Select Page

I Researched Flat Earth for 3 Years Gergő Varga Full Documentary

Embark on the journey of a lifetime with Part 1 of my 3-year research into Flat Earth. Discover why I failed to debunk Flat Earth theory and explore the truth behind the globe Earth model.

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
0:28 The beginning of my journey
2:42 Number of flat earthers is growing
4:32 FE statistics
5:52 Google search
6:45 Flat Earth Society
7:36 Heliocentric model vs Geocentric model
8:40 Obama
10:20 Youtube censorship
14:24 BBC
16:36 Stand up comedy
17:08 TV Show liar
17:46 What people believed before
22:21 Old documentary clip
24:24 Media report
24:55 Facebook debate groups
28:06 How I investigate/Questions
29:52 Science?

Transcript

I wanted to prove once and for all that the  Flat Earth theory is stupid and it makes no  

sense but I failed at every step I’ve done  my research for over 3 years I saved and I  

documented everything and I’m going to show  you exactly what I found let’s talk about it

flat Earth is the number number one conspiracy  theory in the world that’s the mother of all  

conspiracies and what I always thought that it’s  stupid first of all and second I thought that the  

bad guys those who are responsible for all the  other conspiracies they invented this Theory so  

they can ridicule all the other conspiracy  theories does that make sense so I always  

thought that it’s stupid because it sounds stupid  right we know we live on a globe but it always  

came back to my life and I saw it here and there  so I decided that I’m going to end this debate  

once and for all I’m going to prove the globe and  we can forget flat earth theory once and for all but  

as I said I failed I was never a flat earther I always  believed in the globe and I even used the globe as  

a thumbnail for some of my previous videos as I  said I researched it for over 3 years I had lot  

of questions I’m sure you have too and as I said  I saved I documented everything that I found so  

I’m not here to tell you whether the Earth is a  globe or it’s flat I’m here to show you exactly  

what I found during my research and you can  decide for yourself fair enough welcome to  

mystery teachings my name is Gergo if you are new to  the channel then greetings and Namaste or if you  

are a returning beautiful soul hey thanks for coming  back I appreciate you before I started this whole  

investigation I knew one thing if I want to get a  clear picture of what’s going on and which side is  

true I need to put aside everything that I think I  believe or I feel about the Earth and in this case  

the globe itself so it doesn’t matter how stupid  I think Flat Earth is I need to be open-minded and  

I promised myself that I’m going to look at both  sides with an open mind I just step aside and I  

look at it as an observer and that’s exactly what  I’m asking from you as well put aside everything  

you believe and let me take you to a journey that  you have never been before and even though we have  

lot of photos and videos of the earth and this is  the first thing that we learn as a child as soon  

as we born the first thing we know that we live  on a globe I know but still what made me start  

this journey in the first place was the fact that  the number of people who believe in Flat Earth is  

growing massively even the media reported it  check this out the round or spherical Earth  

theory is propagated by some conspiracy and the  number of people who think so is growing thousands  

if not millions of people believe the World is  Flat and it’s a subject of tonight’s special  

report W c3’s Aaron eids is here with us now and  Aaron as far as conspiracy theories go flat Earth  

theory is actually getting pretty popular yeah  believe it or not the number of people who believe   the Earth is flat is actually growing scientists  might have an idea of why that is and it’s worth  

talking about and what better place to do so  than one of the flattest places in the country   right here in Central Illinois but there are ideas  that this is a sham NASA a fraudulent organization  

bent on siphoning your tax dollars the moon  landing didn’t happen those iconic Blue Marble  

images seen from space fakes you start seeing  words like composite or animation or you know  

something that tells you this is not an actual  photograph of the Earth the biggest concern   with the Flat Earth movement is how fast it’s  gaining steam scientists are worried that Flat  

Earth could become a political issue like climate  change vaccination or Evolution guys all right  

fascinating stuff all right Aaron thank you very  interesting so according to Forbes only 2/3 of  

American Millennials believe the Earth is round  with other words in the age group of 18 to 24  

one third of American young people believe the Earth is  flat so that’s interesting and if you look at here  

in Britain three in a 100 britons think the Earth  is flat and one in 20 say the theory is probably  

but not definitely false and guys first I was in  the definitely false category I was in that 88%  

but as I said once I researched it everything  changed so first when you hear about flat  

Earth you really ridicule it but once you research  it that’s a different story and I’m going to show  

you why so put this Statistics into a different  perspective basically millions of people in the  

world believe that the Earth is flat and  at this point I want to hear their story I want  

to know why and I have lot of questions I’m  an intelligent guy so it’s going to be very  

difficult to convince me that the Earth is flat  so you need to be very very good with their  

explanations and with their reasons if they really  want to convince me about this now if anyone  

wants to research Flat Earth the first thing you  probably do is go on Google which is a big mistake  

and it’s a dead end and let me show you why  these are the images that Google will show you  

that Flat Earth is but I can tell you after my  research that this is stupid I thought the same  

at the beginning I mean this is this is what Flat earthers  believe then this is absolutely rubbish but this  

is not this has nothing to do with the Flat Earth  movement I can tell you that or what you will find  

is these images that you know ships are getting  to the edge and they just fall off the edge  

You probably seen many of these images before  so this is not true no flat Earth researcher  

thinks this this is bullshit this is propaganda  this is not real now the other thing you will  

definitely find if you search for Flat Earth is  the Flat Earth Society now this was started by a  

guy called Leo Ferrari and first it was called the  flat earthed Society of Canada and then they made  

it simple just by calling the Flat Earth Society  and basically this is controlled opposition this  

is propaganda so they give you some truth but they  show you footages like this and they tell you that  

the flat Earth disc is accelerating upwards in  space and obviously you will think it’s stupid so  

the Flat Earth Society again has nothing to do  with the real Flat Earth movement and there’s  

a lot of propaganda around Flat Earth we’re going  to discuss much much more about that the question   for now is why basically just to clarify this  whole thing we have two Earth models that we  

talk about one is the heliocentric model the  other is the geocentric model the heliocentric  

model what we know today is that the sun is the  center of the universe and all the other planets  

including the Earth and everything else moves  around the Sun whereas the geocentric AKA flat earth 

model that’s where the Earth is the center of  the universe the Earth is stationary it’s not  

moving just as we feel it and then the Sun  the moon and the stars and everything else  

rotate around us in the sky just as we see it  but for now I just want you to understand that  

we have these two models the heliocentric and  the geocentric and when you see images like  

this that’s basically mixing up the two so zero  flat earthers believe in this bullshit this is not real  

this is created by the media and others who who  want you to think that Flat Earth is stupid and  

when celebrities or politicians talk about Flat  Earth they will always mention the Flat Earth  

Society again because they want you to look at  their website This Is How They mislead you and  

this is how they deceive you just like Barack  Obama did he mentioned the Flat Earth Society  

many many times they’ve been walking down new  sources of energy they dismiss wind power they  

dismiss solar power they make jokes about biofuels  they were against raising fuel standards I guess  

they like gas guzzlers they think that’s good  for our future we’re trying to move towards the  

future they they want to be stuck in the past  and we’ve heard this kind of thinking before  

let me tell you something if some of  these folks were around when Columbus set sail they they were they they must  have been founding members of of the  

Flat Earth Society they they would  not have believed that the world was round we don’t have time for a meeting of the  Flat Earth Society we don’t have time for a  

meeting of the Flat Earth Society I say that  the world is round and someone else says it’s

flat that’s worth reporting but you might also  want to report on a bunch of scientific evidence  

that seems to support the notion that the world  is round in other breaking news the world is  

round not flat now that we clarified all this with  the Flat Earth Society and why they talk about it  

let’s move on to YouTube because Google is not the  only one who will feed you with stupidity YouTube  

is the other one and this lady is the head of  public policy on YouTube and she went to Congress  

the other day and they talk about how to censor  conspiracy theorists so check this out and after  

we will discuss it further does Google think that  this is a problem and what is the solution that  

you’re coming up with to address it thank you for  the question so as you noted uh when Alex Jones posted  

video you described saying that the survivors  of the Parkland Massacre were crisis actors  

that violated our harassment policy we have  a specific policy that says if you say a well   documented violent attack didn’t happen and  you use the name or image of of survivors or  

victims of that attack that is a a malicious  attack and it violates our policy in terms of   conspiracy theory content generally our goal is  to promote authoritative content to our users so  

we have two principles that guide the way here  that’s the first one is we want to provide users   with authoritative trustworthy I’m sorry to cut  you off I only have a minute and a half and I I  

I don’t really need to hear what you’re trying to  provide I want to know how you’re dealing with all   these conspiracy theorists on your platform so the  the first way is by demoting lowquality content  

and promoting more authoritative content and the  second is by providing more transparency for users  

so we’re introducing boxes that provide factual  information at the top of results that have shown  

themselves to turn up a lot of information that  is counterfactual such as searching for the Earth  

is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of your  response is to put a box saying nope the Earth is   not flat correct okay and this is one example of  these boxes with information she was talking about  

but my question is that if Flat Earth is stupid  if it’s false and it’s a conspiracy theory then  

why do they need to discuss it in Congress and  furthermore why do they need to censor it so if  

we all know that we live on a globe why do I need  a box to tell me that don’t believe in flat earth because  

we live on a globe you see my problem here and  this is what YouTube tells you about these little  

information panels or boxes when you search or  watch videos related to topics that are prone  

to misinformation such as the moon landing you may  see an information panel at the top of your search  

results or under a video that you’re watching  information panels show basic background info  

sourced from independent third party Partners  to give more context on a topic if you want  

to learn more the panels also link to the third  party partners website so you see these pels at  

all the Flat Earth videos basically and you will  probably see it under this video as well or under  

my series but this is when it gets more weird with  YouTube because there was this article and I heard  

this from different sources that YouTube promises  to stop recommending Flat Earth and 9 11 truther  

videos but why would they stop recommending it if  it’s stupid you see and that’s not only what they  

do here is someone commented on Eric Dubay’s Channel  he is one of the flat earth guys and he educate  

people about flat earth and this commenter says  that YouTube unsubscribed me from your channel keep  

telling the truth so it’s not only information  boxes and not only stop recommending the Flat  

Earth videos but they even unsubscribe people  from Flat Earth’s channels so YouTube creators are  

really censored when it comes to Flat Earth and  I’m not sure how much effect this series will make  

on my channel on mystery teachings but I really  don’t care cuz I’m on YouTube I’m on bitchute I’m  

on rumble so I’m going to make this series anyway  no matter what effect it will make on my channel  

but I hope it will be okay now let me show you a  clip from BBC and I want you to pay attention to  

a couple of things and guys in this first part  I really just want to show you how I started to  

research this whole topic and all the deadend I  found so you can see the difference between fake  

news and propaganda and real information and you  know true information so BBC they have a report  

on Flat Earth and I want you to pay attention  to a few things one is the music they play a  

really silly music which will subconsciously give  you an idea already that this is something you  

shouldn’t take seriously it’s about a flat Earth  conference and the other thing is they show you  

people in weird shoes and then they interview  a guy who look really weird and really mad and  

really crazy so again to give you an idea that  flat earther equals Madness and craziness so this is how  

the propaganda machine works and fake news works  but here is the clip and you decide for yourself

we used to think when we got started individually   in this that we were alone we have  one thing in common we live on a flat

plane when you’re watching videos at  home it’s just you in the screen and it’s  

lonely I came here because I needed to see  what Flat Earth people look like and I was not

disappointed they look normal very few people  overweight about 30% of them are cigarette  

smokers and only four of them that I met are  from around here can you see what’s going on  

which I just mentioned silly music they show  you some crazy looking person so they show  

you everything the way that they want you  you to believe that these people are crazy  

and mad and they are stupid so again this is  not okay now let’s see what a standup comedy  

guy say about Flat Earth I was watching a  documentary recently about flat earthers  

that was fascinating I don’t know if anybody saw  this there are people who believe the Earth is   flat the documentary is called assholes again  just because someone believes something else  

why do you need to to talk about them like this  they call them assholes for what reason someone  

has a different belief than you so what why  is it such a big deal but anyway let’s see a  

different example from a TV show it was  some kind of a game and we will discuss  

it after check this out in the Middle Ages  what shape did people think the world was

Flat I know we all think they did but  there’s absolutely no evidence whatsoever they  

thought it was round they all wrote about  it it was round the Greeks knew that it was   round round and flat no they thought it was  a sphere the Greeks knew it was round he says  

Chara knew it was round Roger Bacon wrote about  the curvature of the Earth in the 13th century   you see almost no one in the history of the  world has belied the Earth is Flat now this guy  

is a liar and I have multiple reasons to  say that and guys I just quickly want to   debunk this part because lot of people say and  think and believe that Flat Earth is something  

that just appeared a few years ago on  YouTube and on social media that is not true  

first I remember that I learned in school that  indeed people believed the Earth is flat like a  

century ago two centuries ago or whatever even  ancient civilizations which we’re going to cover  

in this series later in our journey now the other  thing is I want to show you a clip of an interview  

with a lady who is over 100 years old and she  remembers learning in school that the Earth is flat

check this out all right tell me your name Ruth  Heath Ruth and how old are you today 102 102 so  

you were born in 1918 1918 and um we were just  talking and I asked you what what shape the Earth  

is and what did you say what were you taught in  school when in elementary school I was taught in school that  

the Earth was Flat and and then what what do you  remember when they changed it to a globe well when  

it they changed it I remember when they changed  it but I can’t remember the day or anything like  

that and did you believe them yes I did you did  now I I I was young right and we all we all were  

told by people that we trust that’s right where  did you go to school elementary school I went  

to spurgin school in Hampton Connecticut okay now  the other thing is the famous astrophysicist Neil  

degrass Tyson I’m sure you heard about him even he  tells you that indeed people in the past believed  

the Earth is flat check this out you’re not a  climate scientist but you’re a very distinguished   scientist and as astrophysicist hey what’s  up Neil I got like a super important question  

for you that I’ve been wondering like my whole  life okay is the world round or flat because  

if so if the if the world is round why isn’t  the water falling out into the space out into  

space Nikkel you ask a very important question this  concept had eluded all of humanity for centuries  

they once thought Earth was flat why cuz it  looked flat and they posed the same arguments   you did if it was round stuff would fall off on  the other side you can’t have people standing  

upside down on a round earth here’s the thing  we thought Earth was flat before we had seagoing  

vessels that went beyond the Horizon recognizing  that there has to be a curve there cuz the ship   doesn’t always stay in view so Columbus we he set  sail the ship eventually disappeared and you can  

chase after him and you can keep disappearing and  keep doing this this would count as evidence that  

Earth’s surface was curved I’m I’m sure you  remember this movie but do you remember when   these guys discussed that people believed the  Earth is flat but why why a big secret people  

are smart they can handle it the person is smart  people are dumb panicky dangerous animals and you  

know it 1500 years ago everybody knew the Earth  was the center of the universe 500 years ago  

everybody knew the Earth was flat and 15 minutes  ago you knew that people were alone on this

planet imagine what you’ll know

tomorrow and just to make sure we are all on the  same level here is my bonus for you so that we can  

all understand that people believed in Flat Earth  not that long ago yeah I could stay home and scrub  

floors hey you store aways are you speaking to  us yeah listen there’s going to be a mutiny in a  

few minutes a mutiny sh keep your voice down yes a  mutiny the captain thinks the world is round see  

but we all know it’s flat right of course  it’s flat sure I know the World is Flat so  

everybody knows that good good then you’re  on our side we’re going to take over the boat   throw Columbus in Chains and head it for home  good idea otherwise we’d fall right off the  

edge of the ice I know we all think they did  but there’s absolutely no evidence whatsoever   they all thought it was round they all wrote  about it it was round the Greeks knew that  

it was round okay now that we established that  this is not some new idea this was in history  

for a long time time now let’s see something  from the flat earth side as I said I need to  

consider both sides simultaneously and then decide  for myself so something from the flat earth side  

from an old documentary here is a short clip  which is going to be quite interesting here we go it’s a commonly held misconception that the  Earth is a spherical object that revolves around  

the Sun but the fact is of course that  the Earth is a circular dish surrounded  

by a barrier of ice that explorers have been  attempting to penetrate for centuries Samuel  

Burley robottom better known throughout the  scientific Community as Parallax in 1881 he  

had published this book Earth not a globe  outlining dozens of experiments performed  

over many years it quickly became  the standard Authority for anti-l globulars perhaps the most significant  experiments were those car out on a  

canal known as the old Bedford level located in  Cambridge England the canal is perfectly straight  

over an uninterrupted 6mile stretch while there  Parallax conducted many experiments all towards  

one conclusion to prove that the surface of  the water in the canal was indeed perfectly

flat in One experiment a boat carrying a flag rode  from one bridge to to another 6 M away an observer  

with a telescope placed 8 in above the surface of  the water found that the flag and the boat were  

distinctly visible throughout the entire distance  if the Earth is a sphere with a circumference of  

25,000 Mi then over a distance of 6 mil the second  bridge should mathematically be 16 ft below the  

observer’s eyeline and just to give you something  that’s not as old as the previous one here is a  

short one from mainstream media the curving  Horizon the sloping sea level the spin of the  

earth unless you can see these phenomena with  your own eyes they may not be true unlike what  

we’ve been told in school the earth looks like  a snow globe round but not sphere the North Pole  

is at the center of most flat Earth maps with  the ice of Antarctica holding everything in  

all right now let’s move on to social media and  it’s time to find some debate groups flat versus  

globe and now here is the first one which is a  group description which is already weird look at  

this the Flat Earth has gone too far again how  they have become so many and have way too much  

influence especially on the young people again  same question how did they how do they have so  

much influence if they spread something that’s  stupid but anyway it’s it’s also most likely that  

all of them believe in several other conspiracies  some of them dangerous oh this is the group for  

me join us so we can end this insane Madness  how do you want to end this exactly guaranteed  

quality entertainment every day have fun now let  me show you the quality entertainment they talk  

about and here is an example of your guaranteed  entertainment and I know this is just one group  

example but I found the exact same thing with  all the other groups that I’ve been into and it  

was at least 20 different groups so this is  what they post saying that this is proof of  

the curvature of the earth and I wanted to post  this photo that this doesn’t prove anything even  

though at this point I’m on the globe side but  this doesn’t prove anything this is perspective  

this is how we see things the further something  is the lower it appears on the sky so this is  

not due to curvature and this doesn’t prove  or disprove the globe but when I wanted to   post this photo it was rejected so this is  when things getting interesting and this is  

a good example from someone who posted this  screenshot that basically the globe side can  

post anything but the flatter earthed side cannot  post anything so this is really interesting and  

this is what I personally experienced as well so  these groups look like they debating but in fact  

whenever you post something that supports the  flat side it just gets rejected so with other  

words this is like 5 years old people but anyway  here is some more examples of your guaranteed  

entertainment here is some examples from the globe  side and basically they talk to flaters and they  

talk about them like they were the biggest idiots  which I can kind of understand but my problem is  

that the way they treat other human beings  is acceptable in my opinion um and they post  

this kind of memes and then obviously you have  examples from the other side from the flat side  

for example this one now watching flat numbers  grow 700% since 2015 and Earth is too big to see  

the curve but on the other side ships disappear  over Earth’s curvature so which also makes you  

think or this one that fence is disappearing  over the curvature of the Earth but the point  

is that you’re not going to get anywhere in these  groups and you’re not going to find out the truth  

so this was also a little bit of dead end for me  in the words of aristotel it is the mark of an  

educated mind to be able to entertain a thought  without accepting it with other words one of  

the truest marks of intelligence is being able  to consider opposite ideas without immediately  

accepting or rejecting one of them so if we only  research or think think about one side of an issue  

and reject the other side without consideration  that’s the highest form of willful ignorance and  

we’re not going to do that so we’re going to  consider both sides and we’ll see how it goes   so as I said I have lot of questions from flat  earthers and I want to hear from them I don’t  

want other people to tell me what flat earthers  think I want to hear it from Flat earthers but I want to  

know a lot of things how days and nights work how  do we have different seasons how are we floating  

in space are we floating in space at all or it’s  something else and what is below Flat Earth I want  

to see the edge I want to know everything what is  it about this Dome they talk about and you know  

pilots and airplanes how we fly above a flat earth  disc or plane or whatever and many other questions  

satellites how about satellites how do they work  where are they and all these kind of things I   have lot of questions and they really need to  convince me with everything if they want me to  

believe that the Earth is flat so let’s see how  it goes and even though I agree with this quote  

that all truth goes through three stages at first  it’s ridiculed at second it is violently rejected  

and in the third it is accepted as self-evident  because this is really true but when it comes to  

Flat Earth and when it comes to science we need  something that’s observable that that’s testable  

that’s measurable and repeatable that’s when we  call it science but interesting enough the flat  

earth side actually say that science is more than  welcome to investigate Flat Earth check this out  

science should never ever be uh be worried about  investigating the Flat Earth I mean science should  

welcome an investigation in the flat earth science  is supposed to be objectiv to learn to to grow and  

it’s you know as we were finding out flat earthers  are pointing out things about science that science   doesn’t have an answer for and yet they still are  fighting now when it comes to science most of the  

people believe that this is what’s happening in  our solar system when in reality this is what’s  

happening in our solar system and when you start  to look at the details here and the different  

speeds and the directions of the movement that’s  when everything will start to get weird so we need  

to investigate science and question science  which exactly what we’re going to do in part two

In Part 2 of my Flat Earth research, I dive deep into questioning science, exploring details, numbers, the solar system, and what we’ve been taught. Let’s challenge our beliefs together!

What’s cognitive dissonance:
• What is cognitive dissonance and why …

Music: Epidemic Sound – Get your first month for free here: https://share.epidemicsound.com/52iyig

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
0:35 Basic Science?
1:55 What can we call scientific?
3:02 Earth’s rotation speed
3:56 Why we don’t feel the speed
6:49 Examples when we feel the speed
8:39 Speed of the moon
9:18 Speed of Earth around the sun
12:09 Speed examples
15:15 Speed of the sun and Milky way
17:54 Recap
18:47 the movement of earth
22:00 The stars
24:23 Water
26:46 Bonus
28:33 The photos of the globe

Transcript

what if I told you that everything you  knew about our solar system is wrong I  

know it’s a bold statement but once we  investigate the details and the numbers  

in the universe everything will start to get  weird and I’m going to show you exactly what  

I mean so it’s time to start questioning  science and to challenge our understanding  

of the universe and we’re going to  do it right now let’s talk about it

do you remember when I was talking about the  Facebook debate groups in part one and even  

though I said that that was a dead end because I  didn’t really find out anything but I learned a  

lot just by reading the posts and the comments and  one of the arguments from the globe side which I  

saw all the time was that flat earthers don’t even  understand basic science so I decided that we  

going to investigate science I’m going to go back  to the basics we’re going to go back to school  

and look at all the numbers here and I can tell  you one thing more than 90% of the information  

I found during this investigation was something  that I didn’t remember at all or I didn’t learn  

it in school if you watch some of my previous  videos you know that I always encourage you to  

question everything so let’s do that together  let’s go into a big investigation of the solar  

system and find out whether it makes sense or not  but we’re going to question science and that will  

help us to get closer to the solution and to  the truth whether the Earth is a globe or it’s  

flat welcome to mystery teachings my name is Gergo  if you are new to the channel then welcome and  

Namaste or if you are a returning beautiful  soul hey thanks for coming back I appreciate  

you first of all I think we can all agree that  in order to be able to call something a scientific

fact we need to be able to observe it we need  to test it we need to measure it and we need to be  

able to repeat these as many times as necessary if  we are able to do that then we can call it science  

and scientific fact if not then it’s basically  pseudo science so let’s just keep that in mind  

my first problem with the solar system is that I  learned in school that the planets are orbiting  

the Sun but the sun is in a fixed position I  didn’t know that the sun is moving as well and  

we all constantly following the Sun so this is  already confusing for me guys I didn’t know this  

and if you did well done but I never learned this  I grown up in Hungary and in Hungary the primary  

school I went to they never told us that the sun  is moving so this is already really confusing so  

this was one of the reasons why I decided  that I need to do a proper investigation  

and I need to start with the basics the  circumference of the earth is 24,901 miles so if  

we divide the 24,900 with 24 we’re going to  get the speed of the rotation which is  

1038 mph but this speed applies to the area of  the Equator if you are Elsewhere on the planet  

depending on the latitude you will experience a  different speed but the problem is that you don’t  

experience any speed doesn’t matter where you  are even though the entire planet is spinning  

at a 1,000 mph now guys don’t get me wrong this is  not my main issue the big problems will come later  

you will see them in a moment but this is already  weird we all know that it takes 24 hours to make a  

full circle but if you look at the speed something  doesn’t add up and I know we don’t feel the speed  

because we are moving to together with the Earth  we are on its surface just like when you travel in  

a car for example or if you are sitting on a train  or maybe the best example is an airplane because  

the airplane is really fast and indeed you don’t  feel any speed furthermore if you think about  

it if you travel on a train for example or on an  airplane which is really high speed you can still  

take a bottle of water and pour it into a glass  without any problem and this is a valid argument  

however the reason you don’t feel the speed on  a train or on an airplane because you are in a  

closed environment you travel in a closed system  so when we say that we don’t feel the speed in  

the car just please remember there are people  who have car sickness as soon as the car starts  

moving and we only talk about 30 or 40 mph or 50  or 60 but not a thousand and even if we just talk  

about a car and you drive on a Motorway you can  still pour your glass of water because you have  

a wind screen that protects you you see it’s  called wind screen for a reason now with the  

train example is the same thing it’s a closed  environment but when you travel like this guy for  

example obviously don’t try it it’s dangerous but  this guy did and you can imagine he felt the speed  

probably and when it comes to an airplane we can  definitely agree that you would indeed feel the  

speed if the door was open or you would be able to  open the window just like these passengers did in  

this news report we’re going to turn now to the  terrifying scene in the air when a man actually  

opened a plane door mid-flight 12 passengers had  to be rushed to the hospital after landing and Gio  

is back with the latest this morning good morning  to you Gio hey Juju good morning again yeah this  

was an Asiana Airlines plane with 194 people on  board and let’s go ahead and go right to the video  

now because it’s just unbelievable because police  there in South Korea say a 33-year-old passenger  

opened the emergency exit door about 850 ft above  ground right after the pilot made that routine  

announcement that the plane was about to land  now the passenger we told was traveling alone  

police have not said why he did it but they did  say there were no signs he’d been drinking now  

once the plane landed safely 12 people were  taken to the hospital for respiratory issues  

now the passenger was arrested of course and if  convicted he could face up to 10 years in prison  Juju

now we understand that traveling on a train  or an airplane is a different thing because you  

are inside in a closed environment but the Earth  is an open system I mean we can go out to space  

right so let’s see some examples what happens  when you travel at high speed in something that’s  

open and the roller coaster is a good example  because we go to theme parks and sit on roller  

coasters to have some extraordinary experience right  another good example is my favorite sport the  

Formula 1 cars because they can reach a top speed  of around 230 235 mph but the Earth is still four  

times faster so we need something faster so  let me share my example when I went skydiving  

a couple of years ago yep that’s me in the blue  so I can tell you when we were stepping outside  

of the plane I felt the speed and not only that  but it was a mindblowing experience during our  

freefall we reached a speed of 211 km per hour  which is approximately 130 mph and even with this  

relatively slow speed I can tell you that this  was one of the best experiences in my life so  

there’s a big difference when something is moving  or if not moving but let’s put the earth rotation  

speed into more context so the speed of sound  is only 767 mph the Earth is a thousand so we  

are spinning faster than the speed of sound and  this is what should happen with all the oceans  

and all the water on the Earth but somehow  our experience is completely the opposite

so as I said this is not my major problem and I  can even accept this and I don’t want to stress  

on the speed so let’s just move forward and look  at something else the speed of the moon so the  

moon orbits Earth at a speed of 2,288 mph really  okay so let’s put this into perspective again the  

speed of a bullet can travel at a speed of 1,800  mph but the Moon is faster than that it’s 2,288  

mph so next time when you look at the Moon ask  yourself the question is this really shooting over  

2,000 mph faster than the speed of a bullet and if  it’s still not crazy enough let’s not forget that  

the Earth rotates around the Sun and completes  one full circle in a year now that sounds very  

slow but considering that the sun is 93 million  miles away from the earth we need to travel at  

67,000 miles per hour around the sun which is equivalent  to traveling from London to New York in 3 minutes  

so imagine that the Earth is one of these carts  and the platform itself is our rotation around the  

Sun and we feel nothing and I just look at photos  like this and I’m wondering what is going on and  

since we travel at two different speeds let’s not  forget about the moon because the moon needs to  

catch up with all of this which makes everything  even more complicated here is why so let’s recap  

the Moon is traveling around the earth 13 times  per year as we have 13 Moon cycles at a speed of  

2,288 mph meanwhile the Earth is orbiting the Sun  at 67,000 mph so the Moon needs to change its  

speed drastically in order to follow the Earth  which is also orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph  

so when the moon is on the Outer Circle on its  orbit then it needs to speed up to 67,000 mph  

in addition to its original 2,288 mph that’s all  together 69,288 mph so basically it can overtake  

the Earth and when it gets in front of the earth  we know that the Moon is 240,000 miles away which  

means that with this speed the Earth can catch up  to the Moon in just 4 hours so it needs to get the  

same speed as the Earth which is 67,000 and then  when it goes back to the inner side of the orbit  

now it needs to slow down to its original speed to  2,288 mph in order to the Earth to pass by right  

so how does the moon speed up to nearly 70,000  from 2,200 and then how does it slow down again  

from 69,000 to 2,200 2,000 70,000 2,000 70,000  how does the moon do that what mechanism make  

it possible and please don’t say it’s gravity cuz  I’m going to cry or laugh or both but don’t worry  

it’s going to be even more complicated than that  and you will see the more details we find the more  

ridiculous it becomes but for now let’s just stick  to this Earth’s rotation speed 67,000 mph and put  

it into even more perspective first let’s see a  very fast airplane which is the Concorde it has a  

maximum cruising speed of 1,354 mph which means  that the flight between London and New York is  

about 3 hours well that’s nothing cuz the Earth  is doing it in just 3 minutes so the Concorde is  

really slow and if we do the calculation it turns  out that the Earth is rotating around the Sun 49  

times faster than the maximum speed of the Concorde  okay let’s see something faster missiles which  

one is the fastest missile I was asking Google  and it tells me that the Russian 3 M22 whatever  

missile at a speed of 6,100 mph now that’s fast  but the Earth is still 10 times almost 11 times  

faster than the fastest missile in the world okay  now let’s see the Hypersonic sled track which is  

this one it travels at a speed of 6,600 mph watch  did you see it yeah me neither and if you look at  

it at half speed we still cannot see anything and  if we look at it at quarter speed you still cannot  

see a thing and the Earth is apparently 10 times  faster than this okay is there anything faster  

than that the fastest airplane in the world is  the NASA x43a airplane which travel at a speed of

7,366 mph now that’s a massive crazy speed but  if we do the calculation the Earth is still nine  

times faster and there’s only one thing that’s  faster than any of this and that’s the NASA space  

shuttle which travels at a speed of 17,500 mph  and guess what the Earth is still 3.8 times faster 

by the way let me just stop here for a  second isn’t this weird the fastest airplane  

is 7,000 and the space shuttle is 17,000 now  look at the two photos the space shuttle looks  

like a normal commercial airplane right and  it’s apparently 10,000 mph faster than the  

fastest airplane on the left that’s weird  but we’re going to investigate NASA later  

in our journey anyway so we are spinning at 1,000  mph orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph and when  

we go out to Nature on a nice day the water is  completely still okay but let’s complicate it  

even further and this is my favorite part because  as I said I never learned that the sun is moving  

I thought that it’s in a fixed position in the  same position and it’s only the planets that are  

moving around it but as I said I had to realize  that this is not what’s going on and Google tells  

us that the sun travels at a speed of 540,000 mph but it also gave me a different figure which  

is 448,000 mph so I think we can agree with  an average half a million miles per hour Now ladies  

and gentlemen that’s the speed of the sun which  means that at this speed you could travel around  

the earth’s equator in 2 minutes and 54 seconds so  according to mainstream science the entire solar  

system is traveling around in the Milky Way and  completes one full circle at approximately 230  

million years which we call a galactic year  so that means that the Earth is orbiting the  

Sun 30 times faster than the speed of a bullet  and the sun speed is 230 times faster than the  

speed of the bullet and if you are wondering  there’s more yes there’s more because guess  

what the Milky Way too moves In space relative to  other galaxies so I’m just wondering do I want to  

know what’s the speed of the Milky Way the motion  that’s left must be the particular motion of our  

galaxy through the universe and how fast is the  Milky Way galaxy moving the speed turns out to  

be an astounding 1.3 million miles per hour so at this  point in my investigation I probably experience  

cognitive dissonance which if you don’t know what  is in short basically when you have a core belief  

that you believe for a long long time for example  that the Earth is a globe and someone shows you  

evidence against this belief then basically the  brain doesn’t know what to do and you might experience  

some discomfort stress or you might feel anxious  maybe you are in denial you say this is not true  

this is not true or you want to ignore the  information you can be angry so there can be a  

lot of different stages but I made an entire video  about this and if you want you can check it out in  

more details what cognitive dissonance is but this  is how I feel right now so let’s recap the Earth  

is spinning at 1,000 mph, faster than the speed  of sound, the moon is rotating around the earth  

at 2,288 mph, faster than the speed of a bullet  while the Earth is orbiting the Sun at 67,000  

mph, faster than anything and the Sun is basically  running through the Galaxy with half a million  

miles per hour and the entire galaxy is moving at  a speed of 1.3 million mph meanwhile here on Earth

okay I don’t want to torture anyone with  any more numbers or speeds so let’s look  

at something else and please remember what we  discussed about science so I want to find out  

how can we measure or detect the motion of the  Earth the rotation or any movement since we don’t  

feel a thing so here’s a short clip about that in  1887 Albert Michaelson and Edward Morley conducted  

what’s known as the Michaelson Morley experiment  this experiment was attempting to prove the  

speculated motion of the Earth around the Sun and  when it failed Albert Einstein was forced to form  

the theory of relativity to overcome this problem  in fact anytime mainstream science is faced with  

undesirable results they create a workaround which  isn’t real science at all I saw this quote from  

Einstein in a flat Earth documentary: I have come  to believe that the motion of the earth cannot  

be detected by any Optical experiment so maybe  the reason we cannot feel the Earth spinning is  

because it’s not spinning maybe it is stationary  as flat earthers say because look at these examples when  

there is some earthquake here and there in the  world this is one in Taiwan for example or here  

is another one from a news report it’s the iconic  footage from the California earthquake now the  

woman who desperately tried to save her cell phone  when her swimming pool turned into a mini tidal  

wave and here is another footage of these guys  they are in a swimming pool during an earthquake  

I mean it’s mindblowing it’s so scary and finally  here is one more for you from a garden and  

just look at the water this is what happens when  the Earth moves a little bit but with all these  

crazy speeds that we just discuss this is what  we experience normally right this is normal this  

is nature and if nobody told us that the Earth is  moving we would probably never even think of such  

craziness so I just want to put this quote here  again from part one because maybe it start to make  

sense now right and I still have more for  you because we have all these crazy movements but  

here is a good example this monument at precisely  1111 a.m. each Veterans Day November 11th well  

there’s a lot of 11 there which is a master  number in numerology and it has an important  

meaning but anyway the sun’s Rays pass through  the ellipses of the five armed services pillars  

to form a solar Spotlight on the glass Mosaic  of the Great Seal of the United States the same  

time and day every single year and also we  have this crazy movement but we have the orion  

belt which is perfectly aligned with the Great  Pyramids of Giza in Egypt or there’s another  

example the Georgia guide stones and even though  this was blown up a couple of years ago there was  

a hole inside the Guide stones and every night the  North Star Polaris could be seen through the hole  

and then the more important question is why do  we have the exact same constellations seen in  

the night sky every single night and not only  that but we cannot see any so-called Parallax  

movement from the stars now what does that mean  parallax means that anything that’s closer to you  

moves faster than things in the background so the  trees and the fence they moving fast the clouds  

they moving a little bit slower and then the moon  in the background doesn’t move at all that’s what  

we call parallax this is what we should see but  this is not the case at all we never see this  

what we see is that the stars are moving around  in a circular motion let me show you some examples

so in the geocentric AKA Flat Earth model the  stars are fixed in the sky and they rotate around  

us which is basically what we see and we will  talk about the stars and the sky in more details  

later in our journey but for now I just want you  to understand this because on the other side in  

the heliocentric AKA Globe model we are shooting  through the universe like crazy so pretty much  

this is what we should see every night but this is  not the case and we see the exact same stars and  

apart from that since we are going around the Sun  once per year that means that every 6 months we  

are on the other side so therefore our night sky  should look completely different but again this  

is not what we experience and let’s not forget  about water because we know that 75% of the Earth  

is water and all the oceans in the world are  somehow able to stick to the ball while we  

are spinning like crazy and our only answer to  that is gravity and we will talk about gravity  

in a different episode but it’s really weird and  strange for me that water always finds Its level  

water does not bend the only exception when it  does is the example of the Earth the Globe it’s  

just common sense water does not behave the way  the heliocentric model tells us it doesn’t matter  

how you spin water the centrifugal force will push  it away I mean it’s basic science how do you think  

a washing machine removes the water from your  clothes you’re supposed to be on a ball spinning  

1,000 mph orbiting the Sun at 66,000 mph while  shooting through the Galaxy at 500,000 mph that’s  

also so moving at 1.2 million mph yet none  of those speeds match anything we experience in  

reality in fact it’s completely insane to suggest  such a notion bodies of water always find an  

equilibrium when they’re at rest the surface is  completely flat it’s time to realize the math  

ain’t mathing and the science ain’t sciencing  you can’t even make it make sense so how can we  

call any of this science or scientific fact if  we cannot observe it we cannot test it we have  

no idea how to measure it and obviously we can’t  repeat any of these because we didn’t do a thing  

and even though I want to believe in the globe  and I want to prove the globe when the globe  

side says that flat earthers don’t understand basic  science well they need to think twice the word  

scientific in Latin actually means know that it is  fiction so maybe our understanding is really not  

complete yet Leonardo da Vinci said that if you  find from your own experience that something is  

a fact and it contradicts what some Authority has  written down then you must abandon the authority  

and base your reasoning on your own findings  now it’s time for our bonus today which is  

about another problem in the solar system because  if the Earth was round we would never see Venus  

and Mercury at night since these two planets are  between the Earth and Sun I’ve got the sun down  

here I’ve got Mercury represented in this first  orbit and it supposedly orbits somewhere around  

43 million miles at its maximum and then you have  Venus over here at 67 million miles in the second  

orbit from the Sun and of course we’ve got the  Blue Marble we’ve got Earth up here in the third  

orbit going around the Sun at 66,000 miles per hour  supposedly at a distance of 93 million miles  

from the Sun okay in the meantime we’re spinning  around here okay and right now the reason  

I got the light I just wanted to cast a strong  enough shadow so you see this would be daytime  

on this side and it’s nighttime on this side the  dark side okay so I get thinking we are out here  

looking this way we’re looking out that way I  want to knock the Earth out of its orbit but  

we are looking this direction toward the darkness  in our sky okay now the question is why can I see  

Venus at all if Venus is rotating down here  in its second orbit we’re in the third orbit  

but we are facing away from Venus right now how  come I can see it in the sky I mean it might be  

up here wherever but it’s still maintaining this  circular distance in here inside the orbit on  

the inside orbit between Earth and Sun so why am I  able to see Venus On the Dark Side of Earth right  

now it would have to be out here to to enable it  to be seen it have to be catching the light from  

the sun and and being able to be seen here if  it’s where we are told it is located we would  

not be able to see it in our night sky right now  so I’m a bit disappointed with the globe and I  

thought it’s going to be much easier to prove it but I’m not going to give up and I know  

you want to hear about flat Earth and you have  lot of questions just like I have and we going  

to talk about it a lot I promise but remember  I started this journey to prove the globe and  

I still have some ideas to do that and the next  one is the photos of the earth it’s very simple  

we have thousands and thousands of real photos  of the earth taken from space but the flat earthers  

say that it’s just more trickery and if you look  at it a bit closer you will realize that these  

are fake photos and Photoshop and CGI now that  sounds weird so the next step I want to do is do  

a proper investigation of all the photos of the  earth so that’s exactly what we do in part three

I Researched Flat Earth for 3 Years – Part 3 – No Real Photos

In part 3 of my 3-year research on Flat Earth, I question the validity of globe photos and explore the idea that they may be fake. Join me in discovering the truth! #flatearth #globe #fakephotos #questioningscience

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
0:28 We have 1000s of photos
3:21 Blue marble problems
8:21 Obama
9:08 Size problems
11:02 The dark side of the moon
15:16 Fake moon photo
16:25 Which one is real?
19:06 Google’s real photos
22:00 More problems
24:36 Space art
29:30 ChatGPT about real photos
33:24 The 7 most iconic photos
35:58 Bonus
37:46 Personal thoughts – more questions

Transcript

one of the best proof that we live on a globe is the thousands of photos taken from space but what if those photos are fake or photoshop or CGI how can we tell how do we know the difference between real and fake well I have some ideas to find it out so let’s talk about it we all know that we have thousands and thousands of photos of the earth taken from outer space however the flat side claims that all of these photos are fake now this is a very bold statement and first I wasn’t really sure how to figure it out whether it’s true or not I cannot just look at all the photos you know thousands and thousands of pictures and just keep wondering hm is this real or not that’s not going to take me anywhere so what we’re going to do is in the first part of the this video we’re going to look at all the issues errors and problems that we can find with these photos and I can tell you there’s plenty of issues and after that we will use different searching options like Google and artificial intelligence to give me the best photos the top 10 or 15 photos that are claimed to be real and just as I said in part one here is a reminder I told you that I’m not here to tell you whether the Earth is a globe or it’s flat I show you what I found during the last couple of years while I was investigating this and you decide for yourself this is exactly the same what we’re going to do in this video I’m going to show you everything I found about the photos and whether they are real or fake that’s something that I let you decide fair enough welcome to mystery teachings my name is GGO if you are new to the channel then welcome and Namaste or if you are a returning Beautiful Soul hey thanks for coming back I appreciate you let me start with a clip from the media this was in a talk show and the reason I want to show you this it’s a little bit similar to what we discussed in part one but this one is different because they bring up the topic of today’s video the photos of the earth as evidence that we live on a globe check this out like you talk in the book about how we now have to listen to people saying the Earth is flat yeah yes that that’s that’s one of the pieces in there is about the the new uh the new Flat Earth International Conference it isn’t a conference from The 14th Century this is a conference that started I think in 2017 and is a growing thing and that’s because people are so contrarian people are so willing to believe unsubstantiated things that have websites that they are now going back on the conclusion we have all rightly drawn about the shape of the planet we live on and people are sort of going and by people I mean idiots saying I I’m a questioning person so why am I going to go along with this idea that the world is round well I tell you why because people went up in a rocket looked out of the window and took a bloody photo the guy makes a valid argument we have photos of the earth so as I said it’s time to investigate those photos and we do it right now okay I want to start with the Blue Marble because the Blue Marble pictures are probably the most famous or one of the most famous pictures and obviously there’s not just one there’s plenty different versions from different years but I want to start with this one cuz this is a really famous one and this was the default background photo of the iPhone for many many years and lot of people believe that this is an actual photograph but we have lot of problems with this one and let me show you a clip from a documentary where a guy who really understand how Photoshop Works he will tell you what’s the here we go there’s a big problem with the blue marble and I’m going to zoom in here and show you what the problem is these are all composite images where they are really not very good at Photoshop because they’re using the Photoshop clone tool to replicate clouds This Cloud is a copy of this Cloud see the formations they’re identical identical formations these right here side by side side by side see see this kind of w looking shape right here replicated right here this cloud is exactly the same as that cloud um you know same clouds right there and same thing on the other side of the world they got the same thing going on they they got caress here look one two three four five the same formations replicated right there these two replicated same exact formations right here um this right here is is clone of that right there I mean really so you’re telling me that we could take pictures of Jupiter and Saturn huge massive planets and now we’re out going to Pluto but we don’t have one legitimate picture of the Earth from space that’s not a composite how about that so we have some problems with the blue marble and you know lot of people including me believ that this was a real photo but apparently this is a composite image which means that they Reed the data from NASA but to be honest at this point I don’t know what to believe anymore and they put the pieces together into one image that’s all they do and I know that the guy who created this Blue Marble is called Robert Simon so I was asking chpt how did Robert Simon make the Blue Marble image of the earth and the AI tells me that Robert Simon did not create the original Blue Marble image but he did produce an updated version using data from NASA’s suami NPP satellite he combined data from multiple satellite passes to create a seamless cloud-free image of Earth he used software to enhance colors and remove atmospheric Haze resulting in the iconic Blue Marble image so this is the guy Robert Simon who made the famous Blue Marble and here is an audio interview with him in 2002 Blue Marble 2.0 NASA’s Rob Simmon made this and it had wide appeal too for example it ended up as the default background on the iPhone I didn’t even know until I bought an iPhone um and turned it on and kind of did a little happy dance Simmons’s job is it’s primarily taking data and making pictures out of it that’s what this is a composite of data sets from several different instruments translated into a picture the to us the really cool thing was the data set up until that point there was no realistic color map of the globe anywhere so the land layer here comes from the moderate resolution imaging spectr radiometer aboard Tera and the tricky part here was the weather so we actually had to take clouds out they stashed the clouds for later went onto the ocean that came from an instrument that measures phytoplankton in the sea where it was low I colored it dark blue because they’re low mostly in mid oceans and then where it was a little bit higher it was like a little bit brighter green then add the clouds back in there’s a small problem with it because there’s a very slight Gap in between each orbit so some of those are painted on it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be then there was another layer to sort of simulate the atmosphere and then there’s this little bright spot it’s called the specular highlight so it’s the reflection of sunlight off of water those are the pieces but you can’t just slap them all together it just didn’t look realistic it looks kind of flat or the clouds are sort of to seethrough so I just takeit command z a lot there’s Artistry to creating the world what I imagine it to be um unfortunately I’m not an astronaut I’ve never been to space but I’ve looked at these images over and over again trying to sort of get the essence of it it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be it has to be really and you will see that we don’t have an actual Blue Marble photo so that’s a big problem in my opinion and then here is a clip from Barack Obama again when he tells you otherwise I don’t want to I don’t want to I don’t want to fool you last month for the first time since 1972 NASA released a Blue Marble a single snapshot of the earth taken from outer space it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be so much has changed in the decades between that first picture and the second borders have shifted Generations have come and gone our global population has nearly doubled but one thing hasn’t changed our our planet is as beautiful as ever it still looks blue yeah still looks blue and they colored it in Photoshop really nicely all right let’s have some fun guys so first of all we have some size issues here why is the size changes in these three images hm interesting if you look at this one Blue Marble 2002 2012 what’s happening with America why does it change size okay Blue Marble 2002 12 now the question is if you look at the map and I know it’s a Mera projection map but how can you drop the rest of the world on the other side of the ball so H H how do you feed South America Africa Europe Asia Australia Antarctica on the other side how do you do that here’s another one with Africa same question how can you put the rest of the world on the other side here is Blue Marble 2022 with Africa and again North America Greenland Europe Asia everything is missing how how does it fit on the other side that how do you do that here’s one more for you blue Marvel 2012 both sides look at the map same question where is the rest of the world it is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be okay blue Mar versus ISS footage we got some size issues again this is not possible and guys we are just getting started this is just the beginning it’s going to be so ridiculous you’re not going to believe it here is one more ISS footage Google again look at the difference everything is just changing size apparently very interesting and here is one more look at that one now how how is that possible this is so crazy right and you probably remember that a lot of people claimed a couple of years ago that they want to see the Dark Side of the Moon the backside of the Moon that we never see because we always see the same side and then Naza gave us this picture now let’s see the clip about this photo and we going to discuss the problems after a camera aboard the NASA satellite has captured the Dark Side of the Moon the series of images were taken from ‘s deep space climate Observatory and show a view of the Far Side of the Moon as it’s lit by the Sun and moves in front of the Earth the images show the moon moving across the Pacific Ocean towards North America its Far Side is revealed showing a crater observers on Earth only see one side of the moon because it’s tidily locked to our planet meaning its orbital period is the same as its rotation around its axis the images of The Far Side of the Moon weren’t seen by humankind until a Soviet mission in 1959 while it monitors solar winds NASA’s Observatory will capture the Dark Side of the Moon twice each year okay so I have a couple of problems with this footage first of all it looks completely fake I mean does this look real for you honestly okay number two is the clouds so you can see how the Earth rotates and as we learned in part two the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph and the Moon is rotating around the earth at 2,288 mph so this is apparently hours and hours of footage because you can see a big rotation of the Earth but somehow the clouds are exactly the same they don’t change shape at all when in reality when you look up the sky and you look at the clouds they change their shape every minute or every few seconds but here for hours and hours they look exactly the same now we have more problems than that because if you look at the Moon around the earth it just looks like it approaches the Earth and then it just goes away this doesn’t look like orbiting around it and on top of of that let’s not forget that the Earth is also rotating around the Sun at 67,000 mph and the whole solar system is shooting in space at half a million miles per hour so somehow NASA’s camera can magically capture all of this and follow all these movements and give us this perfect footage of moon how it orbits Earth yeah right now the other problem why this looks completely fake because if you zoom in you can see this little green line around the moon now that tells me one thing that this is photo manipulation otherwise if this is a real footage and captured by a camera then what’s that green line there it’s really interesting on top of that if you think about it we have the Earth rise photos which was taken by the Apollo missions back in the’ 60s if we place this where the Moon is on this wonderful nazza footage then shouldn’t the earth look much bigger from that perspective so let’s just use our brain a little bit Yeah Common Sense okay no worries so here’s a better explanation the Earth is apparently nearly four times larger than the moon and if you look at how the Moon looks like from the Earth then why is it that the Earth from Moon looks even smaller it shouldn’t even look the same size it should look almost four times bigger so again wouldn’t the Earth from the Moon look more like this and not like this but this photo is actually also fake and here is why cck on this picture right here supposedly the same mission same guys that took the picture of the most famous picture of our Earth I’m going to do save image has and let’s see Apollo Moon let’s call it Apollo Moon 17 and I’m going to open that in Photoshop and if those of you who think this technical difficulty was planned and think I’m scamming you go do it for yourself because you’re GNA find the exact same thing I got nothing to hide here this is live on the air okay I’m going to zoom in on the earth in Photoshop you see the Earth go to image adjust levels and I’m going to the levels over here and I’m going to bring the levels up uh oh what is that why is there a square box around the earth allegedly taken from the scientist on the moon in Apollo 17 people wonder why I don’t trust NASA that’s why I don’t trust NASA this phot shot but it’s it’s has to be okay now let’s play with the colors a little bit so we got the blue images from 1967 to 2015 why does it look completely different I mean just look at the oceans the color of the water and yeah we can say that it’s just different filters or you know just some some editing in Photoshop after they had the the row image and they just changed it a little bit but if we look at more these are all Blue Marble images look how different they look like so which one is the real one or look at this which one is the real Earth I mean you tell me I don’t know supposedly they all are real images but they look absolutely different here is another example let’s play a game guys which one is the cartoon do you think we’re living on let me know in the comments I have no idea and if we put these pieces together and try to create the Earth this is what we’re going to get so at this point I’m really trying to find one real photograph of the globe and it’s somehow it looks impossible at this moment now let’s look at different space agencies because every single space agency in the world is creating a completely different image about the Earth so we got the NASA we already discussed that and then we got the Russian one the Ros Cosmos that looks already completely different and then we have Jaa which is short for Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency and then we have the esa which is the European Space Agency now look at these four images of the earth it’s quite interesting so four different nations see the world completely differently literally and then we have more because we have Google Earth obviously we got NASA again and then we got the Russian again there’s another one from the European Space Agency there’s also another the one from the Japanese one and then cnsa is short for China or Chinese National Space Agency and it’s interesting that we have the Universal Pictures logo there as well and obviously SpaceX has a different Earth as well here are some more examples of different Earth photos so my question is the same again which one is the real one here is some other example from other space missions and Apollo and and different satellites or whatever these are but again completely different and then here is some more interesting stuff for you and feel free to do this for yourself basically I Googled real photos and photographs of the earth taken from space and this is what Google shows me and gave me these pictures this is another one this is an interesting coloring again and then here is one more here the continents look more like goldish yellowish some something like that and then we got the Russian one we’re going to discuss that a little bit more later and then we have this one I think this was the European again with the continents look completely green we have this one uh the continents look Brown again and the vot there is a different blue and then here we have the Japanese again and then we got this one and I mean the top part is really interesting I don’t know what’s going on there with so much cloud looks like quarter of the globe is in some storm or something like that and then this one now this one is really cool it looks really cool I really like this one but again this is not real so these are all the ones that Google shows me as real photos of the Earth from space it is photoshoop but it’s it’s has to be and by the way why don’t we see any satellites around the earth I mean we have thousands and thousands of satellites orbiting the Earth apparently but all we see is just the Earth itself we don’t see stars we don’t see other planets we don’t see satellites we don’t even see space debris which they tell us that there’s a lot in space and it’s a big issue actually so we see nothing in space not a single star nothing is behind the Earth ever it just always the Earth photo itself and before you say that these are obviously images these are not the real photos I’m going to show you the real photos very very soon and you will see the same thing there’s nothing around Earth which is really weird to say the least so this is what space look from Earth but this is what space looks from space I mean give me a break and I know we got all these Fancy video footages and we’re going to discuss these in a different episode when we will talk about the ISS so let’s just uh move to some more Earth photos the first photos taken from space or from the Moon in this case was the Apollo missions and this is the Apollo 9 earthrise photo we have the Apollo 11 really nice footage and we have the Apollo 12 but the problem is that these three have the exact same clouds these are apparently different missions in different years three different Apollo Mission and we have the exact same clouds how is that possible and then we got this one for example I mean this supposed to be the surface of the Moon again I’m not here to tell you what to believe you decide for yourself and then here is one from the NASA website that’s where the sun is so you have an idea how the Shadows should look like or where the Shadows should be but as you can see that’s not the case at all so there’s a lot of trickery and fakery here and we’re going to investigate nazza very soon in our journey but let me show show you a different example on this Earth photo you can see the word sex and why is that here is with a different filter so I guess the guys who are working at the Photoshop Department sometimes they have a boring day or something you can see the letters s x I’m wondering why or if we go further I’m sure this is just a coincidence but you can even see cartoon characters in cloud formations which is also quite interesting and if this is not enough let’s look at the official nasza photo of Pluto and if we look at the cartoon Pluto I mean for me this looks like they really laughing at us but I can show you a different example which is Jupiter this is apparently taken in 2014 this is a real photograph and then you got on the right Jupiter 2016 just another example of NASA faking space take a look here at this supposed image of Jupiter nothing more than CGI fakery the supposed auroras towards the north let’s take a look here again at NASA’s official website where it states Hubble captures Vivid auroras in Jupiter’s atmosphere here’s the problem the date of June 30th 2016 now take a look at this another so-called official image of Jupiter this one’s from back in 2014 you see the problems here let’s take a closer look at the supposed two images provided from NASA of Jupiter here’s the problem again 2016 2014 what’s the difference here well the difference is they added the supposed auroras on the North and this is nothing but a Christmas tree give me a break take a look here I mean all the clouds are in the same exact position just the 2016 image is a bit I would say darker this a bit lighter than 2014 here’s a side by side people can’t see what’s taking place here with NASA is photoshopped but it’s it’s has to be so we talk about an entire space art here and honestly you don’t need to be a conspiracy theories because NASA actually admits that they have an entire department creating these images and footages and videos check this out in the meantime they are images that Inspire educate and sometimes just make us say wow over the years NASA has given us spectacular photos and renderings that reveal a colorful and Mysterious Universe no doubt and now Chris Martinez is introducing us to two of the artists behind some of the most iconic space art in the galaxy in a small bright office working side by side let’s see Robert hurt and Tim pile bring the universe to life what we’re doing does have real science underlying it Robert is an astrophysicist turned artist Tim once a Hollywood animator is now a planet illustrator together they produce some of NASA’s most popular images from renderings of how planets light years away could look to actual photos of stars and galaxies captured by NASA’s powerful telescopes and this is sort of how it comes to me and many of those images have a dark grainy start but color and light reveal an astonishing Glimpse the deepest regions of space might appear to the human eye what I’m trying to do is show people sort of the the broader colors that the Universe has to offer it’s a delicate blend of imagination and data the artists meet with NASA scientists over many drafts to ensure a planet or Galaxy’s look lines up with the research to make each one as accurate as possible I love the challenge it’s kind of like a puzzle to me of trying to create something that looks really cool within the restrictions that were given by the scientists it can take days even weeks to produce just a single image the dazzling fin results enough to keep us all dreaming of the final frontier for years to come Chris Martinez CBS News Pasadena California the artists also say they have to be especially careful when it comes to illustrations of other planets to avoid colors many of us would associate with Earth like blue for water heart nebulas Celestial collisions a bird’s eye view of the Milky Way astronomers are charting the outer reaches of the cosmos and bringing back jaw-dropping images from telescopes like Hubble and its infrared cousin Spitzer if you look down at the bottom of that Milky Way image you’ll see these two words artist concept this sweeping image of the Orion Nebula actually looks like this and the trapist one star system the latest discovery of seven potentially habitable exoplanets that made national headlines it’s really only a box of gray and white pixels you see space art is part of NASA’s Most Fascinating images most space imagery begins with data very very complex data and transforming these numbers and graphs into an image that captures the Public’s imagination requires a delicate balance between science and art and that is where Robert comes in as an astronomer and artist Robert isn’t editing images so much as he’s making an artistic hypothesis grounded in facts so we can visualize what’s really happening up there and Robert takes the scientific limitation seriously because the wrong color could be very misleading rendering exoplanet with bright green continents would be kind of crossing a line for us we don’t want to say hey we found life on this planet and showing green really would communicate that it’s enough to show some evidence of water in fact a lot of times we’ve made special efforts to make the water not look super appealing you know not like this tropical deep blue appearance because you would think that complete accuracy would be the goal when you’re doing astronomical illustrations but it isn’t always the case the primary goal is communication and understanding having a visual response to technical triumphs was something NASA latched on to early on for over 50 years NASA worked closely with artists and creative leaders like Walt Disney and Norman Rockwell to help shape the stories of space flight it’s the same Legacy today just with more advancing and better tools to imagine what far-off worlds might look like if we could visit them we want to take a lot of care to make sure we don’t oversell the part of the story that isn’t the story there are people who just look and think oh NASA’s photographed a planet and they don’t understand that actually that was a piece of art on the other hand if we don’t do that and we don’t put a piece of compelling artwork then people may never even look at the story anyway so this is what happens when you are fascinated to see the beauty of the cosmos on the bottom of some frying pans all right let’s move on to CAD GPT and look at the real photographs what does the AI tell me about these but before we do that just for fun I was asking Chad GPT to create an image of the globe and to make it very realistic even better than the Blue Marble and it gave me this so this is a realistic picture according to artificial intelligence but anyway let’s move on to what I just mentioned when it comes to actual photographs of Earth without editing or photoshop the list is much shorter these images are primarily from missions where astronauts or spacecraft captured Earth in a single shot rather than Composites or digital Creations here’s a rundown of notable examples and it gives me five examples of photographs without editing or photoshop here is number one Apollo 17 Blue Marble feel free to pause it and read it for yourself if you want but in the bottom it tells me authenticity this is a single anal photograph making it the truest representation of the Earth as seen from space now which photo is that here we go this is a single unaltered photograph yeah I’m sure it is it just reminds me what I just discussed with you about the colors and trying to find one real photograph but okay uh let’s see number two which is the Apollo 8 earthrise and it says at the bottom authenticity a true photograph often color adjusted in reproductions that’s fair enough if it’s color adjusted but we already discuss that these are the ones that have the exact same clouds number three Galileo spacecraft 1990 which says at the bottom mostly true photographs though some color balancing may have been applied in postprocessing that’s fair enough again and these are the one Google told me or showed me for four different photos they look a little bit similar maybe color adjusted okay so these apparently real on I mean do you think these are real ones after what we just saw and what we went through number four messenger spacecraft 205 authenticity largely untouched photographs these are the ones they show us I’m not sure but as I said you decide number five the LR Earth rise photo 2015 this one and it says authenticity depends on the specific image some versions are Composites but this is what Google tells me and shows me and look at this photo I mean look at the Moon surface is that the moon and this is apparently a real photograph okay what makes them rare unaltered single frame photographs of Earth are rare because one perspective most spacecraft orbits or travel paths don’t allow for a clear full Earth view why not what’s in the way okay number two technological needs earlier missions used film requiring careful planning for such shots so why don’t we use film but okay and number three modern tools today we rely more on digital composits and enhanced Imaging for higher resolution and complete coverage yeah I can see that that we rely on Composites and images and fakery because there are no real photographs but it also tells me the Apollo 17 Blue Marble Remains the most famous and genuine single photograph of Earth most other iconic Earth images are Composites or edited to enhance Clarity detail or Aesthetics so this one is still the most famous and genuine single photograph and I still have more for you and first I was thinking to put this in to today’s bonus but I have a different bonus for you so here we go I found this article seven of the most iconic photos of Earth taken from space and I’m really curious what that list look like so it tells me that it wasn’t until 1946 that humans first saw what the Earth looked like from space yeah but Universal Pictures knew it in 1927 but no worries and it also tells me that the farest is from the Voyager One spacecraft which captured Earth from 3.7 billion miles away I love these numbers uh just as we discussed in part two so let’s see the images the first photo of Earth from space taken just 65 miles above our planet and this is the photo here is the second one the first television picture from space taking 450 Mi above Earth that’s interesting if you would tell me that this is an x-ray of someone’s Valley I would believe that too and here is a description for it if you want read it for yourself number three which is the Blue Marble the same one from 1972 which we already discussed Apollo 17 crew this is apparently a real one and then we got this one number four which is the Orion takes a snapshot of Earth and the Moon from 268,000 miles now the problem with this one is that why is the moon larger than the Earth Earth okay whatever and then the Earth R photo which we also discussed already and then we have this one Earth as SE from the Dark Side of Saturn 898 Million Miles Away I love how they how they come up with these numbers someone definitely measured it this little dot is the Earth and this is a real photograph okay and the last one this is my favorite an iconic image of our pale blue dot taking 3.7 billion miles away and let me zoom on it so you can see it properly well that’s Earth and yes this is a real photograph please believe that and let’s not forget we have all these shots but again we are orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph while shooting through the Galaxy at half a million miles per hour and we have all these beautiful photographs taking from millions and millions of miles away okay and now it’s time for our bonus today which is something that you can easily verify for yourself and I recommend for you to do so so if you go on Google and type in Russia photo of Earth or you look for Ros Cosmos that’s the same thing you will see this photo is coming up and the problem with this one is that if you start zooming on this photo can you see the problem or should I zoom a little bit more can you see the problem now that little hand there why is a hand on a real photo of the earth hm interesting so basically whoever made this in Photoshop they forgot somehow to remove that little hand from there so this is how much we’ve been misled and let me continue with a quote again from Leonardo da Vinci there are three classes of people those who see those who see when they are shown and those who do not see so for the globe side I’d like to say something because they always ask the question do you have a photo of FL do you have a real photo of Flat Earth well first you need to show us a real photo of the globber but you know what here is a photo of Flat Earth for you cuz you always ask for this and this is a real photo guys please believe it this is a real photo just like the globe photos and I would really suggest to every want go on Google and search for real photos of the earth this is how you’re going to feel and you ask the question what is this place so I feel like this I feel a bit angry I’ve been lied to and I just cannot find a real photo and that’s really pissing me off to be honest so why am I going to go along with this idea that the world is round well I tell you why because people went up in a rocket looked out of the window and took a bloody photo which photo this for chopped but it’s it’s has to be I couldn’t find any that I could say it’s 100% real so I’m sorry but I cannot accept this as evidence that the Earth is a globe so we need to go to the next stage which is the curvature of the earth very important topic if we have a curvature the Earth is a globe if there is no curvature the Earth is not a globe but before we do that I want to say something when I was at this point in my investigation I already started to ask some questions from myself what if I become a flat hter I mean I just looked at the solar system and I didn’t find what I expected to find and then now I looked at the photos I thought that’s going to prove everything and then it didn’t so I keep going and I’m going to keep investigating but I have to ask the question what if I become a flat there do I want that do I want other people to ridicule me just like they do with flaters I can already see how the globe side talk to flat hter and talk about flat hter they call them all kinds of names which is not okay we talk about basic human respect towards one another I cannot see that between globers and flats which is really strange and I don’t like that so I need to ask myself the question like do I want to keep continue do I want to have this experience but you know what if you know me from the previous videos and you follow me for a while you know that I want to know the truth I don’t care what they’re going to label me I was labeled before as conspiracy guy and crazy whatever and I’m fine with that so I just want to know the truth whatever it is some of you already asked me how long this series is going to be and what topics we are going to cover in this now the short answer is that we’re going to cover pretty much everything and it’s it’s going to be at least 25 parts or more we’ll see am I going to answer all your questions probably not simply because I still have questions myself how do we circumnavigate the Flat Earth I know how it works on the globe but how does it work on a flat surface or directions NorthEast Southwest H how does it work again or how about pilots and airplanes and flights I mean every single pilot is like lying about this I don’t believe that I mean if more than two people is aware of a secret it’s not a secret anymore then how is it possible that thousands of people are lying about the shape of the earth I don’t believe that that just makes no sense how about gravity how does that work on the Flat Earth or how about Maps do we have any accurate Flat Earth Map that we can do measurements with or we can plan traveling from A to B and it’s actually correct how about NASA and all the other space agencies there’s plenty in the world not only NASA and they have lot of footages video footages we have the ISS the space station up there how about the Sun and the Moon how do we have days and nights where does the sun go how does a sunset look like on the Flat Earth or how about the Stars how about the other planets where are they then how about ancient civilizations what did they actually think about the Earth or how about ancient texts religious texts not just the Bible but all the others I want to find it out how is it possible that they can just cover it up and we have thousands of pilots and we have so many scientists and teachers and professors and lot of people in the world who should lie about this how is that possible I think it’s not but on the other side the number of people believe in Flat Earth is growing there are millions and millions and we discussed that in part one already this is a fact so I want to get to the end of this and the most important question is why would they lie about it what’s the benefit for that why is it good for them if we don’t know whether we live on a globe or not now before we go to the next step of the investigation which is the curvature of the earth there’s one more thing we need to do and that’s looking into Google Earth and actually first I wanted to skip this part and just go to curvature cuz I didn’t see the point why I should look into Google Earth but actually we need to look into it because some people in the globe side say that somehow Google Earth proves that we live on a globe because we have real satellite footages and you can look around anywhere on the on the globe map so we’re going to do some investigation about Google Earth in part four I’ll see you there stay blessed [Music]

In Part 4 of my flat earth research series, I dive into Google Earth to uncover more evidence. The truth is closer than ever!.

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
0:30 Does Google Earth prove anything?
1:57 Airplane, not satellite
3:23 Google street view
6:35 Measurements
9:47 Bonus 1
13:22 Bonus 2
14:00 Bonus 3
15:03 Next step

Transcript

one of the most important things in my  three years research was to find and prove  

the curvature of the earth if we can do that  we live on a globe and the debate is settled  

however in order to do that we need to do a  lot of different observations and the first  

one is to look into Google Earth whether or  not it can prove the globe let’s talk about it

let’s be honest Google Earth is a really awesome  tool to look around anywhere in the world and  

check out places where you might never travel in  your life however the flat side pointed out that  

there are a couple of problems with Google Earth  for example even though you can see the curvature  

of the earth that’s just some animation and when  you try to measure areas like the Arctic or the  

Antarctic the North or the South Pole there are  weird things happening so we’re going to look into  

all of this we’re going to do some experiments  and some measurements on Google Earth to find out  

whether or not we can get closer to settling this  debate if we have a curvature or not welcome to  

Mystery Teachings my name is Gergo if you are new to  the channel then welcome and Namaste or if you are  

a returning beautiful soul hey thanks for coming  back I appreciate you. As you have seen in part 3

we couldn’t find a real photograph of the  earth which is more than weird to be honest but  

there are other ways to prove the curvature  for example Google Earth which we’re going to  

do in a second and of course video footages for  example from the ISS or other satellite footages  

so in the next few episodes we’re going to check  all the different possibilities to prove the curve  

of the globe and as I said we need to start with  Google Earth because there are some interesting  

or even weird things that you need to see and I  must show you the first thing I want to show you  

is this aerial footage and when I say aerial footage  and not satellite footage I say it because if we  

zoom out this whole image and footage becomes  a cartoon if you look at it now this is already  

a cartoon especially if you look at the sea  that’s not a real sea and not real water this  

is a cartoon so this is aerial footage made by  Google drones like this or Google airplanes like  

this and when you zoom out what I just said the  whole thing turns into a cartoon I got this cool  

app on my phone too I like how you can zoom in and  do like a 3D and look at the city and everything  

but my issue is that when you zoom out and you  go into outer space this Earth that we live on  

turns into a cartoon this is a cartoon now where  is the real Earth? oh that’s right space ain’t a  

real place that’s why this camera doesn’t go into outer space. hold on for a second did he just say  

that outer space isn’t the real place? okay that’s  a bit weird and after these curvature episodes  

we’re going to investigate NASA the ISS and outer  space itself but it’s really weird to say that it  

isn’t the real place cuz we know we are in space  right but anyway let’s continue let’s talk about  

the Google Street View cars and the reason I  want to show you these because there are people  

who believe that the street view on Google Earth  is by satellites and satellite footage well they  

are not so I just want to make sure that really  all of us are on the same level and this is why  

I show you that these are the cars that are  capturing every single Street on earth now a  

good example to show you this is the example  of where I used to live which is this house  

basically this one and the interesting part is  this white car this white Toyota Prius this is  

the car I drove but I drove this car till summer  2023 and what’s even more interesting is the fact  

that I moved out of this place in April 2023  so nearly 2 years ago and this is what Google  

Earth still shows you and the other reason why you  can easily see that this is a car is this shadow  

of the camera or if we move a little bit further  you can see it again so as you can see this is on  

the road it’s actually following the bus if you  look at it where can you drop the little man you  

can see that wherever there are green areas or  Parks you cannot do that you can only do it in  

streets you see this is all the way the roads this  is the Streets of London this is an area where a  

car cannot come indeed but this is a man with a  camera which I’m going to show you in a moment  

this is the solution to show you places where the  cars cannot go this is how simple it is and this  

has nothing to do with satellites or if we want to  look around in Antarctica for example and we drop  

the little man we will see in a moment that these  images are taken by people with a camera here we  

go you can even see the shadow of this man so it’s  simple as that this is not satellite footage and I  

know it’s probably obvious for most of you but as  I said I want everybody be on the same level and  

sometimes there are even more interesting things  on Google Earth cuz I was just curious I wanted  

to check out the South Pole and this is where it  took me to an office okay thanks Google really  

nice okay now why was this important to talk about  in the first place? whether these images footages  

are made by drones or airplanes or car or people  well the point is that one thing you cannot do on  

Google Earth is to zoom in upside down for example  zoom in to Australia and then see a satellite  

footage something like this like upside down so  this is what you cannot do and this is what they  

will never do there’s never an ISS footage or any  NASA footage from any telescope or anything at all  

whatsoever where you would see anything on Earth  upside down and you know that would easily prove  

the curvature of the Earth but we don’t have  any isn’t that strange? okay now let’s move on  

and let’s talk about those measurements I just  mentioned at the beginning of the video so here  

as you can see we are measuring the borders of  Texas in the United States this is not my video  

I just found this and it’s really good and as you  can see you can perfectly see what you measured  

you can even see the distance and you know  how long anything is and when you want to do the  

same thing on Antarctica as you can see it’s quite  precise the guy goes around really perfectly you  

can see how many meters we are measuring but when  we finish it this is what happens and then another  

weird thing is if you just want to measure half of  the globe this is interesting already why it moved  

like that but if you go around this is the result  and I didn’t want to believe that this is what  

happening so I said okay I need to try it out so  this is my own recording I just start somewhere  

and I slowly slowly go around the globe and as  you can see I’m going I’m at 18 23 25,000 km  

and I just carry on carry on getting back to the  other half so it should show me half of the globe  

but when I close the shape this is what happens  now why is that so I don’t want to believe this  

I just want to try it one more time so again I  just go around I speed this up a little bit for  

you and I go around the globe making it half and  when I close the shape again what is this why is  

this happening now the other weird thing what I  also just mentioned before what’s happening at the  

North Pole so I just want to go around obviously  North Pole is there’s no land there so it just in  

the water and when I measure it and I close the  shape what why is this why do I have a crescent 

you know so this is really strange and now I try  it again start measuring a different area you can  

see the kilometers there I close the shape again what  is going on here people okay let’s see a different  

example I just go up a little bit and I’m going  to measure these small Islands here um with the  

where you can see some snow on them so let’s just  do it go that way and then close the shape there  

you go it measured perfectly and it shows me what I  measured but why is it different when I want to  

do that in Antarctica or at the North Pole what’s  the difference there I’m trying an even bigger one  

there you go that’s a bit weird but it’s kind  of okay and I go back to the North Pole again  

and I measure a bigger part again let’s see what  happens this time should be all right no this is  

weird all right now it’s time for our bonuses  and since this episode is a bit shorter than  

the previous ones I said bonuses yes because  I have multiple ones for you and this is all  

Google Earth related and it’s going to be really  interesting uh but let’s start with this one so if  

we go to this area this is again someone else’s  footage and we find this little bit here we’re  

going to find Mars on Google Earth so just another  thing another lie from NASA and as I said we’re  

going to investigate NASA later in our journey uh  because you know a lot of people say nasa is short  

for never a straight answer or not a space agency  and this is just a good example of that that NASA  

is not very honest with us so we can find Mars  on Google Earth and that’s one footage here is an  

other one let’s zoom in here to this area and this  is as you can see this is the same area and again  

we talk about Google Earth so again we drop the  little man here and we look around and we’re going  

to find pretty much the same thing Mars 1 okay  this is the car we just checked in the previous  

video this is the one so apparently this is how  nasa is traveling to Mars it’s all recorded  

here on Earth isn’t that unbelievable? looking at  Google Earth and this big snow covered monstrosity  

is staring me in the face like um why is that  covered in snow I look into Ireland and some  

other areas around it Iceland Ireland gets snow  only once a year one day a year so I keep digging  

a little bit deeper and I finally get underneath  this cloud cover here and a few images pop up and  

I said oh images what are they well this is what  you got which I’m sure that looks familiar to you  

right looks just like the pictures they give us  of Mars s just kind of creeping around here and  

definitely noticing the same kind of undulation  changes and same kind of rock same kind of dirt  

only thing that’s missing is that nice little  red tint that they pay somebody $150,000 a year  

to put on there but those mountains those rocks  definitely exactly like we see on Mars so this  

one here said roving the Arctic so what is that  make any sense pop in here see if we can find  

anything again same kind of mountains that looks  like the same kind of water I’ve seen before  

that I thought was water on Mars who knows so I’ll  keep kind of going through here and see if it what the

uh yeah so I think I found out where Mars is  guys it’s just uh about a thousand miles north  

of me not quite the distance that NASA says  but I can’t find anybody who’s in charge of  

this they must be hiding behind these rocks  oh there they are out in front of everybody  

just standing there lovely clown number  one clown number two and clown number

three yeah this very empty here oh there’s one  of those ATVs all right now run something oh I  

got another truck oh yeah it says NASA what’s  that say Mars project okay NASA you don’t seem  

to be very honest but anyway let’s move on and  there’s an other bonus for you which which is  

just some interesting find on Google Earth and you  can see the coordinates here so this is really  

has nothing to do with the curvature or the series  this is really just some extra I find interesting  

so what is this? what is that laser? what the hell  is that? and what is this place? and I’m sure some  

of you might know the answer what that laser is  doing but most of the people including me had no  

idea that even such thing exists and then I’ve got  the third bonus for you which is again something  

that’s just really really weird this one is  actually really scary in my opinion so let’s just  

zoom into this area again this is someone else’s  video I just found it but it’s really interesting  

this little island here and when you drop the  little man which we’re going to do in a second  

that’s when everything will be very weird so you  see these people here in this boat that’s not the  

interesting part if we turn around and this is  going to be a bit shocking or at least it was for  

me let’s just look at the sea what is this animal  here? what? look at those eyes what kind of creature  

is this? look at that it’s like a massive I don’t  know crocodile shark sea monster kind of thing okay  

now that we clarified everything about Google  Earth it’s time to investigate the curvature even  

further for example we have many many photographs  where you can clearly see the curvature or let’s  

not forget the High Altitude balloon footages  where you can also see the curvature or the  

classic example that ships disappear over the  curvature of the earth and this is just a few  

examples that are many many more and we going to  investigate all of them in part five stay blessed

Join me in Part 5 of my 3-year research journey into the flat Earth theory as we dive into the topic of curvature and the quest to find the curve. Let’s explore the evidence together!.

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
0:22 The most important question
1:19 How to find the curve?
2:27 4 mountains on same photo
5:06 We need to go high
5:42 Sea level
6:02 Drone footages
6:47 7500 feet
7:17 Flights altitude
9:13 Auguste Piccard
11:18 What’s the difference
13:04 Russian aeronauts
13:38 Spy plane
14:08 Asking ChatGPT
15:24 High altitude balloons
18:59 Felix Baumgartner
21:42 Blue Origin
22:51 Kármán Line
23:26 Fish Eye lens
28:26 Bonus
32:15 Next steps

Transcript

most érkeztünk meg ennek az egész utazásnak az egyik legfontosabb mérföldkövéhez a Föld görbületéhez ha megtaláljuk és bebizonyítjuk a görbét akkor

a földgömbön élünk ha nem akkor a Föld lapos beszéljünk róla szóval itt az ideje feltenni a legfontosabb kérdést ezen az egész utazáson, van

-e görbülete a Földnek vagy nincs? és mint mindig, mindenféle lehetőséget megvizsgálunk, el fogunk utazni

az óceánokhoz, egyre magasabbra és feljebb megyünk, és mutatok néhány érdekes felvételt, mert nyilvánvalóan minél magasabbra megyünk, minél inkább látnunk kell a

Föld görbületét, de ez csak egy példa, sok más dolgot is meg fogunk tenni annak bizonyítására vagy cáfolására, hogy

a Földnek van-e görbülete vagy sem, és ez meghatározza, hogyan folytatódik ez az egész sorozat. mint

mindig Nem azért vagyok itt, hogy meggyőzzelek bármiről, csak megmutatom, mit találtam, és mint

mindig, maga dönti el, elég igazságos? üdvözöllek a Mystery Teachingsben, a nevem Gergő, ha új vagy

a csatornán, akkor üdvözlöm és Namaste, vagy ha visszatérő gyönyörű lélek vagy, köszi, hogy visszatértél,

hálás vagyok, hadd kezdjem ezzel, mert a lapos oldal azt mondja, hogy ha lenne

mérhető görbület, nem lennének lapos földesek, és ez arra késztet, hogy így

a videó elején tényleg csak néhány képet szeretnék mutatni, mert

valóban laposnak tűnnek, de nem akarom azt mondani. csak azért, mert ezek a fotók laposnak tűnnek, és láthat egy

egyenes horizontot, az azt jelenti, hogy a Föld lapos, nem, nem tennék ilyet, mert szerintem

sokkal magasabbra kell mennünk, hogy lássunk görbületet, de ezek a képek nagyon érdekesek. ez azt jelenti, hogy ha

ezt nézzük, ez érdekes, és ha nincs görbület, és

például rácsot teszünk erre a fotóra, akkor melyik ponton fogunk látni a görbületet? de mindegy, ez csak

néhány fotó, ahogy mondtam, és nem akarok mást sugallni, mint

például a Fuji hegy a háttérben, vagy ez például sokkal magasabban van, szóval hogyan találjuk meg a

föld görbületét? amit ennek a videónak az elején mondtam, ezt fogjuk csinálni ebben az epizódban, és

először hadd mutassam meg ezt a négy hegyet, ez nagyon érdekes, és ha megnézzük a hivatalos

görbületi képletet, mert van ilyen is nyilvánvalóan 8 hüvelyk négyzetmérföldenként, ami azt jelenti, hogy

1 mérföldes távolságban a képlet 1 * 1 * 8, ami 8 hüvelyk, majd 2 mérföldnél 2 * 2 * 8, majd

3 * 3 * 8 8 hüvelyk négyzetméterenként, és így fogunk megkapni minden szükséges információt, és

itt mérföldekben van az EarthCurvature.com-tól, szóval emlékezzen néhány itt látható számra, például 5 mérföldre,

már 16 láb görbülete 10 mérföld 50 100 mérföld, szóval ez nagyon érdekes, de itt is

kilométerben van megadva, mert nem vagyok benne biztos, hogy ti az Imperial-t vagy az

általam használt metrikus rendszert használjátok, mert Én Magyarországon nőttem fel, ahol a metrikus rendszert használjuk, de itt az Egyesült Királyságban az Imperialt használjuk, így nem tudom, melyik a jobb neked, ezért megpróbálok mindent megmutatni

mindkét rendszerben, de ebben pl. 5 km-nél már közel 2 m-es görbülettel rendelkezel, ami azt

jelenti, hogy ez a magasság több, mint egy felnőtt ember átlagos magassága, vagy

10 km-nél már közel 8 m és 50 km-nél 200 m, ezért ezeket a méréseket és a számokat fogjuk használni

mert ezek nagyon fontosak most vissza ehhez a fotóhoz,

ugyanazon a képen látható a Hood-hegy Rainier-hegy Adams és a St Helens-hegy, minden görbület nélkül, most

megnéztem a Google Földben és a Mountain hood és Adams közötti különbség az, hogy az alsó 92,24 km-en látható

, és a görbületnek már 664 méternek kell lennie, és ezt nem látjuk, és ha

egy kicsit tovább megyünk mint a Hood hegy és a hegy Adams, vagy nem, ez Mountain Rainier bocs, ezért 164,52 km

, és itt a számítás, tehát 2,1 km-es görbületnek vagy 1,26 mérföldnek kell lennie, és ha

újra megnézed a fotót, nem látsz semmit és Tudom, hogy a magasság számít a görbület kiszámításakor,

de az a lényeg, hogy ha ezen a képen van görbület, akkor először csak

a hegy teteje lehetne látható, de az összes hegy egyenesen felfelé van

nem dőlnek el tőlünk a görbületen, de mutatok rá egy jó példát később, ami szintén érdekes, ha megnézed ezt az animációt, akkor

balra láthatod, hogy minél feljebb megyünk Minél nagyobb a görbületi csökkenés, amit

már említettem, és a jobb oldalon látható, ha a Föld lapos, akkor a horizont vonal mindig

találkozik a szemmagassággal, mint például ezen a képen, és még egy egyenes vonalat is tudok húzni itt

ez a sárga vonal középen ahogy látod, és a kérdés az, hogy ez hogyan lehetséges ezen, ezért azt

hiszem, a legjobb, ha olyan magasra megyünk, amennyire csak tudunk, és megnézzük, találunk-e görbületet, úgyhogy

kezdjük 0 lábbal, megmutatom mérföldben és kilométerben vagy méterben is, szóval

ez nulla láb tengerszint, és ez a repülőgép egyenes vonalban repül, most mondhatod

, hogy oké, ez túl alacsony, vagy bármi, és van görbület, nem vagyok benne biztos, de egyenesen

repül Azt hiszem, ennél magasabbra kell mennünk, tehát az első, ahová megyünk, az 850 láb

6 mérföld vagy 259 méter, és ehhez itt van ez a drónfelvétel, ahol láthatod, hogy nem látod a

görbületet, szóval ez teljesen laposnak tűnik, ezért ennél magasabbra kell mennünk, így a következő

500 láb 28 Mi vagy 457 M lesz, ami egy másik drónfelvétel, és nagyjából ugyanazt látjuk,

szóval ezen a ponton úgy gondolom, hogy Ennél sokkal feljebb kell mennünk, ha látni akarjuk a

görbületet, tehát ez nem elég, valóban laposnak tűnik, de nem elég, menjünk még egy kicsit

feljebb, és ez 7500 láb vagy 1,4 mérföld vagy 2,2 km lesz. ezt a felvételt, és amikor

először ezt néztem, arra gondoltam, hogy nézd, ott van a föld görbülete, de aztán

ha egy kicsit tovább nézzük, láthatod, hogy homorú az imént látható,

és most megint teljesen lapos, szóval ez még mindig nem elég,

ennél sokkal feljebb kell mennünk, így a következő 30 000 láb vagy 6 mil vagy 10 km lesz, és ez az átlagos utazómagasság

a kereskedelmi járatok számára szóval amikor repülsz, általában ilyen magasságról van szó, és

sokszor repültem, általában évente kétszer háromszor repülök, és az utazás előtt soha nem néztem bele a

Föld görbületébe, de azóta mindig csináld, és soha nem látom, és hadd mutassam meg a felvételeimet,

amelyek Londontól Budapestig készültek, és itt láthatod, hogy a horizont teljesen

egyenes, szóval ez még mindig nem elég, ennél magasabbra kell mennünk, de hadd mutassam meg egy másik érdekesség, ahol ott a Hold és a Nap a másik oldalon a Horizont alatt látható,

szóval hogyan lehetséges ez a heliocentrikus modell szerint

ez nem lehetséges, nem kellene a horizont alatt lenniük de térjünk

vissza a repülőgépekre, mert tudom, hogy a földgömb felől egyesek azt mondják, hogy látják a görbületet a repülőgép ablakaiból, és szerintem ez nem lehetséges, de

ennek az egyik magyarázata ez a cikk, amely szerint a riasztó ok, amiért a repülőgép ablakait négyzetről kerekre változtatták.

Nehéz elképzelni, hogy a repülőgépek szelíd négyzet alakú ablakokkal rendelkezzenek, de egykor megtették, csak

az 50-es évek végén jelentek meg a kerek vagy ovális kabinablakok, amelyeket mindannyian ismerünk és szeretünk,

és ez nem csupán esztétikai okokból történt. és a cikk továbbra is lényegében elmondja nekünk, hogy

azért változtattak négyszögletes ablakról kerek ablakra, mert volt néhány végzetes baleset az ablakok miatt.

Úgy értem, nem tudom, ez csak egy furcsa magyarázat, hogy ellenőrizze, mit

csináltak, de mindegy haladjunk tovább, és menjünk sokkal magasabbra, így ezúttal 51775 láb lesz,

ami 9,8 mérföld vagy 15,7 km. Ez az a magasság, amelyet Auguste Piccard ért el, és a ChatGPT szerint

ő egy svájci fizikus feltaláló, és a felfedező történelmet írt 1931-ben

azzal, hogy egy hidrogénballonhoz erősített nyomás alatti gondolával

felszállt a sztratoszférába e forradalmi repülés során, és elérte a 15 780 M magasságot. vagy 51 000 láb ez volt az első alkalom, hogy

ember belépett a sztratoszférába és jelentősen hozzájárult a légköri és kozmikus sugárzás

1931-ben írt egy cikket Piccardról, ahol elmondta a szavait idézem, úgy tűnt egy lapos lemez

felfordított éllel, ez elég érdekes, majd 1960-ban, azaz 29 évvel később az amerikai

légierő azt mondta, hogy fel fognak menni, és megmutatják nekünk a csillagokat, ahogy kinéznek. az űrből

, és ezt mutatták nekünk, úgy értem, nézz oda a Holdra, és nézd meg ezeket a csillagokat. Nem

ismerem fel ezeket a csillagképeket, mi ez a vicc? és amit még érdekesebbnek találtam,

az ez a 2021-es képeslap, amely Piccard

sztratoszférába repülésének 90. ​​évfordulója volt, és a tetején az áll, hogy először figyelte meg a Föld görbületét,

így 2021-ben azt mondják nekünk, hogy látta a görbületet. a Földről, de azt mondta, hogy lapos korongnak tűnik

felfelé fordított éllel.

jobban megérted ezt a lapos, felfelé ívelő lemezt, itt van egy

jó animáció és magyarázat egy sráctól, hogy szerinted melyik a nagyobb vagy kisebb, melyik az,

amelyik egy kicsit másképp világít. Megadom nektek srácok egy pillanatra tényleg tartson

egy pillanatot, hogy elgondolkozzon, mi más lehetne még akkor is, ha ez egy

fénykép az űrből, akkor is nagyon könnyen becsaphatnák mindenki érzékelését úgy, hogy azt gondolják, hogy ez

egy gömb, miközben a valóságban ez egy sík, egy sík sík megfelelő megvilágítással bármit 3D-snek látszhat

, oké, amíg itt vagyok, csinálok még egy dolgot rendben, így megfordíthatom ezt még akkor is, ha

sík síkon vagyunk, ha a sík valójában egy nagy kör, ha magasra tudunk menni elég ahhoz, hogy a Horizont

nagyon görbüljön, de ez nem azért van, mert egy gömbön vagyunk, hanem azért, mert még mindig keresünk

azon a szélén, ami felénk ívelt, így már most is kezd úgy kinézni, mint

egy földgömb, de nem lapos, csak a szélét nézzük, ami körülöttünk kering, hadd

kicsinyítsek egy kicsit oké Horizont feljutni talán ide az összes technológiánk segítségével

talán látunk egy kis görbületet, de ez nem azt jelenti, hogy ezt látjuk, hanem csak azt jelenti, hogy

látjuk a lekerekített élt. szerintem ez egy nagyon jó magyarázat, de ha

ez nem lenne elég, menjünk még feljebb, és a következő 62,3 Ft vagy 11,8 mil vagy 19 km

ez az a magasság, amit néhány orosz repülő 1933-ban ért el egy léggömbön, így

2 évekkel később a Popular Science magazin is írt erről egy cikket, és

találd ki, mit mondtak lenézve, hiába próbálták kimutatni a

Föld horizontjának görbületét, most ez egy igazán érdekes. cikk megint igaz? de menjünk ennél magasabbra

, és a következő 70 000 ft 13,2 Mi vagy 21,3 km és ez az U2 kémrepülőgép, amely kétszer olyan

magasan repül, mint a kereskedelmi járatok, és jól látható, hogy nem látja tisztán a görbületet

szóval ez megint egy teljes egyenes, és már tényleg elég magasan vagyunk, szóval nagyon

kíváncsi vagyok, milyen magasra kell mennünk, ezért ezen a ponton meg kell kérdeznem a ChatGPT-től, hogy milyen magasságban látjuk

a Föld görbületét, és azt mondja nekem, hogy a fő tudomány szerint

a Föld görbülete körülbelül 35 000 láb vagy 10,7 km magasságban válik láthatóvá, ami nagyjából

egy kereskedelmi repülőgép utazómagassága, de ezen a magasságon a görbület finom

és nem biztos, hogy mindenki számára észrevehető akadálymentes horizont és tiszta időjárás nélkül

jól csináltuk, hogy már ő beszél 35.000 ft és már 70 000-nél tartunk, így folytatódik

a Föld görbületének kifejezettebb és összetéveszthetetlenebb nézete érdekében, jellemzően

60 000 láb vagy 18 300 méteres magasságból látható ezeken a magasságokon, például

nagy magasságú léggömbök vagy űrhajók szemszögéből a görbület Világos a

Föld tágabb látásmódja miatt, majd később beszélünk az űrhajókról és az ISS-ről, és mindezekről az utunkon

, de azt írja, hogy 60 000 láb az összetéveszthetetlen kilátás, nos, már 70 000-en vagyunk, és

ezzel a kémrepülőgép-felvétellel nem láthattuk, ezért duplázzuk meg a 60 000 lábat, és sokkal magasabbra megyünk

115 000 és 122 00 000 láb között. ami 21 és 23 mil vagy 35-37 km között van, és hadd

mutassak meg néhány nagy magasságú léggömb felvételt, amiről a ChatGPT beszél, és döntsd el magad

[Zene]

Nagyon szeretem ezt a felvételt, ez a híres Dogcam felvétel, és ezen a nap Hotspot-ját láthatod

ott, közvetlenül a nap alatt. úgy tűnik, hogy a nap

nincs 93 millió mérföldre, különben hogyan lehet egy forró pontja, és jól láthatja

ott, így például amikor megnézzük ezeket a felvételeket, például ez jut eszembe

A NASA és más űrügynökségek mutatnak nekünk, de görbülettel, így úgy tűnik, hogy

hasonló felvételeket használnak, mint ez, de meggörbítik az egész vízszintes vonalat, és úgy tűnik, hogy

az űrben vagyunk, és a Nap csak a háttérben van. ez az a felvétel, amit mindig látok

, vagy ne feledkezzünk meg azokról az emberekről, akik amatőr nagy magasságú léggömböket küldenek fel,

mint például ezek az emberek, de ha az interneten vagy a YouTube-on keres, és

győződjön meg arról, hogy csak olyan felvételt talál normál kameralencsével érkezik, és nem valami nagylátószögű objektívvel

vagy halszem objektívvel, amiről hamarosan beszélni fogunk, de ez az, amit sok felvételen látok, amelyeket az imént küldtek az emberek, tudod, hogy nem fizetett ügynökségek, és

nem kormányzati szervek ezek átlagos emberek, mint te és én, és

több videóplatformra töltik fel videóikat és felvételeiket, és ezt látod, így

a ChatGPT azt mondja, hogy a Föld görbületének összetéveszthetetlen képet kell látnunk 60 000 ft-

ot már megdupláztuk, de ennél sokkal feljebb megyünk, és spoiler figyelmeztetés szerint

több mint ötször magasabbra megyünk, szóval maradj velem, de a következő

128 170 láb vagy 24,2 mérföld vagy 39 km ez az a magasság, amelyet Felix Baumgartner elért az úgynevezett űrugrása alatt

és ha megnézzük az eredeti felvételt, akkor láthatod, hogy amikor az ajtó kinyílik, az

egy egyenes, majd a következő vágásnál ott van a görbület, ha kicsit lassabban nézed újra

egyenes és a horizont felemelkedik a szemmagasságba és itt van egy kép

Felixről, ott megint egy egyenes, de ha más szögből nézzük, akkor egy nagy ívet láthatunk,

így ez nem igazán lehetséges, és ha a kettőt egymás mellé rakod, akkor a másik probléma

A Zenith szo egy másik helyen van, amint láthatod, miért van az, hogy ezen kívül ha elkészítjük ezt

a képet és befejezzük a kört, akkor ezt kapjuk, szóval szerintem láthatod, mi a

probléma itt, és hallgassuk meg Neil DeGrass Tyson, a híres asztrofizikus, akit az első részben említettem

, mit mondott erről az egész űrugrásról, oké, ha a Föld valójában ekkora lenne,

akkor a Nemzetközi Űrállomás körülbelül fél hüvelykkel keringene

a felszín felett, és a haver, aki kiugrott egy teljesen jó léggömbből hm mi a neve Felix Felix

baumgartner uh kb 2 mm-rel a földgömb felszíne felett volt, ez az ő széle az űrugrásban

most tudod, hogy nem ez az F, akit akar. nem lenne baj, ha megcsinálja, de

ennek őszintesége nagyban csökkentené azt, amit szerintem az emberek valójában csinál, és nem csak

azt, hogy lefotózzák, ahogy ott áll nagylátószögű objektív, ami vízszintes vonalakat görbít, így a képen látod a Föld felszínének ezt a görbületét, és azt mondtad, hú, ő

az űrben van, nézd meg, nem, nincs olyan magasságban nem látod, nem látod a

föld görbületét, ha 2 mm-rel a strandlabda felett vagy, az a cucc lapos, és ha megnézed

az eredeti felvételt, láthatod, hogy nagylátószögű objektív, mert most azt látod, hogy homorú, majd lapos, és

akkor domború, és ott egy nagy görbe, tehát az ürben van? nem ő nem, de menjünk feljebb

és ismét csak egy emlékeztető a ChatGPT szerint 60 000 ft összetéveszthetetlen Kilátás és a görbület egyértelmű

a Föld tágabb nézetének köszönhetően, ezért hadd menjek ennél sokkal feljebb 329 000 Ft-ra, ami 62,4

MI vagy 100,4 km és emlékezz arra, amiről már beszéltünk, hogy ha a Föld egy földgömb, akkor látnunk kell

egy görbület esést, vagy ha lapos, akkor a horizontvonal a szemmagasságig emelkedik, és ez

a blue origin felvétel, fel tudnak menni erre a magasságra, és ahogy jól látod, ahogy mondtam,

döntsd el magad, hogy a horizont vonal emelkedik a szemmagasságig és én Nem tudom, te hogy vagy vele, de

nem látok itt semmiféle görbületet, hogy a dolgok laposak, jól van, vegyünk egy mély levegőt. Tudom, hogy

elég magasan vagyunk, és ez nagyon furcsa, de más módon fogunk választ találni

, és mi vagyunk Sok minden mást is megvizsgálunk, de már elértük a 100 km-t, ami a Kármán vonal

, és csak magyarként szeretném megemlíteni, mert egy magyar Theodore von Kármánról kapta a nevét,

vagy ahogy a magyarok mondják Kármán Todor magyar fizikusról és repülőgép-mérnök, úttörő alakja volt

az aerodinamika és az űrhajózás terén, és a ChatGPT lényegében elmondja, miért nevezték el

róla, és azt hiszem, ő volt a őszintén szólva, de a világűrről és a gravitációról és minden egyébről fogunk beszélni

az utunk későbbi szakaszában, de hadd térjek vissza a blue originhez, és hadd

mutassam meg ezt a másik felvételt, és ha a blue originre keresel, akkor Valószínűleg találsz

egy ilyen videót, és össze voltam zavarodva, mintha hé, most már látom a görbületet, szóval mi történik,

de ha tovább nézzük, és ez a visszaúton van, akkor ez a leszállás, az előző volt

a felfelé és még mindig látod a görbületet, miért látom még mindig a görbét, és már landol

, és még mindig ott van, szóval ezért kell beszélnünk a halszem objektívről és a nagylátószögű objektívről,

így a halszem objektívet 1906-ban Robert W wood a találta fel. fizikus és feltaláló az objektívet

eredetileg meteorológiára fejlesztették ki, de később légi célokra használták. Fogalmam sincs, hogyan kell kiejteni

ezt a szót és más célokra, de itt a lényeg a halszem Az objektív egy széles látószögű

objektív, amely extrém vizuális torzítást eredményez, az objektív alakja félgömb alakú képet hoz létre

vagy panoráma effektust. Az objektívet arról nevezték el, hogy a halak hogyan látják a világot a víz alatt, és először

hadd mutassak meg valamit az ejtőernyős videómból, ahogy a második részben tettem, amikor a földgömb forgásáról beszéltünk, de ezúttal tudom Boldognak tűnök, és mindez, és vidám

vagy akár vicces is, de csak a horizont vonalára koncentrálj, hogy amint látod, van egy görbület a hátunk mögött

, és nagyon tetszik ez a rész, tényleg fantasztikus, és megint ott van a görbe, és egy pillanat alatt homorúvá válik,

így továbbra is görbület van, és most újra homorú, mert a srác

GoPro-t használ, amibe halszem objektív van beépítve, itt van még néhány példa, amikor láthatja, hogy

a teljes kép csak eltorzult, és ez az objektív miatt van, vagy itt van egy másik, amikor ezek az emberek felküldték a léggömbjüket, de te már látod a Föld görbületét a földszinten,

vagy itt van egy Jet Pilóta és jól látja a görbületet, de ha

a leszállás idejét nézzük, az ugyanaz, ami egy lencsehatás, ami nem a

Föld görbülete, vagy itt van ez, úgy értem, hogy szerinted az űrben vannak, én nem gondold meg, vagy itt van

ez, rengeteg ilyen videót találsz, például léggömb felvételeket, akiktől ismersz

, és ha újra megnézed a földszinten, ugyanazt látod ott egy görbét, szóval ez

az objektív, semmi más és ez erről beszéltem az előző felvételnél, amikor azt mondtam, hogy ezt mutatja a NASA, de görbülettel mutatják, és ugyanezt látod

ezeken a nagy magasságú ballonos felvételeken, nem érdekes? szóval lehet, hogy csak becsapnak

minket, vagy mi történik, és akkor itt van egy másik, ahol láthatod a különbséget

a halszemlencse és a nem halszemlencse között, de ugyanazok a felvételek mindkét lencsével, és ez nagyon

jó magyarázatot ad miért látjuk, amit látunk, például ezt láthatja, hogy a halszem

változat mindent természetellenesen meggörbít, és ez Eric Dubaytől származik, a felső két videó

halszem objektívvel készült, az alsó két videó pedig halszem objektív nélkül, és tisztán láthatja a különbséget

, vagy itt van egy másik példa, amikor látja a nyers felvételt, és látja, hogyan néz ki, amikor

halszem objektívet használnak, vagy itt van egy másik példa ezekkel a Jetekkel, ahol jól látható a

görbület a Földet, de azért lehet mondani, hogy ez egy nagylátószögű objektív, mert most vízszintesbe fordul, majd újra homorúvá válik, így ugyanaz történik

minden egyes felvétellel, és ezt csinálja például a SpaceX. így láthatod, hogy itt görbül, de

ha várunk egy kicsit, és látni fogod, ahogy átérünk az úgynevezett Földgömb másik oldalára,

most vízszintes vonallá változik, majd újra homorúvá válik, így a SpaceX csak elküldik

a technológiájukat, és megmutatják nekünk ezt a felvételt, amit ismersz nagylátószögű objektívvel, és ugyanazt a dolgot

még egyszer, hacsak nem akarjuk azt hinni, hogy ez a fickó csak kimegy a világűrbe, már

az űrben van, nézd, alatta van a földgömb ott van a háttérben a nap, és valamiért

kék az űr, igaz? nem, természetesen nem úgy, ahogy a videó elején tettem, itt van néhány

kép, ahol ugyanazt láthatod, a horizont vonala találkozik a szem magasságával, függetlenül attól, milyen

alacsonyan vagy milyen magasan vagy, és megint csak laposnak tűnik. Nem javaslok semmit, csak megmutatom,

mit találtam, és ahogy mondtam, döntsd el magad, de most itt az ideje a mai bónuszunknak, és ezt

egy kicsit említettem az első részben, ha még nem láttad, vagy új itt

akkor Namaste és miután megnézted ezt mindenképp nézd meg az első négy részt

, mert ha nem láttad, sokat kihagysz, ezért megmutattam ezt a képet az egyik Facebook csoportból, amit az első részben említettem, vagy itt van egy másik amit a Földgömb oldal nagyon szeret

használni, hogy ez nekik a görbület bizonyítéka, de az a bajom, hogy

a hegyekkel készült képeknél azt mondtam, hogy ha van görbület, akkor miért áll minden egyenesen egyenesen felfelé és

semmi sem dől el semmi sem fordul el tőlünk, és megmutattam egy rövid klipet ettől

a sráctól, aki elmagyarázta a perspektívát. Őszintén szólva nem emlékszem a nevére, de ő és a barátja

nagyon jó videókat készít, és mindig arra buzdít mindenkit, hogy ossza meg, ezért meg akarom osztani, mert

ezt nagyon jól elmagyarázza egy vizuális megjelenítéssel, ahogy korábban említettem, ha

egy lapos lemezen élünk, ami kerek, ha elég magasra jutunk. Még mindig látni fogjuk azt, amit görbének

érzékelhetnénk , de ez nem arról szól, hogy ez egy tényleges gömb vagy földgömb, amit nézünk, és

ahogy egyre magasabbra jutunk, az észlelésed határozottan egyre több görbületet lát, ahogy nézel. lefelé

, de nem csak azt gondolom, hogy az emberek sok mindent magától értetődőnek tartanak, ha távoli felvételeket látunk olyan

kamerákkal, amelyek őrült zoomokat tudnak végezni, és még mindig függőlegesen látunk dolgokat, aminek nincs értelme, és hadd

magyarázzam el, miért most ez természetesen ez nem egy mérleg, de minél távolabb kerülünk a

dolgoktól, ha íves felületen vagyunk, akkor mindennek függőlegesnek kell lennie

a perspektíva középpontja szerint, tehát kifelé haladva, kifelé haladva és kifelé haladva

kifelé a manapság használt kameráink ezt felvennék, hadd menjek el innen a világítás

jobb oké nem tettem igazából ezt nem is csináltam rendesen, mert ezeknek is

így kellene kicsit ívelniük, ha tényleg ülünk ez a perspektíva, akkor mindegyik ilyen lenne,

de oké, hagyjuk ki, hogy egy pillanatra a távolság során

egy korlátozott látómezőt látunk, és a B-t, ahogy egyre távolabb kerülünk, a dolgok természetesen nem

csavarodni látszik távolabb tőlünk, hogy egyre jobban és egyre jobban megyünk errefelé,

minél távolabb megyünk valamitől, annál távolabbról kezdenénk látni, és ha

ezer mérföldre lövést kapunk, akkor nem csak az lenne ívelt, de maga a görbület miatt jóval a mi nézőpontunk alatt lenne,

nem látnánk a Föld körül

a fénytörést, vagy nincs fénytörés, és mégis, ahogyan a dolgokat nézzük, minden egyenes, mintha

egyenesen épülne fel, semmi sem épül fel. kifelé haladva és minden Direction fotó azt illusztrálná, hogy

különösen légi felvételek esetén egy hatalmas légi felvétel mindenféle görbületet mutatna az épületek oldalain,

látszólag minden eltávolodik tőled, és ahogy pásztázol, tegyük fel, hogy

egy hőlégballonnal megyünk felfelé. nagyon magasra jutunk, ahogy körbe-körbe pásztáztunk minden

nagyon távol lenne tőlünk, rendben van, remélem, most van értelme, erről beszéltem,

ne legyenek felfelé, ha eltűnnek a görbület, vagy ha nem a görbület, akkor

ezekkel a szélmalmokkal valami más okból eltűnnek, amiről még nem beszéltünk, de sok másról nem beszéltünk, erről a fotóról nem beszéltünk például miért látod

itt egy görbületet vagy ezt a híres Concorde felvételt Sokszor látom ezt azokban a Facebook-csoportokban,

amiket az első részben említettem, és nem beszéltünk a mérnökökről és a fontos és értékes munkájukról, hogyan

építenek hidakat, vasutakat és a csatornák és mit mondanak a görbületről és hogyan mérik

vagy nem beszéltünk a távolsági fotózásokról és tudjátok azok a képek, amikor az emberek

olyan dolgokat rögzítenek, amiknek a görbület miatt nem szabadna látszódniuk és nem beszéltünk

olyan tesztek , mint a lézeres tesztek, hogy elérik-e a céljukat a görbület miatt vagy sem, és

annyiszor említettem azokat a hajókat, amelyek eltűnnek a Föld görbülete miatt, miért van

In Part 6 of my series on Flat Earth research, we tackle the question: Where is the curve? Join me as we delve deeper into this controversial topic. 

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
1:19 Curvature photos
4:05 Water in the air and lense affect
10:22 What is mirage and what is not
14:25 Long distance photography
21:07 Long distance videography
25:25 Water and common sense
28:51 Ships disappear due to curvature?
37:40 Why the bottom of the ships disappear first
40:40 Lighthouses
42:58 Bridges, railroads and canals
46:22 Personal thoughts
48:46 Bonus
54:45 Next steps

Transcript

in today’s video we continue our conversation  about the curvature of the earth and even though  

in the previous part we couldn’t find  it there’s still a lot of areas that we   didn’t cover like ships disappear over the  curvature of the earth why is that and how  

is that or long distance photography and  videography or long distance laser tests  

whether they reach their target or not and  a lot of other things so let’s talk about it

if you have seen the previous part you know  that we tried a couple of things to see and   detect and prove the curvature of the earth we  went up really high and we couldn’t find it and  

we talked about wide angle lens and a couple of  other things but we still didn’t finish and in   this part we continue the journey and I still  want to find the curve so as I said I have lot  

of ideas and I don’t want to make this intro too  long so let’s just jump into it and my aim in  

this video is to answer one simple question: where  is the curve? that’s all I want to know welcome to  

Mystery Teachings my name is Gergo if you are  new to the channel then welcome and Namaste   or if you are a returning beautiful soul hey  thanks for coming back I appreciate you okay  

so let’s continue exactly where we finished  the previous part so first one this photo   and the globe side claims that this is the  curvature and this is proof of the curvature  

the flat side sometimes say that oh look also  the Concord is um curved but the Concord looks  

like that so you know that’s that’s not a good  explanation with this case I can do what I did  

previously and just complete the circle and  this is what you get so this is the problem  

here or here is another example and as you can  see that Concord would be way too big so that’s  

not curvature now when it comes to these photos I  mentioned this one in part one when I was talking  

about those Facebook debate groups so if you  haven’t seen it go and check it out but I want   to talk about this photo and this photo because  somebody said um in the previous part that oh now  

I’m in trouble because I show you these and you  can see the curvature and I just want to remind  

you that I’m not here to prove or disprove flat earth I’m here to show you what I found and I  

just tell you when I think it makes sense or it  doesn’t make sense so I’m not afraid to talk about  

these photos I do want to talk about them  because it looks like you see curvature there   but in both cases the problem is the same that  you have a straight horizon line so it is not  

possible that you know in one direction in this  direction you have a curvature but if you look at  

it horizontally the horizon line looks  completely level and straight that would only  

be possible if the Earth was shaped like a paper  tower roll but we know no that’s not the case so  

here is another example with this Causeway which  is 23.8 MI long and there is this photo saying  

that oh there’s the curvature same thing straight  horizon line and if we look at it from an aerial  

footage you can see that there is no curvature  there so what’s going on with these photos and  

one logical explanation I found is for example  this photo with these Legos on a table they look  

the same so I think this is only just some optical  illusion nothing else so here it is uh with the  

screws you see the same thing and here is a third  example with these markers and you see the same  

thing that’s not curvature this is just how it  looks like so again with these photos it must be  

something else and when I first looked at it I’ll  be honest I thought the same that okay that might  

be curvature but knowing what I know now let me  show you my little conversation with artificial  

intelligence again so I was asking how much water  is in the air especially above Seas or oceans is  

it possible that the amount of water drops in the  air can create a magnifying lense effect and how we  

see things in the background and ChatGPT tells  me this: the amount of water in the air varies  

depending on temperature pressure and humidity  over seas and oceans where evaporation is is high  

the air can hold significant moisture the maximum  amount of water vapor air can hold increases with  

temperature for example at 30° C air can hold  about 30 G of water per cubic meter at 10° C  

it holds only about 9 G per cubic M so this is  already interesting can water droplets in the  

air act like a magnifying glass? yes water droplets  can bend and distort light affecting how we see distant  

objects this happens through refraction  scattering and defraction some key Optical  

effects include one fata Morgana or however you  pronounce it Mirages at Sea light bends due  

to temperature differences in the air making  distant objects appear stretched distorted  

or even floating for example this photo it looks  like the boat is floating but we know that’s not  

possible number two Glory effect and fogbows tiny  water droplets scatter and reflect light creating  

bright Rings or Halos around objects okay number  three magnification: large droplets like raindrops  

or dense mist can act like miniature lenses  briefly magnifying small parts of the background  

however this effect is usually weak and local  rather than forming a large scale magnifying glass  

if you’re thinking of something like a large scale  natural lens in humid air above the ocean it’s  

more likely that temperature layers bending light  cause apparent size distortions rather than actual  

magnification from water droplets themselves so  it is possible and there is a logical explanation  

to it now to make sure that we all understand  everything I was also asking what’s the difference  

between reflection and refraction so they are  both behaviors of light or other waves when  

they interact with different surfaces or media  but they are distinct phenomena one reflection  

occurs when a wave such as light bounces off a  surface without changing its medium the angle at  

which the wave hits the surface is equal to the  angle at which it bounces off example a mirror  

reflecting light okay this is clear number two  refraction occurs when a wave passes from one  

medium to another for example from air to water  changing its speed and direction this bending  

effect is due to the change in the wave speed  as it moves between media with different optical  

densities example a straw appearing bent in a glass  of water or in this case um a pencil is the same  

thing that’s refraction so in short reflection is  bouncing back while refraction is bending due to a  

change in medium okay now that we understand this  here is this footage which is interesting because  

you see the same thing but those buildings just as  I said in the previous part they are not slanted  

they are not you know twisted away from you  as they should if there was curvature there so  

there must be something else and if you look at  it how far they zoomed in to see these buildings  

well again that doesn’t look like curvature to me  so let me show you something from Rob  

Skiba because he explains this phenomena really  well if the atmosphere especially over water is  

made up of zillions and zillions of tiny convex  drops of water then collectively perhaps  

they all combined to make one big convex lens in  which case it would act like a magnifying glass  

uh using the sheet right here set the city up a  little cut out of the city and now I’ve got the  

big magnifying glass sheet bring the camera right  up to the lens see that’s the normal view of the  

city now let’s back up again the science is the  same of that of a lens here’s a simple example  

so if you’re looking at the Chicago here  the atmosphere really is like acting like a lens  

yes atmosphere really is acting like a lens  and this is how much of the city is missing  

due to the lensing effect the magnification uh of  the atmosphere you’re you’re you’re missing you  

know a good portion of the city just by pulling my  iPhone back on a 3 foot long desk that’s how much  

I lost of the city here has some more examples  like this orange and if we remove the magnifying  

sheet you can see it’s still there the table is  not curved or you can see it with this ship that  

is disappears and actually it’s pretty much the  same how and why we see the sunset the way we  

see it but we will talk about the Sun and sunrise  and sunset and all of that in a different episode  

cuz there’s much more to it and there’s a lot more  to understand with that one but this is basically  

the same thing or as we can see with this timelapse you can see the horizon line rises and  

falls depending on the amount of water in the  air and you can see the whole city completely  

disappears you can see the same thing with the  background with that mountain that it’s visible and  

then it’s not visible so this has nothing to do  with curvature this is due to this atmospheric  

effect so back to these photos again probably it’s  the same thing if you think it’s not then tell  

me what you think leave a comment below cuz that’s  a logical explanation for me but I cannot say that  

this is curvature again for the same reason it’s  not possible that we have curvature one way but  

not the other way so all I’m saying is that even  if it looks like that you see curvature it doesn’t  

always mean that it’s actually the curvature  itself that’s all I’m saying now let’s talk about  

this photo because this was taken by  a flat earther and they sent it to mainstream media  

and here is what the local meteorologist guy said  about this photo this photo from Grand Mir State  

Park this is from Joshua nowiki and what you’re  seeing here is a mirage we typically would not  

be able to see this from the Lake Michigan shore  we talked about this last night conditions are  

right on the lake that we’re actually seeing  a mirage the atmosphere is acting like a lens  

which magnifies the city brings it up a little  closer and as it does so we start to lose a little  

bit of the bottom of the buildings and perhaps  due to uh the density in the atmosphere there’s an  

additional refraction that takes place that makes  it drop down even more is that what happened let’s  

look at it from another angle here from the side  view now bring our graphic back in of refraction  

let’s go ahead and Orient the graphic so it better  represents what we’re looking at here I’ll angle  

the light rays to show the density of the air  here causing the refraction and bring our lens in  

so we can magnify the city it brings the city up  brings the city up and as it does so we start to   lose a little bit of the bottom of the city and  perhaps either due to the magnification or due to  

additional refraction maybe it has dropped down a  little bit more and uh this is what we end up with  

huh just like we saw now this is a steel frame  from the half hour video that I did and uh the  

numbers you see there are all based on the numbers  that Tony was giving me based on his device uh  

his device said it was 37 nautical miles which  is 42.6 statute miles but when you plot the  

same exact location that we were at the exact  distance you get on Google Earth is uh 46 miles  

so you basically add about four miles to all the  numbers that you saw in the half hour video okay  

so what is a mirage it’s an optical illusion  caused by atmospheric conditions especially  

the appearance of a sheet of water in a desert  or on a hot Road caused by refraction of light  

from the sky by heated air so this is a mirage  or as you can see it on this photo the ship is  

the actual ship but you can see we have a false  Horizon because there’s a mirage there um how you  

can see that mirroring effect basically or here  is another example on the road as the truck is  

getting closer you can see that basically  you see the same mirroring effect so that’s a  

mirage but it gets closer and then it becomes  more and more visible as it actually looks like  

and now guess what happened this guy um I just  showed you this meteorologist he said later in  

TV that he received a lot of email from people and  they were really upset here is a short clip about  

that chief meteorologist Tom kums here and I want  to talk about Mirage thought it wasn’t that big  

of a deal when I shared this picture about a year  ago from Joshua new Wiki you could see the entire  

Chicago skyline all the way down to almost the  shore of Chicago from the shores of Lake Michigan  

something I said was impossible at least under  normal conditions this had to be a mirage or some  

sort of focusing by the atmosphere because there  was a big inversion that night thought was pretty  

straightforward I did a quick 30 second explainer on  there and moved on with my weathercast well email  

after email later this is just a few of those  emails Facebook posts comments I was shocked  

to find out that there are a number of people  that believe the Earth is still flat and that   to them this is actually proof that the Earth is  flat well I’m not saying it proves or disproves  

anything but that’s definitely interesting that  the city shouldn’t be visible but anyway let’s  

move on because we have still a lot of interesting  things uh to do and talk about first let’s talk  

about longdistance photographies and and first I  was going to give you multiple examples but then  

I realized that if we don’t have curvature at one  location it’s probably missing everywhere else so  

I will give you three examples of long distance  photos this is the first one and feel free to pause  

it if you want but basically we have two photos  from 11 miles and 18 miles away and also in the  

bottom it tells us that the arch bridge is 40 ft  tall now when we do the calculation even with the  

shorter 11 m distance we have 80 ft of curvature  that’s twice as much as the height of the arch  

bridge itself so even with the shorter distance it  shouldn’t be visible and from 18 miles we have 216  

ft of curvature but here is the photo and the arch  is perfectly visible now that’s weird right okay  

here is the next one which is actually a Guinness  World Record and you can see it’s a photo from 443

kilometers you can see some details of the camera  and some other stuff here um again pause it if  

you want so the photo was taken on July 16 2016  and here it is so it’s a world record photo from  

443 kilometers and they even show you the surrounding  mountains as well and here it is on the map you  

can see a crazy long distance and then also the  article gives us some other photos a picture with  

wide angle and a missing silhouette few minutes  before sunrise and then after sunrise and you  

can’t see anything so again this really depends on  atmospheric and weather conditions now the article  

also did the calculation for us um with the  altitude and the target distance in miles and feet  

and you can see that there should be 16,500 ft  of curvature here it is uh in the metric system so  

with 443 kilometers there’s the the altitude as well  and uh the Target hidden height is 5,000 m which  

is 5 km and again you can see all the mountains so  again where is the curve? but this is my absolute  

favorite and actually this should be the Guinness  World Record I’m not sure why it isn’t maybe the  

they just didn’t bother to send it to Guinness  World Records but this is from Mountain Snowdon  

they captured Mount blanc which is 700 miles or 1,127  km away this photo was taken on July 25th 2021 and  

here it is on the map it’s a really really long  distance now I didn’t um I don’t know the altitude  

for this photo so I’ve just done the calculation  in the distance so it’s not 100% accurate but  

still we should have 61.7 miles curvature which  is 99.4 KM and here it is the photo again here  

it is a little bit closer and that’s mount Blanc in  the background so again this is not possible there  

should be a lot of curvature there 60 M or 99  nearly 100 kilm now here is an interesting article  

from a science website which says that the Earth’s  surface curves out of sight at a distance of 3.1  

Miles or 5 kilometers well after these photos I’m not sure  about that anymore and it also tells us that our  

visual Acuity extends Far Beyond the Horizon if  the Earth were flat or if you were standing on  

top of a mountain surveying a larger than usual  patch of the planet you could perceive Bright  

Lights hundreds of miles distant on a dark night  you could even see a candle flame flickering up  

to 30 Mi or 48 km away well I don’t think so how  could you see a candle flame from 30 Mi away?  

you couldn’t even see it from a mile away cuz  it’s a small flame and we know that the further  

something is the less and less it’s visible so  again science that’s why we question science right?  

now let me show you a clip from a documentary  called Flatlanders it’s a four parts documentary  

I’m not sure if you can find it on YouTube  but if you go on bitchute or rumble or any   other video platform and you just type in  Flatlanders all the four parts should come  

up so here is a little clip about longdistance  photography again it’s embedded everywhere and  

and basically science just says there’s  refraction that’s their only answer oh  

there’s refraction that’s why you’re seeing it  halfway around the world yeah exciting location  

malibu California and we’re watching uh mountains  in the distant infrared this is a converted  

infrared camera I can see Mountain Baldi about 70 80 mil  away and I can see the arrowhead Mountain barely  

because it’s got snow on top that’s at about 115  miles but Mount sanra Cento right now I cannot  

tell if I’m picking it up or not later when I go  home and I process um the information in photoshop  

sometimes I just contrast any you know I spot it  but we can at least see something in the distance  

and usually the cloud cover see there’s a slight  cloud cover that blocks the um the uh um infrared  

light from the Sun so the mountain could be in  an infrared shadow but the other ones show up  

so that’s great so lots of lots of cool stuff um  it’s exciting to be able to see that far right 123  

miles away mountains that shouldn’t be visible  you know now that I’ve lived this reality for  

a while you know it’s it’s not as exciting but  when you first hear about it it’s like shocking  

you know uh so I went through my you know paradigm  shift about five years ago and everything kind of  

just boom like a domino effect and I realized  oh my God we’re like under a dome all right now  

let’s talk about long distance videography and  the following footage I’m about to show you is  

also a Guinness World Record and you will see it  in a moment the guy recorded himself from 12.4  

miles or 20 km away here is the calculation again  that should be 102 ft or 31.3 9 M of curvature  

meaning the guy shouldn’t be visible at all but  you will see that even his shoes are visible in  

the recording check this out the video and audio  that you’re watching right now is being filmed   from 12.4 miles away or about 20,000 M which  makes this the longest furthest recorded video

ever this is the 2T long lens which is going to  make this possible it’s one of the longest and  

most efficient lenses which can allow you to shoot  extremely long distances I have no idea why anyone  

would actually want to have this in real life  it is a 400 52 time zoom which is well uh Stupid  

we’re going to be able to see from one end of this  extremely long desert road which stretches across   this giant valley for about 12 miles I’m going to  be standing all the way on the other end of that  

and then we’re going to have this camera fastened  safe and sound right here at this little clear   out here far away from the road but still aimed  at the exact other end of it and as you can see  

from the final result this is how it looks like  to be filmed from 12 Mi away so I’m petitioning  

gness world records I’m looking right at you gness  wherever you are to basically allow me to gain  

this world record and I’m going to explain to you  how exactly I did that this thing right here is an  

apparatus which is going to prevent too much  sunlight from reaching into the lens because   of course when you have a 400 plus X zoom and  you’re filming something from nearly 13 Mi away  

it’s going to be kind of catastrophic to the end  result if too much sunlight is entering in there   it’s going to overexpose extremely high this  is the only Valley in the entire country which  

just simply has the largest amount of open space  that allows me to even attempt to do this I really  

have no idea how it’s going to turn out so if  you’re seeing the video edited in into this that   means it turned out good enough for me to make it  into a YouTube video I can only dearly hope that  

I’m actually standing in the right place to have  myself filmed in because from across this 12 mile  

wide Valley where I have this whole camera set up  and where I’m standing at the highway at the edge  

of the valley um the margin of error that I have  in order to stand in the right place is equivalent  

to about 0.001 Arc seconds to put it simply it’s  very very narrow the chances of me standing in  

the exact correct spot for you to see me is about  the same chance of you getting a hole-in-one in wi   Sports golf and the chances of me looking directly  at you right now is about the same chance as you  

getting a hole inone in we Sports golf about 10  times in a row and also as a further note that I  

forgot to add into this while I was recording  this was actually a 10 times further of a zoom  

than what the lens can offer on a Zone by using  an updated version of the normal Canon dslr’s  

camera software which allowed me to zoom in  up to 10 times the distance as well that was  

already there which made it technically over a  4000x zoom now since we’re here and I already  

traveled for about 45 minutes to get to the point  away from where the camera is currently filming me  

I guess I might as well put into respect of the  amount of distance that there is between me and   you right now I am about 20,000 meters away  so as I said before that’s very far distance  

and it means even the speed of light is going to  take 0.0000001 seconds to reach your eyes through  

this camera so technically I’m 0.00001 seconds  delayed so anyways that’s all I’m going to say  

for this video if you found this to be educational  then well I could just say subscribe I guess so  

guys honestly I have more and more doubts about  the existence of the curvature and this is the  

reason why I want to talk about water because  I never thought this actually this way but we  

know that water always Finds Its level and as  you can see it in this article it tells us the  

absurdity of the globe is believing that water’s  surface takes the shape of what is underneath  

even if oceans were forced to stick to the ball  Earth because of gravity the water would still  

remain level and not curved so again it’s just  some common sense and I never thought about it  

this way but how can tons and tons of water stick  to the ball even upside down it just doesn’t make  

sense to me anymore after especially after what  we’ve seen now let me show you two short clips   with some more common sense about water it doesn’t  matter how you spin water the centrifugal force  

will push it away I mean it’s basic science how do  you think of the washing machine removes the water  

from your clothes you’re supposed to be on a bowl  spinning 1,000 mph orbiting the Sun at 66,000 M  

hour while shooting through the Galaxy at 500,000  M hour that’s also moving at 1 point to million  

mph yet none of those speeds match anything we  experience in reality in fact it’s completely  

insane to suggest such a notion bodies of water  always find an equilibrium when they’re at rest  

the surface is completely flat it’s time to  realize the math ain’t mathing and the science  

ain’t sciencing you can’t even make it make sense  you’re not a random mutated monkey man living on  

an accidental rocket ball so follow and bind your  mind to find out where you really live take the  

water bordering our Horizon for instance it is  the natural physics of water to find and maintain  

a level and it just so happens that that level is  flat if Earth was a spherical ball water would not  

maintain such consistent flat levels we are used  to water doing this and this but we have never in  

all our lives on Earth witness with our own eyes  water do this water does not Bend it’s not called  

sea level for nothing you know and if water did  not always find a flat level then why would we  

use tools such as this to achieve accuracy again  water does not Bend Rivers for instance always  

run down to sea level if Earth was a rotating ball  then inevitably many rivers on Earth would at some  

point in their Journey have to flow uphill as Eric Dubay points out the Mississippi is 3,000 M long  

which means it would need to run uphill for 11  miles on a globular Earth he also points out that  

a portion of the Nile runs for 1,000 miles with  a fall of only one foot again if the Earth was a  

spherical ball this would be impossible so after  all this how can we believe that this is what’s  

happening on the bottom of the globe let’s say  in Australia for example okay so now let’s talk  

about those ships and why and how they disappear  whether it’s curvature or not and first let me  

show you a short clip from a guy called Bill Nye  he’s an American TV presenter also known as the  

science guy he’s quite famous in America and here  is a short clip of how he explained this phenomena  

of the earth Horizon model watch the ships sail  away they don’t disappear all at once now first  

the bottom will disappear see the bottom of the  ship is gone now we can see Midway up and then  

the whole thing disappears now ships came back  they didn’t fall off a table so people realized  

that the world is curved I mean it’s a big curve  but it’s curved okay so it makes sense right this  

is what we all learned quite early in school I  personally saw it when I was on the beach and I  

saw that after a while I couldn’t see the ships  um and this is exactly what Neil degrass Tyson  

said and I showed you that in part one here is a  short reminder here’s the thing we thought Earth  

was flat before we had seagoing vessels that went  beyond the Horizon recognizing that there has to  

be a curve there cuz the ship doesn’t always stay  in view so Columbus where he set sail the ship  

eventually disappeared and you can chase after him  and you can keep disappearing and keep doing this  

this would count as evidence that Earth’s surface  was curved so basically he says the same thing but  

in my opinion it’s a little bit controversial  cuz in the previous part when we were talking   about the space jump of Felix Baumgartner  he said that from that height you cannot see the  

curvature here is a short reminder you don’t see  you don’t see the curvature of the earth if you  

are 2 mm Above This beach ball you just don’t  that stuff is flat so again how is it possible  

that from such a distance if you go up so high  you cannot see the curvature but just by standing  

at the beach you can see how the ships disappear  due to the curvature that’s a bit controversial   for me so let’s go into the details and see why is  it possible or what’s the solution or what’s the answer  

first of all I was asking Google AI how far we can  see at sea level and it tells me that you can see  

about 2.9 mil or 4.5 km due to the curvature of  the Earth this is the distance to the Horizon Okay  

now what’s the definition of the Horizon it means  the line at which the Earth’s surface and the sky  

appear to meet so it looks like the sky meets the  ocean but we know that it doesn’t happen okay here  

is another definition which is also important the  vanishing point one: the point at which receding  

parallel lines viewed in perspective appear to  converge two: the point at which something that  

has been growing smaller or increasingly faint  disappears altogether now please remember all  

these definitions and here is a couple of footages  where you stand at the beach and people with a  

high zoom camera or telescope they zoom in and  guess what happens you can bring back the ship  

into view it didn’t disappear due to curvature it  disappears due to perspective here is another  

example when they zoom in like crazy and there  you go there’s the ship again so let me show you  

a couple of more examples with high Zoom cameras  and again you can decide for yourself but it looks  

like this is just perspective things disappear  beyond the vanishing point and this is how our  

eyes can see so here is a couple of more examples  and we continue with more details in a moment

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]  

so again this is how our eyes work we can only  see a certain distance before we see the horizon  

line which means that the sky meets the ocean but  we know that’s not the case so things disappear  

beyond the vanishing point here is this example  with the city in the distance you can perfectly  

see the city and the straight horizon line and  if we zoom out you can see that it’s not because  

of curvature it’s because of our limited eye  vision or here is one last example and it’s  

the same thing so this is how perspective works  that’s all I’m saying so it’s quite interesting  

and again what did both science guys says Neil Degrass Tyson and Bill Nye they say oh we can  

see how it disappears due to curvature and that’s  evidence that earth’s surface is curved well after  

all these footages I’m really not sure anymore  so after what you’ve just seen well we can say that  

this is not due to curvature um this is because  of the vanishing point and perspective and that  

also answers the question what globers ask all  the time from the flat side that if the Earth is  

flat then why can I not see Asia from America?  well this is the exact same reason and let me  

show you one more clip from the channel called  flat out truth I follow the channel it’s really  

awesome go and check it out he explains this one  more time. boats vanish Beyond the Horizon due to  

perspective and not the curvature of a round earth  as demonstrated here with the White Cap being the  

boat and the countertop being the Flat Earth and  the camera will be at ground level as you can see  

the White Cap in the bottom right corner now watch  as we move it away it disappears slowly then it’s  

totally gone out of your view does it mean it  went over a round counter does it just means it  

went out of your line of sight due to perspective  but as you can see here if you zoom in with the  

camera you’re going to find that it pops right  back into view proving that it did not disappear  

due to curvature but due to perspective and then  we can see the same thing on this footage this  

was recorded in a football field and as the  guy walks away just like the ships the bottom  

disappears first like you can see his legs are not  visible anymore even his trouser nearly half of  

his T-shirt and as he he’s coming back everything  comes back into view again so just for one last  

time this is due to perspective and nothing else I  hope it makes sense now okay and if this is still  

not enough I still have more for you and what I’m  about to show you is something I wanted to give  

you as a bonus today but I have a different bonus  so I just put it into this part so basically I was  

asking Chat GPT if the Earth is flat just to play  a game so I I said to the AI that you know don’t  

take this seriously let’s just be a bit playful  and if the Earth is flat then is it possible that  

the bottom of the ships disappear first and if so  what’s the reason for that here is what it said I  

understand that you are trying to understand  the phenomena of sight and The Disappearance   of distant objects through a theoretical exercise  assuming the Earth is flat and level here is what  

could cause The Disappearance of ships and  optical illusions One: Vision limitations and  

Optical effects the human eyes actual range of  vision is limited even in clear conditions the  

human eye can detect objects only up to 510  kilm away this is due partly to atmospheric  

disturbances like scattering or reflection of  light as well as the natural limits of the field  

of view optical illusions on a flat Earth optical  illusions and Atmospheric effects could still  

affect the perceived image for example due to  light reflection distant objects might appear  

distorted making them seem as if they are  disappearing atmospheric refraction which  

is changes in light wavelength and speed  through different layers of the atmosphere  

can cause optical illusions if the Earth were  flat atmospheric refraction could partially or  

completely obscure distant shapes though other  factors might also distort the view bottom of  

the ship disappearing first light reflection if  the Earth were flat look at this the bottom of  

the ship would still disappear first due to the  effects of vision and light reflection the light  

reaching the distant Horizon runs lower than the  upper parts of the ship due to atmospheric effects  

and angular differences lower parts might blend  into or become invisible due to the limits of size  

why higher Parts remain visible longer summary in  theory if the Earth were flat The Disappearance of  

ships would mainly be caused by optical illusions  and atmospheric conditions the bottom of the ship  

disappears first because lower parts reach the  visual limit or become distorted by atmospheric  

conditions before the higher parts do high Zoom  cameras can detail the viewed image but they  

cannot completely alter the fundamental Optical  and Atmospheric limits of object disappearance  

there you go that’s your answer if the Earth  is flat this is still possible so if someone  

ask you next time why is the bottom of the ship  disappear first show them this video now back to  

this article again it tells us that the Earth’s  surface curves out of side at a distance of  

3.1 M or 5 km if the Earth surface really curves  out at this distance which we already shown it’s  

not possible then the other problem is that  lighthouses would be completely useless the  

whole point of Lighthouses is that they are  visible from a much longer distance and I   was asking the AI about this um you know what  are the longest or or how far people could see  

um lighthouses and this is what it said anecdotal  reports of lighthouses being visible from extreme  

distances can vary greatly and may not always  be scientifically verified however there have  

been accounts of lighthouses being visible from  distances exceeding 30 or even 40 nautical miles  

now one nautical mile is 1.15 normal miles which is  55 to 74 km under exceptional conditions such as  

extremely clear weather favorable atmospheric  conditions and high elevations for the Observer  

these instances are rare and not representative  of typical visibility ranges but the point is that  

it did happen before that they were visible from  such a distance so again this article is not very  

scientific in my humble opinion now another  thing before we continue which we said that  

we see a certain distance and we see the same  distance in all directions due to perspective  

so even if you’re in the middle of ocean and it  looks like you see some kind of curvature that’s  

perspective and not curvature just to make  sure we’re all on the same page and finally  

if this was curvature then this is actually makes  a lot of sense to me why don’t we see pictures of  

airplanes like this one with a high zoom camera  we never see such photos so that’s not curvature  

again so here is my summary of this whole  part and then we continue with something else

all right now after all this I want to talk about  engineers and Engineering in general because we  

do have extremely long bridges in the world and  after what we have just seen so far I’m really  

not sure anymore if Engineers need to account  for and calculate for any curvature of course  

there are examples like this photo when you see  some curve but that’s the construction of the  

bridge itself and not the water surface or  the Earth’s surface here is another one with a  

really long bridge so again my question is the  same do they account for curvature or not? here  

is this Causeway again which is 23.8 MI long and  there’s apparently 380 ft of missing curvature  

and we can go on and on and on and basically we  can see the same thing so again when Engineers  

do their planning and their calculations I don’t  think they account for any curvature or let’s talk  

about railroads and you know the the same thing  there are thousands and thousands of miles of  

railroads without curvature and by the way this is  a another good example for the vanishing point or  

let’s not forget about Canals because they are  also extremely long and do they curve well I don’t  

think so the Suez Canal for example a really good  example which is connecting the Mediterranean with  

the red sea and it’s 102 Mi long without any locks  making the water an uninterrupted continuation of  

the two Seas when constructed the Earth’s supposed  curvature was not taken into account it was dug  

along a horizontal datum line 20 ft below sea  level passing through several lakes from one  

sea to the other with the datum line around the  water surface running perfectly parallel over  

the 102 miles if the Earth were a globe with the  circumference of 24,901 Mi there would be 6,936  

ft or 1.31 Mi of curvature but it is completely  level with no locks needed now let me show you  

what the engineer called W Winkler published  in the earth Review magazine and he said the  

following: as an engineer of many years standing  I saw that this absurd allowance is only  

permitted in school books no engineer would dream  of allowing anything of the kind I have projected  

many miles of Railways and many more of canals  and the allowance has not even been thought of  

much less allowed for this allowance for curvature  means this that it is 8 inches for the first mile of a  

canal and increasing at the ratio by the square  of the distance in miles thus a small navigable  

Canal for boats say 30 miles long will have by the  above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 ft  

think of that and then please credit Engineers as  not being quite such fools nothing of the sort is  

allowed we no more think of allowing 600 ft for a  line of 30 miles of Railway or Canal than of wasting  

our time trying to square the circle well it  tells a lot in my opinion so again people say that  

Flat Earth is so stupid and at this point I’m  wondering that we think this is normal and this  

is some really crazy stupid conspiracy theory  but if we have no observable curvature that  

means the Earth is not a globe and I know this  is not the scale but I’m really wondering if we  

actually live on something like this and I want to  show you a quote again because it really matches  

everything we talked about the truth is the truth  even if No One Believes it and the LIE is a lie  

even if everyone believes it all right so  we still didn’t finish I still have more for you  

but at this point I’d like to say something so  when I was at this point in my entire research  

and investigation journey I thought that what  I found so far is really strange and what I can  

tell from the previous experience from the first  six part of this series that so far Flat Earth  

is not that stupid as they say it is if you think  back in part one we already saw that the number of  

people believe in flat earth is growing like crazy  and also it is heavily censored on multiple media  

platforms including YouTube and Google and many  others and then in part two we questioned science  

and as I said you decide for yourself but all  those spinning kind of crazy movements that  

doesn’t make sense to me and then we find that  we don’t find any real photos of the earth and  

then we saw that Google Earth proves nothing and in the  previous and this part we tried to find the Curve  

and I couldn’t maybe I miss something maybe I’m  wrong somewhere I’m not sure but at this point I  

decided that I want to continue and I can tell  you something there are still so many areas to  

talk about when it comes to Flat Earth that we  are really just getting started with this series  

so we’re going to continue this investigation and  whether I’m right or wrong that doesn’t matter at  

this point I just want to continue I’m curious if  it makes more sense or not and obviously I have a  

lot of questions still about a lot of things  so we will continue and I will just keep my  

open mind and be openminded to the idea that what  if the Earth is not a globe so this is how the  

series will continue but first we have one more  thing to do so this is your bonus time and today  

I have a really special one for you because it’s  about my beautiful country Hungary and in Hungary  

we have a lake called the lake balaton and these  are my photos I’ve taken these uh last summer  

in 2024 we’ve been there and I’m going to  go there this year as well I’ve been there   a million times it’s an amazing place but the  reason why it’s important because Lake Balaton  

is the biggest lake in Central Europe it’s 48  Miles long which is 77 km and the curvature of the  

earth between the two ends of Lake Balon results  in a height difference of approximately 465.3 meters

this means that if you stand at one end of the lake, the other end is about this much lower due to the Earth’s curvature

now the problem is that if you look at some aerial footages and here are a couple of examples

again, you can not see that so called curvature and we talk about a massive long lake

48 miles and 77 km so why is this important well you  will see that in a moment but basically today’s  

bonus is slightly different than the previous  ones because today I want to give you a video  

recommendation and a 1 hour documentary  that I find super interesting and I think  

you should definitely watch it and obviously  decide for yourself so it’s about the greatest  

laser experiment in history and guess what it  happened in Hungary as well as in the Netherlands  

but mainly in Hungary and there was a Hungarian  guy involved in the story as well so today in  

this bonus I really just want to give you a short  trailer of this video and I will put the link to  

the full documentary to the description below here  is the trailer the curvature Earth is said to be a  

sphere with a circumference of 25,000 Mi or 40,000  km therefore it has to have a curvature of about  

8 inches per Mile squared can we observe or verify this  this? we are taught about the ancient observations  

like a Sailing Boat going over the horizon and the  measurements of Eratosthenes they are all falsified by  

our current observations and better understanding  of the optical effects of the atmosphere but how  

can we really measure the curvature of the Earth  in the 21st century Fe core has established the  

terrestrial laser targeting method or TLT method  for short to measure the geopotential surface of  

the Earth geopotential means the shape that the  ocean surface takes under the influence of gravity  

with the TLT method you can accurately verify or  falsify the curved surface defined by the wgs84  

geoid model on large bodies of water sandor is  an inventor from Hungary who joined fe core from the  

beginning sandor had also been considering how to  verify that bodies of water conform with the wgs84  

geid model in 2016 he decided to test this by  using a laser beam over the surface of water Zach  

and I decided to recreate an experiment similar  to Steven Hawkins experiment to prove that the  

surface of the water actually curves according to  the curvature of the earth Hawkins target was 3 miles away  

and it seemed to match a curvature of the wgs84 geoid  model but his results look strange to me because I  

could see the shore on the other side of Lake balaton  which is a lot further away than his distance of   three miles so we decided to do a laser experiment  with a few other friends we chose to perform the  

first test over Lake Balaton Hungary about an hour  drive Southwest of budapest it’s approximately 48  

mil or 77 km long by an average of 4 to 6 Miles or 7  to 10 km wide so it provides a long distance for  

a line of sight laser observation Balaton also has  many locations to carry out such an experiment  

okay check this out brothers and sisters  28 kilometers in your face wow wow awesome that is  

awesome uh my camera is 85 CM above uh sea  level look at that that’s amazing you can  

see it reflecting off the lake water yeah that’s  astounding that’s the nail in the coffin yes it is  

oh this is so great bu it’s really awesome  Fe core performed seven documented TLT  

measurements in 2018 two were at Lake Balaton in  Hungary and five were performed at Lake Ijsel in  

the Netherlands based on the collected data Fe  core now has evidence that falsifies the wgs84  

mathematical construct this has huge implications  to our current understanding of Earth’s geometric  

shape so as I I said spoiler alert there were  seven different measurements and there was no  

curvature but as I said go and check it out for  yourself the link is in the description and now  

we need to continue and my next question is that  if there is no curvature then what does the Earth  

look like from space I think that’s an obvious  next step in this whole investigation Journey  

now the flat side pointed out and this is where  they pretty much agree that space as we  

know it is not real they say it’s fake and  this is the first part or first point in my  

whole journey when I thought that okay this is a  little bit beyond my limits I mean we know we are  

in space so how can you claim that it’s fake so  this is really interesting but as I also said I  

will be open-minded I will listen and I will  decide for myself so what we need to do next  

is to investigate not only NASA but other space  agencies as well in general so we’re going to  

go and look for space and we will need to find  out whether or not Nasa and all the others are  

real space agencies or not so follow me to part  seven and let’s find it out together stay blessed

The Mechanical Realm Flat Earth Documentary A Working FE Model Antikythera Mechanism

The Mechanical Realm Flat Earth Documentary A Working FE Model Antikythera Mechanism

Antikythera Mechanism, the First Computer.

The Antikythera Mechanism, an ancient analog computer, is presented as proof of a geocentric, flat Earth. The text argues mainstream science suppresses this truth, advocating for open-mindedness and trusting direct observation over complex heliocentric theories.

“The Mechanical Realm” by Vikka Draziv presents a comprehensive exploration of the Antikythera Mechanism, an ancient Greek analog computer discovered in 1901, and uses it as evidence to support flat Earth and geocentric cosmological theories. The document argues that this 2,000-year-old mechanical device demonstrates that ancient civilizations possessed sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on a stationary, flat Earth model rather than the modern heliocentric understanding of the solar system.
 
The work is structured in three main sections: an introduction that challenges modern scientific consensus and discusses the social stigma surrounding flat Earth theories, a detailed examination of the Antikythera Mechanism and its historical significance, and a concluding argument that positions the device as proof of geocentric cosmology. Throughout, the author contends that mainstream science has deliberately suppressed alternative cosmological models and that the precision of ancient astronomical calculations supports a flat, stationary Earth model.

Introduction and Philosophical Framework

The document begins by establishing a contrast between modern technological advancement and ancient wisdom, suggesting that while we live in an era of remarkable scientific progress, we may have lost touch with fundamental truths about our world’s nature. The author positions 2023 as a pivotal moment where technological capabilities seem almost science-fictional, yet argues that this progress may be leading humanity away from essential truths about Earth’s structure and our place in the cosmos.
Central to the author’s argument is the assertion that questioning the shape of the Earth has become socially taboo, creating divisions within families, workplaces, and educational institutions. The text emphasizes that until approximately 500 years ago, geocentric and flat Earth models were widely accepted across various cultures and religious traditions. Ancient texts including the Torah, Bible, Vedas, and other religious manuscripts are cited as supporting evidence for a flat, immovable Earth surrounded by celestial bodies in motion.
The author particularly highlights a Vedic map from the 1900s that allegedly illustrates a flat Earth surrounded by other Earths hidden behind ice walls, suggesting that alternative cosmological models have persisted even into relatively recent times. This historical perspective forms the foundation for the argument that modern heliocentric theory represents a departure from long-established understanding rather than scientific progress.

The Problem of Scientific Orthodoxy

A significant portion of the introduction addresses what the author perceives as unfair treatment of flat Earth proponents by the mainstream scientific community. The text argues that questioning heliocentric theory—the model placing the sun at the center of the solar system—provokes responses ranging from ridicule to moral outrage, comparing the social reaction to that faced by Holocaust deniers. This comparison is used to illustrate the intensity of social pressure against questioning established cosmological models.
The author contends that while scientists freely investigate and debate numerous other theories, including the existence of a Creator, flat Earth theories are uniquely subjected to ridicule and dismissal. This selective skepticism is presented as evidence of a potential conspiracy or cover-up within the scientific establishment. The text suggests that mainstream scientists may be “protesting too much” and potentially hiding important information from the public.
The document extensively discusses the role of media and popular culture in reinforcing spherical Earth concepts. From the invention of cinema and television to modern advertising, logos, and science fiction, the author argues that globe imagery has been systematically embedded in public consciousness. This constant exposure is characterized as a form of psychological conditioning or “brainwashing” that makes it difficult for individuals to consider alternative models.
Drawing on psychological principles, the text explains how repeated exposure to ideas creates deeply ingrained beliefs that become resistant to change. This process is compared to techniques used by advertising agencies, governments, schools, and religious organizations to influence public opinion. The author suggests that the heliocentric model may have been deliberately promoted to diminish humanity’s sense of special significance, reducing human beings from divinely created beings at the center of creation to insignificant products of random evolutionary processes on a small planet in an vast, meaningless universe.

The Flat Earth Community and Scientific Method

Contrary to mainstream portrayals, the author presents flat Earth proponents as thoughtful, well-researched individuals who have extensively studied astronomical and cosmological topics. These individuals are described as having been raised with conventional globe Earth beliefs but possessing the critical thinking skills necessary to evaluate new information objectively. The text emphasizes that serious flat Earth advocates typically invest considerable time and effort in research before adopting their positions.
The author argues that flat Earth researchers demonstrate genuine scientific reasoning and methodology, conducting experiments and investigations based on logic and empirical observation rather than pseudoscience. This characterization directly challenges the common perception of flat Earth believers as scientifically illiterate or gullible. Instead, they are presented as individuals who have courageously questioned established orthodoxy despite significant social pressure.
The difficulty of changing deeply held belief systems is acknowledged, particularly when new ideas challenge fundamental assumptions about reality. The author suggests that societal conditioning has made geocentric models appear “idiotic,” but argues this perception results from deliberate manipulation rather than scientific evidence. The solution proposed is simple: approach alternative ideas with an open mind, listen to the arguments, and make individual judgments rather than accepting predetermined conclusions.

The Antikythera Mechanism: Historical Discovery

The second major section of the document focuses on the Antikythera Mechanism, discovered by Greek sponge divers near the island of Antikythera in the early 1900s. The discovery story is presented dramatically, with divers initially mistaking ancient bronze and marble statues for corpses on the seafloor. This shipwreck yielded one of the largest collections of ancient treasures ever found, with artifacts now displayed in the National Archaeological Museum of Athens.
 
The mechanism itself was initially overlooked, appearing as an unremarkable corroded rock among other artifacts. It wasn’t until the 1950s that researchers noticed inscriptions on the device, leading to the realization that this was some form of clockwork mechanism that seemingly shouldn’t have existed in the ancient world. This delayed recognition is presented as evidence of how revolutionary discoveries can be initially dismissed or ignored when they don’t fit established historical narratives.
The Antikythera Mechanism is described as an ancient analog computer capable of accurately calculating the motions of celestial bodies using only metal and wood components, without electricity. The device, approximately the size of a shoebox, contains dozens of interlocking gears with synchronized pointers on its exterior surfaces. The sophistication of this 2,000-year-old technology is emphasized as evidence of advanced ancient engineering capabilities that exceed modern expectations of Greek and Roman technological development.

Technical Analysis and Functionality

The document provides detailed technical analysis of the mechanism’s operation, explaining how gears with different numbers of teeth work together to recreate the relative motions of celestial objects. A hand crank operates the main gear representing the solar year, with power transmitted through connected gears to simulate the movements of the sun, moon, planets, and constellations. This mechanical complexity required extraordinary precision and craftsmanship.
 
The text draws comparisons between ancient analog computers and modern digital systems, noting that while contemporary computers process information using binary code, analog computers use mechanical principles for calculations. Examples of familiar analog computers include clocks and wind-up toys. The historical timeline is emphasized: while most historians dated the first analog computers to the 14th century, the Antikythera Mechanism predates these by over a millennium.
 
Dr. Derek J. de Solla Price of Yale University is credited as a pioneer in bringing the mechanism’s significance to public attention. For the first 50 years after its discovery, scholars struggled to understand the device’s purpose and capabilities. Price’s careful examination in the late 1950s provided the first comprehensive understanding of its true function. His comparison of the discovery to finding recognizable combustion engine parts in King Tutankhamun’s tomb illustrates the anachronistic nature of such advanced technology in the ancient world.
 
Price’s analysis revealed that the front dial was divided into 12 sections corresponding to zodiac constellations, with Greek words for Libra and Virgo clearly visible. This led to the understanding that the device represented the 12 zodiacal constellations that mark the ecliptic—the annual path of the sun and the primary zone of lunar and planetary activity. The mechanism thus served as a comprehensive astronomical calculator and educational device.

Mechanical Engineering and Precision

The document emphasizes the extraordinary precision required for the mechanism’s construction, noting that gear meshing is technically challenging even with modern tools. The historical context is significant: complex gear trains weren’t found in European clocks until the 1400s, making the ancient Greek device’s sophistication remarkable. Modern applications of similar gearing systems include grandfather clocks, analog watches, locks, and telescope focusing mechanisms.
X-ray analysis revealed the internal structure, showing six smaller gears attached to the main drive gear in a configuration known as a gear train. The specific example given involves a 64-tooth gear driving a 38-tooth gear through a series of intermediate gears, achieving a precise ratio of 254 to 19. This ratio corresponds to the Metonic cycle, named after Greek astronomer Meton, which describes the relationship between solar and lunar calendars over a 19-year period.
The Metonic cycle represents 254 tropical months and 19 solar years, the time required for lunar and solar cycles to realign. The mechanical implementation of this calculation demonstrates sophisticated mathematical understanding translated into physical engineering. The device could represent the sky at any given time and predict the positions of celestial bodies through simple mechanical operation.
The mechanism contained approximately 30 gear wheels, all visible in X-ray images. With a single control, operators could reproduce the movements of all visible celestial bodies, making it a miniature mechanical representation of the cosmos. This functionality required precise knowledge of astronomical cycles and the engineering capability to translate that knowledge into a working mechanical system.

Astronomical Knowledge and Calendrical Systems

The document details how ancient Greek astronomers had established precise understanding of celestial cycles, including the complex relationship between lunar and solar calendars. The 19-year Metonic cycle provided a framework for reconciling these different timekeeping systems, with 235 lunar months corresponding to 19 solar years. This knowledge was later refined and incorporated into the mechanism’s design.
The device featured multiple display systems: seven pointers tracking planets from Mercury to Saturn as viewed from Earth, positioned according to zodiacal coordinates. A central lunar display changed color from black to white as the mechanism operated, simulating lunar phases. Instruction manuals were inscribed on doors and panels, indicating the device was designed for educational use.
The back of the mechanism contained two large dials: a lunar calendar and a solar/lunar eclipse prediction system. These components worked together with the front display to determine when eclipses would occur. The precision required for eclipse prediction demonstrates the sophisticated astronomical knowledge embedded in the device’s design.
The mechanism’s construction required gears fitted with extraordinary precision—tolerances measured in tenths of millimeters rather than full millimeters. Some gears were only six millimeters in diameter, with matching requirements of less than half a millimeter for proper operation. Dial and axle wobble had to be controlled to within 0.5 millimeters, achievable only through careful craftsmanship and possibly the use of primitive lathes.

Evidence for Geocentric Cosmology

The author’s central argument positions the Antikythera Mechanism as evidence for geocentric, flat Earth cosmology. The device features a stationary center representing Earth, with all other celestial bodies moving around this fixed point. The author argues that if Earth were actually moving through space, as proposed in heliocentric models, this motion would have been incorporated into the mechanism’s design alongside the movements of other known planets.
The text emphasizes that ancient Greek astronomers knew of five planets beyond Earth but designed their mechanism with Earth as the stationary reference point. This design choice is presented as evidence that the builders had no concept of heliocentric solar systems or Big Bang cosmology. The author argues that if Earth were actually in motion, the consistent appearance of the night sky over thousands of years would be impossible, and the mechanism wouldn’t function accurately at any location on a moving planet.
The precision of ancient astronomical calculations is highlighted as evidence supporting the geocentric model. The author notes that 2,000 years ago, astronomers achieved predictive accuracy that “holds up better than today’s standards” and knew their calculations would remain valid indefinitely. This consistency is presented as proof that the underlying cosmological model must be correct.
Inscriptions on the mechanism’s back cover describe external features and displays that incorporated pointers and spheres representing all five known planets in their motions around Earth. Each planetary sphere moved through its designated circle, suggesting that the front display represented the complete Aristotelian conception of the universe with Earth at the center.

Cosmological Implications and Modern Applications

The document argues that the mechanism served dual functions: as an analog computer for quantitative astronomical calculations and as an educational device demonstrating the hierarchical structure and movements of celestial bodies. This combination made it a comprehensive representation of ancient cosmological understanding, earning it designation as a “cosmos” in its own right.
The author connects the Antikythera Mechanism to later astronomical instruments, including medieval astronomical clocks in Prague and Cremona, Italy. These later devices similarly show celestial bodies moving around a stationary, flat Earth represented as a circle at the center. The continuity of this design approach across centuries is presented as evidence for the persistence of geocentric understanding.
Modern planetarium projectors and telescopes are described as descendants of the ancient mechanism, though the author argues that contemporary instruments have been corrupted by heliocentric assumptions. The original geocentric approach is presented as more accurate and truthful than modern astronomical models.
The text emphasizes that the mechanism represents “simple arithmetic and simple geometry, but put together in an absolutely beautiful way.” This mathematical elegance is contrasted with what the author characterizes as the unnecessarily complex theories required to support heliocentric models, including gravity, relativity, and various cosmological concepts that require additional theories for support.

Critique of Modern Cosmology

The final section presents a comprehensive critique of contemporary astronomical and cosmological theories. The author argues that heliocentric models require numerous supporting theories—gravity, relativity, wormholes, black holes, string theory—that don’t work effectively in real-world applications. This theoretical complexity is contrasted with the elegant simplicity of geocentric models demonstrated by the Antikythera Mechanism.
The document characterizes modern cosmology as presenting existence as “accidental, random, chaotic, and often meaningless,” disconnecting humanity from recognition of divine creation. The author argues that this “fake world reality” has been systematically promoted to prevent people from understanding the true nature of their environment as a specially created realm.
The text advocates for trusting direct sensory experience over theoretical constructs, noting that the sun and moon appear to be the same size and that all celestial bodies appear to revolve around Earth. The geocentric system is presented as adequately explaining all observable phenomena without requiring the complex theoretical framework of modern astronomy.
The author argues that the consistent, repeatable cycles demonstrated by the Antikythera Mechanism would be impossible in a heliocentric model where Earth moves through space at incredible speeds in multiple directions simultaneously. The mechanical precision of ancient astronomical predictions is presented as proof that the underlying geocentric model accurately represents reality.

Historical and Cultural Context

Throughout the document, the author emphasizes that geocentric, stationary Earth models were “common knowledge” and “widely accepted by philosophers, astronomers, and other scholars” throughout most of human history. The relatively recent adoption of heliocentric models is presented as an aberration rather than scientific progress.
Ancient civilizations worldwide are noted for constructing massive architectural projects aligned with celestial bodies, demonstrating sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on geocentric principles. The author argues that these cultures had no concept of heliocentric models because such models simply didn’t exist in their understanding of reality.
The text suggests that the transition to heliocentric thinking represents the influence of “maniacs” who promoted “psychobabble” about nuclear furnaces in space being chased by planets across vast distances over billions of years. Gravity is dismissed as an inadequately explained force with multiple contradictory versions, none of which make logical sense.
The document concludes by wondering what ancient astronomers and engineers would think of modern cosmological theories, implying that they would find contemporary models absurd compared to their elegant, functional understanding of a geocentric cosmos.

Conclusion

“The Mechanical Realm” presents the Antikythera Mechanism as compelling evidence for reconsidering fundamental assumptions about Earth’s nature and humanity’s place in the cosmos. The author argues that this ancient device demonstrates sophisticated astronomical knowledge based on geocentric principles that produced accurate, long-lasting predictions impossible under heliocentric models.
 
The document challenges readers to question established scientific orthodoxy and consider alternative cosmological models based on direct observation and ancient wisdom rather than complex theoretical frameworks. The precision and functionality of the 2,000-year-old mechanism is presented as proof that geocentric, flat Earth models represent accurate understanding of reality rather than primitive misconceptions.
 
While the arguments presented reflect a minority viewpoint within contemporary scientific discourse, the document provides detailed technical analysis of the Antikythera Mechanism’s construction and operation, highlighting the remarkable engineering achievements of ancient Greek civilization and raising questions about the development of astronomical knowledge throughout human history.
Transcript

The Mechanical Realm

Introduction

We find ourselves in the most amazing of times, 2023. Even the numerical date still sounds like one from science fiction. We have technologies that enable us to communicate across the world instantaneously, medicines that boggle the mind, and scientists even proclaiming coming advancements where machine and human unite to benefit humanity. Whether we think these things are for good or not is unimportant. It seems the future is beyond our control to a large degree. Progress is inevitable and for the greater good, if we are to heed the words of world organizations such as the World Economic Forum.
Some of us are looking to the past. We are looking to ancient evidence that causes us to ask many questions. Questions that have the possibility to divide families, friends, work colleagues, and educators. All can suddenly turn against a person who decides to question the shape of our home, our world. Why is this subject so taboo? Up until 500 years ago, it was commonly accepted that the Earth was the center of the universe. The Sun and the Moon revolved around us in the sky, and we lived on a stationary Flat Earth. Some of the oldest books in existence—the Torah, Bible, Vedas, and many ancient texts—even describe the Earth being flat and immovable. Nearly every culture and religion had its own mimicry of disbelief to varying degrees. There is a Vedic map from the 1900s that illustrates a flat Earth with other Earths surrounding, which are hidden by ice walls. There are so many stories that are there to show us that questioning the globe theory is actually a valid thing to do, one that scientists should embrace, not ridicule.
So why does this area of science have so much negative stigma attached to it? To question the heliocentric model—the theory that the sun is the center of the universe—and all its relevant theories that help to back it up can bring responses that range from complete ridicule to utter horror, as if you are akin to a Holocaust denier. No one wants to be ridiculed, and they definitely do not want to offend to the degree that this topic can bring. There is no reason for the scientific community to see the topic as ridiculous. Scientists are seriously trying to prove and/or disprove so many things, even the existence of the Creator, and strangely, no ridicule is seen there. So why the Flat Earth? We don’t know. Maybe they protest too much, and maybe they are hiding something. We won’t know until the Flat Earth community can be taken seriously and intelligently. That is not too much to ask, is it?
The globe has been flooding our consciousness since the invention of the silver screen and later the television. The globe Earth is seen on film, logos, food advertising, and airlines, just to name a few. Science fiction novels, film, TV, and comics all continue to bombard us with planets that are immeasurably far from Earth—all globes, all hurtling through space and time. We have been inundated with the globe since childhood. We are taught it as a fact when they fail to tell us that it’s still just a theory, as is gravity, relativity, wormholes, black holes, string theory, etc., etc. All these ideas have had to be theorized about to try to make sense of the globe and its relation to its environment, the universe.
A psychologist will tell you that if someone repeats an idea or a phrase often enough, it becomes a belief that is very hard to remove from your psyche. This is part of the process of what is commonly called brainwashing. No one wants to admit they have been the victim of brainwashing, but unfortunately, it’s a very common effect used on the human mind, from advertising agencies to governments, schools, religious cults, and many more areas of society. The field of behavioral science is being used to make people change their ideas about so many things. We see changes in how society sees religion and medical procedures such as abortions, gender realignment, to name a few very current cultural changes. 100 years ago, these things would never have even been heard of and would be seen as terrible. Is it a natural evolution of society, or does society have its mind changed from the top down?
It doesn’t seem so strange to consider that the heliocentric model was a programmed idea to change the role of humanity as a special creation on Earth to nothing more than meaningless results of evolution from a random, meaningless explosion floating on a blue speck in an ever-expanding universe. There are many scientists that have spoken for or have had their theories used to create the heliocentric theory, from Isaac Newton, Johannes Kepler, and Albert Einstein, and promoted today by modern mainstream scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, Bill Nye, etc. These theories are promoted by the mainstream science community as fact to keep the population on their spinning ball. The modern scientists’ names are given almost rock star status, and they refuse to acknowledge that there is a debate to be had with the Flat Earth community.
The Flat Earth community is portrayed by mainstream science as cult-like and ignorant, when in reality the opposite is more than true. A typical Flat Earth proponent will have been brought up to totally believe in the Disney-style globe, just like everybody else. They usually have the ability to use critical thought and see new information as a reason to get excited about exploring the possibilities of holding a new idea in their minds. They hold the value of scientific reasoning as central to their ideas. They are good at researching and evaluating their research to the extent that, despite not being university graduates in astronomy or astrophysics, they can be seen as an expert in these fields as they have spent many years studying them. It’s very hard to find someone who is brave enough to stand up and say the Earth is flat who hasn’t done hours and hours of research to back the statement up. Why is it so hard for others to let go of their belief system? Because, simply speaking, it is hard to let go of any old belief system, especially if the new one is as challenging as society has made the geocentric model look. Regardless of why society has made the model look so idiotic, they have.
How do we get out of this bind and open our minds to the possibilities? Personally, I think it’s easy: you give it a chance and simply listen to the ideas and choose whether it’s for you or not. If we don’t give another’s ideas a chance, we could lose our freedom of thought simply because we have been encouraged to think something was stupid. No one should be told what to think; it’s always ours to choose. Well, you are in for a surprise. Flat Earth science, research, and experiments are based on logic and truth, not pseudoscience. Be prepared to have your mind blown.

The Antikythera Mechanism

Two thousand years ago, a shipwreck created a time capsule hidden beneath the waves. Untouched by time, the secrets it held would challenge our understanding of the past and reveal the incredible ingenuity of our ancestors. Journey with us as we dive into the depths of history, uncovering the enigmatic ancient marvel that defies the limits of its time. Rediscovered a century ago by another shipwreck, nature seemed to guard its secrets, preserving a device that would rewrite our understanding of ancient technology. The mechanical realm beckons us to unlock its mysteries. Through history, archaeology, astrophysics, and astronomy, we embark on a quest to decipher the intricate workings of the past. The pieces of the puzzle come together as we explore the convergence of art, science, and philosophy. Prepare for an extraordinary journey where hidden truths come to light. The secrets of the mechanical realm will redefine our perception of history and reshape our appreciation of the past and the shape of our Earth. Get ready to witness the unveiling of the extraordinary: a geocentric, stationary Flat Earth working model that has defied the passage of time.
So, according to the historical accounts, Greek sponge divers stopped close to Antikythera, an island in the Aegean Sea, back in the 1900s. An underwater suit consisted of a thick, heavy suit and a large metal helmet with glass windows. Fresh air was pumped into the helmet through a pipe by someone on the boat. So, one man descends looking for sponges, but soon enough comes back up horrified, ranting about the pile of dead bodies he had seen on the seafloor. So the captain went down to take a look for himself and discovered that these were not dead bodies but ancient bronze and marble statues. It turned out to be the discovery of one of the largest hoards of ancient treasure ever made. The artifacts that were found onboard this old wreck are today on display at the National Archaeological Museum of Athens. While the artifacts looked about, the strange cracked rock was put aside with many other pieces, and it wasn’t until the 1950s that someone noted its inscriptions. According to recorded accounts of the time, this appeared to be some sort of clockwork device that simply shouldn’t have existed in the ancient world.
The Antikythera Mechanism is an ancient computer. It could accurately calculate the motions of the heavenly luminaries. It’s only built with metal and wood, and it doesn’t use electricity. Predicting the patterns of what we see in the sky above us requires sophisticated calculations, and it’s already been done in Greece 2,000 years ago. This ancient computer, this ancient machine, is only about the size of a shoebox. Inside are dozens of interlocking gears, and on the outside, on the front and the back, are several synchronized pointers. It was built by someone who could decode the solar system. By hand-cranking, what more precise ways of building a machine precisely mimic this behavior? Not refuse the far greater mastery of complex miniaturization of mechanical devices than anyone dared think existed in ancient Greece and Rome. Around the first century BC, it has sparked the imagination of thousands of anthropologists and historians as to the many secrets that may yet remain in European history. The mechanism’s calculations occur when the gears with different numbers of teeth are put together to recreate the appropriate relative motion of different celestial objects. The side handle, meant to be operated by a person, turns the main gear, which represents the solar year. Power from this gear is variously reduced or enlarged by subsequent connected gears to produce the motion of different objects, including the sun, the moon, the planets, and the constellations. In order to achieve this, a dazzling display of mechanical workmanship was required.
Everyone today is familiar with a digital computer, a machine that deals in ones and zeros, a few million at a time. But have you heard about analog computers? Or perhaps not as much as you probably should have. An analog computer is a computational device that uses mechanical principles rather than digital math to make calculations. You may have seen one or two in your lifetime, like a wind-up toy or a clock, for example. Quite how long these devices have been around is debatable, but most agree that the first analog computers, mostly astronomical clocks, were first invented around the 14th century. That was until a discovery in 1901 near Antikythera in Greece that changed our understanding of the history of computers forever. A discovery so shocking that nearly 70 years of mainstream historians and technologists dismissed it as either fake or a fluke. That was until one group of dedicated researchers and rebellious minds proved that the ancient Greeks did indeed possess complex analog computers of their own, nearly a millennium and a half earlier than we thought. Dr. Derek J. de Solla Price of Yale University was one of the first to bring the Antikythera Mechanism’s historical significance to the public’s attention. Price is a pioneer, and we all owe him a great debt of gratitude. For the first 50 years, scholars, scientists, and historians had no idea of putting the pieces of this puzzle back together. Price was the first person to examine the device carefully enough to have a basic understanding of what its true capabilities really were. And he even said that this was as spectacular as if we had opened King Tut’s tomb to find decayed but recognizable parts of a combustion engine. And because it was too far outside the realm of what academics were comfortable with, very few people were prepared to think seriously about the Antikythera before Price.
Scientific historian interested in the history of scientific technology, he set out in about 1958 to examine the Greek gears to determine just what they were used for. He noticed that the front dial was divided into 12 sections. When he saw that Eli is printed on one of the sections, Eli is the Greek word for Libra. And then further around the dial, he noticed two of the letters for the Greek word for Virgo, leading Price to conclude that what he was looking at was a representation of the 12 zodiac constellations. A total of 88 constellations are noted and recognized today. They were all documented 5,000 years ago in Mesopotamia, but these are the 12 that provide the annual path of the sun along with most of the lunar and planetary activity, and this is called the ecliptic. The sun tells us the time of the day, the moon tells us the time of the month, and the stars tell us the time of the year. It preceded such gears by more than a thousand years. This ancient Greek device is now known as the Antikythera Mechanism, in honor of the land where it was discovered. Even today, more than a century after its discovery, scientists are still studying it to comprehend what it does.
Meshing gears is a difficult task, but our world would be very different without these gears and the people who have the patience, knowledge, and understanding to make them. During the Industrial Revolution, they were the driving force behind the development of factory machinery, which made assembly lines possible. Without gears, there would also be no trains or automobiles. Prior to the discovery of the Antikythera Mechanism, the earliest complex gear trains were discovered in European clocks around the 1400s, when the Middle Ages were just giving way to the Renaissance. Although this ancient Greek computer is a thousand years older, it contains gears that are just as complex as those found in medieval clocks. In modern times, you will still find gears in grandfather clocks, analog watches, locks, and telescope focus adjustments. One of the intriguing things about the Antikythera Mechanism is how they considered carefully how to make it both small enough and functional. X-rays of the crusty metal show six smaller gears attached to the main drive gear, known as a gear train. So you have a 64-tooth gear moving a 38-tooth gear, moving this gear, moving this gear, moving this gear, achieving the same ratio of 254 to 19. The discovery that the Sun and the Moon orbit the same points in the sky is attributed to a Greek astronomer named Meton. The Metonic cycle is deeply ingrained in the Antikythera Mechanism. It is 254 tropical months and 19 solar years, which is the amount of time it takes the planets to rotate around each other. To think about this and to see how gears can calculate ratios, think of a large gear with 254 teeth and a much smaller gear with 19 teeth. 19 turns of the large gear makes 254 turns on the smaller gear. It is essentially simple math, so the division can be broken down into chunks instead of done all at once. 30 gear wheels, and the gears are very visible on the X-rays. This could represent the sky at any given time or use them in a date from a specific rotation of the luminaries. With just one button, you could reproduce all the movement of the visible luminaries: the Sun and the Moon. The device is a miniature mechanical representation of the cosmos. Geocentric astronomy at the time of Antikythera had been established for a while. They knew precisely the cycle of each of the luminaries, including the issue of the offset between the lunar and the solar calendars, identified by the Greeks. For the course of 19 years or 19 solar years, they were precise: 235 lunar months, and that was fine-tuned a century later. If you take four times the Metonic cycle, which is 4 into 19, which equals 76, then we remove one day, then we have the concordance of the dial is the Babylonian zodiac. There are seven pointers for the planets all the way out to Saturn that point to the positions of the planets as viewed from the Earth along the zodiac. In the middle of the dial, there is a little moon that changes color from black to white as you rotate the mechanism. The doors and panels are all inscribed with an instruction manual. The back of the mechanism has two large dials. The top dial is a lunar calendar, and the bottom dial is the most important one, which is the lunar and solar eclipse dial, and that is used in conjunction with the front of the mechanism to determine whether there would be a lunar or solar eclipse. Its gears must be utterly precise and fitted ever so perfectly in place for the device to have worked.
It is in this example, in order to calculate the 19-year cycle in which the solar and lunar years overlap and to accurately show where the moon will be in the sky at any given point during that cycle, gears that indicated a solar day and the lunar day are connected by a series of smaller gears which translate the motion of the solar day into the corresponding motion of the lunar day. The mechanism also appears to contain a number of novel complications, a name given by horologists within a device which subtly changes its operation. These complications seem to be inserted into the mechanism. We know this device is a working Flat Earth model because this device has a stationary center where everything else goes around the stationary center, which is the Earth, gauging all of this motion from the Earth, and that has nothing to show that it’s moving. If it was moving, if the Earth was moving with all the other planets and the Sun and the Moon, it would have been represented with the five other planets they knew before they built this machine. No idea about the heliocentric solar system, Big Bang idea, let alone for 5,000 years of all recorded history. If we were moving, we wouldn’t see the same nighttime sky twice in a row, let alone for thousands of years, and the Antikythera Mechanism wouldn’t work in any location on Earth, anywhere, ever, for any reason, because it’s moving. Here we have more of a chance of seeing the pyramids shift position than we do any of the stars ever shift in position. It’s amazing that 2,000 years ago they knew this planetary motion with precision that holds up better than today’s standards, and they knew it would never change. And the Antikythera Mechanism proves undeniably, and the software that runs it was based on information handed down for thousands of years. Improved readings of an inscription that was on the mechanism’s back cover, describing its external features and displays, leaves little room for doubt that the front display incorporated evolving pointers, varying little spheres to represent all five planets known in antiquity, making their upfront motions around the Earth. Each sphere is set to move through a circle belonging to the planet, strongly suggesting that a certain feature of the front display that the inscription called Cosmos was in fact the entire front dial, portraying in cross-section the Aristotelian conception of the universe. It will track the 29 and a half days, for example. You could advance until Mercury goes retrograde and see what constellation that occurs in, or see how long Venus will be visible at sunrise, or what constellation the moon will be in at the next lunar eclipse. The Antikythera Mechanism is the cosmos. The cosmos is on the front of the mechanism, and the stars are represented in a more conceptual manner by the fixed graduated dial inscribed with the names of the zodiacal signs and with key letters referring to the list of dates of first and last risings and settings of constellations in the parapagma inscription. Above and below the central dials, visual representations of the ancient geocentric cosmology and medieval and Renaissance manuscripts and artwork commonly use the Zodiac in this way to stand for the hemisphere of fixed stars. A dial constructed in this manner would have elegantly combined two functions of the mechanism: one as an analog computer permitting quantitative read-off of the longitudinal positions and motions of the heavenly luminaries, and two as an educational, wonder-working device portraying its constituent parts in their hierarchical structure and intricate movements. The entire complex of dials and pointers of the mechanism’s front could by manual autonomy be itself called the cosmos. The mechanism was an important precursor to modern astronomical instruments, including telescopes and planetarium projectors. The construction of the mechanism was a testament to the skill and ingenuity of ancient engineers and craftsmen. In addition to its scientific uses, the Antikythera Mechanism was likely used for astrological and religious purposes, reflecting the importance of astronomy in ancient cultures.

Geocentric Model and Flat Earth

Changes that always appear at the end of one Platonic month and the beginning of the next, which are roughly every 2,100 years. It seems there are changes that occur when a new constellation takes psychic dominance of the archetype or god, as they used to be called, brings about and accompanies long-lasting transformations of the collective psyche. These changes arise in nature and are due to certain gradual transformations of the archetype. They indicate that the clock is active and is continuously moving, passing from one cyclic division into another. Kepler discovered over a couple of hundred years ago about the elliptical movements of the luminaries. He also mentioned that the universe is a giant clock. It’s a mechanism. He knows what he means. That’s why he could predict or discover these motions. People think of the ancients as immature or primitive because they believed in a geocentric, stationary Earth. These ancients were using a fully functional device like an Antikythera Mechanism and all the science related to it 2,000 plus years before, and that was based on the geocentric, stationary Flat Earth. The Antikythera Mechanism was a testament to the importance of astronomy in ancient Greek culture, reflecting the desire of Greek astronomers and mathematicians to understand the workings of the cosmos. Though the word cosmos had a range of possibilities outside of scientific context, in Hellenistic astronomy it always meant either the aggregate of the heavens and the Earth or the heavens as distinct from the Earth. All these relations are why the Antikythera Mechanism is often called an analog computer, and because of its complexity and sheer number of scenarios it could replicate, is a primary reason that it remains one of the most fascinating objects of the ancient world.
The Antikythera Mechanism is the cosmic planetarium. The nested geocentric cosmology had wide acceptance in Greek science in the 4th century BC on, and it was one of the parts of astronomy that an educated layman could be expected to know. The figures, for example, in the first chapter of Geminus’s Introduction to the Phenomena, a popularization of astronomy from the 1st century BC. Although no pictorial representation has survived from before late antiquity, diagrams showing the cosmos in cross-section, a series of concentric circular rings surrounding a flat, stationary Earth, frequently occurred in medieval manuscripts and even in Renaissance paintings. The outermost cycle of the fixed stars is very often represented in these pictures as a ring containing the names, symbols, or pictures of the 12 zodiacal signs, just as we find it in the Antikythera Mechanism. Probably one of the most special things on the ship full of treasures. Some people say that watching the stars was like watching TV for the ancients, and if the narrative is accurate, I don’t think that could be true because they’d be way too occupied with feeding themselves and basic survival skills back then. So, while watching the stars may have been entertaining, I don’t think that was the purpose. It was much more functional in their daily lives, and they had good reason, hundreds of reasons, to observe and record all of the subtle motions of the cosmos. Thousands of years, culture after culture, a common thread in all the ancient cosmologies. The other reason that the base of the mechanism is a stationary realm could be comparable to devices like the astrolabe, which is used for a particular day and the position of the luminaries above, having scripture in Sanskrit, and the plate below represents the Bhu-mandala, the physical flat realm with all the movements above. And the same thing goes for the Antikythera Mechanism. They say Bhu-mandala representing a solar system, but the fact is that Bhu-mandala is the physical plane with rings of oceans and land. How’s that possible in space? The Antikythera Mechanism base reflects the same purpose of a geocentric, stationary level realm as an astrolabe. The Antikythera Mechanism seems to be the predecessor of clocks like the astronomical clock in Prague and the Torreso in Cremona, Italy. Here we can observe how the geocentric model comes to life on a non-movable Flat Earth. These clocks show the positions of the Sun, the Moon, and stars, and also other cyclical formations like day and night, lunar and solar eclipses, the seasons, and solstices. In the inner circle, we see the Earth represented as a flat circle, establishing the geocentricity of the model. On the inner ring, we see the 12 calendar months represented by the symbol. On the outer ring, we see the 24 hours dividing the clock, and all the rings and pointers are in constant motion, circling the flat Earth in the center and giving the exact solar date, just like the Antikythera Mechanism. This mechanism is an instrument of mathematical astronomy. It’s intensely rich in mathematics. It’s not complicated mathematics; it’s simple arithmetic and simple geometry, but put together in an absolutely beautiful way. This new paper brings together many ideas from the past, but it puts them forward in a synthesis which shows an absolutely dazzling display of the ancient Greek cosmos, how they saw planets, the moon, and the sun. Patterns of pillars on this wheel, it had structure, some sort of structure that revolved like a merry-go-round, and what I ended up with was models of the planets. This is a model of the Greek cosmos, geocentric. You can think of this cover plate in the middle as representing the Earth, and everything goes around it. This is a model of the Greek cosmos, geocentric. You can think of this cover plate in the middle as representing the Earth, and everything goes around it. It’s geocentric, geocentric, geocentric. So what the Antikythera Mechanism teaches us is that the heliocentric hypothesis is false. The sun is not the center of anything. Nothing is going around the sun. Everything is going over the surface of our flat and stationary Earth. The Sun, the Moon, and the stars, they move in perfect, precise order. They are absolute perfection, and they work almost like a divinely inspired clock. So this realm that we live in works in perfect order. It is not chaotic. It is not the result of some random explosion of nothing that created everything that we see. It works with precision, and what you will see if you look at the Antikythera Mechanism and compare it to what we see in our observable reality is that everything moves over the surface of our flat and stationary Earth. Nothing goes around the sun. The sun is not the center. The heliocentric hypothesis is false. The geocentric hypothesis is reality. The geocentric idea of the Earth is reality, but not geocentric, meaning that the Earth is a globe. The Earth is flat and stationary. The geocentric model is a flat and stationary Earth and an enclosed electrical topographical stationary plane where everything we see in the sky is moving in a perfect pattern over us, replicated patterns that repeat themselves. It seems like every 19 years the Sun, the Moon, and the stars move under Polaris around the surface of our flat and stationary Earth, making nine gears one inside the other and inside the other nine times. The tolerance is not of a millimeter, thickness of a fingernail, but a tenth of a millimeter. More than that, there are four gears that are only six millimeters in diameter. The gears matched by less than half a millimeter for the gears to operate correctly. You need to keep the dial and axle wobble less than 0.5 of a millimeter, and you can do that by trial and error. It takes a long time, but you need a lathe to rotate the gear and without any wobble. The model of engineering displayed by these people so recently out of the Iron Age is how they were able to flatten that brass and fit those gears so perfectly. Soldering also historically absent before it was made and again after it was made. The clocks were introduced for another 1,400 years later, and two astrolabes gave us historical luck. We have to challenge the science. I mean, theories that need other theories to support it, formulas that don’t work in real life, that’s not real science. But yet you still believe this is the universe we live in, an accidental, random, chaotic, and often meaningless existence. Over and over again, this fake world reality has been presented to you as an absolute truth to keep you disconnected from the real truth that this is a divine creation. The fact of the matter is that everything is actually just as you see and experience it. Trust your senses. The Sun and the Moon are the same size, and all celestial bodies revolve around us. The geocentric system adequately explains all earthly as celestial phenomena. It tells me is that the luminaries are moving in a circular motion in relation to the Earth below them. It would be impossible to see this cycle in the heliocentric model, which has us moving in at least four different ways at incredible speeds to run endless space. This mechanism is based on a geocentric model with us in the center and all luminaries circling above us in a repeatable cycle. Our whole Earth system with the Sun, the Moon, and stars is a magnificent timepiece, divinely created for us to keep count of the days, the months, and the years in such a way that we can see it with our naked eyes. Who could have taken all that knowledge and put it in a gear mechanism in such an incredible way? Think of the Earth as a bullseye, and in the middle of the Earth or the middle of that bullseye is Polaris up in the sky. But down below is possibly a tree, possibly a black rock, or the stump of a tree. You can hypothesize that all you want. I don’t know. But what I do know from what the Antikythera Mechanism shows us and what we’ve seen when we look into the sky is that everything is circling in a spirograph pattern all around the surface of our flat, stationary Earth, and nothing is going around the sun. The sun is part of this realm that moves in perfect precision with everything else in the sky. It is not the center. It is not a huge ball of mass that’s attracting all these other planets that are rotating it or revolving, tilting, wobbling it. None of that. The heliocentric hypothesis is false. The geocentric view of this world or this realm is reality, but not a globe. The Earth is flat and stationary. Geocentric means everything is moving around the center of our flat and stationary Earth. The geocentric stationary Earth model, common knowledge that the Earth was stationary and located at the center of the universe with the sun, moon, and luminaries moving around it in circular paths around the Earth, was widely accepted by philosophers, astronomers, and other scholars. The mechanism also used epicyclical gears to track the motions of the planets. Epicyclical gears were used to track the movements of the planets as they moved across the sky from the perspective of an observer on Earth. Precision couldn’t have been achieved in the heliocentric model. Nearly all throughout the world, ancients also built structures of amazing size and spectacle that were aligned with certain constellations. They had no idea about the heliocentric model because it simply was none. No one thought they were moving around until maniacs took over, started talking psychobabble about an uncontained pressurized nuclear furnace like the sun being chased by planets over millions of miles through billions of years, all caused by gravity, which is a force they still can’t really explain. They have three different versions, and neither one of them makes sense. I wonder what they would think about this.

This Should Not Exist

Transcript

Transcript

a merchant ship is on its way to
Rome it is loaded to the brim with
treasure just past Creek it gets into a
heavy
storm the 300 tons of cargo make it very
heavy possibly too
heavy the ship sinks
[Music]
history became legend legend became myth
and for over 2,000 years the ship passed
out of all
knowledge perhaps it would have been
forgotten forever swallowed by the Sea
like so many ships before
it that was until a sponge diver from a
small town of Simi makes a dive into the
ocean
on the sea floor he discovers a bronze
hand sticking out of the mud heavily
corroded but still
recognizable he reports his findings to
his captain with the help of the Greek
government the crew recovers what must
have been a
shipwreck ancient bronze and marble
statues fragmented pots and
bases it’s the largest collection of
Greek artifacts ever
found they take everything to Athens
Museum staff are piecing together the
artifacts
meanwhile this corroded lump of bronze
still sits there unnoticed over the
course of the next few months it dries
up and cracks
open the shattered Rock reveals
something very strange a large wheel
engraved letters and a number of smaller
gears it looks like an ancient machine a
sophisticated device that simply should
not exist with a mechanism over a
thousand years ahead of its
time for over a century archaeologist
engineers and physicists from all over
the world will try to solve the riddle
of the world’s first
computer this video is largely based on
the Fantastic book decoding the heavens
by Joe Marchant Link in the
description Greek archaeologist Valerio
sty is the first person to examine the
strange objects the many traces of Gears
lead him to believe that this must be
some kind of ancient clock but
mechanical clocks were not invented
until the Renaissance 1,400 years later
and when while there are mentions of
tooth Wheels no gears from Antiquity has
ever been found before at least until
now sty soon realizes that he needs the
expertise of others he invites John
Soros and Adolf Wilhelm both experts in
ancient text they decipher the
scribblings as ancient Greek
letters another scientist named Pericles
rtis studies the inscriptions and
suggest that they must be operating
instructions this word in particular
stands out to him it’s an old an unusual
word for the Zodiac scale a scale
dividing the year in 12 zodiac
constellations Rus and Soros conclude
that the device must be an astrolabe an
ancient calculator to measure the
position of stars and planets but
traditionally astrolabes don’t need
gears Maybe This Strange astap was
somehow able to determine the position
of stars
mechanically in the following years the
fragments are carefully cleaned Albert
REM an expert from ancient languages
from Germany travels to Athens to
inspect a device he discovers another
word previously hidden an ancient
Egyptian month in Greek letters what if
REM argues this machine is able to
simulate the movement of celestial
objects throughout the year shortly
after his Discovery work on the antitha
mechanism stalls years pass without any
new major breakthroughs two world wars
hamper the
excitement the machine survives at the
bottom of some store room crates in
danger of being forgotten
again computer technology has come a
long way today we don’t just study stars
or track time mechanically we can now
access and control our most powerful
tools from halfway across the world this
is possible because of services like our
sponsor nesk nesk is a free lightning
fast tool that lets you access all of
your devices remotely whether you’re
making complex 3D animations on your
laptop from the the coast of Greece or
just helping a family member
troubleshoot Tech issues any desk is
here to help with reliable and secure
connections even in low bandwidth
situations the clean interface makes any
desk of Breeze for anyone to use it’s
available for all platforms from your
laptop into your phone all the way to
your grandmother’s Windows XP machine if
the antio mechanism would have had an
internet connection maybe it could have
run any desk as well if you want to
check out what nides has to offer go to
nid desk.com Fern and try it for free
fast forward to 1953 a new generation of
divers is in the waters near anira among
them Shak custo filmmaker and Pioneer
thanks to him diving gear went from this
to this divers can go much deeper now
there are many stories of treasures that
fell over the cliff beneath the recite
they were out of reach for the sponge
divers back then but not for custo and
his crew after days of searching they
find something buried under a thick
layer of sand
the sunken ship’s hole almost perfectly
preserved but the crew does not have the
necessary equipment to unearth it they
return two decades later with better
gear and a
camera the crew finds more treasure but
no new parts from the mechanism luckily
science itself is developing rapidly
Derek price a historian from the UK uses
newly developed x-ray technology to scan
the existing fragments
he finds more gears and is able to build
the first model of the antitha mechanism
he calls it a calendar
computer but his model isn’t very
accurate for it to work price had to
change the number of teeth on the gears
despite his x-ray images showing
otherwise the researchers Michael Wright
and Alan Bramley see that price clearly
made some mistakes so they decide to
solve the mechanism
themselves the two fly to Athens for a
month they reexamine measure and
photograph the 82 remaining pieces of
the device but after 2,000 years and
likely passing through as many hands the
inevitable
happens maybe an x-ray was the right
call after all the two learn of a
relatively new technique called
tomography it basically works by taking
multiple slices of pictures from an
object and putting them together
afterwards they take a total of 700
images with them they can have a clear
look at the inside after after years of
work Wright and Bramley are this close
to unraveling the mystery but suddenly
Bramley Cuts ties with
Wright he thinks right for his work
takes the images and
leaves a few years later Bramley is
diagnosed with cancer on his deathbed he
confesses to WR he alone wanted to be
known for solving the antitha mechanism
but he failed in the end Bry hands over
his 3D scans to Wright Wright had
already designed a prototype in 2002 but
with these images he would be finally
able to solve the device or so he
thought Tony free a mathematician and
filmmaker gathers a group of researchers
under the anic era mechanism research
project the group scans and measures the
fragments yet again this time with even
better and newer technology the quality
of their images is astonishing even the
smallest inscriptions hidden deep within
the stone are now readable in sharp
detail they regularly publish new papers
of the device there are few more
expeditions to the Shipwreck with
drastically changed diving gear but
again no one can find New pieces of the
mechanism on the
seabed in 2021 free and the others are
finally able to put together all the
pieces of the puzzle they are able to
combine all the evidence of the last
century in one
machine The Mystery of the world’s
oldest computer is finally solved
so what does it
do a computer is a device that can store
and process information any device that
is able to solve math equations and show
you the result can therefore technically
be considered a computer there are two
types digital computers like the phone
you’re watching this video on and analog
ones so you have this task 8 * 2 digital
computers work with ones and zeros to
solve the task it first needs to
translate the numbers in binary 1 0 * 0
1 0 one way to multiply the numbers
would just be to multiply the individual
numbers one by one and add the
individual results just like in school
translate the number back to decimal and
there’s your result but there is also
another way the same task can be
represented by an analog computer with
gears this can be translated into one
Gear with eight teeth and a larger one
with 16 each time you turn the larger
gear once the smaller one turns twice
mathematically speaking your input has
been multiplied by
two this is basically what clocks do
transforming seconds into minutes and
minutes into
hours and this is also what the anthura
mechanism does only that it’s much more
complex the device originally sat in
this wooden box it had a handle on the
side to control the complex internal
mechanism these gears move a series of
pointers at the front and back back the
ancient Greeks believed the Earth was at
the center of the universe that’s why
Earth sits right in the middle around it
orbits the moon as well as the sun and
the five planets that were known at the
time there are also rings for the
Egyptian months and dates with its
respective
zodiac Additionally the front is full
with step-by-step instructions on how to
use
it the back shows two spiral rings with
large pointers in the
middle the upper one shows the 19-year
matonic cycle it’s the basis for many an
ancient calendars inside these Rings is
a smaller scale showing the 4-year cycle
of the Olympic Games the lower ring is
an eclipse predictor that well predicts
eclipses the antitha mechanism is a
complex simulation of the cosmos pick
any day the machine shows you where the
moon stood which Star constellation was
rising or when the next eclipse was
coming all this in a wooden case as
large as a book perhaps it was used by
astronomers or by teachers but one
common the suggests otherwise it most
likely wasn’t a tool it was probably a
luxury toy a very impressive and also
very expensive piece of tech for anyone
who can afford
it some suggest it might have been used
to cast
horoscopes the ancient Greeks like
strangely many people today believed in
astrology the idea that the position of
the stars and planets at your birth have
an influence on your life say you want
to know what Mercury was doing when you
were born today you just Google it in
ancient Greece you need an astronomer at
the time of your birth to write down the
exact constellations otherwise this
information would be lost with the
antitha mechanism you could set it to
your birthday only to realize that
mercury was in
retrograde over 2,000 years ago some
wealthy owner took the device with him
on a trip to
Rome but he never reached his
goal the antitha mechanism is a
technological Masterpiece that no one
would have thought possible at the time
there is a slight catch however the
device actually sucked it wasn’t very
accurate ancient Greeks didn’t have the
scientific tools to measure the universe
like we do they mostly looked up at the
sky for a very long time wrote down what
they saw and develop theories about the
universe when you look up at Mercury
long enough you realize something very
strange at first Mercury becomes slower
and slower until suddenly it changes
Direction and seems to move backwards
but the way this is actually what people
are talking about when they say Mercury
is in retrograde which is a bad sign
apparently or
whatever in fact every planet has these
little Loops called epicycles if you
write it all down this is what the
geocentric Universe looks
[Music]
like thanks to cernus we know that the
universe is heliocentric these epicycles
are only an optical illusion this is
what the two models look like side by
side
translating the geocentric model into
the right gears is an incredibly
difficult task sure you can calculate it
but the model is very prone to error
every gear needs to accurately simulate
the different speeds of the planets
during these epicycles and even the
apparent retrograde motion this is why
the inside of the antier mechanism is so
mind boogly complex building a machine
like this without modern technology also
adds mechanical
errors ultimately the antier mechanism
is off by about one whole zodiac
considering the age of the machine that
is of course still incredibly
[Music]
impressive for a long time historians
believ that the ancient Greeks were
talented but not very practically minded
philosophy yes pretty sculptures sure
but building a space computer out of
Gears absolutely impossible but they
somehow did the tiic mechanism is so
unbelievable that some people believe it
actually came from Aliens and was used
by them to navigate the stars for others
it is an ancient time machine and plot
device in a Hollywood movie fact is the
antiac mechanism is real and it most
likely wasn’t even the first of its kind
several ancient texts mention a device
designed by Archimedes a sphere that
shows the motion of the sun moon and
planets around the Earth but it was lost
the bronze inside the Machinery melted
into coins in a weird since we might be
lucky that the merchant ship sank during
that storm 2,000 years ago

Whats crazier than flat earth – there is nothing more mind blowing

Whats crazier than flat earth – there is nothing more mind blowing

Transcript

Transcript

what’s crazier than Flat Earth what’s
that’s the CRA that’s the craziest thing
really is it’s really not though but it
is you know people kept coming up have
you have you looked into Flat Earth I’m
like dude shut the [ __ ] up yeah you’re
crazy yeah I’m about to one on that one
I think uh the Earth is round I think we
went to the moon I don’t believe the
Earth is flat at all I think I can just
prove Flat Earth that’s the typical
story everyone’s trying to debunk in the
world is not flat the Earth is flat the
Earth is flat this Earth is flat that’s
[ __ ] insane the Earth isn’t flat I
was violently opposed to it I was mad at
people that would bring it up there’s no
[ __ ] way the Earth is flat friend of
mine was posting all these things on
Facebook it was pissing me off you know
I was like what the [ __ ] is he [ __ ]
with me God this is a [ __ ] nightmare
I can’t be a flat Earth person I like
flat earthers that means they think
[Music]
fors and they’re
skeptical the the only problem with the
FL Earth uh Rabbit Hole whatever you
want to call it is it’s kind of hard to
beat God damn it the Earth is clearly
not a [ __ ] spinning ball started
going into the research and
[Music]
boom oh [ __ ] stupid unbelievable like
like how the [ __ ] are we supposed to
handle all of this there’s nothing
compares nothing compares to the whole
quote unquote Flat Earth res search uh
rabbit hole and then I remember feeling
kind of sad cuz I was like there’s no
way I’m ever going to have my mind blown
this hard ever again cuz there’s nothing
more
mindblowing than realizing that we’re
we’ve been lied to to the point where we
don’t even know where we are I can’t I
can’t think of any other experience
topping
[Music]
that this can’t this can’t be reality
needs to sink in for people to see this
in the big picture because the
perspective of what we been taught and
how Truman this Truman Show really is is
vital to us fighting this it is you have
to know what game you’re playing in
order to fight it right to Fathom the
reality is so terrifying to most people
that they just can’t do it like there’s
a some sort of mental block it’s like
you either got to believe the official
story as it’s told or you have to
believe that like all of these trusted
networks are in it together there’s some
sort of massive conspiracy it goes all
the way to the top and that idea is so
horrifying that people just reject it
outright I mean these people and their
ability to control the minds of the
masses is admirable if not completely
evil this entire establishment this
entire corrupt structure relies on
Mindless unquestioning obedience and it
might not seem like that but in reality
they keep you in a very uh confined uh
um you know mental state where you you
can’t break out of that until someone
like Alex sign shows up like the uh like
the woman from the 1984 commercial in
apple and just throw throws the hammer
through the screen and shatters the
reality and and hopefully uh shakes you
out of this delusion that you’re trapped
in this coma that you’re asleep in not
enough people question the reality in
which we live in I just want you to ask
the questions that are right in front of
you I want to try to address the
elephant that is in the room that you
know we constantly ignore flat earthers
get banned on YouTube why are they
Banning it if they hiding somebody’s
trying to cover something up absolutely
because if it was so ridiculous then
they would allow the counternarrative
and they would allow
discourse and discussion why would they
do that why Al why would they do that
Google cares about us Alex exactly so is
space fake is there even spaceace is
fake so fake so fake do they think we’re
stupid it’s like Santa Claus for adult
it doesn’t take a rocket scientist it’s
just it’s a laughable on good authority
that space is fake so really really
whatever math that we have for the
current size and shape of the earth is
has been proven wrong I mean it’s been
proven wrong you can’t deny it that’s
just in my opinion a fact n resumes they
received to work there it’s like are you
proficient in
Photoshop it’s like what everything uh
that comes out of NASA is faking it’s
all fake I think I mean you know kind of
like space NASA’s in the business of
Faking everything are you denying space
a little bit a little bit and that’s
normal every everybody that’s into Flat
Earth mhm it was very hard for them to
get into it in admit it took like a year
and a half for them to admit I’ve never
seen a former flat earther nobody’s ever
seen what the actual ual shape of the
earth is and then been like you know
what Neil degr Tyson really does give me
a good argument cuz it’s literally
ridiculous and when you study history
and this dark art stuff you realize that
this long con has happened for a very
long time to teach everybody what is Up
Is Down nobody is upside down that’s one
of the dumbest things you [ __ ] say is
that intrinsic direction of down caused
by gravity what’s the difference what’s
down on a globe en point of the
Copernicus system that is being utilized
now is to try to prove there is no up
there is no down there’s no Heaven above
there’s no nothing no right there’s no
wrong what’s the difference what’s down
on a globe there is no up or down it’s
all just con it’s all just
a like a a play they’re putting on and
everyone believes it time you think uh
Greg Reese can’t top himself he he does
just absolutely amazing stuff even like
the so-called smartest people in the
world will all be like these flat
earthers are [ __ ] you know of us
flat earthers know that once a person
says that they’re basically just
admitting that they haven’t even they
either haven’t even bothered to look or
they’re not smart enough to understand
that the math doesn’t add up one of the
two one of the two things you’re a globe
par it’s all [ __ ] a long time maybe
this really is a long time think I think
you’re on to something so I think that
your motive can ring true especially
with other situation they want to beat
us now they want to make us feel like
we’re insignificant they want to make
you feel like your life is just an
accident but it’s not I’m a creationist
I believe this was created in
intelligent design for sure 110% big
time I’m very much in uh the intelligent
design Camp you have to realize there is
a Creator and that there is some sort of
purpose in life and that we’re not just
some big bang Cosmic accident you know
we didn’t just evolve from Pawn scum
there’s somebody that played play on the
record player that put all this stuff in
motion so we need to connect back to
that spirituality you think you
understand the level of deception that
goes into these schemes we been living
in a matrix we’ve been living in an
artificial world with artificial history
artificial science this entire time more
and more it’s being proven they’re a
bunch of damn liar we’re not the crazy
people you’re the Liars we know they
lied about this we know we lied they
lied about that they lied about things
government lies all time who would
rather be thought as a [ __ ] for not
trusting criminals than a [ __ ]
sellout and a traitor for defending them
that message needs to be resonated here
with the facts and the
truth every day fires will be kindled to
testify that two and two make
four Swords will be drawn to prove that
leaves are green in the summer you’re
not crazy they’re the Liars with the
proof with the evidence you can do the
math guys basic curvature math the math
is right
there everyone’s prove you’re on a flat
plane okay there it is it’s right there
that’s the flat not moving plane
how about you prove you’re on a spinning
ball and it all goes out the window and
you realize it’s all [ __ ] it’s all a
lie folks it’s all a lie and I get where
I don’t believe any of this crap anymore
it’s like Mass psychosis would they do
this of course they would not everybody
can be a robot polisher really don’t
understand how like why they cannot wake
up why they cannot
see how this works dangerous
misinformation like the Earth is flat
and that humans have an immune system
the world round yes it’s a
globe GL card

Top 5 Proofs The Earth is Not a globe

Top 5 Proofs The Earth is Not a globe

Transcript

Transcript

our level Earth plane has long been
ridiculed as being a crazy conspiracy
theory and an ignorant unscientific
worldview but the facts of the matter
are far from what you have been told
when thoroughly examined and diligently
researched with an open mind any
skeptical critical thinker will find it
is actually the spinning space ball
Earth presented by government space
agencies and taught in schools that is
truly ridiculous and un
scientific proof number one common sense
it cannot be overstated or
overemphasized the most important thing
to realize and the most obvious way to
know we are not spinning on a ball is
our own common sense and lived
experience we have always and will
always experienced ourselves as living
right side up on a non-rotating level
Earth with the sun moon and stars
revolving over and around us this is
common sense and what everyone in the
world personally
experiences every day of their
lives we are taught to believe otherwise
however many things completely contrary
to our own common sense and experience
from a very early
age we are told that we live on a sphere
where people on the other side live with
their feet above their heads where rain
falls upwards trees grow upside down and
the sky is lower than the ground truly
the idea that people are standing ships
are sailing and planes are flying upside
down on certain parts of the earth While
others are tilted at 90° and all other
impossible angles is an utter absurdity
and an insult to Common
Sense in fact common sense is the first
casualty of globe
belief proof number
two
water the natural physics of water is
that once contained and undisturbed the
surface will always remain
horizontal this fundamental physical
property of water is why it has been
used as a leveling tool by Builders and
Engineers from Millennia whether in a
pond lake or ocean the surface of the
water at rest always remains level and
doesn’t have the ability to hold and
display convexity or any shape
whatsoever upon its surface this
fundamental fact of reality is easily
demonstrable and empirically verifiable
but completely at odds with what we are
told about the globe for Earth to be
globular and over 70% covered in water
the oceans must somehow be curving
around and sticking to all sides of a
rapidly spinning ball suspended in a
vacuum it is simply impossible to make
water behave this way as anyone can
experiment for themselves bodies of
water will not stick to the underside of
a ball and cannot display or hold
convexity or any other shape upon their
surface
proof number three fake
photographs one of the main reasons the
average person believes the world is a
globe is because of the globular Earth
images and video footage provided by
NASA and other space
agencies hundreds of such pictures and
thousands of videos featuring a globe
Earth are freely available on the
internet yet most people never
critically examine them with a skeptical
eye from the earliest photographs to the
latest live stream NASA and the world’s
other space agencies continue to be
exposed for their Hollywood style
trickery when conscientiously compared
contrasted and investigated for
inconsistencies it turns out every
single image and video showing a
globular Earth has been manipulated in
some way all Globe videos for example
are achieved using either a fisheye lens
to curve the horizon or created
completely through CGI technology
as for the hundreds of supposed
photographs available of the globe NASA
readily admits that these are computer
generated composite images and not
actual photographs if NASA and the
world’s space agencies could provide
real legitimate photographs and videos
of a globe they most certainly would so
the fact that they continue producing
and pumping out nothing but fisheye
fakery and CGI cartoons is strong
evidence that Earth is not what they
claim proof four longdistance
photography we are consistently able to
observe objects at incredibly long
distances far beyond what would be
possible if Earth was actually a globe
of given
proportions by inputting The Observer
height and distance viewed into an earth
curvature calculator it is easy to check
how much a Target should be obstructed
on a globe Earth in Genoa Italy clear
days reveal the distant island of Elba
125 M away if Earth were a ball with a
25,000 Mi circumference Elba should be
concealed behind over a mile of
curvature making it forever invisible in
recent times people have been filming
using infrared Zoom cameras at high
altitudes to capture Lakes mountains and
other landmarks up to an incredible
thousand miles away if Earth was really
a globe the size we are told many of the
landmarks photographed would be hidden
behind upwards of 70 MI of curved
Earth proof five The
Horizon The Horizon is always perfectly
horizontal 360° around the Observer
regardless of altitude all amateur
footage captured from balloons Rockets
planes and drones at maximum altitudes
of over 20 mi without using fisheye
lenses consistently shows a completely
flat Horizon that remains at I level
only in NASA and other space aent gency
footage does the Horizon ever curve or
appear below the observer’s eye level in
the heliocentric model The Horizon is
claimed to be the physical curvature of
their globe and the reason boats
receding from a shore-bound Observer
disappear from view this was originally
presented as one of the alleged proofs
for a globe Earth by Aristotle and is
still echoed by Believers today however
with the use of modern Zoom technology
we now know that the Horizon isn’t a
result of the physical curvature of a
glob glob and those boats can be zoomed
back into full view this is because the
Horizon is not an objective physical
phenomenon at all but rather a
subjective Optical phenomenon based on
an individual observer’s perspective if
the Horizon was actually the objective
physical curvature of a globe then
objects receding Beyond it could not be
zoomed back into view and it would
remain fixed as an observer ascended
this proves the horizon line is not some
objective point of curvature on a convex
Earth but rather the subjective
Vanishing line of perspective from a
given observer’s point of
view suffice to say these five points
are just scratching the surface and
there are many many more proofs
available both in William Carpenter’s
book 100 proofs Earth is not a globe and
Eric dubay’s 200 proofs Earth is not a
spinning
ball to gain a deeper understanding of
this crucial and heavily censored topic
take the time to research and discern
for yourself

The Shape Of Deception Why The Truth Matters

The Shape Of Deception Why The Truth Matters

 

‘Flat Earth’ as a term DOES NOT represent a map or a model. It’s not an “Archaic Conception”, but instead represents free thinking and an ongoing investigation and understanding of where we are, who we are, what we are, when, how, and why.

Transcript
is often used as a defense mechanism by
stubborn Globe Defenders it’s more
rhetorical than inquisitive and tends to
be their final discussion point before
refusing to engage further with the
subject
this question formulated one of several
ways is so what if the Earth is level
why does the shape of the earth even
matter
what difference does it make to my life
firstly the thing of crucial importance
is not the shape it’s the LIE
the LIE of heliocentrism is one of the
most Insidious lies imaginable that
replaces our common sense and lived
experience with unproven theories and
explanations from supposed experts
children are indoctrinated to abandon
the evidence of their senses in favor of
this nonsensical Globe Model A Schism
occurs in their psyche where they are no
longer able to trust their own senses
and experience and instead must trust
information completely contrary to it
presented by perceived authority figures
teach such a false cosmology is
incredibly deceitful and disempowering
to the individual and the result is that
Humanity has become just like the slaves
in Plato’s allegory of the cave
[Music]
a child who learns not to trust the
evidence of their senses becomes forever
imprisoned within Plato’s Cave
a world of distorted Shadows
cast by Plato’s Puppet Masters
that blinds them to the reality Beyond
so why does the shape of the earth
matter
again it’s not about the shape
it’s about the LIE
to fool nearly the entirety of humanity
from multiple Generations stripping
people of their common sense and
replacing it with carefully crafted lies
is obviously a matter of serious
importance
it is one of the most psychologically
devastating things that could be
perpetrated upon an individual
and seeing through it should be one of
the most revealing Revelations of a
lifetime
so when someone asks the foolish
question of what difference does it make
that is already evidence of extreme
psychological Distortion if knowing the
truth doesn’t matter to your life what
does that say about your life
the level Earth is an epic Epiphany that
changes many people to their core
affirming their common sense
developing their critical thinking
skills and reigniting a spirit of
Discovery and adventure
in this way the level Earth Revelation
is holistically helpful and truly
transformational for many on an
individual level
even more importantly however is if
Humanity succeeds in fully exposing this
egregious lie
and finally rooting out the liars
The Beneficial ripple effect it will
have throughout Society is massive
once these foundational facts are
realized these governments universities
media outlets and other entangled
organizations
suddenly and completely lose all
credibility
the resulting Mass mental Exodus away
from the control system is exactly what
is needed
essentially once the level Earth
conspiracy is exposed
so is every other important conspiracy
by proxy
because this so-called mother of all
conspiracies holds under its umbrella so
many fundamental and foundational facts
fully reveals them