, because NASA isn’t real. They don’t want you to know about the Black OPs Projects, that Trillions in tax dollars have bee spent on. We pay for it, but get nothing in return, while those Corporations profit and rule the solar system and beyond. The lies and deception are far worse that what you may see on any TV screen They are very good at mind control and they know that people will see through the charade being played before them, and that is exactly what they planned. Ignore NASA! This is all a distraction, to keep you focused on their lies so that you won’t look elsewhere. You are being hoodwinked again. We have had Secret Space Programs since the 50’s, you pay for it but you won’t benefit from all the advanced technology they and the elite use. Just stay focused on the NASA lies and you will never learn the truth.

HOW TO SPOT A PSYOP- The Final Experiment Edition

by fevideo | Mar 10, 2025 | Experiments, Fake, Flat Earth

HOW TO SPOT A PSYOP- The Final Experiment Edition

The Final Experiment hits all 10 criteria for being an “engineered reality,” also called “a psyop.” The only reason someone can still believe this was a real event after watching this, is because there is a deep emotional connection that has been implemented. It’s the same process that MK Ultra uses. It’s called brainwashing. It’s time to wake up to the reality around you and for you to start seeking the truth about the ground you walk on and the luminaries that go over your head every day.

Transcript

named will Duffy to try to discredit Flat Earth AKA biblical cosmology they

supposedly went to Antarctica to film a 24-hour son that somehow was Never filmed properly without suspicious edits

yes a mysticism practicing hermeticism promoting Bible denying heretic of a pastor that says

this so please I beg you we have to stop

claiming that the Ten Commandments prohibit lying that’s not true the Ten

Commandments prohibit bearing false witness against your neighbor

okay we finally get to my conclusion on the matter of lying in deception and

that is this after carefully looking at both sides of the debate and after

taking a very deep dive into everything I could possibly find in scripture regarding lying and

deception I have come to the conclusion that neither lying nor deception are

inherently immoral this deceitful Pastor must have not made it to Psalms 1017

that states he that worketh deceit shall not dwell within my house he that tell lies shall not tar in my sight or he

must have not have made it to Revelations 218 that states but the fearful and unbelieving and the

Abominable and murderer and whoremongers and Sorcerers and idolators and all

liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone which is the second death or he must

have not have read Proverbs 12:22 that states lying lips are Abomination to the

Lord but they that deal truly are his Delight so in light of this movement

it’s been my honor to edit this video for you enjoy

most people have no awareness of how easily our behavior and even our identity can be completely taken

over but people are waking [Music]

up I spent 20 years in the US military I’m a behavior expert I’ve trained Sops

I’m the bestselling author in behavioral psychology I want to show you exactly how to identify what we call engineered

reality or what some people call scops

[Music]

at the end of this I’m going to give you a tool that’s literally going to give you a score out of 100 that shows you

how likely something is to be a scop let’s do

this so the first thing you need to know is following the Fate model Focus

Authority tribe and emotion this is what triggers the mamalian part of our brain that makes all of our real decision

decisions the first part is focus Sops always aim to hijack your attention with

repetition so with this pause and ask why is this message being pushed so

aggressively they consistently pushed this narrative over the past few months because they understood the importance

of a first impression if someone’s first impression of Flat Earth or biblical cosmology is this final experiment then

of course they are going to disregard it and not take the time to properly and thoroughly research it it only takes 7

seconds to form a first impression this movement has been gaining so much momentum that they are willing to do

whatever it takes to try to slow it down let alone whoever orchestrated this must have also known the psychology behind a

lasting impression cognitively speaking what we say at CIA is your last

impression is the impression that lasts the second part here is Authority trusted figures might shift their tone

or positions unnaturally to support the narrative we’ll uh now turn it over to the flat

earthers so obviously you all know jiren Campanella of jiren ism one of the most

popular Flat Earth YouTube channels not for long all right guys uh sometimes you are

wrong in life and I thought that there was no 24-hour son in fact I was pretty sure of it kept saying it was true I

kept saying it wasn’t it’s uh a fact the sun uh does Circle you in the South that

the sun does exactly what these guys said as far as circles the southern continent so I honestly believe there

was no 24-hour Sun I honestly now believe there is they’re holding guns on the other side of this camera this is

all stage this is all stage I mean I was one of the people that said I definitely

didn’t think that there was a 24-hour son we were wrong it is doing what they

said it would do truth doesn’t fear investigation truth doesn’t fear investigation so watch very closely for

expert panelists or endorsements where authority figures might speak outside of

their expertise pay close attention to that one then we have tribe so messages

that polarize opinions or create Stark in groups versus out groups or exploit

our tribal instincts for example labeling groups as Patriots versus traitors or scientific versus deniers be

very careful when you hear that language finally we have emotion so be wary of any communication that

triggers strong emotions like fear hope or outrage without any clear verifiable

evidence so emotional responses suppress critical thinking at the same time but

from a stationary standpoint in relation to other stationary standpoints Parallax should still show

up okay first of all it does like if I look if I pull my footage back up right now as I turn it around the relative

positioning of the items absolutely changes as you have you interacted with the video I’ll share it secondly it is

obviously different if the camera’s physically moving around and dude this is this is the thing bro you can just

come and interact with it and this is I don’t understand kind of annoying but

here we’ll just we’ll just show it emotional responses suppress critical thinking so as a tip here analyze the

evidence that’s presented to you if facts are replaced by appeals to emotion you need to be very very very

cautious so if I keep the sun still that means the camera is rotating and the

Earth is moving it’s the same thing so don’t let them bamboozle

you so it’s the same is if I’m using a camera a single lens camera or I’m using

a 360 camera and I rotate the footage to keep the Sun Center it’s the same

thing it’s the same for

both so here’s the point if there is a south pole with a 24-hour Sun then there

must be extreme parallel shift we don’t see that in their footage because the Earth is not

rotating and if the Earth’s not rotating there cannot be a South Pole so they’re lying to you so don’t

think they went there oh it was a sunny day that they were lucky no because it’d be hard to fake that so

let’s look at the footage so the claim here is that it’s a 360 camera the camera must be turning

because the the Earth is turning and I can see the cameras moving

because the Earth is

turning if I’ve got a rotating platform I put a spit level and I put a the capup

must have a left hand side and a right hand side so if the Earth is turning what

would my camera see so remember when even if you’re using a 360 camera I just in my nle isolate the Sun and keep the

sun standing still well the the spirit level can’t bend around me the spirit

level must turn rotate like this you’ll see one side of the spirit level then

you’ll see the other side of the spirit level you see one side of the robot then you see the other side of the robot the

same with the spirit level in the cup you must see the left side and the right side because it must rotate because the

Earth is supposed to be rotating right so we’re looking at parallel

shift so let’s put it into perspective

remember the camera if I’m rotating the camera or I’m rotating the footage it’s

the same thing things are in their relative position

and distances from the center of the camera so you must see paralle

shift and things can’t bend around you right as we see in their footage

things will move at different speeds and the table can’t

bend mountains can’t bend around you they must keep their same north and

south and east and west must be the same so you see this

bending is because they’re using a psych next question novelty our brains are

wired to focus on Sudden or unusual changes because they signal potential

threats or opportunities and this is an evolutionary survival mechanism scops

exploit this by creating events that break normal expectations you really

want to believe that YouTube shills went to Antarctica and got a 24-hour son on

video when there’s no government agency that has ever recorded a 24-hour son in

Antarctica and there’s government bases down there for over a 100 years some of them you really want to believe that

YouTube shills got a 24-hour Sun recorded in 2024 as Flat Earth is

exploding and there’s no 24-hour Sun videos from any University or any

scientist or or any astrophysicist there’s a few random ones starting I think around the year 2017

but no 24-hour Sun videos from 2010 or 2005 or the 1990s there’s no other

24-hour Sun videos in Antarctica but we’re supposed to believe that YouTube

shills got a video of a 24-hour son in Antarctica in 2024 that defies all reason all logic

all common sense so ask yourself why is this new so consider if the event or

somebody’s message has been artificially manufactured or timed look for patterns

like sudden shifts in public opinion trending hashtag that are unusual or viral videos that seem very coincidental

the timing shifts public Focus all of this is part of the NCI system I

developed for teaching tradecraft in extreme psychological operations and there’s even a gigantic textbook for all

of this stuff in the description definitely not for everybody but it’s definitely the most comprehensive guide

in the world on this stuff so next item look for multiple sources centralized

narratives create an echo chamber and they silence dissent and they narrow perspectives for example if all media

Outlets present identical talking points it is a humongous red flag so actively

seek out contrarian or independent voices even if they challenge something that’s already in your head so in

reality an example all the major news outlets report on the exact same study

but independent researchers reveal the study was funded by a company selling

the solution so watch for that group speak next is identify cognitive dissonance weapons let’s talk about how

this works so cognitive dissonance comes up when new information clashes with our

Identity or our beliefs so scops exploit the hell out of this by uh including

micro agreements micro Agreements are little small seemingly harmless

concessions to shape your identity and over time you’re going to unconsciously align your behavior to reduce that

internal conflict and as a weaponization example of this a scop might present you

as a part of moral or intelligent Enlightenment like only good citizens do

XYZ if you disagree with that you risk some identity conflict there so reflect

on your identity and ask am I being nudged to identify with some other group

you can Google or YouTube the final experiment and it’s easy to tell you were being fed one side of the

story remember once you decide on a subject it can take a long time and a lot of information to rethink

it it’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled

Mark TW so be very careful of any campaigns that

are asking for seemingly minor commitments as an example of this let’s say a company launches an ad campaign

and they claim real Patriots by local if you disagree with their product it feels

like rejecting your identity as a patriot so this pushes you to conform to

be very very skeptical about those identity statements next is looking for

those emotional scripts and what I mean by this is the scripts that were written in our brains by our ancestors so

manipulated narratives trigger instincts round round round round lumbo the world

she’s flat the world she’s around she’s

flat look King she’s around like a the APPA she’s flat like the pancake POA

she’s round she’s a firm she’s a fully packed she’s round like my head she’s

flat like your [Music]

head a

[Music] biscuit yeah and what up do I’m a

disgust and nobody believes in the world that she’s around

me she looks around to me DC Oh by come here a Queen Isabella if you can

prove the world is round Chris I’ll give you my Jewels have Tribal rejection

these are threats of being socially Outcast like you’re selfish if you don’t comply and those things override logic

every time and as a tip for this break the script by focusing on the facts like

what’s the likelihood of this scenario so compare the claims with other sources

if the 24-hour Sun existed in Antarctica then it would be reasonable to assume that North facing Shadows should be

found with some images taken during the Antarctic Summer come to find out the

vast majority if not all of Google Earth’s images of Antarctica were taken

during its summer that is great news for shadow research sech it will depend on the time of day the footage was taken

but if we look over all of Antarctica and find no North facing Shadows then that is some strong evidence for no

24-hour Sun remember that what we call Satellites operate at all times of the

day a certain percentage of Shadows must be facing north than if a 24-hour Sun

actually existed let’s find out pay attention to the compass in the upper

right corner and the imagery date below [Music]

and again this is at it start I noticed it like 51 minutes in to video and now

at 52 minutes and six seconds it’s just

obvious

that there is angle and a blue line that cuts all the way up and across this is

all stage this is all stage next is follow the money so there’s a trail of

beneficiaries here so identifying who benefits always is going to reveal the motive okay five yeah no let’s do it I

I’m very I’m here for this actually okay how much are you getting paid

how much am I getting paid listen wait don’t answer that Jonathan don’t answer that yeah Will Duffy will Jonathan needs

to get paid for his time will hired him okay we could hire we we could hire somebody so I’m gonna stand up for will

on that one he hired him so look for funding sources like sponsorships or political connections that are tied to

the narrative at Amazon Studios we think big

and that’s why we’ve invested in the newest Technologies expand ing our

creative possibilities and offering our filmmakers an experience like no other

introducing Amazon Studios virtual production we ourselves are the

filmmaker so we’re trying to make a safe place for storytellers to be ambitious bigger than traditional walls that have

been built in the past just so we’re able to Encompass full World building shows there’s such a wonderful realism

that’s created with virtual production the ability to experiment with it on on this piece felt really f fitting it

definitely gives the ability for filmmakers to be able to visualize and utilize different locations within the same stage there are going to be aspects

of it as we shoot different content for different shows we could have a setup in the morning of one environment to have foreground set

pieces camera please shoot all that and then after wrap be able to swap out all the foreground step pieces switch out

the background and shoot a totally different environment the next morning could be a whole different part of the world this type of film making tool

makes location shooting around the world accessible to budgets big and small

next and this one is very important is analyze the context boundary the

mechanism here is context and context defines what is permissible so

manipulative people shift contexts to normalize extreme behavior on yah I

swear on everything that I went to Antarctica and that I did not went to

Antarctica he looks to the right he’s lying and he also doesn’t say that I

swear I saw a 24-hour son in an Arctica so that’s interesting so ask what is the

context compare some similar events in different settings to see if the rules or responses seem disproportionate look

for contradiction compare some similar events in different settings to see if the rules or responses seem

disproportionate look for contradictions so for lots of the students who are brand new to to NCI University this

right here is the most massive realization when they realize that the ability to weaponize cognitive

dissonance and then shift the context and get anyone to do almost anything

this changes the context to make previously unacceptable actions seem absolutely necessary next spot the use

of archetypes because they’re woven into our brains Sops simplify narratives by

using Arch types like heroes and villains and saviors deconstruct the story ask who are the characters and

what roles are they playing making a documentary I’m the filmmaker in the group I’m a flat earther as

well it’s hard to say what I think these days um but I’ll tell you this the AE map seems to be inaccurate um I think

some of the things with the Flat Earth now give me reason to investigate a little different um you know when you

see the sun circle around you it’s pretty clear just based on where we are that it couldn’t be happening where the

rest of the the planet is getting day and night every day as they do with the exception of the North Pole but that’s

for the same reason that down here in the South Pole we’re getting this 24-hour

sunlight I that doesn’t make any sense you’ve been a flat earther for eight or nine years and you just said we go to

space another red flag bro okay well excuse my uh my grammar

but my my my thoughts were send us up in a ship as high as it’ll go with one of these ships and like obviously if they

don’t send us in a ship high enough oh there’s an issue if they do send us what will we see Jonathan’s a real flat

earther simplistic like good versus evil stories usually signal manipulation just

about every time so always seek Nuance there the final

experiment uh is about the fact that a 24-hour sun in Antarctica does not work on a flat Earth

it’s not possible on a flat Earth and it’s obviously what the globe says

happens and the narrative ignores their mistakes and oversimplifies the conflict

to prevent a lot of scrutiny now what is VAP gate you might ask well one comment

that kept cropping up during people’s live streams was the lack of visible

breath with conspiracy theorists arguing that this was somehow proof that we

weren’t outside in a cold environment but instead we must be in a studio

somewhere then during Austin wit’s live stream he’d already been asked a few times about breath and was then asked to

pick up some snow so he went back into the Hut off camera to go and get his

gloves and when he came back onto camera he then produced two visible breaths

which then stopped again and what I’m seeing from that is thick foggy breath

being exhaled as he exits the hot then clearly holding what appears to be a vape pen to his mouth for quite a while

as he’s walking back then putting something in his pocket and then blowing thick fog from his mouth before getting

back to the computer which to me personally seems to fit the argument of him vaping I live in Florida bro where

it’s warm humid and close to sea level this was a complete flip on his head for

me I literally got sick okay now what I want you to actually address though is

I’m telling you factually I did not hit a vape walk over to the camera and

exhale a vape the first time I was asked if I Vaped in antic I said yes yes I Vaped I’m telling you actually I did not

hit a vape yes I Vaped I used to vape I quit vaping I found a vape in my bag

everyone claiming that’s a lie I I guess I can see why that’s coincidental or whatever but but the more words you use

the less believable you sound the more words it takes to tell the truth the farther it looks from I found an old

vape and I hit it because I wasn’t at home right so like I I wouldn’t Vape around my children you know like I

wasn’t going to smoke when I had children or whatever I also had a cigarette there I hate cigarettes think they smell terrible would never smoke

around my children ETA so the idea that I was away from my house is the only reason I would be vaping or smoking a

cigarette okay I never lied about hitting a vape I’m telling you actually I did not hit a vape yes I Vaped what I

said and still say to this day which is just the truth is that I did not hit a vape and walk over to the camera to try

to fake my breath less is more when you overe explain it’s because you have this fear that they’re not going to believe

you so you give more detail and hopes that they believe that you’re telling the truth or believe you know what you’re talking about so like if you

actually look at the video real closely you’ll see every time I hit a vape I’m trying to hide it from the camera and that’s because I would never Vape on

camera the more words you use the less believable you sound the more words it takes to tell the

hit a vape I walk over there I exhale out away from the camera like I turn my head away from the camera and everything

try to get another there’s more when you overe explain it’s because you have this fear that they’re not going to believe

you so you give more detail and hopes that they believe that you’re telling the truth or believe you know what you’re talking about hot water because

if you want it to be cold you just throw snow in there like the water just comes from the snow anyway right so when you drink hot water and you walk outside you

see your breath more and it takes like a couple minutes so you don’t really see your breath so I just assumed that that’s what my breath was from which is

why I said what’s up now and took two deep breaths after that thinking you keep seeing it and you didn’t why isn’t

your breath

FY S as Fogg as it was a second

ago it’s kind of foggy right now but right before I started the stream I I tested it so I knew you guys were going

to say that and my breath was like super foggy earlier but it’s not really talk you right

now there’s a little breath what’s up

now you have to take like deeper breath and it sucks it hurts your lungs stop the

cap stop right now stop no but Marty you wanted to bring up

some points um about what we care about and what we’re saying and what we mean here yeah so let’s just go let’s just go

on the list right away okay so are we proclaiming without question that they faked the 24-hour Sun as of right now

I’m leaning very strongly yes and I think Dave is pretty much there too but we you know there there other possibilities is do we still have to

take into consideration that there could be a rational reasonable explanation for there is a 24-hour sun down there and there’s a reasonable explanation in our

Flat Earth model because of Optics Dome that sort of thing yes that’s still a possibility as well but do we do we

believe that this Avenue should be specifically looked at yes and once you start looking at that this Avenue I

think the rest of them are going to fall off and you’re going to start to see that this actually makes a whole lot of sense next evaluate the frame so let’s

do a step-by-step evaluation here first one is expectation what are you expected to believe or do based on this thing

that you’re exposed to in the media next is belief what assumptions are being made about you like your values or your

fears then we have perception so how is reality being shaped like selective

facts or missing contexts and definition is the final step here when it comes to a frame what truth is being asserted as

something that’s completely unchallengeable they expect to get you to believe in a perception to accept

this fallacy of a reality so they can control your mind more easily when

someone is sucked out of their skull so far beyond comprehension that they can’t trust their own senses you can imagine

how easily manipulated they are when it comes to other deceptions I do not know of one seasoned flat earther who fell

for the planemic and actually got injected with this comes up with information

suppression so really look for topics that are being avoided critics that are being silenced if somebody needs to be

silenced in order for an idea to make it then the idea is not good so alternative

viewpoints being discredited that’s a big one to look out for you can actually take the same link from your YouTube

video and post it on the RTS platform and it’ll lift the shadow Banning sometimes YouTube will only show less

than 1% of the views that are actually being viewed this is a good example here of

one of my videos where it shows 419 views but somehow 3,000 likes I’ve

literally caught them sabotaging My Views terms of conspiracy theory content generally our goal is to promote

authoritative content to our users so we have two principles that guide the way here that’s the first one is we want to

provide users with authoritative trustworthy I’m sorry to cat you off I only have a minute half and I I I don’t

really need to hear what you’re trying to provide I want to know how you’re dealing with all these conspiracy theorists on your platform so the the

first way is by demoting lowquality content and promoting more authoritative content and the second is by providing

more transparency for users so we’re introducing boxes that provide factual

information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual

such as searching for the Earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of your response is to put a box saying nope the

Earth is not flat correct okay so cross check timelines of events and notice if

critics are labeled conspiracists or if algorithms are suppressing some kind of

specific search and this is a big one especially in today’s time this should go without saying but I will go ahead

and say it anyway whenever you Google Flat Earth all of the information is completely one-sided it’s either

misinformation a strawman fallacy world opposition or information that’s

steering you away from Flat Earth it’s not giving you any credible content from

a real flat earther perspective why isn’t there better content like TR Earth Wiki that comes up where you can look up

whatever you want regarding Flat Earth that will give you a credible resource it’s because they are hiding

the truth from you that should be very easy to understand so next be alert to

Rapid compliance shifts this one is scary and it’s happening every day scops

create urgency to drive rapid compliance and these tactics are stuff like

emotional appeals staged group behaviors or False Consensus for this it’s really

important to slow down and resist the pressure to act to question the Conformity as much as possible and test

the message engaging the Skeptics there then we have this controlled opposition

named Robbie Davidson who is now coming out on his Facebook saying that he is going back to the globe if that is not a

rapid compliance shift I don’t know what is study the timing of the events and

this one’s huge especially right now timing is everything ask yourself why is

this happening now so what other events or scandals might this thing be distracting everybody from so look for

very coincidental timing with unrelated major news stories or political

movements Sops can very often be uh smoke screens ironically right after the

final experiment is finished and all the information starts blowing up La starts burning down to the point where only

some of the trees burned but somehow was melting aluminum down to a liquid

coincidence probably not the next thing I want you to do is to sharpen your brain to start hearing and understanding

these manipulation tactics and one of the biggest things that you can do the most effective way that I could train

you right now just you and me is to teach your brain to recognize logical

fallacies so let’s go through these cuz Sops very often use these flawed arguments to convince people and if you

know how to spot them it makes you a lot harder to manipulate let me give you 10 of these so that your brain gets

hardwired to start seeing everything a whole lot differently so the first one

that you’re going to see all the time appeal to emotion so this uses fear and anger and hope to bypass logic this

Exodus will continue until a flat earther can show how tf’s experiments

and observations can work on a flat Earth but instead of doing this the Flat

Earth Community as a whole is taking the position that we did not actually go to

Antarctica or that we did not see the real sun or that there is no 24-hour sun

in Antarctica despite the fact that we all witnessed it with our own eyes they

are arguing that we were in a giant Studio filled with LED screens or that

the sun was created with a giant laser pointer to fool us no one ever said that next is the

straw man argument this misrepresents somebody’s argument so they can attack

it better don’t let anybody trick you that Flat Earth is a flat disc in outer

space so somebody might say they oppose the lockdowns because they don’t care

about lives think about that one number three is the bandwagon policy so this

claims that something is true because everyone supports it and this is you hear this all the time millions of

people agree with X Y and Z you should agree with it too I had asked you to debate one of them Flat Earth guys no I

don’t I can’t no I know we talked about it and we’re going to have him on Skype no that is something that should not be

debated does not belong in front of an audience getting debated only 64% are

convinced that the world is a ball the world is a circle that the world is a

what is it a spheroid only 64% are convinced that the world is a

ball please don’t cry like that please don’t

[Applause] Brennon number four is the false dilemma

this presents only only two extreme options and it ignores Alternatives so

it’s the either you’re with us or you’re against us fallacy there it doesn’t

matter when there’s a 24-hour sun in Antarctica if there is that falsifies

Flat Earth and it confirms the globe number five is the ad homonym attacks this is the attack of the person and not

the argument be very observant for this so this is when you hear you can’t trust

her she’s not a scientist you can’t do X because they’re not qualified based on X

ad homonym is very common and I want your brain to be able to spot it why do people think the Earth is flat the Earth

is clearly round right that’s why we have the Horizon time zone Seasons day and night cycle weing seen it from space

we know more about the curvature of the earth and the vast majority of things in our world how can someone get confused about the shape of the earth well the

answer is actually more annoying than you’d think flat earthers aren’t coming to the conclusion that the Earth is flat the same way we came to understand that

the Earth is round scientific experiments General observations and mathematical equations all prove to us that the Earth was round but flat

earthers belief isn’t based on evidence it’s based on distrust they believe that people in power are lying to them that

experts are full of sh there is no actual evidence that proves the Earth is flat the whole conspiracy is based

solely on the distrust of authority that’s it and hey I told you the answer was annoying number six is appeal to

Authority and this is a claim that something is true because an authority figure said so so like Dr X supports it

so it’s absolutely right you have to trust the science we should speak of seeking evidence that dis favors the

hypothesis that the Earth is flat of which there is plenty starting with the

historical evidence about how Stellar constellations shift if you travel how the length of Shadows changes to

Newton’s 1 over R square Force law that is the law for a sphere not a dis not to

mention Einstein and gravitational red shift and the peralan Precision of mercury and so on and so forth the

problem that flat earthers have is that they cannot do most of these observations themselves so if you buy

the idea that it’s only your personally collected evidence that you should accept then it seems you cannot refute

the idea that the Earth is flat number seven is the slippery slope these are claims that one action is going to lead

to some extreme negative outcome so you’ve heard this before somebody says

something like if we allow this we’re going to lose all of our freedoms all of our freedoms are Gone the country is

gone all of that kind of talk like that be very attuned to when you hear that

and very cautious when you hear that if you do not think about your sensory input if you do not properly decode it

you arrive at the wrong conclusion flat earther similarly arrive at the wrong

conclusion by failing to decode evidence indeed by simply ignoring a lot of evidence that their own censors deliver

this is evidence about how society and how science Works whether we are

scientists or not we all constantly use this evidence to navigate life and I’m

sure flat earthers are no exception number eight Hasty generalizations and

these are broad claims that are made with very little evidence so the example

is two politicians lied so all of them must be corrupt so giant claim tiny bit

of evidence two politicians might have lied so they’re all corrupt these controlled opposition’s

accusation do not speak for the entire Flat Earth Community you don’t have to be a Jack Parsons to figure that one out

number nine is huge it’s the red herring so this distracts people with irrelevant

information you’ve heard this maybe as an example when somebody says why are we worrying about climate change when we

have so much crime going on right now it’s an argument of distraction number 10 is false equivalence all right so

anybody can go to these two websites or any website really and um check out the

AI detection software this first one I uploaded the video from

mckagan’s the first one that was uploaded and it took like eight still shots or whatever came back as multiple

fake indicators shows you the image manipulation that 39% of it is

manipulated so they probably use some fake some real um here’s this footage or this picture

coming back as being AI or not or maybe computer generated not necessarily AI

but tampered with um same with this one there’s dozens of them that I put in

here I I took a picture from my window to show what it looks like a real

picture just to for as like a comparison and obviously that came back

with the green saying it’s fine so here’s another one that’s like the

little tents from jiren’s chest cam footage got quite a bit of jiren’s chest

cam footage that’s fake this one actually said that it looked legit but then I noticed it looked like I didn’t

see a sun I just saw the mountains there so then I decided to crop just zoom in

take the picture just cropped out the Sun as you can see here put that in and

all of a sudden Bam um computer generated modified

image that’s a very damaging

one I know there’s a lot of information here so I want to give you access to the actual tool that we use to identify Sops

that even rates the likelihood on a 1 to 100 scale I’m going to add that into the description right below this video but

keep this in mind throughout history the people who stood tallest in the storm

were not not the ones who knew all the answers they were the ones who asked the right questions they weren’t the loudest

voices they were the calmest they were the people that had composure thanks for

spending some time with me one

love I hope that was easier to watch than it was to edit now I’m going to do

something I don’t usually do I’m going to ask you to share this video I’m obviously not doing it for the views I’m

doing this to get the truth out this is deceiving some people and they do need to see the light so to all the deceivers

out there let this be a message from the real Flat Earth Community you cannot

pull a stunt like this without us honest researchers picking it apart this movement is not being stopped let alone

slow down you are fighting against God’s creation you’re at a lost cause the

truth will always prevail

Final Experiment Fakery

by fevideo | Jan 5, 2025 | Fake

Final Experiment Fakery

Transcript

astute internet sleuths continue

analyzing anomalies and inconsistencies

it’s becoming increasingly clear that

the so-called final experiments 24-hour

Antarctic sun was just another faked

event recorded on a film set unbeknownst

to most for the past few years portable

panoramic 360° LED Studio setups now

exist and are being used for Hollywood

Productions like the Mandalorian and

many others Amazon volume or Amazon

Studio 15 for example are

state-of-the-art Studios which take the

standard of green or blue screen

technology and completely blow it out of

the water with new 360° panoramic LED

screen Studios the entire background and

ceiling or sky are digitally created in

Unreal Engine then projected l in up to

16k resolution so the actors on set can

see react and interact with everything

in real time Amazon’s sets comprise

3,000 seamlessly connected LED panels 80

ft in diameter and nearly 3 stories tall

enclosing

13,700 cubic feet of interactive space

keeping all this in mind let’s review

some footage from the final experiment

to begin with watch the supposed Sun

circling around during their 24-hour

time-lapse video and pay close attention

to its

shape notice how the Sun changes from

circular to being smooshed down

horizontally back to perfectly circular

then smooshed across vertically and then

back

again this is not how the Sun usually

looks or behaves in person or in genuine

footage of the phenomenon from the

Arctic now pay attention to the changes

in length and direction of mun’s Shadow

as he Paces around the base

camp in the space of walking only a

matter of feet his shadow somehow

completely changes Direction and triples

length watch as his shadow stretches

contracts and sharply changes angles

within the space of just a few

Paces this is not at all normal behavior

of Shadows being cast by sunlight or of

a man walking only a few

steps the following is a simple

demonstration of how light and shadows

work depending on the distance of the

light

source in the first example the light

source is held close to the action

figure as he moves along the table and

we see quite pronounced changes in the

length and direction of his

shadow in the second example the light

light source is held farther away from

the action figure as he moves along the

table and we see much less change in the

shadow length and

direction in reality the sun is much

farther away in scale than this

demonstration allows for as well so even

the amount of change seen here is being

generous a man walking such a short

distance outside should never have a

shadow that changes Direction 90° and

triples in length

now let’s watch as mkun and Austin wit

it respond to commenters asking them to

show their breath in the

Antarctic as they blow hot air out their

mouths in freezing temperatures there

should be a Cloudy Mist that forms in

front of their faces as the water vapor

in their breath

condenses instead however every time

they blow not a trace of fog

appears in wit’s live stream he claimed

this was because the air hair was

allegedly too dry there someone then

asks him to pick up some snow which he

initially refuses to do because his

hands would be too

cold so he turns his camera off walks

into the shed to grab some gloves then

comes back in front of the camera and

exhales one and a half breaths which now

mysteriously do show Vapor appearing in

front of his face only to abruptly stop

again he says to the camera there’s a

little breath what’s up now as if

somehow proving the Skeptics wrong and

claiming that he took a sip of water in

the shed which was supposed to account

for it another camera recording from a

different angle however caught wit it

while exiting the shed doing what

appears to be hitting a vape pen just

before turning his camera back

on for comparative purposes here is what

someone’s breath looks like during

winter in Maine

USA every time you exhale there is a

visibly noticeable cloudy fog that

condenses from the difference in

temperature between the hot air in your

lungs and the cold air

outside so after exhaling his Vape hit

into the camera rather than picking up

some of the snow that was all around him

for some reason Austin walks several

feet away and picks up a bit of snow

from over there there then walks it back

to the camera and lets it fall to the

ground if snow is everywhere all around

him why did he have to walk way over

there to get

some anytime closeup footage of their

feet was shown their Footprints always

failed to make any impression in the

snow here he moves his left foot and

there is no impression footprint or

displaced

snow another thing apparent while

watching the footage was the complete

lack of wind or any precipitation

whatsoever throughout the live stream

footage I don’t recall a single instance

of any wind or even a light Breeze

strong enough to affect their hair or

microphones even on a calm sunny day if

they were really outside and not in a

studio we should see or hear the effect

of wind on their bodies or microphones

but it was mysteriously absent the

entire time

jiren wit it and others involved also

made comments several times about how

the mountains in the distance seemed so

close that you could touch them but that

they were actually several miles away

the mountains do seem strangely closer

than they should appear and if you pay

attention to where the background and

foreground meet in footage from the

final experiment particularly the

24-hour Sun time lapse it seems we are

seeing where the digital backdrop ends

and the studio floor

begins there is a separation line

indicative of a film set apparent in

much of the footage and made clear

through the use of video editing

technology by adjusting the contrast it

becomes clear where Studio reality meets

digital fakery in the 24-hour time-lapse

Sun footage the mountains and sky are

both chroma keyed out showing they are

both part of the studio

backdrop compare this to other footage

taken at Union Glacier when chroma key

is applied only the sky disappears

leaving the real mountains

untouched this makes the case that the

final experiment is potentially a

mixture of doctor Studio footage to fake

the 24-hour sun and other authentic

footage actually taken from Union

Glacier

Antarctica the founder of this final

experiment Pastor Will Duffy has also

had a recent clip surface from a sermon

of his that gives some real insight into

the mind of the man behind this

production

okay we finally get to my conclusion on

the matter of lying in deception and

that is this after carefully looking at

both sides of the debate and after

taking a very deep dive into everything

I could possibly find in scripture

regarding lying and deception I have

come to the conclusion that neither

lying nor deception are inherently

immoral

« Older Entries