Anthony Skaar Moochie is a Trump advisor and he went on CNN and made an of
himself on the issue of climate science overwhelmingly census in the scientific community is that presented actions have
an impact on science race oh yeah I was interacting world and whenever it comes out creo had Chris there was an
overwhelming science that the earth was flat and there was an overwhelming sign learned over the time the Senate we were
the center of the world a hundred percent you know we get a lot of things wrong in the scientific community you
and I both know that no that’s called not science geocentrism to there was an
overwhelming signs have you believe no that wasn’t a scientific belief that was a belief that wasn’t scientific that was
a belief there’s a difference there’s a difference hello my name is Nathan Roberts thanks for tuning in to flat
earth doctrine I appreciate you being here please do subscribe if you haven’t yet done so though do not count on my
social media account always being active it’s at one point in time sometime in the future YouTube because it is censoring
flattered specifically you will not be able to find my account it will be gone because of YouTube so as a result to
stay in contact with me once all that goes down please go to my website flat
earth doctrine calm and you’ll see a pop-up appear on the web page please
provide your email address so that when things go down where I’m censored completely we will be able to stay in
contact through email so let’s go ahead and dive into these documents I’m here
to share with you 44 different documents from the government swear by they admit the earth is flat documents from the CIA
USSR US Army NASA Federal Aviation Administration the FFA US Navy national
imagery and mapping agency National geospatial intelligence agency and the US Marine Corps which
includes state-owned universities such as UCLA Penn State and Shang yang aerospace
university government admits Flat Earth document number one put out by the CIA
whereby it looks like they stole it from the USSR and this document was created
appears to be sometime around March of 1957 and you’ll notice that in the
bottom left-hand corner and you’ll see the title of the document the author if there is one cited unless there’s a ton
of them and I’m not gonna list them all and then you have the URL of this document so if you want to go download it yourself you were able to and when I
go through these documents themselves you’ll see on the bottom right-hand corner is the page number where you can
find these these phrases and words cited so beginning with page 19 of 104 this
dissertation there’s the brightness of the firmament the firmament is a biblical term which
is a just mentioned in Genesis chapter one eight different times and beginning with verse six and the firmament is is
was made to divide and separate the waters from above from below as well as
the Sun Moon and stars are placed within the firmament so please go reread
Genesis chapter one the firmament is also mentioned on page 20 also a near
Sun which means localized Sun is mentioned and it talks about the
brightness of the first order and derived on the assumption of a Flat Earth and giving some conclusions
derived on the basis of this formula so the formula is based upon the assumption of a Flat Earth there’s a near Sun and
there’s a firmament apparently government admits Flat Earth document
number two propagation of electromagnetic fields over Flat Earth you’ll notice it on page seven it says
flat idealized Earth on page 17 Flat Earth page 18 Flat Earth
page 28 Flat Earth page 35 Flat Earth government admits
Flat Earth document number three from the US Army titled an energy budget
model to calculate the low atmosphere profiles of effective Sound speed at night there’s an image in the document
where it shows a near and localised Sun crepuscular rays and a flat earth and
that again is on page 10 and then if you go to page 16 you see the word Flat
Earth government admits Flat Earth document number 4 put out by the United
States Army titled computationally efficient algorithms for estimating the
angle of arrival of helicopters using acoustic arrays let’s see what it has to
say on page 17 it says Flat Earth page
30 Flat Earth model page 31 Flat Earth
page 35 a flat earth government admits
flatter document number 5 this one is from United States Army titled adding liquid payloads effects to the 6 DOF
trajectory of spinning projectiles see what it has to say on page 7 says assume
a Flat Earth these equations assume a flat earth government admits Flat Earth
document number 6 this is put out by the United States Army in fact it’s the same author as document number 5 gene R
Cooper and in fact the title is almost eerily the same though what we’ll find
is that he didn’t make any Corrections for assuming a Flat Earth but let’s read
the title trajectory prediction of spin-stabilized projectiles with a steady liquid payload what does it say
page 10 it says these equations assume a Flat Earth
why would you assume a Flat Earth if you’re on a spinning ball govern
admits Flat Earth document number seven put out by NASA in August of 1988
derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model what does it have to say
let’s see here well starting with page six it says this report details the development of the
linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non
rotating earth it goes on to say on the same page by defining the initial conditions of the nominal trajectory for
straight in level flight and setting the asymmetric aerodynamic and inertia terms
to zero one can easily obtain the more traditional linear models from the linear model derived in this report on
page 35 it says this report derives and defines a set of linearized system
matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying in a stationary
atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth on page 55 it says based on
assumptions of symmetric mass distributions symmetric aerodynamics and straight in level flight and then on
page 102 this report documents the derivation and definition of a linear
aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass flying over a flat non
rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 8 put out by NASA
titled general equations of motion for a damaged asymmetric aircraft and on page
2 it states in this paper the rigid body
equations of motion over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat
Earth document number 9 put out by NASA titled predicted performance of a thrust
enhanced sr-71 aircraft with an external payload this has put out in June of 1997
and it states non rotating earth right there page 10 and this this sr-71
blackbird has a top speed of 2,100 93 miles per hour and it doesn’t have to
account for a rotation of the earth the Coriolis effect the alleged Coriolis effect or even the curvature of the
earth at 2193 miles per hour certainly
would have to if it existed unless it was flying over a flat non rotating
earth government emits flat earth document number 10 put out by the Federal Aviation Administration in
conjunction with company named MIT re it’s derivation of a point mass aircraft
model used for fast time simulation this is from April 2015
says assuming a flat non rotating earth page 7 government admits Flat Earth
document number 11 put up by NASA in conjunction with the University of Kansas they contracted kayuu to do this
work with with them and it was put out June of 1971 it is titled a method for
reducing the sensitivity of optimal nonlinear systems to parameter uncertainty let’s see what has to say
page 14 it says the idealizing assumptions made are the following
number two is a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document
number twelve put out by NASA it is titled calculation of wind compensation
for launching of unguided rockets and on page eight and 10 we have a diagram as
well as it states the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat
non rotating earth government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by
NASA December of 1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to
derive linear aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft
flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating or
government admits Flat Earth document number 13 put up by NASA December of
1987 titled user’s manual for linear a Fortran program to derive linear
aircraft models and it’s states on page 16 a rigid aircraft flying in a
stationary atmosphere over a flat non rotating earth government admits Flat
Earth document number 14 put up by NASA in 1988 in fact it looks like to be an updated version from the document number
13 that I just went over same authors and almost the same exact if not same exact title which is user’s manual for
interactive linear a Fortran program to derive linear aircraft models and it
states on page four equations with stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions same thing as
in document 13 same authors basically same title they didn’t make any adjustment going onto page 126 it states
the same thing stationary atmosphere and flat non rotating earth assumptions doesn’t look like they made a mistake
with that documentation their government admits Flat Earth document number 15 put
out by NASA this was put out in March of 1972 and it’s titled determination of
angles of attack and side slip from radar data and a roll stabilized platform what does it have to say well
page two it states the method is limited however to application where a flat non
rotating earth may be assumed if it’s limited to that assumption and the earth
is a spinning ball then this document is garbage unless the earth is truly flat
and non rotating government admits Flat Earth document number 16 put up by NASA
it’s titled US standard atmosphere what does it have to say well on page 22 it says for the
accuracy required in this document it suffices to treat the surface as an
ellipsoid whose flattening ellipticity that means they had to flatten the globe
why would you have to do that for accuracy maybe because the earth is government admits flatter document
number 17 put out by NASA in December of 1991 titled an aircraft model for the
AIAA controls design challenge and what does it have to say on page 13 it states
the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a
flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document number 18 put
out by NASA this was in December of 1978 titled investigation of aircraft landing
in variable wind fields and what does it have to say on page 14 it states the
aircraft trajectory model employed in this study was derived based on the following assumptions a the earth is
flat and non rotating government admits
flatter document number 19 put up by NASA titled a mathematical model of the CH – 53 helicopter and its states on
page 25 the helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with
respect to a flat non rotating earth government admits flatter document
number 20 put out by NASA titled development and validation of a piloted simulation of a helicopter and external
sling load well what does it have to say well on page six it states a general set
of nonlinear rigid body equations of motion for both the helicopter and external load determines the motion of
each vehicle with respect to a flat non rotating earth it states on page 37 the
equations of motion for both the helicopter and the external sling load are developed in body axes with respect
to a flat non rotating earth on page 48 it states the terrain is generally flat
government admits Flat Earth document number 21 put out by NASA and the US Air
Force in conjunction with research provided by Georgia Tech and it is and
it is titled atmospheric oscillations what does it
have to say well on page 13 it states a model frequently used is that of a flat
non rotating earth also States the most one can profitably simplify the problem
is to consider an isothermal atmosphere plane level surfaces and a non rotating
earth government admits flat earth document number 20 to put out by NASA
titled stability and control estimation flight test results for the sr-71
aircraft with externally mounted experiments and what does it have to say
well it states on page 18 and 19 if you put them together because there’s a
break in the paragraph it states these equations assume a rigid vehicle and a
flat non rotating earth not very safe for a vehicle that travels at a top
speed of 2000 193 miles per hour government admits Flat Earth document
number 23 put out by NASA in May of 1988 titled flight testing a V s tol aircraft
to identify a full envelope aerodynamic model and it states motion over a flat
non rotating earth page 9 of 18 government admits flatter document
number 24 put out by NASA it is titled singular arc time optimal climb
trajectory of aircraft in a two dimensional wind field what does it have
to say it states on page two in our minimum time to climb problem the
aircraft is modeled as a point mass of the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non
rotating flat earth government admits flatter document number 25 this is put
out by the United States Navy and it is titled studies on instabilities in long baseline two-way satellite time and
frequency transfer including a troposphere delay model and what does it have to state it states on
page two it shows a graphic which shows two ground stations on equal level
ground both ground stations on the same flat plane and then on page six it states assuming a flat earth and the
straight line of sight line of sight just so you know line of sight does not
apparently exist when you’re looking over the earth and I’m gonna get to that in another document pretty soon
government admits Flat Earth document number 26 United States Army it is
titled scale and sensitive detection algorithm for FLI our imagery what does
it have a state it states that in other scenarios only the range to the center
of the field of view and depressions angle is known so that a flat earth approximation provides the best estimate
that is page 6 of 22 government admits Flat Earth document number 27 put on it
again by the United States Army and it is titled user manual for the microsoft
windows edition of the scanning fast field program version 3.0 what does it
have to stay well it says on page 45 and 47 this model works over a flat and non
turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth document number 28 put out by
the United States Army titled path loss measurements in a forested environment at VHF and what do we have to find in
here but it states on page 8 Flat Earth age 16 over a flat earth age 17 over
flat earth page 18 over flat earth page 19 over flat earth h20 based on Flat
Earth theory not a theory it’s fact page 23 over Flat Earth page 25 Flat
Earth page 26 Flat Earth page 35 over Flat Earth over Flat Earth stated
twice government admits Flat Earth document number 29 this is the US Air
Force who contracted Brown University to put forth the docking
titled review of sound propagation in the lower atmosphere documented in May
1955 so what does it say on page 18 it says in most of the topics to be
discussed the problem is to describe the sound field in a region of atmosphere
above a flat earth and then it goes on to cite and page 208 cite a document an
article that was written in 1954 in physica xx
and it is titled the extension of summer fields formula for the propagation of
radio waves over a flat earth two different conductivities of the soil so
you may want to research that one a little bit further government admits Flat Earth document number 30 put up
with the United States Army entitled beacon position and altitude navigation aided by a magnet meter and it states on
page 11 it says that the first is the
earth fixed coordinate system which is fixed to the earth with a flat earth
assumption and just check out the diagram that they have associated with it are you serious government admits
Flat Earth document number 31 put up by the United States Army and it is titled automatic target acquisition of the demo
3 program and it states on page 9 only
the range to the center of the field of view and the depression angle is known so that a Flat Earth approximation
provides the best estimate government admits Flat Earth document number 32 put
up by the United States Army and it is titled modeling of atmospheric effects
see what it’s got to say well I’m page 28 it states this model works well over
a flat earth and non turbulent atmosphere government admits Flat Earth
document number 33 put out by NASA in conjunction with an organization called
range commander’s Council telemetry group the cumin is titled telemetry standards this
organization range commander’s council their mission is dedicated to serving the technical and operational needs of
us test training and operational ranges the RCC provides a framework where in
common needs are identified and common solutions are sought technical standards are established and disseminated joint
procurement opportunities are explored technical and equipment exchanges are facilitated advanced concepts and
technical innovations are assessed and potential applications are identified the vision is the range commits
commander’s Council RCC will promote credible change to meet Department of Defense DoD tests and training
requirements while promoting the common good of its members and enhance and enhance sharing and interoperability of
infrastructure and resources and so apparently I’ve got a lot more than just
NASA who they serve they just they serve the Department of Defense the Air Force the Navy the army that’s who’s at least
listed here so back to the document which is to telemetry standards on page
172 it states although the equations for the terrain model can be rather daunting
in its simplest form one uses flat earth trigonometry to compute the difference
in path lengths between the direct and reflected signals you don’t use flat
earth trigonometry if you’re on a globe government admits Flat Earth document
number 34 put out by NASA in conjunction with UCLA that’s right the University of California this was put out in 1993 and
it is titled approximate optimal guidance for the Advanced Launch System
and it states that the equations of motion for the 0th order problem of
flight in a vacuum over a flat earth are presented that’s
page 32 of 164 and then on page 43 of 164 it states in this section the
three-dimensional equations of motion are reduced for flight in a great circle
plane the the xz-plane over a flat non-rotating
earth and in further states below it says equations of motion representing
flight in a vacuum over a flat earth government in MIT’s Flat Earth document
number 35 put out by NASA and October 1995 and it is titled flight simulation
software at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and it states on page 4 this
structured with both flat and oblique earth versions has successfully supported more than 50 different
aircraft apparently it also has a flat earth version and in most cases Flat
Earth six degree of freedom equations of motion are used why would that be unless
here at this flat government admits Flat Earth document number 36 put up by NASA and it
is titled simulator arrow model implementation on page 10 it states for
the flat non rotating earth considered here and why are we considering to build
a software over a flat earth to be used for trainings when the earth is a
spinning ball maybe the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document
number 37 this is Shen yang aerospace University which is affiliated with
obviously China and the title is design and implementation of flight visual
simulation system and on page three it states and I’m gonna read this entire thinks it’s very important to understand
mathematical modeling of flight simulation the aircraft flight motion simulation as an important part of fvss
directly affects the reliability and authenticity of the system flight motion simulation of effect can be greatly
improved by relative mathematical models of aircraft flight dynamics in this paper the fvss is based on two
assumptions a flight area is the space above ground level level where the
rotation of the earth and the curvy motion of mass center of Earth are
neglected meaning they don’t take it to an account at all for this flight
simulation software why would they do that if the earth is a spinning ball why
would you create software to train people how to fly on flat non rotating
earth software why because government
admits flat earth document number 38 this is put up by Penn State which is a public university so state-owned the title is a discussion
of methods of real-time airplane flight simulation and what does it have to say
about flight simulation well on page 11 estates flat earth coordinates and many
flight simulators globe navigation is not important in such cases it is
appropriate to model the earth as a plane half-space rather than an oblate
spheroid then the simulator need not worry about how the local horizontal plane changes as the airplane flies
around the earth though we know from other documentation all flight is straight and level this simplifies the
bookkeeping in the simulator considerably the Flat Earth coordinate system is a Cartesian system Flat Earth
model Thank You Penn State government admits Flat Earth document number 39 and
this is in conjunction with nad the National imagery and mapping agency as well as the national
geospatial-intelligence agency and the document is titled the American practical navigator an epitome of
navigation this is the 1995 edition alright so what does it have to say well
it states well one is water line how can water have a line if it’s always curving
maybe because it’s level in any case this assumes that the observer is at sea
level the earth is flat between observer and object there is no refraction in the
object and it’s water line form a right angle for most cases of practical
significance these assumptions produce no large errors or
rather in fact no errors at all and that’s found on page 351 of 7:14 and
then we also find that they have curvature of surface at point 8 foot per
nautical mile which does workout with what commonly is known as the earth
curvature calculation for the statute mile for the statute mile it’s point six
six six foot per statute mile for the
curvature of the surface but for nautical mile it does work out to 0.8 fluid per nautical mile for the
curvature of the surface so apparently they’re using the same spherical trigonometry that flat earthers are
using to prove that the earth is not a globe and that’s found on page 355 of
7:14 and then this definition I think was very interesting it’s called back
shore the part of a beach which is usually dry being reached only by the
highest tides and by extension a narrow strip of relatively flat Coast bordering
the C flat Coast page 573 and then we
also have line of sight now this is a very interesting definition line of sight the straight line between two
points which does not follow the curvature of the earth the only way that
this apparent definition works out would mean that you’re only looking up in the
sky never looking straight out over the plain of the earth because if you were
then you would be following the curvature of the earth thereby it’s no longer the line of sight
but we commonly say in my line of sight I can see such-and-such when you’re
looking straight over the earth apparently we’ve been using it incorrectly government admits Flat Earth
document number 40 put up by the United States Army in November of 1969 titled
the production of firing tables for cannon artillery ballistic research laboratory
in Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland and what is it state right off the get-go on
page ten ms l equals mean sea level what does sea level mean well sea level it is
the level of the sea surface used in reckoning the height of geographical
features such as hills and as a barometric standard and then what is the definition of level but a horizontal
plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point a position on a real or imaginary scale of
amount quantity extent or quality having a flat or and even surface without
slopes or bumps at the same height as someone or something else give a flat or
even surface to begin to fly horizontally after climbing or diving
that’s the word level that’s what is attributed with the word for sea level
the phrase sea level the word level is in there because water always seeks to
find its level and okay so now
interestingly in this document it does state on page 22 and 34 rotation of the
earth that phrase rotation of the earth is cited three times between pages 22
and 34 however an equation based on a theory particle theory is not a proof
for rotation of the earth for each of the three variables for the rotation of the earth in the theoretical equation
the number zero can be plugged in without negatively impacting the
entirety of the equation thus it’s just a variable that has no bearing within
the equation and here was an interesting graphic on page 110 it shows a horizontal range in meters on
the far right the one is chopped off somehow that happened but it’s 12,000
meters that represents seven point four five miles and would be representative
of 37 foot drop if the earth is a ball but earth curvature is not necessary for
calculating ballistic artillery they put it on a [ __ ] until range no curvature government
admits Flat Earth document number 41 put out again by the United States Army April 2016 titled Field Artillery manual
cannon gunnery what do they have to say well no rotation of the earth that is
standard conditions no rotation of the earth that’s on page 175 however it does
state on page 192 theory of rotational effects but we understand if we look at
the word theory in the definition it is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something especially
one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained about hypotheses thesis conjecture
supposition speculation postulation postulate proposition premise surmise
assumption presumption presupposition notion guess hunch feeling suspicions do
you understand that the idea of a theory in science with until it’s been proven
anyways it is simply a form of mysticism even potentially so this idea that they
want to throw in the rotational effects and this document has no bearing because they admit that is just a theory a
supposition a speculation a postulation it’s not a fact so and this is
interesting to the m198 howitzer has a maximum range of 14 miles that would be
a hundred and fifty seven feet of dropped from the alleged earth curvature that goes unaccounted for why why would
you not account for the alleged drop if you’re living on a ball because you don’t have to here at this flat
government emits Flat Earth document number 42 United States Army put out in
July of 2006 titled field artillery gunnery and I’m not gonna go through all
the document but I’m gonna summarize what is in here and you can check it for yourself concepts not discussed or
disclosed in the document Coriolis rotation of the earth sphere curve
or even the motion of the earth however the concept that is discussed is azimuth
and azimuth proves that you have to be on a ground plane flat no curvature for
an azimuth now this image was not in the document itself but the concept itself
is used throughout the document proving that it’s flat government admits Flat
Earth document number 43 and this time it’s the United States Marine Corps and it is titled TTP for the field artillery
cannon gunnery and what is a state the same thing is the document number 42
which I just covered the concepts that are not discussed in this document include Coriolis rotation of the earth
sphere curvature and motion of the earth however azimuth is is discussed again
the earth is flat government admits Flat Earth document number 44 put up by the
United States Marine Corps entitled tactics techniques and procedures for the field artillery manual cannon
gunnery what’s interesting about this document is that it does go into great lengths of
stating the words and phrase rotation of the earth and Coriolis it says it one
two three four five six seven seven different times at least however it also states that the standard
conditions by which it operates or expects to be operating is no rotation
of the earth at all so why is there this contradiction so how do we reconcile the
difference an apparent contradiction of whether or not rotation of the earth or Coriolis needs to be taken into account
well number one other than the mention of the terms rotation of the earth and Coriolis there is absolutely no
instruction in the documentation for how to account for the rotation of the earth so why is that number two the rotation
of the earth is a theory and just as in the quote equation cited in the u.s. army document report number thirteen
seventy one entitled the production of firing tables and for cannon artillery which was document number
it allows for the variable of alleged rotation of the earth to be zero leaving
the entirety of the equation unaffected and it is the same with this documentation produced by the United
States Marine Corps and if you’re interested in looking at document number
40 again one more time you can pause this this is for your help and research a little bit more right
here or you can just go to the document itself and check it for yourself but I’m gonna move on now what is discussed in
the document is azimuth and we understand that only works on a ground
level plane flat no curvature so I rest
my case the earth is flat so in the photo you see this curvature of Earth’s
surface Wow he’s in space look at that no he’s not at that point you don’t see you don’t
see the curvature of the earth if you are two millimeters above this beach ball he just don’t that stuff is what a
quick shout out to pasture Dean Hodel who was the first to expose many of these documents on June 10th 2018 if you
want to check out his website you can go to WWE know tool org and there’s also a
conference coming up and that is October 2nd through the 4th of 2019 and Auburn
Alabama if you would like to register assuming there’s still space for it which actually there is no space but if
there is space or room rather for the event you can go to Skyfall 2019 org and
register nearly everyone interested in space has seen this picture it was
released by NASA and has the iconic name the Blue Marble 2 you can find the
picture everywhere but one of the best places to find it is NASA’s own website
this photograph is iconic because NASA says it is one of the most detailed
true-color images of the entire Earth to date to put it in a nutshell the picture
is iconic well amazingly it turns out a number of sleuths have now found compelling new
evidence that the image is indeed a fake now let’s take a look at first the photo
seems legit I mean it looks like earth the earth that we have always been told
we live on but as the Savi Internet sleuths point out if you take a closer
look things start to take a somewhat sinister turn look closely at the
repeating cloud pattern here we can see clear examples that the photograph has
not only been doctored or constructed but also strong evidence that whoever
done the doctoring used repeating photographic templates that is they
cloned parts of the image and repeated it that is the photograph is a construction this does not happen in
nature clouds do not repeat in the same pattern like this the chances of this
happening in the same photograph are low the only way this could happen is if
someone has cloned clouds and painted them on this of course could be for a
number of reasons you could argue that NASA simply touched up the photograph or effect or that it was a problem with the
imaging systems that were used but still the question exists why is NASA
releasing fake pictures of Earth if they are going to release a picture of Earth to be used in museums and by educators
as they state for the blue marble – then should they not release real images of
Earth instead or manipulated or fake images since the natural extension of
this is what other images have they doctored the moon pluton Mars maybe all
of them and if they are faking pictures to such an extent whether by wanting them to look better or other reasons
then what real scientific value are they isn’t science about finding the truth and is that not hard to do when you are
being fed and accurate or in this case completely manufactured data NASA says
these images are to be used by educators museums and scientists which means they
are passing off the image as a real picture of Earth when it is not what do you guys think do you think
something sinister is going on or is there some harmless and less exotic reason there are great ideas
undiscovered breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truths
protective layers
then in 2002 Blue Marble 2.0 NASA’s Rob
simin made this and it had wide appeal – for example it ended up as the default background on the iPhone I didn’t even
know until I bought an iPhone and turned it on and kind of did a little happy
dance Simmonds job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of
datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture the to us the really cool thing was the
data set up until that point there was no realistic color map of the globe
anywhere so the land layer here comes from the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer aboard Terra and the
tricky part here was the weather so we actually had to take clouds out they stashed the clouds for later went onto
the ocean that came from an instrument that measures phytoplankton in the sea where it was low I colored it dark blue
because they’re low mostly in mid oceans and then where’s a little bit higher it was like a little bit brighter green then add the clouds back in there’s a
small problem with it because there’s a very slight gap in between each orbit so
some of those are painted on it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of
simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlights so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water
those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat or the
clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world
what I imagined it to be unfortunately I’m not an astronaut I’ve never been to space but I’ve looked
at these images over and over again trying to sort of get the essence of it
you [Music]
[Applause] [Music]
[Music]
ha I know ranking centigrade could you show us somersault right now
[Laughter] [Applause]
[Applause]
[Laughter]
[Applause]
low Earth orbit is between 99 miles and 1200 miles away
the moon is claimed to be two hundred and thirty-eight thousand miles away that’s a big difference this is the
spacecraft that’s gonna take humans to explore the solar system it’s the next
big step for NASA in exploration called the Orion multi-purpose crew vehicle or MPCV this next generation spacecraft
will enable America to explore beyond low-earth man that NASA has is to build
a rocket called SLS which is a heavy lift rocket it’s something that is that is much bigger than what we have today
and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board as well as
Landers or other components to be it two destinations beyond Earth orbit right
now we only can fly in Earth orbit that’s the farthest that we can go right now we only can fly in Earth orbit
that’s the farthest that we can go in this new system that we’re building is gonna allow us to go beyond and hopefully take humans into the solar
system to explore so the moon Mars asteroids there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building
these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually the moon Mars the moon the moon the moon
kinds of technologies that we’re testing out on space station are definitely helping us with our goals of going
beyond low-earth orbit our goals of going beyond low-earth orbit a set of crewed flights will test and prove the
systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit [Music]
it was all recorded on these telemetry tapes so where is this hard evidence I
haven’t seen anything that indicates the kilometer II data is even an existence
and as I said even if we had it we don’t have the machines to play it back but you’re you your own researchers show the
telemetry data is missing that’s right could this be true mankind’s first
interplanetary exploration and the original science data is missing if it’s
anywhere it should be here at NASA’s Goddard Space Center in Maryland home to
the national space science data archives Tim you’re making man what is it this is
this is a film trying to prove that Apollo 11 happened I just have an AI mean do you have you have a name for it yet or you okay did we go did we go okay
okay doesn’t have it either this was so
right as an ad right right right we’ve been unable to track it down I mean we
don’t know where this this telemetry data ended up and we don’t know the what
what path it may have taken so unfortunately I’m afraid I can’t really give you much of a clue as to as to
where this data ended up and whether it still exists or not [Music]
mr. look at the supposed to images provided from NASA of Jupiter here’s the
problem again 2016 2014 what’s the difference here no difference is they
how did the supposed Aurora’s on the North it’s nothing but a Christmas tree
give me a break take a look here mean all the clouds from the same exact
position just in 2016 images a bit will take darker it’s a bit lighter in 2014
here’s a side by side if you can’t see what’s taking place or if NASA nothing
more than faker to me give me a break this is completely an insult you have to be brain your head [Music]
so I keep digging a little bit deeper and I finally get underneath this cloud cover here and a few images pop up I
sell they were just really well this we got which I’m sure that looks familiar to you right looks just like the
pictures they give us a Mars so I’m just kinda creeping around here and definitely notice in the same kind of
undulation changes and same kind of rock same kind of dirt only thing it’s missing is that nice of a red tint that
they ate take somebody hundred fifty two thousand dollars a year to put on there
whose owner covers this okay that looks like an assistant well let’s do a little
further because I can’t really see anything on here then NASA simple
I can’t read that track cameras set up dance ATVs who have been there a while
it’s not a one-day trip tennis setup
no we’re in Greenland another ATV the left-wing bubbler
equipment so I keep kind of going through here and yeah so
I think I found out what Mars is guys it’s just 5,000 miles north of me
not quite the distance and essences I can’t find anybody who’s in charge this must be hiding behind these rocks oh no
they’re there I’m friendly with my standard lovely number one number two
number three thinks his travel around taking pictures
[Music]
Simmons job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of
datasets from several different instruments translated into a picture
[Music] um it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has
to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s
called the specular highlight so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just
slap them all together just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat looks kind of flat looks kind of flat or the
clouds are sort of to see-through so I just take command Z a lot there’s artistry to creating the world
[Music]
lish in reading too much but I’ve since grown out of that and I enjoy reading now and I played a lot of sports and all
of that happened at a little town called York Maine across the United States from where we’re talking to you right now us
the United States from where we’re talking to you right now boss the United States from where we’re talking to you right now
[Laughter]
and that enlist the help of a friend thanks you might know ladies and
gentlemen if you didn’t figure out by now I’m gonna be the first man to actually tell you this that teleportation is officially real we are
live in the ISS and let’s go back and relook at that clip again you see it now
watch whoa wait see this ladies and gentlemen should let you know that this
is only done through the usage of chroma key this is chroma key technology this is
green screen or blue screen technology that’s what is being utilized here this
is simply virtual reality that is actually being fed to you and you’re taking this virtual reality making it
the reality when in fact all this is is simply just virtual CGI computer
generated images them so you decide for yourself if we have the technology to
build the space station and have people go and live in the space station for months and months at a time and they are
they’re constantly reporting back to earth the things that they are finding there then the question is why go
through all this trouble as far as taking the space station itself why go through the trouble of making these
people in space who are supposed to be the astronauts who are in space and of their arms disappear from the screen
just like that why have that why go through all the trouble so this video is an astronaut
explaining the mission it’s not like practice footage or anything watch closely
[Music] dan said in the pilot seat during this
operation sort of monitoring the motion of the vehicle making sure that
it was steady and that the you know there were very few vibrations of any
sort here’s a picture of the inset actually being deployed from the
spacecraft you can see that the deploy went very smoothly at that moment did
you see it in the background there was a guy in the background man I’m not kidding you did
you can’t deny that that’s someone in the background there’s a guy moving in the background here and watch it again
watch it closely I looked up or I tried to lock up the
size of this rocket I found his picture you can see it’s massive so if that
rocket is in space and if there’s a guy in the background in that footage that
means that there are like giants like insane big giants floating around in
space looking at NASA that’s pretty that’s probably why they don’t dare to
go back to the moon and why they hide so much stuff space is full of giants and
explore 130 2,900 feet per second altitude now I know I got my downrange distance 7r huh this is not standard
this is not something that is planned of course I can see a solid rocket booster has broken away from shuttle Challenger
that’s what you’re looking at in the middle of your screen I cannot see the shuttle itself in 1986 the shuttle
Challenger exploded about 74 seconds after takeoff killing all seven astronauts insanity or did it
it turns out that six of the seven are still alive and kicking today Ellison
Onizuka claims to be his identical twin brother Claude yeah I’ve got an
identical twin brother Claude do the Challenger pilot Mickey Smith
hasn’t even bothered changing his name he’s now professor Michael J Smith of
University of Wisconsin now Christa McAuliffe was a bit of a sneaky
one she was the Challenger payload specialist quite famous for being a teacher it turns out during her
astronaut days she was using her middle name Christa and now all she goes by her
first name Sharon and she’s a Sorak whose law professor the Challenger
commander Frances Richards scoby is now on dick Scobee who sounds like a rather
unpleasant disease CEO of housing fees limited Judith Resnik the Challenger
mission specialist again hasn’t even bothered changing her name she’s a professor at Yale Law and finally Ronald
McNair another challenger mission specialist claims be is identical twin
brother Carl McNair [Music]
in the first round and white is flying at 17,000 miles per
hour 200 miles above the earth okay
if the spacesuit fails the difference in pressure will kill him instantly this
could be a serious problem because you don’t want your stop-motion toy to die in space as white floats in space a
glove drifts out of the capsule oh so garden glove you’re telling me there’s
an astronaut in space with no glove and a fair hand exposed and what blew it
away the wind today those pictures are are classic they’re
still overpowering today to realize number one has been done and that we did
it it blew me away how easy it was to deceive everyone it was quite easy
actually we all know nASA uses wired and sometimes we’ll catch them like this here the guy I pulled on his wire
however some days when you’re filming my things just don’t work out and it
becomes so blatantly obvious it’s ridiculous so in this clip they’re talking live
feed and what you know we have hey astronaut Tobias in the background
obviously trying to give it a more realistic Spacey station busy effect the
only problem is the camera that was supposed to mess this harness out or the video feed is not working and so we see
the guy come flying along in a harness on his wires pretty amazing but that’s
not all that goes wrong here
channel in 3d space it’s virtual reality he’s they’re wearing argumented contact
lenses so that they can interact with these 3d objects now in this scene the guy on the left and the green shirt he
thinks he sees an object in 3d space is being broadcast to him so he grabs it NE
puts it off to the side he’s looking straight ahead because he’s looking at an object rotating in front of him but
the video channel is down that is supposed to show the viewers what we’re
supposed to see and so we don’t actually get to see the object that he has seen and I would just sum this up as a very
terrible bad horrible day for NASA doing my feet as much fun as this was there is
a time coming when you and I will not be able to tell the difference
[Music]
[Applause] [Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
now I know what you’re thinking so NASA is fake big deal how does this affect me
blah blah blah or you’re thinking no no there’s no way my heroes could be lying
to me there’s no way that this whole world is in on this big scam this is just too much and that’s what I would
have thought too but here is what they are hiding and why NASA form in the
first place pay attention federal bird you’ve been to both the North Pole and the South
Pole is there any unexplored land left on this earth that might appeal to
adventurous young Americans oh yes there is and that up around the North Pole because it’s getting crowded up there
now because they find out it’s really usable not only to live in but militarily but strangely enough that is
left in the world today an area as big as the United States that’s never been seen by human being and that’s beyond
the pole on the other side of the South Pole from middle America
and it’s I think it’s quite astonishing that
there should be an area as big as that unexplored was the tremendous oil is a lot of adventure left down at the bottom
of the world a number of expeditions that will follow I think year after year bottom of the
world because the government has really become interested I tell you one reason
they’re interested it’s by far the most valuable important place left in the
world for science that’s where the scientific groups all over the nation are really interested
but more important than that it’s it has to do with the future of the nation
those to come after us or even during your lifetime because it happens to be
an untouched reservoir of natural resources you know as the world shrinks
with an ever increasing acceleration far-flung places once useless like we
thought the North Pole was and no-man’s land become very useful a the bottom of
the world will be important not only to us but to our allies then it’s the most
peaceful place in the world I’m sure that won’t last very long what are the
natural resources there well a we found enough of coal within
180 miles of the South Pole in a great region Mountain it’s not covered as snow
enough to supply the whole world for quite a while well and that’s that’s the
coal now there’s evidence of other many other minerals we have pretty sure of
this oil now that call shows the bottom of the world now by far the coldest spot
in the world where that coal is gets a hundred below zero in the weather well where’s lunch tropical so we think
there’s oil there and there’s evidence probably uranium there is it any secret
is there uranium there that would be the only thing it would be practical to actually go after I suppose everything
else would be economically unfeasible wouldn’t it well as really recklessly
expend their resources the time common we can we’ll have to go after that stuff down there well Admiral Byrd
our private expedition is a thing of the past is that his expedition and exploration making expedition
exploration now a purely a government function because I think them South it
may be more or less a thing of the past but not other other expeditions and go
there a lot I’m going off now there the North Pole is the sound of an ocean 10,000 feet deep the South Pole the
scent of a plateau 10,000 feet high [Music]
